* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download s Crust and Upper Mantle
Age of the Earth wikipedia , lookup
History of Earth wikipedia , lookup
Schiehallion experiment wikipedia , lookup
History of geology wikipedia , lookup
Future of Earth wikipedia , lookup
Mantle plume wikipedia , lookup
Large igneous province wikipedia , lookup
Post-glacial rebound wikipedia , lookup
Paleostress inversion wikipedia , lookup
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, VOL. 85, NO. B I 1, PAGES 6377-6396, NOVEMBER 10, 1980 Implicationsof Regional Gravity for State Stressin the Earth's Crust and Upper Mantle MARCIA MCNUTT U.S. GeologicalSurvey,Menlo Park, California 94025 Topographyis maintainedby stressdifferenceswithin the earth. Dependingon the distributionof the stresswe classifythe supportaseitherlocal or regionalcompensation.In general,the stresses implied in a regionalcompensationschemeare an order of magnitudelarger than thosecorresponding to local isostasy.Gravity anomalies,a measureof the earth'sdeparturefrom hydrostaticequilibrium,can be usedto distinguishbetweenthe two compensation mechanismsand thusto estimatethe magnitudeof deviatoric stressin the crustand uppermantle.Topographycreatedat an oceanicridgecrestor in a major continental orogeniczoneappearsto be locallycompensated. Suchfeatureswere formedon weak crustincapable of maintainingstressdifferencesmuch greaterthan the stressfrom the applied load. Oceanic volcanoes formed on an already cooled,thickenedlithosphereare regionallysupportedwith elasticstresses.Similarly, the broad topographicriseseawardof subductionzonesis elasticallysupportedasthe lithosphereis bent near the plate margin. Althoughthe implied stressis to somedegreedependenton the theological model assumed,the gravity anomaliesand surfacedeformation producedby thesefeaturesdemonstrate that the upper 30-40 km of the oceaniclithosphereis capableof regionallysupportingstressdifferences in the 100-MPa range. Given certain conditionsof load emplacement,continentalcrustcan also support loads regionallyover 100-m.y. time scales,but the effectsof erosiononly allow an estimateof a lower bound on stress.Data from spaceprobesindicate that the upper layers of other terrestrialplanetsalso supporttopographic-inducedstressdifferencesin excessof 100 MPa. INTRODUCTION permost mantle that supportssignificant deviatoric stress,a Seismologists tell us that abovethe core the mantle reactsas 'lithosphere.'Note that the thicknessof the lithospherecan be an elasticsolid to the passageof seismicdisturbances.The ef- defined on the basisof seismic,thermal, compositional,or mefective seismicrigidity, or resistanceto deformation by shear- chanical properties. We will use the term in the restricted ing stresses, is comparableto the strengthof steel,but this esti- senseof the mechanicallithosphere,that portion of the crust mate only applies to short-periodstressesof relatively small and upper mantle with long-term strength. Within the contextof this discussionwe define 'isostasy'as magnitude. The strength may be much smaller for large stressesof long duration, and in general, the problem dis- the condition in which all stressesare hydrostaticbelow some cussedhere is one of determiningthe earth's 'permanent' re- compensationdepth. This definition encompassesboth local sistanceto shearingstressesas a function of depth, amplitude, and regional compensationmechanisms.A feature is said to and wavelength of the disturbance.This question is funda- be locally compensatedif the total mass in any vertical colmental in that it bears on many other geophysicalproblems, umn above the compensation depth is constant. In this suchas the developmentof mountain chains,long-term verti- scheme, elevated regions are pointwise compensated.A recal motionsof the earth'ssurface,the temperaturestructurein gional mechanismdistributescompensationlaterally around the crust and uppermost mantle, the scale and rate of con- the feature as well as vertically beneath it, implying that shear stressescan be transmitted horizontally. vection, and other aspectsof earth dynamics. We will begin with a brief discussionof Jeffreys' [1924, From an historical viewpoint the first estimatesof stressin 1943, 1976] work, becausehis conceptshave in some way inthe earth were basedon gravity anomalies.The fact that stress differencesexist cannot be denied. Topographicfeaturesalone fluenced the thoughtsof almost all subsequentinvestigators. representa departure from hydrostaticequilibrium, and the The secondsectionconcentrateson strengthestimatesderived earth's reaction to the surfaceload accordingto certain rheo- from measurementsof the longest-wavelengthcomponentsof logical laws providesa meansof distributingthe stresses over the earth's gravity field. The following two sectionsdeal with depth within the earth. Gravity anomaliesare mostoften used oceanicand continental studiesof a more regional dimension. to estimatethe earth's responseto surfacestress,and thus the Finally, the resultsfor the earth are comparedwith stressestimates for the moon and Mars based on recent elevation and stressissuenaturally becomesinvolved with the questionof isostatic compensation.The discussionof stresswithin the gravity measurementsby spaceprobes. earth mustnot be limited to that which is topographica,Hy inJEFFREYS' duced; gravityanomalies alsotell us thatthereexis(mass anomalies, and therefore deviatoric stresses,that are unrelated to existingsurfaceelevations. The purposeof this paper is to review estimatesof earth strength based on gravity observations, although consideration will also be given to studiesof isostaticcompensation based on surface deformation. The prevailing theme that emergesis that there exists a region in the crust and upThis paper is not subjectto U.S. copyright. Publishedin 1980 by the American GeophysicalUnion. Paper number 80B0277. WORK Given only a surfacedistributionof topography,Jeffreys [1976]describes threeapproaches to determiningstress: 1. Assumean earth rheologyand mechanismfor isostatic compensation. Apply the load,allowthe earthto respond,and calculate the stress. 2. Assumethe dynamic processesthat form the topography, and work out the stressconsequences. 3. Calculateall possiblestressdistributions consistent with the surface load. The distribution that attains the least maxi- 6377 6378 MCNUTT: IMPLICATIONS OF GRAVITY FOR STRESS -500 0 0 ioo , , .12 % ..... +..... 50 i , Crmo x = hgp/e ø-mex :.Kn$n h I ot z: • Tr x w0velength of10ud Airy Compensetion• • h0 T -•---a0uguer An•mol• . _•(elestic pluto) '•'"•"••• .... TI TITI• f • • Pm Buoyancy Forces Asthen0sphere (fluid O-max--up t0I0 hg/o/e O-ma x; hgp Fig. 1. Modelsusedby Jefftoys[1976]to calculatestressin the earthfrom surfaceloading.(a) Harmonicloadingon an elasticearth.Maximum stress(amax)dependson the root-mean-square of the topographicstress(s,) and a multiplicative factor(k,), whichdependsonly on harmonicdegree.(6) Harmonicloadingon a flat earth. Orientationof the stressellipsoidis alsoshown.(c) Loadingon an elasticplateoverlyinga fluid. From Bank• et M. [1977],reprintedwith permissionof Blackwell ScientificPublications.(g) Airy compensation. mum stressdifferenceprovidesa lowerboundfor the strength Jeffreysbeginswith the first approach,assumingan elastic rheologyfor the earth. This is basicallya Bouguertheory corThe first two methodsare examplesof the 'forward'prob- rectedfor earth elasticityand makesno assumptionof isoslem in geophysics;the stressanswersare no more valid than tatic compensationby requiringthat the stressbe hydrostatic the assumptions.The first method is often used to test the below somedepth. The value of this approachis twofold. An plausibilityof variousrheologies,usingpredictedstresslevels, analyticsolutioncan be easilyobtained,thusavoidingtedious gravity anomalies,and surfacedeformation as a measure of numericalcalculationof stressdistributions.Secondly,as Jefthe model'sacceptability.The secondapproachis rarely used freysargues,the elastictheory uncorrectedfor isostasygivesa of the earth. owingto a lack of informationon the fundamentals of orog- better estimate of the lower bound on the stress differences be- eny. The third type of analysisrepresentsthe true 'inverse' problem in that the resultsdependonly on the observations, not on the assumptions.It should be remembered that the bound itself is the only quantity of importancein the inverse approach. The stressdistribution that attains the least maxi- causethe entire earth contributesto the supportof the load. If we assumethat the interior of the earth is hydrostaticand thus supportsno stressdifferencesbelow a certaindepth, the maximum stressdifferencein the overlyingelasticlayer must increaseto compensatefor the lossof supportfrom below. Jefmum stressmay not resemble that of the earth, since it was freysalso findsthat the leastmaximum stressdifferencegiven not requiredthat the solutionresultfrom any known or even by the elastictheory is not much more than the value deterplausible earth behavior. mined by the inverseapproach.The reasonfor this perhaps surprising result is that any nonelastic solution for stress TABLE 1. StressFrom Loadingon an ElasticEarth within the earth must increasethe total strainenergyper unit n k. s•, MPa Ao,,,MPa r/a Depth,km volume (Castigliano'sprinciple) even if it does reduce the maximum deviatoricstress.Thus while the inverseapproach 2 3.03 21.3 64.6 0 6400 3 10 30 1.70 1.13 1.025 oo 1.040 106 Pa = 10 bars. 23.4 9.6 3.4 39.8 10.8 3.4 0.591 0.895 0.966 2600 670 220 finds stress solutions that decrease the maximum of a func- tion, it does so at the expenseof increasingthe volume integral of that same function. The result is that stressvalues nearly comparableto the maximum are spreadover a greater volume. MCNUTT: IMPLICATIONS OF GRAVITY The first caseconsideredby Jeffreysis that of a surfaceharmonicload restingon an incompressible elasticsphere(Figure la). Let snequal the root-mean-squarevariation of the topographicstressof degreen as given in termsof fully normalized spherical harmonics. The maximum stressdifference in the sphere from the applied normal stressis given by kns, in which k,is a multiplicativefactor dependentonly on n and is located at a depth of approximately 1/n times the sphere's radius.Using the valuesfor k,and depth from Jeffreys[1943] and the topographycoefficientsfor the earth from Balmino et al. [1973], we can constructTable 1 of stressdifferencesAo, defined as the difference between the maximum FOR STRESS 6379 the plate leads to departuresfrom perfect local isostasyfor short-wavelength loads, but longer-wavelength loads are nearly locally compensated.For a 1-km-amplitude harmonic load of density2500kg/m3 and wavelength450 km the maximum stressdifferencein the plate reaches300 MPa. In general, for a floating crustthe maximum stressmay be as much as 10 times the amplitude of the surfacestress.Jeffreysconcludes that if mountainsare supportedby a floating elastic plate, laboratory measurementson the strengthof rocks indicatethat long-wavelengthinequalities5 km in height should cause fracture of the crust. and mini- Taking again the case in which strengthis uniform with mum principle stresses,and distancefrom the center of the depth, nonelasticsolutionsdo not reduce the maximum stress earth in fraction of earth radius that the stress maximum ocsignificantly.The greatestimprovementis found for harmonic curs.The numbersin this table reveal a theme that reappears loads of degree2 and 3, for which the reductionin necessary in many later studies.For degreeshigher than n -- 10 the strength is from 5 to 30%. For two-dimensional harmonic maximum stress difference is less than 10 MPa and occurs at loading on a planar boundary,however,the reductionin the decreasingdepths.Although estimatesof the strengthof the maximum stressdifference from the elastic solution is only about 7%. earth's uppermostregionsvary [Lainbeck, 1972],the 10 MPa necessaryto support the topographicstressassumingan elasA familiar example of a nonelasticsolution for a floating tic rheology is well within even the most conservativeesti- crust is the Airy isostaticmechanism,shown in Figure ld. mates.The low-order harmonicsdo presenta problem, how- Compensationfor surfacefeaturesis achievedby thickening ever. While it is highly probable that rocks withstand stress the•:rust belowelevated