Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Viruses as Regulators in Microbial Systems Lysogeny and Transduction in the Marine Environment Paul, J.H., P.K. Cochran, S.C. Jiang University of South Florida, St. Petersburg, FL 33701 ABSTRACT Viruses can interact with their hosts in a myriad of ways. Most ecological investigations of viral/bacterial interactions have focused on the process of bacterial mortality resulting from lytic infections. We have been interested in the genetic interactions of phages with their bacterial hosts. Specifically, we have investigated the process of lysogeny, whereby a virus sets up a stable genetic symbiosis with its host cell. We have found a strong seasonal pattern of occurrence of lysogeny in the subtropical estuary of Tampa Bay, with the greatest proportion of lysogens in the spring and summer, with no detectable lysogeny in the winter months. A series of commonly occurring organic pollutants (polychlorinated biphenyls, polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons, and pesticides) were demonstrated to cause prophage induction in natural microbial populations. We have demonstrated plasmid transfer by transduction using a marine bacterial phage host system in culture and in ambient microbial populations. Our work demonstrates that viruses can genetically alter marine microbial populations through the processes of lysogeny and transduction. Introduction Over the past decade, viruses have become recognized as the most numerically abundant members of the planktontic marine microbial flora, at concentrations ranging from 104 to 108/ml [2]. We now know that approximately 20 to 50% of the bacterial mortality can be caused by viral lysis , on the same order of magnitude of that caused by protistan grazing [8]. Models of the Microbial Loop now show that viruses are an important component of this important oceanic process. Perhaps less is known concerning the genetic interaction of viruses and their hosts. In this short communication, we will share some observations on the processes of lysogeny and transduction in the marine environment, two process which potentially can affect the flow of genetic information rather than the flow of carbon through marine microbial communities [4, 13, 14]. In lysogeny, a temperate virus sets up a stable symbiosis with its host, resulting in the integration of the phage genome (termed prophage) into one of the replicons inside the cell. The prophage genes remain silent until the process of induction, whereby a chemical or physical factor results in activation of the prophage genes and initiation of the lytic cycle [1]. A survey of 110 marine bacterial isolates indicated that 40% contained inducible prophage [11]. To determine if lysogeny occurred amongst natural populations of marine bacteria, we have used the mutagen Mitomycin C to induce natural populations of marine bacteria. Inducible prophage were found more in eutrophic estuarine environments (80% of the environments tested) compared to oligotrophic offshore environments (27%), with 1.5 to 38% of the bacterial population being lysogenized [10]. 1 Viruses as Regulators in Microbial Systems Results and Discussion During 13 month of biweekly sampling at a station in Tampa Bay prophage induction by the addition of mitomycin C was only detected when water temperatures were greater than 15oC (February to October; [5]). No induction was detected in November, December, or January (Fig. 1). The percent of the population lysogenized ranged from 0 to 37%, averaging 6.9%. If 30% of the population was lysogenized, and 1/3 of these were induced by some event, this would produce ca. 107 phages /ml, equivalent to 100% of the ambient viral population, indicating that prophage induction could have a significant effect on ambient viral concentrations and bacterial (and phytoplankton) mortality. Fig. 1. (Top panel) Viral direct counts (VDC) and bacterial direct counts during a 13 month seasonal study in Tampa Bay. Notice the low viral counts in December, January, and February. (Bottom panel). Prophage induction by mitomycin C (squares) and water temperature during the same seasonal study. Notice the absence of inducible prophage in November, December, January and early February, followed by a “lysogeny bloom” in late February and early March (p<0.0001). Significant prophage induction (p<0.05) occurred during most samplings from mid-February to October. 