Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Private equity secondary market wikipedia , lookup
Household debt wikipedia , lookup
Securitization wikipedia , lookup
Syndicated loan wikipedia , lookup
Stock selection criterion wikipedia , lookup
Investment fund wikipedia , lookup
Government debt wikipedia , lookup
Quantitative easing wikipedia , lookup
Global bonds: one mighty sell-off, numerous causes Pictet Asset Management Strategy Unit I For professional investors only In Brief May 2015 Global government bond markets have recently witnessed one of their biggest four-week declines on record, and investors are struggling to identify the cause. In our view, there is no single trigger. Rather, a number of fundamental and technical developments have conspired to push yields higher. At the beginning of 2014, strategists and analysts were keen to tell anyone who would listen to sell government bonds. Valuations, they argued, were simply too high at a time when the US Federal Reserve was preparing to raise interest rates. Bonds could only go down. How wrong they were. By the end of that year, yields on developed market sovereign debt were even lower, with the JP Morgan global government bond index delivering an annual return of 8.5 per cent (in local currency terms). The trigger for the rally was as easy to spot as it was impossible to foresee: a precipitous slide in oil prices. • The bond market’s recent plunge can be blamed on a combination of technical and fundamental factors • Investors likely balked at the eye-watering valuations in the euro zone, but unfavourable changes in government bond supply also had a part to play • The euro zone’s recovery and higher inflation expectations contributed to the sell-off too Fast forward five months, however, and the bond bears have found their voice once more. Global government debt has seen its steepest four-week slide on record, plunging 2.5 per cent since mid-April.1 But in contrast to the rally of 2014, there is no single factor responsible for the market’s violent change in direction. There are many different triggers for this one big shift. What is behind the sell-off? 1. Extreme valuations Thanks to central banks’ increasingly aggressive financial repression - the deliberate driving down of interest rates to levels below inflation – negative nominal bond yields have become a feature of the investment landscape. In the weeks following the implementation of quantitative easing from the European Central Bank, about 16 per cent of the bonds in JP Morgan’s government bond index, some USD3.6 trillion, and one in four euro zone sovereign bonds were offering negative nominal yields. Viewing recent developments through a different lens, the valuation of the euro zone bond market appears even more extreme. At one point, the 10-year German Bund was trading at a real yield of -1.32 per cent. That is almost 40 basis points lower than trough hit by the 10-year US real yield in October 2012. At a time when the euro zone economy appears to be gathering strength, such exceptionally low yields look difficult to justify. 1 Decline in local currency terms; data covering period 14.04.2015-14.05-2016 2 | GLOBAL BONDS: ONE MIGHTY SELL-OFF, NUMEROUS CAUSES | MAY 2015 2. A (temporary) shift in ECB bond buying, sovereign debt issuance Although the combination of QE and a decline in government borrowing in the euro zone can – all things being equal - be expected to bear down on sovereign debt yields, the month of May witnessed an unfavourable (possibly temporary) shift in bond supply and demand dynamics. Not only was net issuance of government bond debt positive to the tune of some EUR45 billion2, but the ECB also switched from buying higher-duration securities to lower duration ones. These developments conspired to amplify the sell-off in longer-dated euro zone government debt. FIG. 2 – EXPECTATIONS FOR INFLATION HEAD HIGHER Change in 5y5y inflation swap rate since trough, percentage points to 0.60% — 0.50% — 0.40% — 0.30% — 0.20% — 0.10% — 0.00% — FIG. 1 – NET DEBT ISSUANCE IN EURO ZONE SPIKED IN MAY VS APRIL Net government bond issuance in euro zone, EUR billion (issued/projected) EU UK Source: Thomson Reuters Datastream; trough hit on 14.01.2015 for EUR, 16.03.2015 for US and 19.03.2015 for UK; period end 10.05.2015 100 — 4. A brighter outlook for the euro zone 50 — 0— -50 — -100 — US Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Economic conditions are improving across the euro zone. The most positive signal comes in the shape of increased bank lending to both households and companies – a trend that had begun to emerge months before the ECB decided to embark on quantitative easing. The supply of credit had been contracting a monthly rate of 0.8 per cent in May 2014 but has been rising ever since. It is now firmly in positive territory. Source: ECB, Pictet Asset Management FIG. 3 – CREDIT CONDITIONS IMPROVING IN THE EURO ZONE With oil prices rebounding, worries that the world would succumb to a deflationary spiral have all but evaporated. The 5y5y EUR inflation swap rate – the market’s expectation of where inflation will be in approximately 10 years’ time – has risen to about 1.8 per cent, not far from the ECB’s target of near or at 2 per cent. Supply of credit, month-on-month rise, % 1.5 — 1.0 — There are also tentative signs of a build-up in inflationary pressures in the real economy. 0.5 — Core inflation worldwide troughed some months ago and has been picking gradually ever since. US wages are also beginning to rise – the latest data shows an increase of some 2.6 per cent per year. What is more, the gauges we monitor suggest inflationary pressures should continue to build steadily over the course of the year. The resource utilisation rate across the world’s major economies – our own proxy for a country’s operating capacity – indicate that economic activity is building to levels that will begin to fuel inflation. Tellingly, the last time the US utilisation rate was at its current level was in 2004, when the US Federal Reserve last embarked on a policy of monetary tightening. 