regions. Forperfectisostatic equilibdifferencesat leastastarge as 70 MPa in crustalenvironments, rium the vertical pressurefrom the load is balanced by the it is unlikely that the requisitestrengthis presentin the mantle buoyancypressurefrom fluid displacedby a root of depth w: betweenthe lithosphereand the core. If we require that the wgAp -----hgp, where Ap is the density differencebetween the supportfor the low-orderharmonicslie in the lithosphere,the fluid and the crustand h the land elevationof densityp. The maximum stress difference can increase to several hundred maximum stressdifferencein the crust for this compensation megapascals. distributionis equal to the magnitudeof the load. For smallFor features less than a few hundred kilometers in horizonwavelength featuresthe elastic solution describedabove gives tal scale,Jeffreysadoptsa flat earth model, shownin Figure a smaller stressmaximum, but for wavlengths longer than lb. Given a normal stress distribution with harmonic form 2.6Te the Airy mechanismis optimal. Therefore the local isostasy statement that mass per unit area is constant does not p• = t•ghcos(•x) lead to the smallest maximum stress differences in all cases. If where p is the load density,the maximum stressdifferenceis of the order of 2pgh/e and occursat a depth of 1/2•r times the wavelengthof the load. The stresssolutionsfor loads modeled as raisedstripswith rectangularor triangular sectionare similar; in general, the greateststressdifferencein the elastic theory is betweenone half and two thirdsof the rangeof the load stress,and the greateststrengthis neededat a depth about one quarter of the width of the load. Applying theseapproximate equationsto the Himalayas, for which Jeffreysassumesa height differenceof 5 km betweenpeaks and troughsand a chain width of 100 km, he estimates that stress differences reach 450 MPa at depths of 20-30 km if the mountains are elasticallysupported. Jeffreys'flat earth treatment can be modified to include the effectsof isostasyby assumingthat the elasticsupportresides only in a thin elasticplate overlyinga fluid that can support no shearstresses (Figure lc). For loadswith small amplitude and wavelengthlessthan Te, the thicknessof the plate, the abovesolutionapproximatelyholdsbecausethe regionof appreciable stressesresidesabove the fluid. For loads whose wavelengthis long in relation to the thicknessof the elastic layer, the thin-plate equationsfrom elasticplate theorycan be applied. Jeffreysconsidersa casein which the plate is 50 km thick. The flexural rigidity ETe3 D= 12(1-v2) (1) where E is Young's modulusand v is Poisson'sratio, correspondingto this Tevalue is 9 x 10•3 N m. The supportfrom the definitionof isostasyis amendedto requirethat the maximum stress difference be minimized and in addition that all stressesbe hydrostaticbelow the compensationdepth, then the Airy mechanismwould not be acceptable.However, free air gravity anomaliesin the minimum stressstate would be larger than what is actually observed. Although the Airy mechanismbetter agreeswith observationsbecausethe compensation is total and extendsto all wavelength features, the model is unrealistic.The requirementthat small changesin the load producevertical motion of crustalblocksthat rigidly opposeany horizontalmovementimpliesthat crustalmaterial is infinitely anisotropicto deformation. Artyushkov[1973, 1974]has elaboratedon this point. While local isostasyrequiresonly that vertical forcesequilibrate,the true stable position of the crust balancesvertical forces,horizontal forces, and all moments. Deviatoric stressescannot be homogeneouslydistributed over depth if a layer is locally compensated.Departures of a locally compensatedcrust from true equilibrium are inverselyproportional to the characteristic horizontal scale of the topography or density inhomogeneity. Thus appreciable displacementsof the crust from isostasywill occur only for very narrow features. Given only the horizontal and vertical structure of lithosphericdensity inhomogeneities,Artyushkov[1973] devisesa method of estimatingdeviatoric stressaveragedover the lithospheric thickness.These stressesarise from lateral density and thicknessinhomogeneitiesin an isostaticallycompensated crust.The buoyancyforce at any density discontinuityis ented along the normal to the interface, which may not coincide with the vertical direction. For sloping interfaces, only 6380 MCNUTT: IMPLICATIONS OF GRAVITY FOR STRESS TABLE 2. Artyushkov'sStressEstimates Feature Stress,MPa T•, km MidoceanRidge Crest - 24 50 Margin (EastPacificRise) Margin (Mid-Atlantic Ridge) - 55 -140 50 50 10 80 60 80 110 80 200 80 Continents Margin 3-km uplift, supportedby crustal root 5-km uplift, supportedby While it is not yet possibleto discountfinite strengthentirely in the lower mantle, the attenuationof upward-continuedpotential fieldsmakes it unlikely that any but the longest-wavelength anomalieswould have sourcedepthsgreater than 900 km. Therefore if the gravity anomalies originate below the lithosphere,they more likely pertain to the convectionproblem. Any gravity anomalies that do reside within the lithospheremay provide an estimateof its strength,but the possibility still remains that mass anomalieslocated within the lithosphereare dynamically maintained by vertical forces at its base. crustal root A method adoptedby severalinvestigators[Cruierand Newton, 1965; Allen, 1972; Khan, 1977] for determining source depthsfor low degreesof the global gravity field is basedon the assumptionthat the gravity anomalies are produced by the vertical componentof the buoyancyforce is balancedby randomly distributeddensityvariations.The assumptionof a the weightof the topography,leavingan unbalancedhorizon- white spectrum for the density variations is sufficiently retal component.For severalexamplesof areas with strong strictiveto permit a unique inversionfor either the depth from crustalstructure,estimatesof the averagedeviatoricstressare which the density anomaliesshould extend uniformly downgiven in Table 2. ward or the depth of a single-densityinterface concentrating Note that only the product of averagestresstimes litho- the anomalies.The resultsare dependenton the particular set sphericthicknessTe is determinedby Artyushkov'sanalysis. of potential coefficientsused [Higbie and Stacey, 1971],but a The resultsin Table 2 may underestimatethe deviatoricstress recent analysisby Khan [1977] showsthat the latest satellite for the assumedmodels,sinceit is unlikely that the earth sup- and combination solutions, WGS 72, Gem 7, Gem 8, and 2-km uplift, supportedby low-densitymantle portslarge stressdifferencesbelow 40-50 km. The assumed PGS 110, are consistentto degree 10 or 11. densitystructureis also critical to Artyushkov'scalculation. Assuminga single-densityinterface, the sourcedepths acHowever, with deep seismicsoundingand gravity data it is cording to Khan [1977] are 600-800 km for n -- 2 to n -- 11 possibleto resolvesomeof thesedetailsof crustalstructure. and 300-600 km for n -- 11 to n -- 30. Shallower depths are Further data are needed to determine the actual stress disfound on the assumptionof a disorderedmantle below the tribution within the lithosphere.In particular,the tectonicim- specifieddepth: 150-370 km for n -- 2 to n -- 11 and 150-450 plicationsof the stresses in Table 2 dependprimarily on the km for n -- 11to n -- 30. Only the anomalous part of C2ø relahorizontal and vertical viscositydistribution in the litho- tive to the best fitting satellitereferenceellipsoidwas used in sphere,which we are only beginningto understand.Never- the analysis.The nonhydrostatic part of C2ø is aboutan order theless,Artyushkov[1973]proposesa schemeof globaltecton- of magnitude greater than the next largest coefficientand ics in which horizontal motions are driven by lateral tendsto bias the third- and fourth-degreecomponentstoward spreadingof crustaldensityand thicknessinhomogeneities. greaterdepth. Continued differentiation of the core releasesbuoyant mateWe could conclude from Khan's analysis that the major rial that ascendsthrough the mantle, forming the roots for contributionto the global gravity field is from sublithospheric new uplifts.Thuschemicaldifferentiationprovidesthe driving depth and thereforemust be maintainedby convection.Howmechanism.At presentthere is little supportfor Artyushkov's ever, Goodacre [1978] has questioned the assumption that proposal;sinceit is not possibleto fix all ridgecrestswith re- densityvariationsare uncorrelatedwithin the earth. The fact spectto the lowermantle,it becomesdifficultin Artyushkov's that the sourcedepth dependson n may reflect the existence schemeto explain the continuedexistenceof individual ridge of severalwarped discontinuitysurfaces,but it alsomay result systemsover long geologictime spans.Many other mechani- from a red-shiftedspectrumof densityvariations.To illustrate cal, geochemical, and observational objectionscouldbe listed, this point, Goodacre[1978] considersthe earth's surface tobut they do not directly bear on the resultsof Table 2. The pography.The amplitude spectrumis not white; it varies as fact remainsthat in regionsof relief on internal densityinter- (2n + 1)-•/: [Balminoet al., 1973].Usingthe potentialcoeffi- faces as well as on the earth's surface, deviatoric stressesexist, and they are of the order of a hundredmegapascals. GLOBAL STUDIES The globalgravityfield revealsdeparturesfrom hydrostatic equilibrium that extendover thousandsof kilometers.If these featuresare supportedin an isostaticsenseby the lithosphere, their continuedexistenceimplies significantfinite strength. There is, however,a dynamicalternativeto staticsupport;the anomaliescould be maintained by flow in the mantle. On the assumptionthat the lithosphereis the only regionof the earth with appreciablestrength,depth of the causativemasscan be usedasthe criterionfor distinguishing betweenthesetwo possibilities. Evidence from glacial rebound, isostatic compensation,and seismicstudiesconfirmsthe existenceof an extremely weak asthenosphereunderlying the lithosphere. cientsfor the gravity field from the topography,the depth estimate for the topography on the assumptionthat the density variations have a fiat spectrumis a few hundred kilometers, rather than the expectedzero depth. There is no reasonto believe that internal density variations are any more random than those at the surface,and therefore the above depth estimates may be meaningless.Overall, this approach to interpretingthe globalgravity field is not highlypromising,sinceit involvesvirtually untestableassumptionsconcerningthe statistical behavior of inhomogeneitiesdeep within the mantle. While the above procedure was designedto directly estimate source depth for gravity anomalies, McKenzie [1967] posedthe problemin the reversemanner:If we supposethat gravity anomaliesare supportedby the lithosphere,then what stressesare implied? McKenzie then rejects a lithospheric sourcefor anomaliesthat require stressesabove an assumed MCNUTT: TABLE 3. Lambeck's IMPLICATIONS Stress Estimates n' Omax, MPa 4 5 6 7 875 487 313 219 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 166 129 103 84 70 59 49 15 16 , OF GRAVITY 39 31 ultimate strength.He restrictsdiscussionto gravity anomalies that are produced by uncompensatedwarping of an elastic lithosphere, which could reasonably apply to subducting platesand broad lithosphericswells.Although it might be argued that these large-scale plate deformations are a consequenceof mantle flow, the only concernhere is whether the lithospherecan maintain the configurationonce it has been established. From observedgravity and geoidanomalyamplitudesand wavelengths, McKenzie calculates a minimum stressof 83 MPa to supportplate flexurenear the Tonga and PuertoRico trenches,assuminga 50-km-thicklithosphere.For a 100-kmthick plate the stressestimateis reduced to 22 MPa. The decision as to whether the support for these features is derived from the lithosphere hinges on the choice for its ultimate FOR STRESS 6381 errorin McKenzie's equations andhisuseof a two-dimensional geometry. For a three-dimensionalgeometry, Lambeck constructsa table of averagemaximum stressarisingfrom gravity anomalies of degreen' and higher, assumingthey are supportedby a 100-km-thick lithosphere (Table 3). With Lambeck's preferred 100- to 150-MPa estimatefor the critical strengthof