Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
ONLINE APPENDIX Methods Study Design This study was approved by the Human Investigations Committee of Yale University. All consecutive patients who admitted between 1999 and 2015 to Yale-New Haven Hospital with the diagnosis of aortic dissection, either Type A or Type B, either acute or chronic, were retrospectively screened. Date of onset of symptoms was classified as onset of disease, and patients without an unequivocally defined onset were excluded. Our goal was to characterize the natural history of a traditional flap dissection from acuteto chronic. Therefore, besides the inclusion criteria specifically assigned for each observation tool (described within each paragraph separately), the following additional exclusion criteria were applied: intramural hematoma, penetrating aortic ulcer, localized or focal dissection (e.g., dissection limited to the arch), and dissection limited to the abdominal aorta. The temporal states were defined in relation to the onset of disease as follows: acute = day 0 to 14, subacute day 15 to week 6, and chronic = after week 6 (11). Computed tomography (CT) imaging, transesophageal echocardiographic (TEE) studies and intra-operative pathologic specimens were temporally ordered and sequenced according to their time difference from the onset, named Δtime. Study population In total, 414 patients were admitted during the time period with the diagnosis of aortic dissection and fulfilled the inclusion criteria. 192 of those were classified as Stanford Type A and 222 as Stanford Type B dissections. While 172 (91%) of the Type A dissections were operated within the acute state, 46 (20.7%), 19 (8.6%) and 54 (24.3%) of the Type B dissection underwent surgical or interventional repair at the acute, subacute and chronic state, respectively. One hundred and four patients (46.8%) with Type B dissection were solely treated medically during follow-up period. Online Table 1 presents the demographic characteristics and follow-up information categorized by each assessment tool – CT, echocardiography and histopathology. Due to different selection criteria regarding each tool, demographic data may differ in characteristics and followup duration between categories. Radiographic Imaging To examine the natural anatomic changes from acute to chronic, only patients who naturally transitioned into the chronic state (> 6 weeks) without intervention within the earlier stages were included (Online Table 1) (11). The analysis of progress over time per se requires at least two imaging studies (inclusion criterion) during follow-up; images after any kind of intervention (e.g. fenestration, surgery) were categorically excluded, assuming that this might change the flow properties and natural remodeling of the dissected aorta. Of note, only 7 patients (3.6%) of the Type A dissection had serial images and consequently, no serious analysis could be performed. The measurements of the ascending and descending aorta were evaluated at the bifurcation of the pulmonary artery. Thereby, the following measures were taken: Absolute aortic diameter: Maximum inner diameter – including true and false lumen – of the aorta, including thrombus, but excluding wall hematoma. The inner diameter was taken to permit incorporation of contrast CTs. Flap thickness: Maximum thickness of the flap within the middle third of the flap, but without adherent thrombus. Longitudinal extent and supply of abdominal branch vessels. 2 Patency of the false lumen: Thrombosis grade of false lumen, classified as none, partial, and complete thrombosis. Beyond these basic measurements, the following rates and changes were calculated/estimated: Dynamic of the dilatation: The interval growth rates (diameter2-diameter1/Δtime2-Δtime1) for all serial images were obtained and used to create a best-fit graph describing the dynamics/changes of aortic diameter dilation over time. The upper 95 percentiles within each temporal stage (acute-subacute-chronic) were considered outliers. The best-fit model was that of exponential decay with plateau phase. The Δtimes from onset were estimated at which