* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Cytokinesis: Sid signals septation
Point mutation wikipedia , lookup
Genome (book) wikipedia , lookup
Biology and consumer behaviour wikipedia , lookup
Gene expression profiling wikipedia , lookup
Minimal genome wikipedia , lookup
Artificial gene synthesis wikipedia , lookup
Vectors in gene therapy wikipedia , lookup
Epigenetics of human development wikipedia , lookup
Polycomb Group Proteins and Cancer wikipedia , lookup
Dispatch R547 Cytokinesis: Sid signals septation Kenneth E. Sawin Components of a novel signal transduction pathway which initiates septation in fission yeast are located primarily at the spindle pole body. New studies further characterizing members of this pathway suggest a plausible mechanism for how and why this works. Address: Wellcome Trust Centre for Cell Biology, Institute of Cell and Molecular Biology, University of Edinburgh, Swann Building, Mayfield Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JR, UK. E-mail: [email protected] Current Biology 2000, 10:R547–R550 0960-9822/00/$ – see front matter © 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved. Like DNA replication or chromosome segregation, cytokinesis is a once-and-only-once event in the life of a cell. What controls where, when and how a cell divides? The fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe has recently become a focus for genetic studies of eukaryotic cytokinesis, and this work has revealed, among other things, a novel signal transduction pathway controlling septation [1–3]. What is remarkable about this pathway is that nearly all of its components reside in the nuclear-localized spindle pole body, the yeast equivalent of the centrosome, which Boveri [4] described one hundred years ago as “the true divisionorgan of the cell”. Papers published earlier this year from the groups of Gould [5] and McCollum [6,7] have given a further indication of how the spindle pole body becomes the headquarters for this pathway, and also how the signals generated there finally reach the division site. Interestingly, an analogous pathway also exists in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, although in that organism the same genetic hardware appears to control not septation per se, but rather a more general exit from mitosis [8–10]. Cytokinesis in fission yeast requires the accomplishment of three basic tasks, which are separable genetically — that is, one can find mutants that are specifically defective in one task and not the others [1–3,11]. First, a prospective division site at the cell cortex must be identified, based on nuclear position, in the middle of the cell. Mutations in genes important for this process lead to all subsequent events occurring in the wrong place. Second, a ring of actomyosin and associated proteins forms at the cell middle. This occurs during mitosis itself and depends on a large number of genes, mostly related to actin organization. The third step of cell division occurs later, after the completion of anaphase. Patches of actin appear in the neighborhood of the medial ring, which contracts, concomitant with the centripetal deposition of a primary septum. Division is later completed by degradation of the primary septum; this is replaced by secondary septa on either side, which become the new ends of the two daughter cells. Even before any detailed molecular characterization, it was recognized that the genes specifically involved in septum formation are likely to function together as a single module [12]. More recently, however, with the identification of new components, the cloning of nearly all of the genes involved and the elucidation of their dependency relationships, a clear pathway controlling septation has emerged. Collectively, the genes involved in septation are referred to as sid genes, from their ‘septum initiation defective’ mutant phenotype. Loss-of-function mutation of a sid gene leads to a failure in deposition of septal material and a continuation of cell growth and the nuclear cell cycle, resulting in long, multinucleate cells [11,13]. Although all sid mutants have essentially the same phenotype, it has been possible to determine the order of sid genes in a common pathway, primarily by two methods. First, overexpression or mutation of certain pathway components leads to aberrant septation, but this can be blocked by mutations in more ‘downstream’ genes. Second, most of the sid gene products localize to one or both of the spindle pole bodies in interphase and/or mitosis (see below), and thus one can ask whether a given sid gene product is correctly localized in a given sid mutant. Together, these types of experiment have provided a compelling picture of how the septation signal is transduced from the spindle pole body to the division site (see Figure 1). At the heart of the