* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download The effect of Intravenous Ketamine during Cardiopulmonary Bypass
Survey
Document related concepts
Transcript
Persian Journal of Medical Sciences FADAK PUBLICATIONS WWW.FADAKPUBLICATIONS.COM PJMS.FADAKPUBLICATIONS.COM The effect of Intravenous Ketamine during Cardiopulmonary Bypass on Postoperative Agitation 1 Mansoor Soltanzadeh*, MD, 2 Ahmad Ebadi, MD,3 Mehdi Dehghani Firoozabadi, MD. 4 Seyyed Kamaladdin Tabatabee, MD, 5 Anahita Babaee, MD 1 Associate Professor, Anesthesia Department, Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz 2 Associate Professor, Anesthesia Department, Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz 3 Assistant Professor, Anesthesia Department, Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz 4 Assistant Professor, Anesthesia Department, Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz 5 Assistant, Anesthesia Department, Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz ARTICLE INFO Article history: Received 20.01.2014 Accepted 15.03.2015 Keywords: Heart surgery, Agitation, Ketamine ⁎ Corresponding Author Mansoor Soltanzadeh Associate Professor, Anesthesia Department, Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz e-mail: [email protected] QR ABSTRACT and objective: Postoperative cognitive dysfunctions are prevalent in cardiac surgeries. Ketamine - as a NMDA (N-Methyl-DAspartate) receptor antagonist - exerts neuroprotective effects. We studied the effect of intravenous Ketamine on postoperative agitation during open-heart surgery. Material Methods: In a double blind clinical trial, 40 males (at least 55 years) undergoing open heart surgery were randomly divided into 2 groups: intervention group (received 0.5 mg/kg IV ketamine before sternotomy and the same dose before pumping) and control group (the same volume of normal saline at the same interval). After the end of surgery, agitation signs were assessed by every 2 hours until 8h and then every 8 hours until 3 days. Results: Incidence of agitation on 2nd and 3rd days after operation was significantly lower in patients received ketamine as compared to control group. In 6, 16, and 24h after surgery, again number of agitated patients in control group was higher than ketamine group. Yet, the difference was not significant. Conclusion: Intravenous ketamine administration during open-heart surgery can reduce post-operative agitation by its neuroprotective effect. Background © 2015 FADAK PUBLICATIONS All rights reserved. Introduction Agitation means excessive irritation and akathisia resulted from internal dysfunction or irritations (1 & 2). Agitation is a prevalent dysfunction in patients admitted at ICU. It is reported in %71 patients (2). Agitation etiology is not well understood. Yet, among its factors are underling diseases, metabolic dysfunctions, pain, anxiety, and delirium (2). In agitation, patient’s movements are continuous and aimless. Invasive agitation can be dangerous. It can lead to patient’s disharmony with ventilator, oxygen consumption increase, unwanted separation of equipments and counters connected to patient, and further consequences and mortality (1 & 2). Cardiac surgeries can be accompanied by neurological consequences due to factors such as cardiopulmonary pump and the probability of macro and micro embolus (6 & 7). Among neurological consequences, neuro-focal deficiencies, cognitive dysfunctions such as delirium, agitation, memory loss, concentration suppression, illusions, and delusion can be implied (3, 4 & 5). Despite considerable attention paid to delirium issue in cardiac surgeries, these patients are barely examined with specific respect to agitation. Regarding the fact that there is no reliable preventive treatment for postoperative agitation, carrying out an applied study for coping with this dysfunction seems necessary. Numerous clinical and laboratory evidences show ketamine protective effects during topical and generalized cerebral ischemia (8-10), trauma (11), chronic cerebral hypoperfusion resulted from hypocapnia (12), and cerebral vasogenic (distributive) edema (13). Ketamine is a N-Methyl-D-Aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist. It alleviates neurons loss in cortex via preventing from injuries resulted from brain evoked response (14) and apoptosis after cerebral ischemia (9). It also maintains brain blood circulation via increasing sympathetic nervous system activity (11). Ketamine can also protect brain by hindering systemic inflammatory reactions and central nervous system (3). It also protects brain against post