the growth rate change over time decelerated/stabilized (plateau + 95% confidence interval) and plateaued. Dynamic of flap changes: The dynamic of changes in flap thickness over time were similarly estimated as dynamic of dilatation. Echocardiographic Imaging The intra-operative transesophageal echocardiographic images (TEE) were reviewed in order to evaluate flap mobility. Therefore, patients who were operated at different Δtimes (acute, subacute and chronic) from onset were randomly selected and intra-operative TEEs were analyzed (taken before cannulation to initiate cardiopulmonary bypass) (Online Table 2). These were only evaluated if an appropriate quality of short and long-axis aortic views demonstrating the flap was available. Of note, only 27% of the Type B dissection patients had an intra-operative TEE adequate for inclusion. Therefore, both Type A and Type B dissections were analyzed together for this parameter and a best-fit graph estimated. Regression Model 3 As described previously by our group (50), we analyzed the growth rate and the changes of flap thickness by performing a multivariate regression analysis. Defining ST and ST-1 as sequential imaging studies of size/thickness performed at time T and T-1, respectively, for each patient, and TIME as the time interval in months between ST and ST-1 , the equation defining aneurysm growth may be written as: (1) ST = ST-1exp α *TIME, where exp denotes the exponential function and α is a coefficient to be estimated. To test whether growth of the aortic root is affected by acuity stage, we amend equation (1): (2) ST = ST-1exp(α + β*subacute)*TIME, where subacute is a binary variable, α and β are coefficients to be estimated, and other terms are as defined above. For estimation purposes, we take natural logarithms of equations (1) and (2), and rearrange terms, yielding: (3.1) ln(ST/ST-1) = α*TIME + µ, (3.2) ln(ST/ST-1) = α*TIME + β*subacute*TIME + µ, where µ denotes an independent and identically distributed (iid) normal error term. Equations (3.1 and 3.2) are estimated by ordinary least squares regression. Note that equations (3.1 and 3.2) include no intercept term, since when T=0 we must have ST=ST-1. The smearing method is used to correct for the biases associated with retransformation of the logarithmic equation. Histopathologic Analysis Surgical pathology randomly received specimens from the operating rooms for 95 of the above-mentioned patients according to each temporal stage (Online Table 2), and the specimens were grossly examined. Representative sections were submitted for formalin fixation and paraffin embedding. All cut sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin, with representative sections stained with Masson trichrome (to highlight fibrosis) and/or elastic van Gieson (EVG, to 4 highlight elastin). Sections were reviewed by two Pathologists (AJA and JAR) for the presence or absence of atheroma, intimal hyperplasia, subadventitial fibrosis, inflammation, and fibrosis of vasa vasorum; measured for medial atrophy (in millimeters, mm); and examined for cystic medial necrosis (pooling of basophilic ground substance), medionecrosis (loss of smooth muscle nuclei), elastin fragmentation (disruption of elastic fibers), and fibrosis (increase in collagen deposition) and graded according to Schlatmann and Becker’s grading system (see Appendix 2 for definition of classification categories and grades) (70). The parameters were divided into 4 groups for Type B (day 1-14, week 2-6, week 6-year 1 and >year 1) and 3 groups for Type A dissection (day 1-2, day 2-14, >week 2) according to Δtime to onset and adjusted to the definition of acute, subacute and chronic (11). For each variable, the statistical difference between these time-dependent groups was tested. Variables with a grading system (grade I-III) were first converted into binary variables (grades I-II = “0”, grade III = “1”), and analyzed using crosstabs and performing the chi-square test. Continuous variables were compared using the ANOVA test. Statistical Analysis Categorical variables were reported as number of cases with percentages. Continuous variables were reported as mean ± standard deviation and/or median and range. The analyses were conducted in XLSTAT-Pro® (Version 2015.2.01, Addinsoft, Paris, France) and GraphPad Prism® (Version 6.0f, GraphPad Software Inc., La Jolla, CA). Statistical significance level was set a priori at p < 0.05. Limitations of the Methodology It should be emphasized that the comparisons we make of aortic histopathology and flap mobility evaluation at different time points are from different patients – not from the same patient at different times (impossible in the clinical setting). 