0.0 — -0.5 — -1.0 — 03 . 20 13 . 20 13 07 . 20 13 09 . 20 13 11 . 20 13 01 . 20 14 03 . 20 14 05 . 20 14 07 . 20 14 09 . 20 14 11 . 20 14 01 . 20 15 03 . 20 15 -1.5 — 05 3. Fears of deflation evaporate Source: ECB, Pictet Asset Management 2 Net issuance is total sovereign bond issuance minus ECB debt purchases GLOBAL BONDS: ONE MIGHTY SELL-OFF, NUMEROUS CAUSES | MAY 2015 | 3 5. An impaired secondary bond market As regulatory oversight of the banking sector has intensified, banks have scaled their fixed income marketmaking activities. This appears to be having a negative effect on liquidity: trading conditions are not as favourable as they were in the years prior to the credit crisis in 2008, when the market was much smaller than it is now. The situation has arguably been made worse by the growth in fixed income assets held by funds offering investors daily liquidity. Investors in such vehicles tend to buy and sell at the same time. The combination of many sellers and a shrinking pool of market makers can amplify price moves. Outlook and portfolio positioning – global government bond portfolios In our global bond portfolios, we have held an underweight position in German government bonds for some time and have instead favoured debt issued by sovereigns in peripheral Europe. We retain this stance as we believe one of the goals of the ECB’s QE is to make it easier for countries such as Spain and Italy to place their long-term finances on a more stable footing. Over the medium term, the 10year German Bund yield could edge higher – somewhere between 0.8 and 1 per cent – before settling back lower in the summer months, when supply and demand dynamics in the euro zone debt market are set to become more favourable. Over the near term, it is also increasingly difficult to make the case for yields to rise further in the US, particularly if the country’s recovery continues to lose steam. Mickael Benhaim, Senior Investment Manager and Co-Head, global bonds Luca Paolini, Chief Strategist Supriya Menon, Multi-Asset Strategist ABOUT THE PSU The Pictet Asset Management Strategy Unit (PSU) is the investment group responsible for providing asset allocation guidance across stocks, bonds, cash and commodities. Each month, the PSU sets a broad policy stance based on its analysis of: •business cycle: proprietary leading indicators, inflation •liquidity: monetary policy, credit/money variables •valuation: equity risk premium, yield gap, multiples vs. history •sentiment: Pictet sentiment index (investors’ surveys, tactical indicators) Pictet Asset Management Limited Moor House 120 London Wall London EC2Y 5ET www.pictetfunds.com www.pictet.com This material is for distribution to professional investors only. However, it is not intended for distribution to any person or entity who is a citizen or resident of any locality, state, country or other jurisdiction where such distribution, publication, or use would be contrary to law or regulation. Information used in the preparation of this document is based upon sources believed to be reliable, but no representation or warranty is given as to the accuracy or completeness of those sources. Any opinion, estimate or forecast may be changed at any time without prior warning. Investors should read the prospectus or offering memorandum before investing in any Pictet-managed funds. Tax treatment depends on the individual circumstances of each investor and may be subject to change in the future. Past performance is not a guide to future performance. The value of investments and the income from them can fall as well as rise and is not guaranteed. You may not get back the amount originally invested. This document has been issued in Switzerland by Pictet Asset Management SA and in the rest of the world by Pictet Asset Management Limited, which is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority, and may not be reproduced or distributed, either in part or in full, without their prior authorisation. For UK investors, the Pictet and Pictet Total Return umbrellas are domiciled in Luxembourg and are recognised collective investment schemes under section 264 of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000. Swiss Pictet funds are only registered for distribution in Switzerland under the Swiss Fund Act; they are categorised in the United Kingdom as unregulated collective investment schemes. The Pictet Group manages hedge funds, funds of hedge funds and funds of private equity funds which are not registered for public distribution within the European Union and are categorised in the United Kingdom as unregulated collective investment schemes. For Australian investors, Pictet Asset Management Limited (ARBN 121 228 957) is exempt from the requirement to hold an Australian financial services licence, under the Corporations Act 2001. For US investors, Shares sold in the United States or to US Persons will only be sold in private placements to accredited investors pursuant to exemptions from SEC registration under the Section 4(2) and Regulation D private placement exemptions under the 1933 Act and qualified clients as defined under the 1940 Act. The Shares of the Pictet funds have not been registered under the 1933 Act and may not, except in transactions which do not violate United States securities laws, be directly or indirectly offered or sold in the United States or to any US Person. The Management Fund Companies of the Pictet Group will not be registered under the 1940 Act. © Copyright 2015 Pictet - Issued in May 2015.