2 Viruses as Regulators in Microbial Systems This data clearly shows that in the eutrophic estuary of Tampa Bay, there is some seasonal control in the expression of induction of natural populations of lysogens. We do not know if this means that there were no lysogens present in the winter months, or that they were metabolically inactive and thus not inducible by mitomycin C. We are currently pursuing these hypotheses. We have also investigated the capability of various environmentally significant pollutants and physical treatments to elicit prophage induction of natural populations. The purpose of these studies was to determine the potential for certain pollutants to cause prophage induction. A second goal was to determine if physical stimuli to which natural populations of lysogens can be exposed (elevated temperature, pressure, and sunlight) could cause prophage induction, and thereby increase indigenous phage levels. Such experiments were performed in the Southeastern Gulf of Mexico, the Dry Tortugas, Key West Harbor, Charlotte Harbor, Tampa Bay, and in the South Atlantic Bight off Cape Hatteras, between 1994 and 1997 [6, 10]. Natural populations were either concentrated by Vortex Flow Filtration or used directly. When a chemical agent was used, the natural population was exposed to the agent for 16 to 24 hr, whereas the physical treatments were of usually much shorter duration. The results of these studies appear in Table 1. For an induction to have occurred, a significant increase in viral direct counts (by TEM) compared to an untreated control incubated in the same was found. Table 1. Induction of Indigenous Marine Lysogens by Chemical and Physical Agents Inducing Agent No. of Expts. Performed No. of Positive Inductions Ave. % Viral Increase % Positive inductions (efficiency) Mitomycin C1 33 16 348.8 48.5 UV radiation2 12 6 218.4 50 Sunlight3 9 0 N/A 0 Temperature4 6 2 256.2 33.3 Pressure5 3 0 N/A 0 PAH chemicals6 11 8 206.3 73 PCB Mixture7 4 3 552 75 Arochlor12488 4 3 570 75 Pesticide Mixture9 6 3 570 50 Bunker C fuel oil10 16 1 343 6.3 3 Viruses as Regulators in Microbial Systems Inducing Agent No. of Expts. Performed No. of Positive Inductions Ave. % Viral Increase % Positive inductions (efficiency) Trichloroethylene11 6 1 205.9 17 Mitomycin C was added at a concentration of 1 µg/ml in most instances. UV radiation was administered for 30 s (254 nm; 14.76 mJ cm-2) 3 Sunlight exposure was for 15 min between 1200 and 1600 hr in summer in Florida 4 Temperature treatments that resulted in positive induction were for 30 min@ 30oC or 42oC. 5 Pressure treatment was by lowering the sample to 827 or 2000 m in a sealed microcentrifuge tube. 6 PAH chemicals are the polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons naphthalene, phenanthrene, and pyrene, with effective concentrations equal to their solubility in seawater, or 22.5, 0.72, and 0.08 µg/ml 7,8 PCB (polychlorinated biphenyl) mixture and Arochlor 1248 were added at a concentration of 1 µg/ml 9 Pesticide mixture included lindane, DDD, DDT, BHC, dieldrin, endosulfan I, endrin, hepochlor, and methoxychlor at a combined concentration ranging from 0.01 to 1 µg/ml depending on the experiment. 10 Bunker C fuel oil was added at a range of concentrations (0.01 to 10 µg/ml) depending on the experiment 11 Trichloroethylene was added as a solution at 4%, v/v. 1 2 The highly mutagenic polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons and polychlorinated biphynyls (PCB’s) were the most efficient in causing prophage induction of natural populations, while sunlight, pressure, and bunker C fuel oil were least effective. Prophage induction is believed to be caused by stimulation of excision-repair mechanisms which result in excision of the prophage genome from the host chromosome [1]. Although UVC radiation was relatively efficient in prophage induction, there apparently was not high enough energy of UV in sunlight to cause prophage induction. The pesticides were equally