Sid pathway is the protein kinase Cdc7p, shown by Fankhauser and Simanis [14] to regulate septation in a dosage-dependent manner. During interphase, Cdc7p shows no discrete localization, but in early mitosis it becomes localized to both spindle pole bodies, at opposite ends of the mitotic spindle, and later asymmetrically to a single spindle pole body [15]. This asymmetric localization, which may help to prevent the cell from forming more than one septum, is driven by association with the GTP-bound form of the GTPase switch protein Spg1p [15,16]. The GTPase activity of Spg1p is itself positively regulated by Cdc16p and Byr4p, acting as a two-component GTPaseactivating protein [17,18], and it may also be negatively regulated by the product of the cdc11+ gene acting as a guanine-nucleotide exchange factor [16]. The most recent work has involved the molecular cloning and characterization of additional members of the Sid pathway, and in so doing has not only filled in the gaps but also focussed attention on the precise relationships between components, and specifically on how the formal nature of a signalling scheme corresponds to physical protein complexes within cells. R548 Current Biology Vol 10 No 15 Figure 1 Sid4p Sid4p SPB scaffold? Symmetric at SPB Cdc16p, Byr4p Spg1p GTPase Total protein symmetric at SPB GTP-bound form asymmetric at SPB Spg1p ( GTP) Spg1p ( GDP) Cdc11p?? Cdc7p protein kinase Asymmetric at SPB Cdc7p Sid1p protein kinase Asymmetric at SPB Cell-cycle timing Sid2p protein kinase Symmetric at SPB Movement of signal from 'active' SPB to division site? Sid1p Sid2p Cdc14p Mob1p Current Biology Proposed order of sid gene products in the pathway controlling septation in the fission yeast S. pombe. At left is shown the molecular function and important aspects of localization of sid gene products to the spindle pole body (SPB) during mitosis; some details have been left out. The network at right shows how localization of different sid gene products to the spindle pole body depends on other sid genes. An arrow from ‘A’ to ‘B’ indicates that localization of ‘B’ to the spindle pole body depends on ‘A’, either directly or indirectly. Note the absence of arrows to Sid2p or Mob1p from Spg1p, Sid1p, and Cdc14p. Mob1p localization depends only partially on Cdc7p and Cdc11p (dashed arrows); Sid2p shows a stronger dependence on Cdc7 and Cdc11p, presumably because of its additional dependence on Mob1p. The work of Chang and Gould [5] has clearly put sid4+ at the top of the pathway. Sid4p is a protein which is of unknown function, but which has been found to be localized to the spindle pole body throughout the cell cycle, independently of all other sid genes. By contrast, the localization of all Sid proteins tested to date depends on Sid4p function. An amino-terminal region of Sid4p is sufficient for its localization, although this is not very efficient, suggesting that normal localization of Sid2p to the spindle pole body may depend on multimerization of the protein into a higher-order structure, which is mediated through more carboxy-terminal regions. but are also transiently associated with the division site around the time of septation. The two proteins are also physically associated in vivo, and while Mob1p is required for Sid2p localization to the spindle pole body (but not vice-versa), Sid2p is required for Mob1p to leave the spindle pole body and relocate to the division site [7]. At the other end are Sid2p [19] and Mob1p, identified by Hou et al. [7]. Sid2p was identified in the original sid screen [13] and is, like Cdc7p and Sid1p (see below), a protein kinase. However, Sid2p kinase activity peaks at the time of septation and requires all other sid genes, clearly putting it at the bottom of the pathway. Mob1p was identified from database searches on the basis of its similarity to a protein in budding yeast which binds to a budding yeast Sid2p homolog [20]. Both Sid2p and Mob1p localize to the spindle pole body throughout the cell cycle What is most exciting about Sid2p and Mob1p is that they provide the missing link between the spindle pole body and the division site. What they do there is still anyone’s guess, but the most salient observation in this light is that Sid2p/Mob1p localization to the division site depends on Cdc15p, a component of the medial actomyosin ring [7,19]. Interestingly, among medial ring mutants, cdc15 mutants are unique in that they fail to deposit any septal material during their defective cytokinesis. So the finger is clearly pointed at Cdc15p as a target for Sid2p/Mob1p. The other interesting point about Sid2p and Mob1p is that, although they are at the bottom of a formal signalling pathway, they are found at the spindle pole body throughout interphase, and at both spindle pole bodies during mitosis, whereas some ‘upstream’ components, such as