the lithosphere,it is possiblestaticallyto supportanomaliesof degree 8 or 9 and greater. Lambeck [1972] emphasizesthe point that the broad positive anomaliesdescribedby harmonicdegreesn -- 8 and n = 9 over spreadingcentersneed not be maintainedby convective forces,but this conclusiondependson the assumedthickness of the lithosphere.Isostaticstudiesindicate that the mechanical lithosphereis only 30 km or so thick. For a more realistic lithosphericthickness,the stressesin Table 3 would increase by a factor of 9. Chase[1979], like McKenzie [1967] and Lambeck[1972], favors the forward approachto modeling the long wavelengths of the gravity and geoid anomalies.Rather than considering the effectsof a warped lithosphere,he attributesthe anomalies to uncompensatedpoint massesat depth. Much of the geoid character in harmonics 10 through 20 can be explained by positive mass anomalies in the worldwide subductionzone system. The stressesimplied by the uncompensatedmass range from a minimum 22 MPa for the Zagros subduction zone to a maximum 162 MPa for the Ryukuyu Trench, assuminga 100-km-thick plate. The required massexcessis, in most cases,lessthan the amount predictedby thermal plate models [e.g., McKenzie, 1969]. Thus stressestimatesbased on a mathematicalformulation of densityexcessin a subducting slabwill be larger than thoseconsistentwith the gravity field. Although the models of McKenzie, Lambeck, and Chase are useful for estimatingstressimplied by the global gravity field, thesemodels are static and thus do not answerthe question of whether the lithospherealone supportsits anomalous strength.McKenzie citeslaboratoryexperimentsby Griggset al. [1960] that produce shear failure in dunite at 400-MPa stress.He rejectsthis strengthestimatein favor of the 20 MPa impliedby earthquakestressdrops[BruneandAllen, 1967].As McKenzie admits, there is little justificationfor this choice. The amountof stressdrop during a seismicrupture can only be a lowerboundon the shearstrengthof the lithosphere.On mass and sustains its deformation. Nevertheless, the reoccurthe basis of his choice of 20 MPa a 100-km-thick elastic lithoring themefrom thesestudiesis that for a varietyof plausible sphereis necessary to maintainthe subductionzone gravity anomalysources,gravityanomalieswith wavelengthsbetween anomalies against shear failure. The longer-wavelength 5000 and 1000 km require that the earth in someway (conanomalies representedin the satellite gravity field and the vectivelyor otherwise)maintain stressdifferencesfrom 20 geoid, however,require 100 MPa or more of stresseven for a MPa to near 200 MPa. 100-km-thick lithosphere. McKenzie concludes that these anomaliesmustbe maintainedby flowin themantleand may OCEANIC STUDIES be a consequence of small temperatureinhomogeneities. Kaula [1969, 1972] continueswith McKenzie's theme that the supportfor the satellite-derivedgravity field must lie below the lithosphereand entailsflow in the mantle. He proposesa tectonicclassification of the long-wavelength gravity anomaliescorrespondingto degreesn -- 6 to n -- 16 basedon an associationwith tectonicfeaturessuchas subductionzones, ridge crests,orogenicbelts, sedimentarybasins,and areas of Pleistocene glaciation.Of the 11 classifications, 6 correspond to currentlyactivetectonicfeatures.If indeedthe lithosphere is incapable of supportingstatically the gravity anomalies overthesefeatures,thenthe magnitudeandsignof the gravity anomaliesprovideinformationconcerningmantleconvection. Lambeck [1972] challengesthe assumptionthat the anomalies observedin the sateBRite gravityfield cannotbe supported by the lithosphere.His greatestobjectionis with McKenzie's 20-MPa stresslimit, which he considersto be too low by at least a factor of 4. Lambeck also concludes that McKenzie's stressestimatesare overestimatedby a factor of 2 due to an Long- WavelengthAnomalies The vastimprovementin satelliteand surface-shipgravimetry fosterednew attemptsin the mid-1970'sto determinethe sourceof long-wavelengthgravity anomalies[Andersonet al., 1973; Menard, 1973; Weisseland Hayes, 1974; $clater et al., 1975; Watts, 1976]. These investigationsall center on oceanic observationsin order to avoid the complexitiesof continental crustal structureand tectonic history, and they share a common line of reasoning.Numerical simulationsof mantle convectionin a NewtonJanfluid [e.g.,McKenzie et al., 1974] predict a positive surface elevation and gravity anomaly over risingconvectionlimbs for both high and low Rayleigh number flow. Thus positivelycorrelatedgravity and depth anomaliesprovidea strongcasefor convectionin the mantle,particularly when lithospheric sourcesfor the anomaliescan be ruled out. Although the calculationof residualdepth anomalies is tedious in that it involves systematicallycorrecting bathymetricdata for sedimentloading and the empirical age- 6382 MCNUTT: IMPLICATIONS OF GRAVITY Free o•r Grovdy Anomaly FOR STRESS more convincingby comparingthe ratio of Fourier transforms of the gravity and bathymetrydata with the theoreticaladmittance from convection models: Z(k) = C•)/H(k) + 32_.5 •=75km Te:50 km .• -- +221 Observed +16.6 Te=30km [McKenzie, 1977], where uppercasevariables denote Fourier transformsof gravity g and topographyh and k is the modulus of k. Most of the analysescomputeda regressionfrom 5ø x 5o data averagesand thereforegive an admittanceestimate at only one k value. In addition, from what is known of lithosphericbehavior throughisostaticcompensationand glacial reboundstudies,it is uncharacteristic of the lithosphereto sustainindefinitelyuncompensatedwarps thousandsof kilometersin extent without some incentive from below. Even if we do supposethat upward flexuresare causedby the risingof low-densitymaterial from the mantle, the gravity anomaliesare too ambiguousto define the distribution of the load. The magnitude of the deviatoric Te •O•m_. F stresses associated with the observed surface strain could be several tens of MPa or several hundred MPa, de+198 pending on how the supportis applied. Isostatic Compensation + 395 Te=lOk Topography I00 [Watts, 1978;Cochran,1979;McNutt, 1979].Thesegravity MGAL anomalies,in the wavelengthrange from 20 to 1000 km, are distinctlyof lithosphericoriginand thuspertainmoredirectly , IOO0] •. Meters 01 .•!.'::, . ?-' _1000• ... In the oceans,about 50% of the power in the gravity spectrum is related to the compensation of oceanic features problemof lithosphericstrength.The choicebetween IOOKM 0 :37906 tolocaltheand regionalcompensation for a particularfeaturecan Fig. 2. Comparison of observedand computed free air gravity anomaly profiles of the Hawaiian ridge near Oahu. The computed profilesare basedon the elasticplate model and assumedvaluesof Te of 10, 20, 30, 50, and 75 km. The best overall fit to the observeddata is for Te -- 30 km. From Watts et al. [1980]. be decidedon the basisof gravity anomaliesalone.Figure 2, from Wattset al. [ 1980],comparesthe observedfree air grav- ity anomalyover Oahu with theoreticalgravityfrom elastic plate models.An extremelythin platemodel(Te -- 10 km) poorlypredicts theobserved gravity;theanomaly froma local compensation mechanism (Te -- O)wouldgivea worsefit yet. Largepositivefreeair gravityanomalies flankedby encircling depthrelation[Sclateret aL, 1971],the remainderof the anal- troughsoverOahuandotherislandsandseamounts demand ysisconsistsof simply calculatingregressionlines of gravity regional compensation.Such featurestherefore are more on bathymetry. likely to placea lower boundon the strengthof the lithoAndersonet al. [1973],for example,claim that a 0.33 gravity sphere;they are very large,relativelyuneroded,and regionunit (gu)/m correlation between gravity and bathymetry holdsfor the worldwide ocean-ridgesystem.On an ocean-byocean basis,however, the correlation is convincingonly for the Atlantic and the SouthwestIndian Ridge [seeAndersonet aL, 1973, Figure 3], and even the Indian Ocean correlation disappearsif the data from the Madagascarplateau are removed. In addition, Watts [1976] questionsthe reliability of the resultsof Andersonet al. [1973], Menard [1973], and Weissel and Hayes [1974],which are all basedon the SE 2 gravity field [Gaposchkinand Lambeck, 1971]. A comparisonof the ally supported. Models proposedto explain the bathymetry,gravity anomalies, and deformation of the Moho boundary in the vicinity of theselargeislandsand seamounts assumethat the asthenospherebehaves,for loadingtime scalesgreaterthan 30,000 years,as an inviscidfluid and that the lithosphere can be describedby oneof the followingtheologies:(1) perfectlyelastic [Gunn,1943; Walcott,1970b],(2) elasticwith discontinuig. y at a free edgeunderthe load [Walcott,1970b;Wattsand Cochran, 1974], (3) viscoelastic,(4) layered viscoelasticwith viscosity SE 2 field with sea surface data and the more recent Gem 6 decreasingwith depth [Suyenaga, 1977], and (5) elasticsolution[Lerchet aL, 1974]revealsthat anomalypeakscan be perfectlyplastic[Liu and Kosloff,1978].The simplestmodel, offsetas much as 900 km, half the wavelengthof interest,in a continuouselasticplate, almostcertainly over-estimatesthe the SE 2 field. stressfor a given load. Any attempt to incorporatemore realIn any case it is unlikely that analysisof very long wave- istic theologicalbehavior into the lithospherecan only serve lengthgravity and topographicanomalieswill provide much to reducethe implied stress.For the purposeof this discussion information concerningthe strengthof the lithosphere. Re- we wish to determine how much the stress can be lowered gardlessof whetheror not the lithospherecould supportthe without violating the observations. The trend in recentyearstoward increasingcomplexityand observedgravity anomalies,the agreementbetweentheoretical calculations and observed regressionslopes favors con- number of free parametersin the models has been dictated with the implied stresses than by revectivesupport.The casefor convectioncould be made even more by dissatisfaction MCNUTT: IMPLICATIONS OF GRAVITY FOR STRESS 6383 Fig. 3. Examples of twoelasticplatemodels.Uppermodel:continuous elasticplateof thickness T•;Pcis thedensityof the materialoverlyingthe lithosphere andPmis thedensityof the asthenosphere. Lowermodel:elasticplatefracturedunder the load axis. From Walcott [1976]. fmement in the observations.Consider, for example, the thinplate equation 3 km high and 30 km wide is 200 MPa. Even taking into account the three-dimensionalityand distributednature of real loads, McNutt and Menard [1978] calculate 200-MPa stress Dvnw(x)+ Apgw(x)= P under Tahiti usinga best fitting 14-km elasticplate thickness. where D is the flexural rigidity given by (1), w the plate deflec- Walcott [1976] considers200 MPa to be the 'crushingstrength tion, Ap the density contrastfor materials overlying and un- of rock' and predictsthat failure should occur. Model 2 in Figure 3 reducesthe maximum stressby removderlying the plate, and P the applied load. The solution for plate deflectionof a continuouselasticsheet(Figure 3) under ing the point of maximum curvature.The equationfor the deflection of a plate with a free edge beneath the load is a line load, such as a seamount chain, is w = B exp (-x/a) w = exp (-x/a)A[cos (x/a) + sin (x/a)] in which the flexural parameter a is related to D by where B = P/Apga Ol 4 '- 4D/Apg The value of A is determinedby the isostaticcondition cos (x/a) The bending stressis -2EzB P= 2 Apgw(x)dx and therefore o•= a2 exp(-x/a)sin(x/a) and reachesits maximumat x/a = •r/2 (the firstnodalpoint): A = P/2Apga The bendingstressox is proportionalto d2w/dx2. ' -2EzA -2EzP O.... -- Apa3 exp (-•r/2) A load P that would produce 100 MPa of stresson a continuousplate would produceonly about 40 MPa bendingstresson a fractured plate. While the discontinuousplate reducesthe where E is Young's modulusand z the vertical distancewithin implied stress,Walcott[1970b]found that he wasunableto sithe plate from the neutral plane. The maximum for this funcmultaneouslyfit Moho depth, flexural wavelength,and bathtion occursat x -- 0 and is given by ymetrywith one valuefor the flexuralrigidity of the fractured plate. Moreover, while it might be reasonableto supposethat -EzP during magmatic activity the lithosphericplate is weakened Oxmax = Apga3 and possiblydecoupledbelow the load, it is difficult to justify Walcott [1976] calculatesthat the maximum bendingstress a free