cardiac surgery cognitive dysfunctions in elders (15). Ketamine can also be effective in DOI: 33 Visual Outcome after Penetrating Keratoplasty alleviating pain and increasing sleep depth at the time of sternotomy as well as in warming stage (in the end of placing patient on cardiopulmonary pump). This study determines the effect of intravenous ketamine during cardiopulmonary bypass surgeries on postoperative agitation in these patients. Materials and Methods In this double blind clinical trial, 40 male candidates (at least 55 years of age) of cardiopulmonary bypass via open heart surgery were selected. Patients’ mental and physical status was examined by neurological and psychological assessment a week before surgery. Omission measure included CVA history in three past years, the existence of permanent pacemaker, hepatic dysfunctions with AST and ALT higher than twice normal level, chronic kidney disease (keratin>2), delirium incidence history a week before surgery, proved cognitive dysfunctions, taking drug for treating psychosis and drug abuse. Patients were randomly divided into 2 similar groups: intervention and control groups. Intervention group received 0.5mg/kg ketamine twice; that is, first before sternotomy and second the same dose before pumping. Control group received %0.9 saline with the same volume and at the same time. All patients underwent medication with 0.1mg/kg intramuscular morphine and 0.5mg/kg intramuscular promethazine 30min before operation. Then, anesthetic induction was carried out by 0.15mg/kg diazepam, 3-10𝜇g/kg fentanyl, 2mg/kg thiopental sodium, and 0.5 mg/kg atracurium or 0.15mg/kg Cis atracurium were administered. Nanasthetics also included 0.3 mg/kg atracurium or Cis atracurium, 50𝜇g/kg/min propofol and %0.4-1.6 isoflurane. All patients underwent the standard sternotomy of cardiac surgery. Heart protection includes using 15cc/kg cold hypercalcemic cardioplegic solution in 20min intervals (by the aids of normal saline) and systemic hypothermia (temperature on pump was 32℃). Blood flow speed on pump was 2.4-2.5l/min/m2 and mean arterial blood pressure 60-80mmHg. 300unit/kg heparin was prescribed for systemic anticoagulation so as to keep active coagulation time over 480s. After surgery, 1.3mg protamine sulfate was administered for each 1mg heparin to return its effect. All patients underwent postoperative agitation signs assessment every 2h during the first 8h after surgery and then every 8h until two days after operation (totally, 3 days). Assessment was carried out separately for each patient by experienced anesthesiology resident using Riker Sedation-Agitation Scale (SAS) (Table 1). Data was analyzed by SPSS19. Demographic data was compared using chi-square and Fisher exact test. Hemodynamic data and SAS score were compared between control and test groups in hours under study using t-test. Significance level was considered 0.05. Soltanzadeh et al, 2015 VOL: 1, No: 2(march 2015) 33-36 Results Mean patients age was 61.27±5.85 (55-77 years old). Mean surgery time was 206.75±42.46min. There was no significant difference between two groups regarding mean age, class, and operation time (Table 2). Patients’ neurological and psychological assessment results a week before surgery showed that none of them suffered from any known cognitive dysfunctions and neurological diseases. Postoperative agitation was examined by SAS during 72h after surgery. Based on SAS score>4, there was significant difference between ketamine and placebo groups regarding agitation in 32, 40, 48, 56, and 64h after surgery. That is, number of agitated patients was lower in ketamine groups (versus placebo group) (Table 3) (p<0.05). In 6, 16, and 24h after surgery, again number of agitated patients in control group was higher than ketamine group. Yet, the difference was not significant (p>0.05). There was also no significant difference between two groups regarding heart rate and mean arterial blood pressure at the time of anesthetic induction, before pumping, after pumping, and before and after sternotomy (p<0.05) (Table 4). Table 1: The sedation agitation scale Table 2: Comparing demographic data and operation time between two groups under study Ketamine Placebo p-value Mean age 60/55±5/48 62/00±6/27 0/44 Mean 208±46/97 205/5 ±38/62 0/85 execution time ASA Class Class 1 %0 %5 Class 2 %85 %80 0/59 Class 3 %15 %15 DOI: 34 Soltanzadeh et al, 2015 Visual Outcome after Penetrating Keratoplasty Table 3: Comparing number two groups under study Time (h) Ketamine 2 0(0%) 4 0(0%) 6 0(0%) 8 3(15%) 16 4(20%) 24 3(15%) 32 4(20%) 40 5(25%) 48 1(5%) 56 1(5%) 