5 Online Table 1: Demographic characteristics and follow-up of patients assigned for radiographic studies (only Type B dissection) Computed Tomography n= 68 No. of imaging studies 294 Δtime to first image Median (days) 1 (range 0-2517) Mean (days) 105 ± 372 Absolute diameter Mean (mm) 38.5 ± 8.2 Flap Thickness Mean (mm) 2.3 ± 2.1 Δtime to recent image Median (years) 0.8 (range 0.01-13.7) Mean (years) 2.2 ± 2.9 Absolute diameter Mean (mm) 43.6 ± 9.6 Flap Thickness Mean (mm) 2.6 ± 0.6 59 ± 13 Mean age (years) 44 (65%) Male gender 29 ± 7 BMI Co-Morbidities Medication at discharge Marfan Smoking 29 (43%) COPD 10 (15%) Chronic renal failure 9 (13%) Hypertension 66 (97%) β-blocker 64 (94%) α-blocker 8 (12%) ACE-I / ARB 40 (59%) CCB 38(56%) multiple 63 (93%) 29 (43%) Surgical Intervention Δtime from onset 3 (4%) Median (days) 390 (range 45-3577) 6 Type of intervention Mean (days) 781 ± 879 Graft replacement 21 (31%) Elephant trunk II 7 (10%) TEVAR 1 (1%) Data are shown as median (range), mean ± standard deviation, or number (percentage). 7 Online Table 2: Demographic characteristics and follow-up of patients assigned for TEE and Pathology analysis TEE Histopathology 32 44 63 ± 11 62 ± 12 23 (72%) 23 (52%) 1 (range 0-79) 2 (range 0-184) 6 ± 15 19 ± 40 15 50 Mean age 56 ± 14 57 ± 14 Male gender 9 (60%) 33 (66%) 0.2 (range 0.0-5.3) 0.2 (range 0.0-13.7) 1.1 ± 1.6 1.8 ± 3.1 Type A dissection n= Mean age (years) Male gender Median Δtime to image/specimen (days) Mean Δtime to image/specimen (days) Type B dissection n= Median Δtime to image/specimen (years) Mean Δtime to image/specimen (years) Data are shown as median (range), mean ± standard deviation, or number (percentage). 8 Online Table 3: Results of the Regression Models Measure Sub-Sample Aortic size acute/subacute Variable Adjusted R2 F TIME .41 24.03 TIME*subacute Flap Coefficient (mean/95% CI) T-Statistic p value .2068065 .1228638 - .2907491 4.96 <.001 -.1795578 -.2666887 - -.092427 -4.15 <.001 chronic TIME .31 46.13 .0013704 .0009623 - .0017785 6.79 <.001 acute/subacute TIME .32 11.20 .4330813 .2007184 - .6654443 3,76 .001 -.2657542 -.5048604 - -.0266479 -2.24 .030 .0007298 -.0014079 - .0028675 .69 .493 TIME*subacute chronic TIME .001 .048 Interaction terms between growth rate, time and stage. CI: confidence interval. Online Table 4: Histopathology Grading Grade I Grade II Grade III Cystic medial Minute cyst present within a Increased cyst size and Large cyst extending over necrosis single lamellar unit number in total width of one more than one lamellar unit lamellar unit Elastin Fewer than 5 foci in one 5 or more foci fragmented in Foci with elastin fragmentation micro field (x200), smooth one field (x200), confluent or fragmentation in 5+ elastic muscle orientation preserved scattered media, smooth lamellae, regardless of micro muscle orientation preserved field, smooth muscle cells altered in orientation Fibrosis Increase in collagen in area Increase in collagen between Increase collagen in area (increased collagen) compromising less than 1/3rd 1/3rd and 2/3rds of total width compromising > 2/3rd total of total width of media of media width of media Medionecrosis Area compromising less than Area compromising between Area compromising greater (focal loss of nuclei in 1/3rd of total width of media 1/3rd and 2/3rds of total width than 2/3rd of total width of of media media the media) Atheroma Vasa vasorum Atheroma present Fibrosis present fibrosis Inflammation Intimal Inflammation present Hyperplasia present hyperplasia Medial atrophy Measured in mm Grading according to Schlatmann and Becker (70). 10