edge boundary condition for regionsin which volcanic at the baseof a 60-km-thick plate loaded by a seamountchain activity has ceased[Liu and Kosloff, 1978]. o,,= a2 exp(-x/a)[cos (x/a)- sin(x/a)] 6384 MCNUTT: IMPLICATIONSOF GRAVITY FOR STRESS A viscoelasticplate can alsoreducestressfor a given flexure profile. The behaviorof a plate with a viscousin addition to an elasticresponseis to relax its elasticstresses as loading time increases.Given an initial viscoelasticrigidity Do for loading times short in relation to the viscoelasticrelaxation time r, the plate appearsto be perfectlyelastic.For loadingtimeslong in relation to r the flexuralwavelengthdecreases, and the amplitude increases.If we were to interpret a viscoelasticplate profile in termsof the perfectlyelasticequations,it would appear that the flexural rigidity waslessthan Do. The importantpoint for the implied stressesis that the observedcurvature of the plate is no longer proportionalto the stressbecausesomeof the strainis nonrecoverable,nonelasticdeformationcausedby viscousflow. For any t > 0 then the stresswill alwaysbe overestimatedif the strain is assumedto be perfectlyelastic.Nadai [1963]derivesthe followingexpression for the remainingelastic deformation in which a04= 4Do Apg Yo =X/ao y=x/a and 4t/r = (ao/a)4- 1 - In (ao/a)4 The integrationof (4) is not easily accomplishedwith the systemof equationsin this form. For small t, however,we can estimatean upper bound for the remaining elasticdeflection w' by puttinga lower boundon $w exp (-t/r) dt: w'(t) = w(t) - e-'/'w(O) = w(t) - w(O){1- exp(-t/r)} w' in terms of the viscoelastic deflection w at a time t after the emplacementof the load: w'(t) --w(t) - exp (-t/r) t w(t')exp(t'/r)dt' Doexp[-t/r(1+ 14k4)] 1+ ink 4{1- exp [-t/r(1+/4k4)]} (5) Substitutingfor w from (4) into (5), we obtain (2) The reductionin maximum stressfor a viscoelasticrheology as comparedwith an elasticone dependson the ratio t/r, and thereforewe need an estimateof r for the oceaniclithosphere. Walcott [1970a] interpretsnumerousapparent flexural rigidities D' from continental and oceanic loading studies in terms of a viscoelasticplate model. From a trend toward decreasingD' with increasingload age he estimatesr -- 105 years. There are severalproblemscomplicatingWalcott's interpretation. Known differencesin continental and oceanic thermal structuresuggestthat apparentelasticthicknesses will vary. Firstly, some of the differencesin D' may result from variations in initial rigidity Do quite apart from any relaxation. Secondly,the loadingtimesfor PleistocenelakesAlgonquin and Agassiz are less than 10,000 years. The asthenospherecannot be treated as a fluid on suchshort time scales, and the loadsno doubt did not reachequilibrium. Finally, the relation between D' and Do for linearly viscoelasticplate is [McNutt and Parker, 1978] D'-- er/' dt' (3) where P {1(e_•o cos Yo - e-•cos y) 2-pg + SinYO)(e-t/' I [e_yo (cos Yo - In(ao/a))] } + -- 0lo The bendingstressis proportionalto the secondderivative of w', which has a singularityat the origin. In the physicalworld, however, we would not encounter this point of infinite viscoelasticcurvature,sincepoint loads do not exist. For points other than x -- 0 the curvature d•w ' remains finite and is p •dx= Apgao 3{yo-3(e -yo cos yo- e-ycos y) + yo-2[e -yø(cosYo+ sinYo)- (ao/a)e-• (cosy + siny)] + yo-'[e-yøsinYo- (ao/a)2e -y siny] + [e-'/' - In (ao/a)le-yø(sinYo- cosYo)} This expressionwas evaluated at the crest of the first flexure arch for valuesof t/r = 0.02568and t/, -- 3.0568,with ao -- 50 km. In each casethe stresswas comparedwith the stressimplied by a purely elastic plate with the same flexural wavelength.For the shortloadingtime t/r -- 0.02568the reduction elasticplate modelby using(2) and the equationfor viscoelastic deflection at timet froma constant lineload[Nadai, in stressfor the viscoelastic rheologyis 5%.When the loading time is of the orderof 3 timesthe viscoelastic decaytime, the stressreductioncalculatedis 15%, but this is only a lower bound, becausefor large t the approximationmade in evaluatingthe integralin (2) is no longervalid. Thereforewe may concludethat interpretingflexure profilesin terms of a viscoelasticrather than an elastic plate model leads to lower stressestimates,but the differenceis significantonly for loads much older than r. If r is of the order of 100,000years,we couldpresumethat for loadsa million yearsor older, appre- 1963]: ciable stress relaxation P = Do/Apg Apparentflexuralrigidities canonlybe compared if theyare determinedfrom loadsof the samewavelength • -- 2•r/k. A valuefor r aslow as 10• yearswouldindeedgreatlydecreasethe elasticstresses impliedby present-dayloads.We can approximatethe reductionin stressfor a givenflexural profile when interpretedin termsof a viscoelasticrather than w(x) --2-•pg'(e-yø cos Yo - e-ycos y) 1[e_•o (cos Yo Yo)l [1In(ao/a)l} (4) + -- + sin - has occurred. However, flexural evidencefrom the Hawaiian-Emperor seamountchain is incompatiblewith a 10• year value for r. Assumingan initial plate thicknessof 90 km, Watts [1978] findsthat the present-day20- to 30-km apparentplate thicknessunder the islandof Hawaii requiresa r value of 105-106 years.Flexure beneaththe older Emperorseamountsnorth of MCNUTT: IMPLICATIONS OF GRAVITY FOR STRESS 0 Km 20 0 60 I00 140 I I I • 6385 strain rate; •1 = 3.4 x 108kbar-n s--l; n=3; G-- 30; I 80 o• ,ooo"•] r ø b0•Om ' Tm T •ooo o melting temperatureat ambient pressure; actual temperatureat depth z; deviatoric stress. m The numericalconstantsin this empiricalcreeplaw are taken from the work of Carter [1975], Weertman and Weertman [1975], and Kirby [1977]. The creep strain is estimatedfrom the elasticstresses and homologoustemperature(T/Tm) curve Fig. 4. Creep in a finite element viscous-elasticplate under constant load. (a) Cross section of an 80-km-thick plate showing the from Mercier and Carter [ 1975]. 3. Assume the creep strain is an initial strain within the spreadof fluid elementsas time progresses. The numbersindicate whichregionsof the plate have relaxedto the point of becomingfluid plate and return to step 1. When the creepstrainin a plate eleelementsat 1, 3, and 5 x 10n yearsaftertheloadis applied.Thesere- ment becomesgreater than the elastic strain, the element is •iI Deflection gionssupportno shearstress.(b) Vertical displacementw at the plate considered to be a fluid. surface.The arrows indicate the location of maximum displacement at 0 and at I and 3 x 10n years.After Suyenaga [1977]. 40øN impliesTe-- 10-20 km and r -- 106-107years.Watts interprets this discrepancy in viscoelasticrelaxation times to mean that significantrelaxation does not occur in the Pacific plate over 50-m.y. time scales.He prefers a model in which flexural rigidity doesnot decreasein time but is a function of the age and therefore of the thicknessof the oceanicplate when the load is applied. The lower flexural rigiditiesfor the Emperor seamountsrelative to the Hawaiian Archipelagoare explained by a younger age, and therefore a lower elastic thickness,for the regionof the Pacificplate beneaththe Emperor Seamountswhen the chain wascreated50-60 m.y. ago. The very low flexural rigidity and thin elasticplate thickness found by Cochran [1979] and McNutt [1979] for the topography in the vicinity of PacificspreadingcenterssupportsWatts' interpretation. Regardlessof whether or not viscoelasticrelaxation does occur, the implications for stressare not affected for long decay times. For r greater than 50 m.y., no appreciablestress relaxation has occurred for Hawaii, Tahiti, and other relatively young oceanicloads.Both elasticand viscoelasticplate modelspredict stresses exceeding100 MPa. Another variation on the elasticplate model is the layered plate in which relaxationbeginsat the baseof the lithosphere and migratesupward. This schemeis appealing from a theologicalviewpoint becausethe temperaturedependenceof viscosity predictsthat viscositydecreaseswith depth. Suyenaga [1977] usesa finite elementscheme[Zienkiewicz,1971]to investigatethe time history of flexure for a plate with depthdependent viscosity. He terms this plate model 'viscouselastic' to distinguish it from the viscoelasticmodel whose propertiesare constantwith depth. Suyenaga'sprocedurecan be outlined as follows: Elastic elementsbegin to become fluid at the base of the lithosphere first where T/Tm is a maximum, although, as shownin Figure 4a, the pattern is alsoinfluencedby the stress distributionfrom the flexure.The flexuralrigidity of the plate thereforedecreaseswith time becausethe nonfluid portion of the thermal (• 100 km) lithospherethat actually supportsthe loaddecreases with time. The upwardspreadof fluid elements practicallyhalts after about 106yearsat depthsbetween15 and 30 km, where T = 0.3Tmto 0.5Tm[Murrell, 1976]. Below this depth interval, stressrelaxation is complete,while above, relaxation is only partial and does not change appreciably over loading time scales.As a resultof the partial relaxation the stressin the upper, long-termelasticportion of the plate is lessthan what would be estimatedfrom elastic theory. The evolutionof the surfacedisplacementasthe fluid elementsmigrate upward, shownin Figure 4b, is similar to that of the viscoelasticlithospherewith no depth dependencein the viscosity. The important difference in the two models is that relaxation eventually ceasesin a viscous-elasticlithosphere before the effective rigidity reacheszero. The viscous-elasticmodel is intended to explain why the apparentelasticthicknessof the oceaniclithosphereis only a fraction of its seismicthickness[Hanks, 1971, 1977]. We can also estimate its long-term stressimplicationsby considering the strain rate at the baseof the 30-km-thick elasticlayer as- sumingT = 0.5Tin.From (6), • -- 2.4 X 10-m7/S, which equals 7.5 x 10-n/m.y., for a deviatoricstressof 200 MPa. In the viscoelasticplate model it is assumedthat strain rate depends linearly on stress: • = (1/•t)o •t = Er/3 •_•o 1. Apply a load at time zero to a plate 100 km thick, and using the finite element method, numerically calculate the elastic displacementand stressaccordingto the elastic plate equations. 2. Calculate the amount of creep that will occur at any point within the plate during a time incrementAt accordingto a creep law basedon experimentaldata [Weertman, 1970] • øo • = •1on exp (-GTm/T) (6) 5 STRAIN,• I0 15 (0/0) Fig. 5. Stress-strain curvefor dunite at 500-MPa confiningpressure, in which 800øC,and 5 x 10-4 s-• strainrate.After Griggset al. [1960]. 6386 Predictionof the Rheologyof the Flexed Lithosphere , , from OlivineDeformation Maps Depth(km.) for olderoceaniclithosphere 0 20 40 [ :;' / • 60 80 i00 I.......[..... I......•...... I .. [ ,._.1 ,7'• '%, '• • - ......... • . •, /N?, . •-- .', o i Moxirnurn / • ,•-•,• X¾, • xx•.Xl • xxx-- .• nd 10 •, bending / '.,'VI•%•i • '• ,I • x •- I0'1o, - io2 I/_. ? / / X ,¾|lJ•'\x\ ,E •, _'•J ..-, !/ / ';/ / / /!.' qj\ "• ,"P, _.. J/ CREEP dJ=lV '._•\,,-r16i• Ira,-,-•_ -• / . J,".;,-r18 2" I0 r-•Jvvr_.• L_/-WV t,\ CREEP /I - j/,.. I • , ø --- ,, "Elastic ' ! Temperature (øC x l0 ) I C'i!!!i/ ' ' ' ' ' /•. Base of the Lithosphere ..... ( Newtonian ) C•?•.