as efficient in causing prophage induction as mitomycin C, which has been our standard for detection of lysogeny in the marine environment. The fact that a temperature increase from 27o to 30oC resulted in prophage induction indicates that relatively mild treatments can cause phage release. Temperature increases to 40oC are known to cause induction of λ prophage [3]. The fact that elevated temperature and pollutants such as PAH’s, PCB’s, and pesticides cause prophage induction in natural populations suggests that such processes could in part be causing the elevated phage abundances seen in eutrophic estuaries, particularly in the summer months. To investigate the potential for gene transfer by transduction in the marine environment, we examined the potential for broad host range, non-conjugative plasmids to be transferred using temperate phage-host systems. The first system employed use the φHSIC/HSIC phage host system (PHS) while the second employed φD1B/D1B PHS. Both of these were isolated from Mamala Bay, Oahu [9]. The plasmid used in transduction studies was pQSR50 [7], a 14.4 kb derivative of R1162 and Tn5 that encodes for kanamycin and streptomycin resistance. The plasmid was put into the HSIC and D1B hosts by triparental mating to yield the plasmidcontaining donor strains HOPE-1 and HOPE-2, respectively. For a transduction assay with these strains, a phage lysate was made from each of the donors (HOPE-1 and HOPE-2), the lysate filtered, then exposed to UV to reduce the infectivity to approximately 1%. The lysates were DNAse I treated to ensure that no extracellular plasmid DNA was present that might cause 4 Viruses as Regulators in Microbial Systems transformation. The results of the study appear in Table 2. Table 2. Transduction of plasmid pQSR50 with isolates as recipients. Donor Transducing Phages Recipient MOI1 Frequency of Transduction No. of No. of Transduct/ Transduct/ 2 PFU CFU3 HOPE-1 UV-treated TφHSIC HSIC (10 ml) 0.01 5.13x10-9 4.02x10-10 HSIC (100 ml) 0.01 1.33x10-7 6.8x10-10 0.05 1.33x10-8 6.8x10-10 0.5 <2.6x10-11 — HOPE-2 Untreated TφHSIC HSIC (10 ml) 0.01-10 ND4 UV-treated and untreated φD1B D1B (10 ml) 0.01-5 ND 1 MOI is multiplicity of infection PFU is plaque forming units (number of phages) 3 CFU is colony forming units (number of hosts) 4 ND is not detected 2 Putative transductants were found only when HOPE-1 was used as the donor strain and when the T-φHSIC lysate had been UV-treated. No transfer was found when untreated T-φHSIC was the donor or when the φD1B/HOPE-2 PHS system was used. Additionally, no transfer was found when the MOI was greater than 0.05. This may have been because of the lytic effects at such high MOI’s. To verify that the transductants contained the pQSR50 plasmid, colony lifts and plasmid minipreps of the putative transductants were probed with the nptII probe generated from pQSR50 [7]. Colony lifts and dot-blots of plasmid DNA from HOPE-1 donor strain and putative transductants hybridized strongly with the nptII probe while those from the recipients did not (data not shown). Additionally, the transductants expressed the kanamycin/streptomycin resistance while the recipients did not. We also had made a gene probe to the φHSIC genome by randomly cloning a 100 bp AccI restriction fragment into a Riboprobe vector and labeled it by in vitro transcription. All putative transductants hybridized to the probe while the HOPE-1 donor and HSIC recipient did not. This indicated that the transductants had either integrated the phage genome (were lysogenized) or that the phage genome was also maintained as a plasmid. All 5 Viruses as Regulators in Microbial Systems transductants were tested for sensitivity to the φHSIC virus and all were immune, suggesting that the transductants indeed were lysogenized. Transduction assays were then performed with the indigenous bacterial community as recipient. This was accomplished by concentrating the marine bacterial population from 20 to 100 L of seawater to 50 ml. One ml of transducing lysate was added to 10 ml of the concentrated microbial population for 10 min, then the mixture filtered and plated on selective media (seawater agar plus kanamycin and streptomycin). Putative