64 2(10%) 72 2(10%) of agitated patients between Placebo 0(0%) 0(0%) 3(15%) 3(15%) 9(45%) 9(45%) 12(60%) 13(65%) 10(50%) 11(55%) 9(45%) 1(5%) p-value 1 1 0/23 1 0/176 0/082 0/02 0/025 0/003 0/001 0/031 1 Table 4: Comparing hemodynamic data between two groups under study Time Ketamine Placebo pvalu e Mean Anestheti 88/30±16/4 96/75±18/5 0/13 arterial c 3 1 5 blood induction pressur Before 62/6±12/41 63/75±7/58 0/72 e CPB 6 After 61/8±11/63 57/2±14/08 0/26 CPB 7 Before 80/80±8/30 79/1±7/9 0/51 sternotom y After 79/25±7/63 83/15±6/5 0/09 sternotom y Heart Anestheti 74/25±16/0 80/35±11/7 0/17 rate c 3 6 8 induction Before 71/20±13/3 71/2±11/08 1 sternotom 9 y After 70/8±14/20 77/05±8/87 0.1 sternotom y Discussion Based on results, intravenous ketamine during cardiac surgery significantly suppresses postoperative agitation on the 2nd and 3rd days as compared to control group. Although again agitation cases in ketamine group were less than control group during the first 24h after surgery, the difference was insignificant. Postoperative cognitive dysfunctions can be a combination of neural injuries resulted from surgery stress, inflammatory responses, coagulation increase, anesthetics, and factors related to hospital environment (16). Ketamine is bound to phencyclidine bind locus on NMDA receptor (17). This receptor has also other loci for binding to glutamate and glycine. It allows sodium and calcium to enter into cell by the aids of ion channels (18). As a VOL: 1, No: 2(march 2015) 33-36 NMDA receptor non-competitive antagonist, ketamine can suppress brain ischemia by several mechanisms. First, it can prevent from cells necrosis by inhibiting brain evoked response injuries (14 & 19). Ischemic neurons release glutamate into extracellular space. It leads to NMDA receptor hyperactivity and cells death (20). Ketamine protects brain by temporarily inactivating these receptors. Then, receptors are barely apt to activation after ischemia and reperfusion (15). Second, ketamine changes apoptosis-regulating proteins (9). Apoptosis can alleviate cerebral ischemia intensity. Third, ketamine can disrupt cerebral and systemic inflammatory response to cardiac surgery (21). It seems that inflammatory response plays a critical role in neural damage after cardiopulmonary bypass (3). Ketamine suppresses IL6 response after cardiopulmonary bypass (22). It also hinders TNFα, IL6, and IL8 production mediated by lipopolysacchardies (23). Ketamine controls kB nucleus factor participating in copying proinflammatory cytokine codifying genes (24 & 25). In texts review, no studies were found specifically examining the effect of ketamine on postoperative agitation. Yet, several clinical trials have been carried out on human using NMDA receptor antagonists regarding ischemic cerebral injuries and cognitive dysfunctions (15, 16, 26, and 27). Arrowsmith et al studied remacemide (a NMDA receptor antagonist) effect on neuroprotection of brain after cardiopulmonary bypass (26). In that study, despite low number of patients manifested neuro-psychological dysfunction, significant patients’ improvement was observed totally in three out of nine tests. Hudetz et al carried out two studies on the effect of ketamine on cognitive dysfunctions and delirium after cardiac surgery. They have approved the effect of intravenous ketamine on brain protection and reduction of cognitive dysfunctions (15). In our study, patients had similar hemodynamic status in both groups. It may indicate that the reduction of postoperative agitation in intervention group is not resulted from changes in cerebral blood flow. Here, we used low dose of ketamine. This is because it was shown in previous studies that ketamine antiinflammatory response is seen in lower doses as compared to dose required for anesthesia. High doses of ketamine are not recommended due to cardiovascular and psychotropic consequences (22, 28, and 29). y. 2002; 667. Conclusion Prescribing intravenous ketamine during cardiopulmonary bypass can lead to protective effects on patients’ brain and cardiopulmonary pump. As a result, it reduces postoperative agitation. Acknowledgements: Hereby, we thank all colleagues contributing to the fulfillment of this design. References 1. Fink MP, Ebraham E, Vincent JL, Moore FA, Kochanek PM. Text book of Critical care in: Banerjee A, Wesley Ely E, Pandharpande PP.Agitation and Delirium.6th Edition, McGraw Hill: USA, 2012;8-23 2. Siegel MD. Management of agitation in the intensive care unit. Clin Chest Med. 2003; 24: 713– DOI: 35 Visual Outcome after Penetrating Keratoplasty 725 3. Laffey JG, Boylan JF, Cheng DC. The systemic inflammatory response to cardiac surgery: Implications for the anesthesiologist. Anesthesiology. 