•.,•c Diffusional Law : •:•:• ....................................... •;•Plastic /, Cree•' • / /// ////. [ RhealogicalZonation of the Lithosphere Fig.6. Olivine deformation mapwithsuperimposed upper bound stress distribution in thelithosphere below a point load.Thedeformation mapisforolivine witha 0.1grainsizeandincludes theeffect ofincreased confining pressure with depth. Thefieldsarelabeled according to thesteady staterheology thatdominates at thatstress andtemperature. Also includedarethepredicted strainrates(dashedlines);thereforeeffectiveviscosities canbecalculated. The baseof the litho- sphere (thickness 100km)isdefined bythetemperature of 1300øC. Fora thinner lithosphere thedepthscale canbereadas 'percent oflithospheric thickness.' Thelithospheric stress profile plotsmagnitude ofstress versus depth.Stress in thiscontextmaybeinterpreted asbending stress, shear stress intensity, ordeviatoric stress, allof whichhaveverysimilarvalues. The lowerpartof thefigureshows a projection of thefieldscrossed by thestress distribution ontoa section of the litho- sphere andislabeled according tothedominant rheology predicted forthatzone.'Elastic' implies thatthestrainratefor thatzonewillbesufficiently slowthatit willappear elastic overlongtimescales. FromAshby andVerrall [1977], asmodi- fiedbyBeaumont [1979]. Reprinted withpermission ofBeaumont [1979] andElsevier Scientific Publishing Company. A strainratesimilarto theviscous-elastic ratewouldoccurin lithospheresupportsthe load. The increasein stressas the theviscoelastic platefor •7-- 8 x 1024 N s/m2or •--• 10m.y. Thusat leastinitially,therelaxation rateat 30-kmdepthin a viscous-elastic plateis quantitatively similarto therateof relaxationin a viscoelastic platewith•-= 10m.y.,assuming the samestress level.A majordifference in thetwomodels is that whileviscoclastic relaxation proceeds throughout thedepthof theplate,in theviscous-elastic model,relaxation at deeplevelsincreases thestresses in theupperlevels, sincelessof the platethinsalsoincreases thestrainrate,butthefactorT/T,. dominates thebehavior. For example,to obtaina strainrate as highas7.5 x 10-4/m.y.at a depthof 15 km whereT -• 0.3T,,,,thestress wouldhaveto increase to 4,400,000 MPa. In general,theultimate,long-termstress on timescales of several hundred millionyearsfor a viscoclastic platemodel wouldbeoftheorderoftheweightoftheload(several tensof megapascals), since thecompensation wouldapproach thatof MCNUTT: IMPLICATIONS OF GRAVITY Airy. For a similartime scalethe stressin the upper 15 km of a viscous-elastic plate would continueto increasein the range of several hundred megapascals,since the low T/T,, ratio would precluderelaxation at shallow depths.In this respect then the stressestimateis quite similar to that of the purely elastic plate. Consideration of laboratory creep data has merely provideda mechanismto thin the seismiclithosphere from 100 to the observed30 km on a million-year time scale. It is perhapssignificantto point out that if we were to interpret the changein flexuralprofilein a viscous-elastic plate in termsof a viscoelasticplate equation,it would appear that ? increaseswith time. This is exactly the behavior noted by Watts[1978]alongthe Hawaiian-Emperorchain. The elastic-plasticlithosphere[Liu and Kosloff, 1978]is a further refinement of plate mechanismsincorporatingrock deformation data. The stress-strainrelation for an elastic-perfectlyplasticmaterialis shownin Figure $. The elasticbehavior is representedby the slopedline along which stressand strainare linearly proportional.At a critical stresslevel Ocdetermined by the rate at which the load deformsthe lithosphere,the materialbehavioris plastic.Strain increaseswithout changein stress.The strainrate dependenceof the yield stressis given by a powerlaw equationextrapolatinglaboratory data to geologicloadingrates[Carter, 1976]: FOR STRESS 6387 nessof the lithospherewill be reducedfrom above by brittle fracture and from below by ductile deformation. Strengthdecreaseswith depth according to the temperature structure, leaving an elasticcore severaltens of kilometersthick with a yield strengthbetween300 and 800 MPa. Beaurnont[1979] demonstratesthe theological complexity in a flexedlithosphereby superimposing the deviatoricstress predictedby a 100-kin-thickelasticplate on Ashby and Verrall's [1977] deformation map for olivine (Figure 6). His model only applies to the instant in time before creep and plasticfailure redistributethe stress,but in a generalway it indicatesthe type of responseexpected.If preexistingzonesof weaknessoccur in the upper 10 to 15 km of the plate, the region yieldsby brittle failure on faults.Even in the absenceof faults the lithospherecan deform by cataclasticflow involving stablemicrofracturingat depthsbetween2 and 20 km [Kirby, 1980]. The lower 20 km of the lithosphereyields plastically. Rapid relaxation by diffusionand power law creep at 50- to 80-km depthsalsoreducesthe effectiveelasticthicknessof the lithosphere.The central part of the plate between 15 and approximately50 km relaxesso slowlythat for million-year time scalesit appearselastic. To only a first approximation therefore can we model the mechanicallithosphereas an elasticplate 30-40 km thick. The more completepicture from the rock mechanicsliterature pre(7) • = AOcn exp (-Q/R2) dictsthat with detailed observationswe shouldalso detect(1) in which Q is the activationenergyand R the gas constant. a time dependencein the flexural rigidity as diffusionalcreep The ultimate strengthof the lithosphereis equal to Ocand de- gradually thins the elasticplate and (2) a stressdependencein pendson temperature(and thusdepth) as well as strain rate. the flexural rigidity as the volume of plasticallyyielded lithoFor lower strain rates correspondingto geologicloading, the sphere increaseswith deviatoric stress.The time-dependent aspectsof flexureare not evidentover the loading times(~200 yield stressalso is lower. Liu and Kosloff [1978] model flexure under the Hawaiian m.y.) observedin the oceans.If relaxation in the elastic core archipelagousing an elastic-plasticlithosphere.The rate de- doesoccur,the time scalefor the creepis greaterthan 50 m.y. pendenceof the elasticresponseis incorporatedby using90% For oceanic islands and seamounts,Beaumont [1979] finds that the limited zone of plasticfailure changesthe surfacedisof the elastic moduli, based on a 2% decrease for each 3-decade decreasein loadingrate. The plasticpart of the deforma- placement by 'only 10%. In the absenceof reliable data on tion is given by (7) usingthe parametersfrom Carter and Ave Moho displacement,deviatoric stressesassociatedwith topoLallement [1970]. Liu and Kosloff successfullyfit a profile graphicloading may not be large enoughto resolvedetailsof northeastof the island of Oahu, but there are many free pa- plasticdeformationusingsurfaceobservationsalone. rametersin the model, and the fit is in no way unique. Since The Outer Rise stresscausedby any load cannot exceedOc,the stressimplications for the elastic-plasticplate are determined by the asThe casefor plasticyielding is far better documentedin the sumedtemperaturestructureand deformationrate in (7). For lithospheric flexure profiles seaward of subduction zones. the parametersselectedby Liu and Kosloff, strengthvaries Here the strain reachesabout 2%, compared with strains of greatly with depth, and the nonyieldedportion of the litho- lessthan 1% for seamountloads [Watts et al., 1980]. In the resphereis about 30 km thick. This study is meant to illustrate gion of the outer rise, approximately100 km from the trench how rock deformation data can be employed in flexure stud- axis, the lithosphericdeformationis adequatelydescribedby ies. For the Hawaiian ridge, at least, there appears to be no the elastic plate model. The effective elastic thicknessin the conflict between the extrapolatedresultsof deformation ex- range 30-40 km [Hanks, 1971; Watts and Talwani, 1974] perimentsand observedlithosphericflexurefrom large long- agreeswell with the resultsfrom seamountloading studies. Nearer to the subductionzone, on the outer trench slope,the term geologicloads. To summarizethis section,we find that the proposedrheo- extremely large curvature in the plate requiresplastic yieldlogicalmodelscan explain the regionalcompensationfor fea- ing. McAdooet al. [1978]estimate470-720 MPa for the yield tures like Hawaii as long as they predict a 30-km-thick, pre- stress.Similar resultsare obtained in other studies[ Turcotteet dominantly elasticlayer that sustains100 MPa or more stress al., 1978; Bodine and Watts, 1979]. on a time scalefrom 1 to 50 m.y. Model 1, the homogeneous Not all investigatorsagree that the outer rise is supported elastic plate, is merely the simplestmechanismthat satisfies by the strengthof the lithosphere.Melosh [1978] proposesan this requirement.The fact that a one-parameterelasticmodel alternative schemein which the outer rise is produced by a can explain the data testifiesmore to limitationsof the obser- momentum changein the flow of a viscouslayer beneath an vations than to the rheologicalsimplicity of the earth. Rock elasticlithosphere(Figure 7a). Sinceit is not requiredthat the strengthdependson a number of parameters,includingrock outer rise result from forces and moments applied at the type, confiningpressure,temperature,and strainrate. Accord- trench axis, the wavelengthof the deformationdoesnot detering to a review by Kirby [1980]the effectivemechanicalthick- mine the thickness of the elastic lithosphere. Deviatoric 6388 MCNUTT:IMPLICATIONS OF GRAVITYFORSTRESS SPERE Fig.7. (a)Dynamic model forouter risctopography. A thinelastic platepassively rides overa moving viscous layer.(b) Variationof dynamic modelin whichtheelastic plateisfaulted,formingindependent blocks. stresses can be madearbitrarilysmallby thinningthe elastic plate.For the old oceaniclithosphere commonto the outer riseregion,however, it wouldbeunreasonable to suppose that CONTINENTAL STUDIES There is little doubt that oceanictopographyformedon a is regionallycompensated with its mechanical thicknessis lessthan the 30- to 40-km thickness cooled,thickenedlithosphere high stresses (hundredsof megapascals). Can the beneathseamounts. Regardless of the dynamicsof formation associated and, if so,what is for the outer rise,the observedstrainstill impliesseveralhun- samemodelbe appliedto the continents, over billion-year dredmegapascals of deviatoric stress in a 30- to 40-km-thick the rheologyof the continentallithosphere time scales? We can anticipate several problems in the analyplate. A variationof the dynamicsupportmodelassumes that the sis of continental compensation: Natureof theload. Implicitin mostloadingstudiesis the upperlithosphere consists offaultedblocks independently ridthat the lithosphere passively responds to a load ing the deeperviscousflow, as shownin Figure7b. This assumption canbe model assumesthat the lithosphere is devoid of shear appliedfromabove.A goodcasefor thissimplification strength. Seismic refraction profiles(seeWattsetal. [1980]for made for sedimentarybasinswith distantsources.While for is lessjustified,the plate is alan example)showthat normalfaultsare indeeda common volcanicloadsthe assumption feature of outer trench walls. Brittle behavior in the upper 10 teredand weakenedby magmaticactivityin the area leastre- kmoftheoceanic plateunder largetensile stress ispredictedsolved bythedata.Onlywhen complete refraction dataunder bytherockdeformation experiments [Kirby, 1980]. In fact,if volcanic loads become available willit benecessary todealreevidence of surface fracturing werelacking, therewouldbe alistically withtheload-forming process. Theloading assumpgoodreasonto doubtwhetherlaboratory datado applyto geologic processes. At thistime,however, theredoesnot appearto beanybasisfor extending thefaults40 km to thebase of the elasticplate,and the modelcan be rejectedfor both rheological [Murrell, 1976;Ashbyand Verrall,1977;Kirby, 1980]and seismicreasons [Hanks,1979]. tion is leastappropriatefor continentalmountainbelts.The detailsof orogenyare sketchy,but in mostcases,topography is createdas lithosphericplatescollide.The distinctionbetween the 'load' and the lithospherebecomesmeaninglessif the entire thicknessof the lithosphereis deformed. Complexityof geologichistory. Overprintingof several MCNUTT: IMPLICATIONS OF GRAVITY orogenic,intrusive,and extrusivevolcaniceventsis common for older continentalregionsbut rare in the oceans.Ever present erosion in subaerial environments introduces a time de- pendenceto the loadinghistory. 