transductant colonies were hybridized to the nptII probe and those that hybridized subjected to miniprep and restriction analysis. Unlike the transduction experiments with isolates only (Table 2), there often were indigenous bacteria present resistant to kanamycin and streptomycin, and some of these bacteria hybridized with the nptII probe. Therefore, only experiments where there were no indigenous bacteria hybridizing to the nptII probe were examined further for potential transduction. The results of such experiments appear in Table 3. Table 3. Transduction of indigenous marine bacteria. Recipient Sampling site Donor Transducing phages Transduction frequency (trans./PFU) Transduction detection limit (trans./PFU) Mouth of Tampa Bay (27o 35'N, 82o43'W) HOPE-1 T-φHSIC ND1 1.74x10-10 HOPE-1 UV-treated T−φHSIC ND 1.74x10-10 HOPE-2 T-φD1B 1.57x10-8 1.74x10-10 HOPE-2 UV-treated, TφD1B 3.7x10-8 3.7x10-8 Gulf of Mexico, 24o55'N,85o32'W, 1500 m depth 1 ND is not detected Only two environments yielded putative transductants, and of these, only the T-φD1B phage and HOPE-2 donor system resulted in a positive response. The transductants were verified by PCR amplification of portions of the plasmid followed by restriction digestion and hybridization to the nptII probe [12]. To summarize, we have found a clear seasonal pattern in the distribution of lysogens in Tampa Bay, with none detected in the winter, and an abundance throughout the rest of the year. A series of pollutants and physical agents were found to result in prophage induction of natural populations of marine lysogens, and such induction may be the reason that such large viral populations are present in eutrophic estuaries. Transduction of plasmid DNA occurred with 6 Viruses as Regulators in Microbial Systems coincident lysogenization using a temperate marine phage host system, and transfer to indigenous flora by transduction has been documented. Acknowledgements This research was supported by grants from the National Science Foundation to JHP and a Knight Fellowship to SCJ. References 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. Ackermann H-W, DuBow MS (1987). “Viruses of prokaryotes. Vol.1. General properties of bacteriophages.” CRC Press. Boca Raton. Bergh O, Borsheim KY, Bratbak G, Heldal M (1989) High abundances of viruses found in aquatic environments. Nature 340: 467-468 Bertani G (1953) Lysogenic versus lytic cycle of phage multiplication. Cold Spring Harbour Symp Quant Biol 18:65-70 Chiura, HX (1997) Generalized gene transfer by virus-like particles from marine bacteria. Aquat Microb Ecol 13:75-83 Cochran PK, Paul JH (1998) Seasonal abundance of lysogenic bacteria in a subtropical estuary. Appl Environ Microbiol 64:2308-2312 Cochran PK, Kellogg CA, Paul JH (1998) Prophage induction of indigenous marine lysogenic bacteria by environmental pollutants. Mar Ecol Progr Ser 164:125-133 Frischer ME, Stewart GJ, Paul JH (1994) Plasmid transfer to indigenous marine bacterial populations by natural transformation. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 15:127-136 Fuhrman JA Noble R (1995) Viruses and protists cause similar bacterial mortality in coastal seawater. Limnol. Oceanogr. 40: 1236-1242 Jiang SC, Kellogg CA, Paul JH (1998) Characterization of marine temperate phage-host systems isolated from Mamala Bay, Oahu, Hawaii. Appl Environ Microbiol 64:535-542 Jiang SC, Paul JH (1996) Occurrence of lysogenic bacteria in marine microbial communities as determined by prophage induction. Mar Ecol Progr Ser 142: 27-38 Jiang SC, Paul JH (1998a) Significance of lysogeny in the marine environment: studies with isolates and a model for viral production. Microb Ecol 35:235-243 Jiang SC, Paul JH (1998b) Gene transfer by transduction in the marine environment. Appl Environ Microbiol 64:2780-2787 Moebus K (1997) Investigations of the marine lysogenic bacterium H24.II. Development of pseudolysogeny in a nutrient-rich broth culture. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 148:229-240 Weinbaur MG, Suttle CA (1996) Potential significance of lysogeny to bacteriophage production and bacterial mortality in coastal waters of the Gulf of Mexico. Appl Environ Microbiol 62: 4374-4380 7