2002;97: 215-252 4. Levy JH, Tanaka KA. Inflammatory Response to Cardiopulmonary Bypass. Ann Thorac Surg. 2003;75: 715–20 5. Ouellette R G, Ouellette SM. Understanding postoperative cognitive dysfunction and delirium. OR Nurse J. 2010 July. 40-46 6. Van der Mast RC, van den Broek WW, Fekkes D. Incidence of and preoperative predictors for delirium after cardiac surgery. J Psychosom Res. 1999;46:479-483 7. Litaker D, Locala J, Franco K. Preoperative risk factors for postoperative delirium. Gen Hosp Psychiatry.2001; 23:84-89 8. Proescholdt M, Heimann A, Kempski O. Neuroprotection of ketamine isomer in global forebrain ischemia. Brain Res 2001;904: 245-251. 9. Engelhard K, Werner C, Eberspacher E, et al. The effect of the alpha 2-agonist dexmedetomidine and the Nmethyl-D-aspartate antagonist ketamine on the expression of apoptosis-regulating proteins after incomplete cerebralischemia and reperfusion in rats. AnesthAnalg 2003; 96:524-531 10. Reeker W, Werner C, Mollenberg O, et al. High-dose ketamine improves neurological outcome following incomplete cerebral ischemia in rats. Can J Anaesth 2000;47:572-578 11. Kolenda H, Gremmelt A, Rading S, et al. Ketamine for analgosedative therapy in intensive care treatment of head-injured patients. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1996; 138:1193-1199 12. Miyamoto E, Nakao S, Tomimoto H, et al. Ketamine attenuates hypocapnia-induced neuronal damage in the caudoputamen in a rat model of chronic cerebral hypoperfusion. NeurosciLett. 2004; 354:26-29 13. Nimkoff L, Quinn C, Silver P, et al. The effects of intravenous anesthetics on intracranial pressure and cerebral perfusion pressure in two feline models of brain edema. J Crit Care.1997; 12:132-136 14.Himmelseher S, Pfenninger E, Georgieff M. The effects of ketamine-isomers on neuronal injury and regeneration in rat hippocampal neurons. AnesthAnalg. 1996; 83:505-512 15. Hudetz JA, Iqbal Z, Gandhi SD, et al. Ketamine attenuates postoperative cognitive dysfunction after cardiac surgery. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2009; 53: 864– 872 16. Hudetz JH, Patterson KM, Iqbal Z, Gandhi SD, Byrne AJ, Warltier DC, Pagel IS. Ketamine attenuates delirium after cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia. 2009; 23 (5): 651-657. 17. Nau C, Strichartz. Drug chirality in anesthesia. Anesthesiology . 2002;97:497–502 18. Granry JC, Dube L, Turroques H, et al. Ketamine: new uses for an old drug. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2000; 13: 299–302. 19. Nishizawa Y. Glutamate release and neuronal damage in ischemia. Life Sci 2001; 69: 369–81 Soltanzadeh et al, 2015 VOL: 1, No: 2(march 2015) 33-36 20. Meldrum B. Glutamate as a neurotransmitter in the brain: review of physiology and pathology. J Nutr. 2000; 130:1007S–15. 21. Taggart DP, Sundaram S, McCartney C, Bowman A, McIntyreH, Courtney JM, Wheatley DJ. Endotoxemia, complement, and white blood cell activation in cardiac surgery: a randomized trial of laxatives and pulsatile perfusion. Ann Thorac Surg. 1994; 57: 376–82. 22. Roytblat L, Talmor D, Rachinsky M, et al. Ketamine attenuates the interleukin-6 response after cardiopulmonary bypass. Anesth Analg. 1998; 87:266– 71.. 23. Kawasaki T, Ogata M, Kawasaki C, et al. Ketamine suppresses proinflammatory cytokine production in human whole blood in vitro. Anesth Analg. 1999; 89:665–9. 24. Sakai T, Ichiyama T, Whitten CW, Giesecke AH, Lipton JM. Ketamine suppresses endotoxin-induced Nfkappa B expression. Can J Anaesth. 2000; 47: 1019–24 25. Baldwin AS. Jr. The NF-kappa B and I kappa B proteins: new discoveries and insights. Annu Rev Immunol. 1996; 14: 649–83 26. Arrowsmith JE, Harrison MJ, Newman SP, Stygall J, Timberlake N, Pugsley WB. Neuroprotection of the brainduring cardiopulmonary bypass: a randomized trial of remacemide during coronary artery bypass in 171 patients. Stroke 1998; 29: 2357–62 27. Nagels W, Demeyere R, Van Hemelrijck J, Vandenbussche E, Gijbels K, Vandermeersch E. Evaluation of the neuroprotectiveeffects of S(1)-ketamine during open-heart surgery. AnesthAnalg 2004; 98: 1595– 603 28. Bartoc C, Frumento RJ, Jalbout M, Bennett-Guerrero E, DuE, Nishanian E. A randomized, double-blind, placebocontrolledstudy assessing the anti-inflammatory effectsof ketamine in cardiac surgical patients. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2006; 20: 217–22 29.Slogoff S, Allen GW, Wessels JV, Cheney DH. Clinicalexperience with subanesthetic ketamine. Anesth Analg1974; 53: 354–8 DOI: 36