6389 FOR STRESS O(k)-- -2•rpGexp(-kz½) (8) wherep is the densityof the topography,zcthe compensation depth, and G Newton's gravitationalconstant.For the elastic plate compensationmodel, SedimentaryBasins {I +k4O• -'exp(-kz½) Q(k) ---2•rpG apgJ While the sedimentary basins involve loading conditions which best fit the idealization in the theoretical model, the theologicalimplicationsfrom various studiesshow no consensus.For example, Haxby et al. [1976] infer from the configurationof successive sedimentaryfaciesthat the effectiveri- gidity in the MichiganBasinhasincreasedto 4 x 1023N m over a time span of approximately100 m.y. They invoke uplift of the gabbro-eclogitephasetransitioncausedby shoaling isotherms as the driving mechanism for gravitational subsidenceof the basin.An increasein the flexural rigidity would be an expected consequenceof cooling and thickening a purely elasticlithosphere.Nunn and Sleep[1979] successfully model the samebasinasloading on either an elasticplate with D -- 2 x 102'N m or a viscoelastic platewith Do -- 10•4 N m and • = I m.y. Thermal contractionis used as the driving mechanism for subsidence. For the North Sea, Beaumont (9) whereAp is the densitycontrastfor materialsoverlyingand underlying the plate. Figure 8 showstheoreticalisostaticresponsefunctionsderivedfrom (9) for two z½values.The D = 0 curvescorrespondto local compensation.For identicalz, val- uesthe elasticplate response (D = 1022N m) has a sharper curvatureand falls off more quicklyto zero at shortwavelengths.The explanation for this behavior is that narrow features, supportedby the strength of the plate, have smaller Bougueranomaliesand thereforelower Q valuesthan similar featuresthat are locally compensated.Broad featuresdo not feel the effect of the elasticplate, and thereforelocal and regional responsesare similar at long wavelengths.Because compensationdepth varies,curvature,rather than amplitude of the observedQ, is the best estimateof elasticstresses.For example,referringto Figure 8, the local compensation(D -- 0) responseat medium to long wavelengthswith a 40-kin compensationdepth is actually lower in amplitude than the D -- [1978]prefersthe viscoelastic crustalmodel to explain the apparentdecreasein flexuralrigidity with time. In a manner expectedfrom a viscoelastictheologythe subsidingpart of the basin narrowswith time, and erosionof the peripheral uplift 1022N m response with shallower(30 km) compensation. regions results in an apparently regressivestratigraphicseA closerelative of the isostaticresponsefunction is the free quence at the basin surface.This pattern of progressively air responseZ: youngersedimentsoutcroppingtoward the centerof the basin FA(k) -- Z(k). H(k) is typical of many basins.Sclaterand Christie[1980] explain the observed crustal thickness, heat flow, and subsidence of where FA is the Fourier transform of the free air gravity the North Sea by invoking 50-100% stretchingof the Central anomaly. The Z responseis most commonlyusedfor oceanic Graben. They deliberatelyignoreflexuralloadingof the litho- surveys. The theoretical response 2 is relatedto 0 via sphereon the assumptionthat thermal subsidenceand fault• = {) + 2•rpGexp(-kz,) ing are the dominant factorscontrollingthe evolutionin the centerof the basin.Clearly, the interpretationof sedimentary wherez, is the averagedepth from the seasurfaceto the topofaciesin terms of a theologicalmodel is nonunique,with the graphic surface. mechanismof subsidence contributingthe most uncertainty. There are two major limitations in usingthe responsefuncStudiesof the structureand evolutionof sedimentarybasins tion technique.The first problem is that all gravity signal is and their one-sidedanalogues,passivecontinentalmargins, assumedto be related to compensationof topography with will not allow unambiguousestimatesof rheologicalparame- constantdensity. Density variations unrelated to topography tersuntil otherfactorsarebetterdeterm'med. Thesefactorsindude the initiating mechanism,the sedimentarybudget,and sea level history [Beaumont,1979]. are a sourceof noise,but their effectcan be minimized by statistically separatingout only the gravity field correlatedwith the topography.In regionsof low topographicsignal, how- DistributedTopography Individual volcanic features such as the island of Hawaii are rare on the continents.Elevatedregionsoccur in broad mountain belts where deformationfrom any one load is indistinguishablefrom that of another.A usefulmethod for analyzing the isostaticcompensationin regionsof complextopography is the response function technique. On the assumptionthat isostaticcompensation for a point load is linear and isotropic,the isostaticresponse functionQ(k) can be calculatedfrom Fourier transformsof topographicand Bouguer anomaly data [Dormanand Lewis, 1970]: C•) -- Q(k). H(k) whereG and H are gravityand topographytransformsand k -12 -10 -O8 -0.6 -O4 - 2N rn '•x•L -- -O2 o 5000 DD !01, , ,' 2000 I000 500 0 200 100 50 X,km = Ikl - (k•• + ky•)-'/•. Theresponse Q calculated fromactual Fig. 8. Theoretical isostatic responsefunctions for local comdatasetscanbe directlycompared to theoretical 0 fromthe pensation (solidcurves)andregionalcompensation withD = 10•2 N linearizedforms of regionaland local compensationmodels. m (dashedcurves).Eachresponseis calculatedassumingtwo different For example,for linear Airy isostasy, valuesof compensationdepth z½. 6390 MCNUTT: IMPLICATIONS OF GRAVITY FOR STRESS -I.4 -I.2 -- -I.0 -- -0.8 -- -0.6 -- -0.4 -- -0.2 -- 0 -- AUSTRALIA McNutt & Perker , 1978 Lewis & Dotman, U.S.A. 1970 Stephenson & Beaumont• 1979 CANADA 0.2 5000 2000 I000 500 200 I00 50 WAVELENGTH X , KM Fig.9. Comparison ofUnited Statc• andAustralian isostatic response functions withtheresponse fromtheCanadian Shield.Barsindicatethe standarderror in eachspectralestimate. ever, the uncertaintyin Q is large. A more seriousproblem inv01vesthe necessarilylarge dimensionsof the regionunder investigation.For the continentsthe characteristicfalloff region for Q lies between2000-km and 500-km wavelengths.The calculatedQ may thereforegiveonly an averagerigidity estimate from severaltectonicprovinceswithin the surveyboundary. From the curvature in Lewis and Dorman's [1970] response function for the United States(Figure 9), Banks et al. [1977] determine that the apparent flexural rigidity in the United Statesis between102•and 1022N m. They concludethat Walcott[1970a]foundhigherrigidityvalues(1023-10 24N m) from other North American features because he measured the deat the surface rather than at the Moro. Thus Banks formation et al. [1977]implythatsomesortof depth-dependent relaxa- MississippiValley (Figure 11). The responsefunctionsfrom the two grids are comparedin Figure 12. The isostaticcompensationis obviouslydifferent in the two regions,and Lewis and Dorman's [1970] responsefunction was a hybrid of the two. The overallresponsereflectsthe response signalfrom the regioncontainingthe highestcorrelationbetweenthe gravity and the topography. The Q functionsin Figure 12 can be directly inverted for parameters in compensationmodels. We will consider the data in terms of the best fitting flexural rigidity D and compensationdepth zcin an elasticplate mechanism.This model is appropriate for two reasons:the uncertainty in the data doesnot permit inversionfor more than two parameters,and the resultscan be interpretedquite generally.If the compensationis actually local rather than regional,the preferred D value will be extremelylow. If viscoelasticrelaxationoccurs, the resultingD can be interpreted as a time-dependent apparentrigidity. The inversionresultsare presentedin Figure 13. The horizontal scaleplotsflexural rigidity, and the verticalscalerepresentsthe one-normmisfit betweenthe observedresponseand the theoreticalmodel. Each curve correspondsto a differentzc value. The dashedlines indicate the probability level at which tion reconcilesthe two rigidity estimates. McNutt and Parker [1978] find an even lower value for apparent flexural rigidity in Australia and invoke a viscoelastic relaxation model to explain the difference in United States and AustralianD values.Assuminga 200-m.y. age for the latest Australian orogeny and a 50-m.y. age for the Laramide orogenyin the United States,the viscoelasticrelaxation time •- = 45 m.y. If the viscoelastictheory is correct,the isostaticresponsefrom easternCanadashouldresemblethat of Australia becausethe region consistsof Precambrian shield and oro- the model is consistent with the data. For the western section geniczonesno youngerthan the Paleozoic.Figure 9 compares the best fitting compensationdepth is between30 and 35 kin, the isostaticresponsefrom the Canadian Shield [Stephenson and the response rulesout flexuralrigiditiesabove10•9N m. and Beaumont, 1979] with the Q estimatesfrom the United Since this D value correspondsto a plate thicknessof only 1 States and Australia. The viscoelasticmodel fails this test; the km, we conclude that compensationin the western United Canadian responsein no way resemblesthat of Australia. States is local. For the eastern grid, regardlessof what comThe validity of McNutt and Parker's [1978] viscoelastic pensation depthwe assume, the bestfittingD is 5 X 10•2N m, ,model hingeson theassumption thattheresponse functionis which implies a 20-kin-thick plate. The misfit valley is exdominatedby the signal from the most recentorogeny.This tremely sharp and stronglyrules out local compensation. assumptionisjustified for Australia.When the continentis diResidual gravity maps give an indication of which features vided into eastern,central, and westerngrids,the most coher- determine the isostaticresponse.The residualgravity map is ent Q which dominatesthe averageQ is that of the geologi- producedby subtractingfrom the observedBouguergravity cally youngesteasternsection.In a similar mannerthe United the anomaly predictedby filtering the topographywith the Statesdata setcan be dividedinto two subsets: a westerngrid observedresponsefunction. The residualsare 'isostaticanomcontainingthe Rocky Mountains, the Basin and Range, and alies,' although no particular compensationmechanismhas the Sierra Nevada (Figure 10); and an easterngrid containing been assumed.The residual gravity map for the easterngrid the AppalachianMountains, the Great Lakes region,and the (Figure 11) showsa prominentpositiveanomalyoverthe mid- MCNUTT: IMPLICATIONS OF GRAVITY FOR STRESS 6391 crusthas lost whateververticalmobility it possessed during orogeny.The stressimpliedby the gravityanomalyis 50 MPa, assumingthat it originatesat about 50-km depth. In the westerngrid thereare few surprises (Figure 10). The Rocky Mountains display anomaliesconsistentlypositivein sign, indicating that the compensationdepth is generally deeperthan the 30- to 35-km grid average.The Basin and Range showsnegativeresiduals,indicatingthat the Moho is slightly shallowerthan the regional average.Both observations are consistent with the notions that the Colorado Plateau hasa root and the Basinand Rangehasan anomalouslythin crust. WESTERN UNITED STATES ISOSTATIC ANOMALY '"'• ...... >100 WITHIN+_IO0 g.u. :.'".....'• <-I00 • 200-g.u. CONTOURS 500 KM I These resultssuggestthat the tectonicprocessthat formed the topographyin the westerngrid, by someperhapsthermal or mechanical means, left the crust and upper mantle incapable of transmitting stresslaterally. In the easternUnited States,at leastpart of the lithosphereis capableof responding elastically.A very simple-mindedmodel which could explain theseresultsis shownin Figure 14. Perhapsthe thin-skinned tectonicsresponsiblefor the Appalachian Mountains left the lower part of the elastic lithosphereessentiallyundisturbed. We would expect to observean anomalouslyshallow compensation depth becausethe Bouguer gravity signal comes from the flexureof two interfaceswith densitydiscontinuities: one at the base of the deformed sedimentarylayer and the other at the Moho locatedsomewherewithin the elasticlayer. This type of compensationwould result from shallow, compressionaltectonics.In the westernUnited Statesthe topographic elevation is caused by tensional and/or vertical stressesaffectingthe entire crust and upper mantle. Whether differential movementoccurredalong faults, as shownin the schematicdiagram, or high temperaturescausedthe rocks to behave viscouslyrather than elasticallyis immaterial for the purposeof explainingthe gravity and the compensation.Firm conclusionsrequire that individual loads be modeled; at this point we cannotrule out the possibilitythat severalisostatic mechanisms,supporting features with different characteristic Fig. 10. Residual gravity anomaliesin the westernUnited States. wavelengths,have combined to produce a meaninglessreAnomalies are the Fourier transform of G•k) - Q(k)H(k), where G sponsefunction. and H are the wave number domain representationsof Bouguer grav- Other studiessupportthis conclusionthat continental crust can sustainelastic stresses,given the right conditionsof load emplacement.Both the Boothia Uplift [Walcott, 1970a] and continentgravity high and anomalouslowsin the Mississippi the midcontinentgravity high [Cohenand Meyer, 1966] apValley. Thesegravity anomaliesarisefrom subsurfacedensity pear to be regionally compensatedwith a flexural rigidity of ity andtopography maps,respectively. variationsuncorrelatedwith the topographyand therefore 2 x 1023N m. The associated platethickness, 30 km, is 10 km cannot be analyzed by the responsefunction approach.The residuallows in the Hudson Bay area show the effect of still incomplete isostatic rebound from the Pleistoceneglaciers. For the purposesof this study,the mostimportant observation is that the Bouguer gravity signal from the Appalachian Mountains has been essentiallyremoved. The isostaticresponsein the easterngrid is determinedby the gravity signal from these mountains.A residual belt of negative isostatic anomaliesparallelsthe trend of the highestpeaksin the Ap- greaterthan the value determinedfor the AppalachianMountains. It is difficult to explain the reduction in plate thickness beneaththe Appalachian Mountains in termsof viscousrelaxation of elastic stresses.The ages of both the midcontinent gravity high (•1100 m.y.) and the Boothia Uplift (-•500 m.y.) are greater than the age of the Appalachianorogeny (-•200 m.y.). From the model of the Appalachian Mountains presentedhere, it seemsmore likely that the elasticlithosphere was either mechanicallythinned from above or partially re- palachians. Thisgravity lowcoincides witha 5•-•km-deep laxedat thebasebyelevated temperatures at thetimeof crustalroot determinedfrom seismicrefractiondata [Jameset al., 1968].Given the presentelevationof the mountains,the sizeof the root is excessive and overcompensates the topography. Thus the negative gravity anomaly resultsfrom crustal structureunrelatedto present-dayisostaticbalance,although orogenesis. We face a dilemma in converting the continental compensationmodelsto maximum stressestimates:200-m.y.-old loads are extremely eroded. The presentstressneeded in the lithosphereto supportthe mountainswill underestimatethe it isentirelypossible thattherootis a remnantfroma period peaklevelsattainedin the past.To minimizethe mitigating when the Appalachianswere more impressivefeatures.If this effectsof erosion,we shouldconcentrateon extremelyyoung is the case,the persistenceof the root may indicate that the loads,suchas the Himalaya. Unfortunately,not only are the 6392 MCNUTT: IMPLICATIONSOF GRAVITY FOR STRESS EASTERN UNITED STATES ISOSTATIC ANOMALY ........ '"":'• > I00 • WITHIN__. I00 g.u. :".:• < -I00 200--g.u. CONTOURS o [ 500 , KM I Fig. 11. Residualgravity anomaliesin the easternUnited States. necessarydata unavailable,but the very fact that the mountaliasare youngimpliesthat someof their supportmay be dynamic. From the similarity in elastic plate thicknessin the continentsand oceans,we suspectthat the continentallithospherecan also supportdeviatoric stressin excessof 100 MPa in areaswhereit hasnot beenexcessively thinned,heated,and fractured.Kirby [1980]suggests, however,that the weakening effectsof water may play a more significantrole in the continental granites than in the oceanic basalts. emplacementof the oldest geologicunits. These bodies are consideredto be 'one-plateplanets'[Solomon,1978]and lack the complicated deformation patterns associatedwith the creationand destructionof lithosphericplates. Solomon[1977]infers the thermal historyof the moon and Mercury from the surfacedeformation.Early in a planet's thermal history the interior warms as core segregationprogresses. The planetexpands,causingtensionalsurfacefeatures and volcanism.When differentiationis essentiallycomplete, the planet coolsand contracts,producingcompressionalsurEXTRATERRESTRIAL STUDIES face featuresand cutting off volcanicactivity. For example, Many of the sametechniques usedfor analyzingloaddefor- Mars is dominatedby extensionalfeatures,indicating plan- mationanddetermining stress on theearthhavebeenapplied etaryexpansion overmostof itshistory.Theabsence of extento the moon and other planetsin the solar system.The two mostintenselystudiedfrom a stressviewpointare the moon and Mars. While the remoteness of theseplanetarybodies makes it more difficult to interpretthe geologyand obtain precisemeasurements of gravity and topography,in at least sional featureson Mercury placesthe planetary differentiation phase before the formation of the oldest surface features.The moon lacks extensivecompressionalor extensional features, and therefore its radius cannot have increased or decreased by more than 1 km in the past3.8 b.y. The 1-km one respectthe analysis is simplified. There is no evidence limit is basedon the assumptionthat a changein tangential from the moon, Mars, or even Mercury that there has been stressof 100 MPa would be sufficientto produceobservable any horizontal shifting of rigid lithosphericblockssincethe surfacefaulting.Solomon[1977]findsthat acceptable temper- MCNUTT: IMPLICATIONS OF GRAVITY ature profilesT(z, t) predictinga maximumradiuschangeof lessthan 1 km over the past 3.8 b.y. have initial profileswith meltingtemperaturesdown to 200- to 300-km depth and cold temperaturesin the deep interior. However, the accumulated thermalstressin the lithospherefrom the acceptablemodelsis as high as severalthousandmegapascals.In the moon'sinterior the thermal stresses dissipateby flow on shorttime scales, FOR STRESS 6393 Solomon[1978] find that the older lunar highlandsare locally compensated,while the youngermasconmaria are supported by the strengthof the lithosphere. it followsthat the lunar lithospheremust have increasedin thicknessafter the formation of the highland topography. Olympus Mons, a shield volcano sitgated on the Tharsis ridge of Mars, has receivedconsiderableattention recently. but the mechanism and time scale for relaxation of the litho- With a basalareaof 3 x 105km and a heightof 25 km, Olym- sphericthermalstressis unknown.The solutionto this problem may have important implicationsfor the stateof stressin the lithosphereand the thermal evolutionof planets. Solomonand Head [1979] combine the model for global stresson the moon with predictedstresses from lithospheric flexure in order to explain the spatial and temporal distribution of linearrillesand mareridges.From features3.6-3.8 b.y. old they infer a relativelythin plate,25-50 km thick. Younger featuresonly 3-3.4 b.y. old requirea 100-km-thickplate.Note pus Mons is the largest known volcanic feature in the solar system[Thurberand Toksoz,1978].The excessmassof Olympus Mons and the other three shieldvolcanoesof the Tharsis dome is sufficientlylarge to cause a 1.2-km anomaly in the gravity equipotentialsurfaceand accountfor about 6% of the planetary oblatenessJ2 [Reasenberg,1977; Kaula, 1979]. De- that these effective plate thicknessesare several times those found on earth and imply that the long-termelasticlayer is much thicker on the moon. Given the dependenceof creep rate on temperature(equation(10)), a thick elasticlayer may be the consequence of a more graduallyslopinggeothermfor the moon relative to the earth. The observation that the com- pensationfor youngerlunar featuresrequiresa thicker lithospheremight alsobe consistentwith a viscoelastic plate mechanism,but in this casea viscoelastic explanationis unlikely. Unlessthe initial plate thicknessat time zero is much greater than 100 km, it is difficultfor loadsmore than 3 b.y. old but only 0.1-0.8 b.y. apart in age to differ in effectiveplate thicknessby 50%.From gravity and topographicdata, Thurberand bate has centered on whether or not the Tharsis dome volca- noes are compensated.Phillipsand Saunders[1975] conclude that while older regionsof Mars are locally compensated,the topographyof the Tharsisregionis youngand mostly uncompensated.Their observationcould be explained by the scenario invoked by Solomonand Head [1979], in which the lithospherethickensbetweenthe time of formation of young and old topography. Thurberand Toksoz[1978] directly model the compensation of Olympus Mons usingflexure theory. For an elasticplate thicknessas small as 100 km, the model predicts500 MPa for the maximum extensional surface stress. Thurber WAVELENGTH (Kt4) I WESTERN 0 and Toksoz see no evidence of surface faulting in responseto the high stress,nor do they observean arch of the order of 4 km high that would be produced by plate flexure. Their preferred model, an elasticplate approximately 200 km thick, predicts I I I I I I I i i u.s. EASTERN U.S. & CANADA -3.2 -2.8 -2.4 -I LOG WAVE NUMBER K (KI4 - 2.0 -I.6 ) Fig. 12. Isostaticresponse functionsfrom the easternand westernUnited States. - 6394 MCNUTT: • I i IMPLICATIONS OF GRAVITY FOR STRESS I I I I WESTERN U.S. _ z• km._•__•_. I I EASTERN I I I U.S. 8• CANADA 25 25 Compensationdepth in km 25 km ompensation d 30 km 35 km 20 2O 40 km 45 km 1.5 % 15 20 % __zo_ yo___ . I0 5O % 50 % t 35 km., • . . 66 % 80 % - / I i016 I I i018 I I I 1020 I i022 I i024 FLEXURAL RIGIDITY (Nm) I I i016 I I 1018 I I 1020 I 1022 I I 1024 FLEXURAL RIGIDITY ( Nm ) Fig. 13. One-norm misfitbetween observed response functions in Figure14andQ fromelastic platemodels. Plateparameters areflexuralrigidityD andcompensation depthZc.Dashedlinesindicatetheprobability thattheobserved misfitis causedby random errors in the data. an arch amplitudeof only a kilometeror two, in agreement Sjogren[1979]fails to detectany low-densitycompensating with the topographicdata, and producesmaximum surface massfor OlympusMons. The gravity anomalyover the feastresses lessthan 100 MPa. At depth,however,the maximum ture is about 20% greater than expectedfrom the observed stressunderthe load wouldbe greaterthan 100MPa. Using volumeusinga Bouguertheoryand suggests that even denser Jeffreys'[1924]calculationof stressunderlyinga triangular materialliesbeneaththe volcano.Sjogrenconcludes, 'This esload restingon an elastichalf spaceas a very roughestimate, sentially uncompensated600-km feature produceskilobar the maximumdeviatoricstressoccursat 150-kindepth and stresses that demanda rigid, thick lithosphere,or somerather equals about 200 MPa. uniquescenarioabout very youngtopographyobtainedon a Thurberand Toksoz's[1978]modelassumes that Olympus presentlyseismicallyinert planet.' Mons is supportedonly by the strengthof the Martian lithoSmithet al. [1979]note a high correlationbetweengravity sphere.Phillipset al. [1980]arguethat the impliedstresses are and topographyon the planet Venus. Their data are best extoo largeand that the Tharsisregionmustbe at leastpartially plained by a regionalcompensationmechanismwith D -- 5 x supportedby dynamic forcesfrom below. 1023 N m. The corresponding 40-kinplatethickness issosimiThere is even an indication that stress estimates based on a lar to that determinedfrom terrestrialstudiesthat we mightbe volumemeasureof excess massfrom OlympusMons may be temptedto concludethat the two planetshave comparable too low. From Viking Orbiter2 high-resolution gravitydata, strengthand rheologicalpropertiesin their surfacelayers.The observationthat the temperatureon the surfaceof Venus is /DEFORMED LAYER 400øC complicates the Watts [1978] has proposed that the base of interpretation. the elastic layer in the earth correspondsto approximatelythe 450øCisotherm.At thisstagethe limitations in the data allow only speculation;if the same model appliesto Venus, there are at least two possibleex- ELASTIC LAYER planations for the compensation. Temperature may be a very slowingincreasingfunction of depth beneath the Venusian surface,or the chemistryof the rocksmight allow greater strengthat higher temperatures. CONCLUSIONS At this point we must in someway answerthe question, What magnitudestresscan the lithospheresupporton geoFig. 14. Schematicdiagramshowingtwo stylesof tectonicdeformation.(a) Shallowcompressional forcesdeformweak sedimentary logic time scales?Owing to the fundamental differencesin layer overlyingmore competentelasticplate. (b) Vertical or tensional oceanic and continental tectonic settingsthe oceanic loads forcesdisruptentire thicknessof competentlayer. tend to provide a good estimate of maximum stresslevel, MCNUTT: IMPLICATIONS OF GRAVITYFOR STRESS whilethe continentsbetterindicatethe durationof stresssupport. For example,from seismicrefraction,surfacegravity, and bathymetrystudies,the spatialextentand magnitudeof lithosphericstrain causedby the Hawaiian load is rather well 6395 Cohen,T. J., andR. P. Meyer,The mid continentgravityhigh:Gross crustalstructure,in The Earth Beneaththe Continents, Geophys. Monogr.Ser.,vol. 10,editedby J. S. SteinhardtandT. J. Smith,pp. 141-165, AGU, Washington,D.C., 1966. Dorman,L. M., andB. T. R. Lewis,Experimental isostasy, 1, Theory documented. There exists nowhere on the continents such a of determinationof the earth'sisostaticresponseto a concentrated load,J. Geophys. Res.,75,3357-3365,1970. classicexample of lithosphericflexure. The continual overGaposchkin, E. M., and K. Lambeck,Earth'sgravityfieldto sixteenth printing of continentalorogenic,volcanic,and epeirogenic degreeand stationcoordinates from satelliteand terrestrialdata, J. episodes,with attendanterosion,obscuresthe deformationreGeophys.Res., 76, 4844-4883, 1971. cordedduring any one event. On the other hand, sinceno oce- Goodacre,A. K., A commenton depthsof sources of anomaliesin the earth's gravity field, Geophys.J. Roy. Astron. Soc., 55, 745-746, anic loadsare older than about200 m.y., it is not possibleto 1978. ruleout relaxationthroughoutthethickness of the lithosphere Griggs,D. T., F. J. Turner, and H. C. Heard, Deformationof rocksat on a time scaleof 100m.y. The 30-kinelasticplate thickness 500ø to 800øC,Geol.Soc.Amer.Mem. 79, chap.4, 1960. supportingthe midcontinentgravityhigh [Cohenand Meyer, Guier,W. H., andR. R. Newton,The earth'sgravityfieldasdeduced 1966]rather convincinglyarguesagainstlithosphericrelaxafrom the Dopplertrackingof five satellites,J. Geophys. Res., 70, 4613-4626, 1965. tion on the continents on billion-yeartime scales.While it is dangerousto apply oceanicstressestimatesto the continents or assumethat continentaltime scalesare appropriateto the Gunta:R., A quantitativeevaluationof the influenceof the lithosphereon the anomaliesof gravity,J. FranklinInst., 236, 373-396, 1943. oceans, it appears thata mechanical lithosphere, 30-km orso Hanks, T.C.,TheKuriltrench'-Hokkaido risesystem: Large shallow thick, sustainsstresses to about 200 MPa over billion-year earthquakes and simplemodelsof deformation, Geophys. J. Roy. Astron. Soc., 23, 173-189, 1971. timescales. The modelresultsarenot unique,in partowingto and the ambiguityof gravitydataand in part to the uncertaintyin Hanks,T. C., Earthquakestressdrops,ambienttectonicstresses, rheology, but it is unlikely that refinement in observations coulddrasticallychangetheseestimates. In particular,thereis no conflictbetweenempiricalflow laws extrapolatedfrom laboratorydata and observedgeophysicaldeformationdata. Acknowledgments. I Wish tothank T. C.Hanks, R.L.Parker, A. McGarr,J. COckran,andan anonymous reviewerfor suggesting several improvements on an earlierform of this manuscript. stresses that driveplatemotions,PureAppl.Geophys., 115,330-331, 1977. Hanks,T. C., Deviatoricstresses and earthquakeoccurrence at the outer rise, J. Geophys.Res., 84, 2343-2347, 1979. Haxby, W. F., D. L. Turcotte, and J. M. Bird, Thermal and mechani- cal evolutionof the Michigan Basin, Tectonophysics, 36, 57-75, 1976. Higbie, J. W., and F. D. Stacey,Interpretationof global gravity anomalies,Nature Phys.Sci., 234, 130, 1971. James,D. E., T. J. Smith, and J. S. Steinhart, Crustal structureof the m•iddleAtlantic states,J. Geophys.Res., 73, 1983-2008, 1968. Jeffreys,H., TheEarth,CambridgeUniversityPress,New York, 1924. Jeffreys,H., TheEarth,CambridgeUniversityPress,New York, 1943. Allen,R. R., Depthof sources of gravityanomalies, NaturePhys.Sci., Jeffreys,H., TheEarth,CambridgeUniversityPress,New York, 1976. 236, 22-23, 1972. Kaula, W. M., Earth'sgravityfield, relationto globaltectonics,Science, 169, 982-985, 1969. Anderson,R. N., D. P. McKenzie,and J. G. Sclater,Gravity, bathymetryandconvection in the earth,EarthPlanet.Sci.Lett.,18, Kaula,W. M., Globalgravityandtectonics, in TheNatureof theSolid 391-407, 1973. Earth, edited by E. C. Robertson,pp. 385-405, McGraw-Hill, New REFERENCES ArtyUshkov, E. V., The stresses in thelithosphere caused by crustal thickness inhomogenieties, J. Geophys. Res.,78, 7675-7708,1973. Artyushkov, E. V., Can the earth'scrustbe in a stateof isostasy?, J. Geophys. Res., 79, 741-752, 1974. Ashby, M. F., and R. A. Verrall, Micromechanismsof flow and frac- York, 1972. Kaula, W. M., The momentof inertiaof Mars, Geophys. Res.Lett., 6, 194-196, 1979. Khan,M. A., Depthof sources of gravityanomalies, Geophys. J. Roy. Astron. Soc., 48, 197-209, 1977. tureandtheir relevance to the rheologyof the uppermantle,Phil. Trans.Roy.Soc.London,Ser.A, 288,59-95, 1977. Kirby, S. H., State of stressin the lithosphere:Inferencesfrom the flow laws of olivine, Pure Appl. Geophys.,115, 245-258, 1977. Balmino, G.,K.Lambeck, W.H.Kaula, A spherical harmonic analy- Kirby, S. H., Tectonicstresses in the lithosphere:Constraintsprosisof the earth'stopography,J. Geophys. Res., 78, 478-481, 1973. videdby theexperimental deformation of rocks,J. Geophys. Res., Banks,R. J., R. L. Parker,and J.P. Huestis,Isostaticcompensation 85, this issue, 1980. on a continentalscale:Localversusregionalmechanisms, Geophys. Lambeck,K., Gravityanomalies overoceanridges,Geophys. J. Roy. J. Roy. Astron. Soc., 51,431-452, 1977. Astron. Soc., 30, 37-53, 1972. Beaumont, C., Theevolution of sedimentary basins on a vis•lastic Lerch, F. J., C. A. Wagner, J. A. Richardson,and J. E. Brownd, Godlithosphere: TheOry andexamples, Geophys. J. Roy.Astron. Soc., dard earthmodels(5 and 6), Doc. X-921-74-145,100pp., Goddard 55, 471-497, 1978. Beaumont, C., On rheological zonationof thelithosphere duringflexure, Tectonophysics, 59, 347-365, 1979. Bodine,J. H., and A. B. Watts,on the lithosphericflexureseawardof SpaceFlight Center, Greenbelt, Md., 1974. Lewis,B. T. R., and L. M. Dotman,Experimentalisostasy, 2, An isostatic model for the U.S.A. derivedfrom gravity and topographic data, J. Geophys.Res., 75, 3367-3386, 1970. theBoninandMarianatrenches, EarthPlanet.Sci.Lett.,43, 132- Liu, H. P., and D. Kosloff,Elastic-plastic bendingof the lithosphere 148, 1979. Brune,J. N., and C. R. Allen, A low-stress droplow magnitudeearth- quakewithsurface faulting:TheImperialCaliforniaearthquake of incorporatingrock deformationdata, with applicationto the structure of the Hawaiian Archipelago,Tectonophysics, 50, 249-274, 1978. March 4, 1966,Bull Seisrnol.Soc.Arner.,57, 501-514, 1967. McAdoo, D.C., J. G. Caldwell, and D. L. Turcotte, On the elasticCarter,N. L., High temperatureflow of rocks,Rev. Geophys. Space perfectlyplasticbendingof the lithosphereundergeneralizedloadPhys., 13, 344-349, 1975. ing with applicationto the Kuril trench,Geophys. J. Roy. Astron. Carter,N. L., Steadystateflowof rocks,Rev.Geophys. SpacePhys., 14, 301-360, 1976. Carter,N. L., andH. G. Av6 Lallement,High temperature flowof du- Soc., 54, 11-26, 1978. McKenzie,D. P., Someremarkson heat flow and gravityanomalies, J. Geophys.Res., 72, 6261-6273, 1967. nite and peridotite, Geol. Soc.Amer. Bull., 81, 2181-2202, 1970. McKenzie, D. P., Speculationson the causesand consequences of Chase,C. G., Subduction,the geoid, and lower mantle convection, plate motions,Geophys.J. Roy. Astron.Soc., 18, 1-32, 1969. Nature, 282, 464-467, 1979. McKenzie, D. P., Surfacedeformation,gravity anomaliesand conCochran,J. R., An analysisof isostasyin the world'soceans,2, Midvection, Geophys.J. Roy. Astron. Soc., 48, 211-238, 1977. oceanridge crests,J. Geophys.Res.,84, 4713-4729, 1979. McKenzie, D. P., J. M. Roberts, and N. O. Weiss, Toward the numer- 6396 MCNUTT:IMPLICATIONS OF GRAVITYFOR STRESS ical simulation of convection in the earth's mantle, J. Fluid Mech., 62, 465-538, 1974. McNutt, M. K., Compensationof oceanictopography:An application of the responsefunctiontechniqueto the Surveyorarea,J. Geophys. Res., 84, 7589-7598, 1979. McNutt, M. K., and H. W. Menard, Lithosphericflexureand uplifted atolls, J. Geophys.Res., 82, 1206-1212, 1978. McNutt, M. K., and R. L. Parker, Isostasyin Australiaand the evolution of the compensationmechanism,Science,199, 773-775, 1978. Melosh, H. J., Dynamic supportof the outer rise,Geophys. Res.Lett., 5, 321-324, 1978. Menard, H. W., Depth anomaliesand the bobbingmotion of drifting islands, J. Geophys.Res., 78, 5128-5137, 1973. Stephenson, R., andC. Beaumont, Smallscaleconvection in theupper mantle and the isostaticresponseof the Canadianshield,re- port, Advan. Sci. Inst., Newcastle-Upon-Tyne, England,April 1979. Suyenaga, W., Earthdeformation onresponse to surface landing: Application to the formation of the Hawaiian Islands, Ph.D. dissertation,147pp., Univ. of Hawaii, Honolulu, 1977. Thurber, C. H., and S.C. Solomon,An assessment of crustalthick- nessvariationson the lunar nearside:Models,uncertainties, and implicationsfor crustal differentiation,Proc. Lunar Planet. Sci. Conf. 9th, 1169-1170, 1978. Thurber,C. H., and M. N. Toksoz,Martianlithospheric thickness fromelasticflexuretheory,Geophys. Res.Lett.,5, 977-980,1978. Mercier, J. C., and N. L. Carter, Pyroxenegeotherms,J. Geophys. Turcotte, D. L., D.C. McAdoo,andJ. C. Caldwell,An elastic-perRes., 80, 3349-3362, 1975. fectlyplasticanalysis of the bendinglithosphere, Tectonophysics, Murrell, S. A. F., Rheology of the lithosphere-experimentalindications, Tectonophysics, 36, 5-24, 1976. Nadai, A., Theoryof Flow and Fractureof Solids,vol. 2, pp. 272-297, Walcott,R. I., Flexuralrigidity,thickness, andviscosity of thelitho- McGraw-Hill, New York, 1963. Nunn, J. A., and N.H. Sleep, Gravity anomaliesand flexure of the Walcott,R. I., Flexureof thelithosphere at Hawaii,Tectonophysics, 9, Michigan Basin: A three-dimensionalstudy, Eos Trans.,4G U, 60, 936, 1979. Phillips, R. J., and R. S. Saunders,The isostaticstate of Martian topography,J. Geophys.Res.,80, 2893-2898, 1975. Phillips,R. J., W. B. Banerdt,N. L. Sleep,and R. S. Saunders,Mar- 47, 193, 1978. sphere,J. Geophys. Res.,75, 3941-3954,1970a. 435-446, 1970b. Walcott,R. I., Lithospheric flexure,analysis of gravityanomalies, and thepropagation of seamount chains, in TheGeophysics of thePacificOceanBasinandIts Margin,Geophys. Monogr.Ser.,vol. 19, editedby G. H. Sutton,M. H. Manghnani, andR. Moberly,pp. 431-438,AGU, Washington,D.C., 1976. tian stressdistribution:Argumentsaboutfinite supportof Tharsis, Watts,A. B., Gravityandbathymetry in thecentralPacificOcean,J. J. Geophys.Res., in press,1980. Geophys.Res., 81, 1533-1553, 1976. Reasenberg,R. D., The moment-of-inertiaand isostasyof Mars, J. Watts,A. B., An analysisof isostasy in theworld'soceans,1, HawaiGeophys.Res.,82, 369-375, 1977. ian-EmperorSeamountChain,J. Geophys. Res.,83, 5989-6004, 1978. Sclater,J. G., and P. A. F. Christie, Continentalstretching:An explanation of the post mid-Cretaceoussubsidencein the central Watts,A. B., andJ. R. Cochran,Gravityanomalies andflexureof the North Sea basin, J. Geophys.Res., 85, 3659-3669, 1980. lithospherealong the Hawaiian-EmperorSeamountChain, Sclater,J. G., R. N. Anderson,and M. L. Bell, The elevationof ridges Geophys. J. Roy. ,4stron.Soc.,38, 119-141, 1974. and the evolutionof the centraleasternPacific,J. Geophys. Res., 76, Watts,A. B.,andM. Talwani,Gravityanomalies seaward of deep-sea 7888-7915, 1971. Sclater,J. G., L. A. Lawver, and B. Parsons,Comparisonsof longwavelengthresidualelevationand free air gravity anomaliesin the North Atlantic and possibleimplicationsfor the thicknessof the lithosphericplate, J. Geophys.Res.,81, 1031-1052, 1975. Sjogren,W. L., Mars gravity:High resolutionresultsfrom Viking October 2, Science, 203, 1006-1009, 1979. Smith, J. C., R. J. Phillips, and W. L. Sjogren,An analysisof Venus gravity data (abstract),Fall Meeting Program,p. 48, AGU, Washington, D.C., 1979. Solomon,S.C., The relationshipbetweencrustaltectonicsand internal evolutionin the Moon and Mercury, Phys.Earth Planet.Interiors, 51, 135-145, 1977. Solomon,S.C., On volcanismand thermaltectonics on one-plate planets,Geophys.Res. Lett., 5, 461-464, 1978. Solomon, S.C., and J. W. Head, Vertical movement in mare basins: Relation to mare emplacement,basin tectonics,and lunar thermal history,J. Geophys.Res.,84, 1667-1682, 1979. trenches and their tectonicimplications, Geophys. J. Roy.,4stron. Soc., 36, 57-90, 1974. Watts, A. B., J. H. Bodine,and M. S. Steckler,Observations of flexure andthestateof stress in theoceanic lithosphere, J. Geophys. Res., 85, this issue, 1980. Weertman, J.,Thecreepstrength of theearth's mantle, Rev.Geophys. SpacePhys.,13, 344-349, 1970. Weertman, J., andJ. R. Weertman, Hightemperature creepof rock and mantleviscosity, ,4nnu.Rev.Earth Sci.,3, 239-316,1975. Weissel, J. K., and D. E. Hayes, The Australian-Antarctic dis- cordance: Newresultsandimplications, J. Geophys. Res.,79,25792587, 1974. Zienkiewicz, O. C., TheFiniteElementMethodin Engineering Sciences,McGraw-Hill, New York, 1971. (ReceivedNovember 2, 1979; revisedFebruary 15, 1980; acceptedMarch 6, 1980.)