Dispatch Sid1p, Cdc14p and Cdc7p, are associated with the spindle pole body only during mitosis, and in late mitosis with a single spindle pole body rather than both spindle poles [7,19]. Moreover, while the asymmetric spindle pole body localization of, for example, Sid1p and Cdc14p depends on all upstream components of the pathway [6], the spindle pole body localization of Sid2p and Mob1p is independent of Spg1p, Sid1p and Cdc14p, and Mob1p localization may also be somewhat independent of Cdc7p and the still uncloned cdc11+ (see Figure 1). So what looks like a linear pathway with respect to signalling begins to seem a little more complex from a structural point of view and not, for example, simply a pathway of successive recruitment of proteins to the spindle pole body. How might this shape our thinking of how the signalling complexes are actually arrayed at the spindle pole body, and how they function? Chang and Gould [5] suggest that Sid4p may serve as a kind of scaffolding platform for the entire Sid module. Sid4p could recruit Spg1 — and thereby Cdc7p, and thereby Sid1p/Cdc14p, as these three proteins depend on all upstream components for localization — and at the same time recruit a Mob1p/Sid2p complex more or less independently of upstream components (although this may be modulated by soluble, nonspindle-pole-body-localized Cdc7p). By contrast, the work of Guertin et al. [6] contributes significantly to a picture of temporal control. Sid1p, a protein kinase, and its binding partner, Cdc14p, lie downstream of Cdc7p in the pathway, and upstream of Sid2p. Like Spg1p–GTP and Cdc7p, Sid1p and Cdc14p are localized to the spindle pole body only in mitosis, and primarily to a single spindle pole body in late mitosis. However, the temporal appearance of Sid1p and Cdc14p at the spindle pole body is later than that of Cdc7, and also, unlike Cdc7p, the localization of Sid1p and Cdc14p to the spindle pole body seems to depend on inactivation of the mitotic, cyclin-dependent kinase composed of Cdc2p and Cdc13p, providing a compelling link between the completion of mitosis and the onset of septation. This link is strengthened by the fact that at least some of the elements involved in controlling mitotic progression in fission yeast (and budding yeast) are enriched at the spindle pole body [10]. Thus, not only do these new papers fill out the pathway by ordering nearly all of the known genes involved, but also they animate it into a series of spatially and temporally controlled events to which we can relate even as nongeneticists. The model of Guertin et al. [6], with the additional data on Mob1p and Sid4p, might be summarized as follows: Sid4p provides a landing site for Spg1p and also Sid2p/Mob1p. In mitosis, the GTP-bound form of Spg1p, by virtue of Cdc16p, Byr4p and Cdc11p, spatially restricts signalling to a single spindle pole body. R549 Signalling is handed off to Cdc7, which is recruited as an effector molecule of Spg1p. But Cdc7p, although active, cannot propagate the signal to Sid1p and Cdc14p until they are recruited to the spindle pole body, which depends on a signal of a successful mitosis from the cellcycle machinery. The timing of firing of septation is then provided by the kinase activity of Sid1p/Cdc14p, which promotes activation and release of Mob1p/Sid2p from the spindle pole body, allowing it to find the division site. To determine whether or not this is all moonshine will require more detailed biochemical analysis, as fractionation of complexes and the identification of the physiological kinase substrates in the Sid pathway will help to link all of the components together. But the basic elements of the model now provide a framework for further experiments to address the question of how the cell makes one, and only one, septum per cell cycle. For example, what is ultimately responsible for the asymmetry of signalling components at the spindle pole body? Is it a chance event, or driven by inherent asymmetries in spindle pole body reproduction [18]? What is the precise role of Sid2p/Mob1p at the division site, and how does it get there? And what is the nature of the relationship between the Sid pathway and the cell-cycle machinery, and with the polo kinase Plo1p, which has several functions in both mitosis and cytokinesis, and is also found at the spindle pole body [21,22]? Answers to these and other interesting questions should soon be forthcoming. Acknowledgements I thank Irina Stancheva and Hiro Ohkura for discussion and comments. In several places for the sake of brevity I have cited recent reviews rather than the primary literature. References 1. Gould KL, Simanis V: The control of septum formation in fission yeast. Genes Dev 1997, 11:2939-2951. 2. Balasubramanian MK, McCollum D, Gould KL: Cytokinesis in fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Methods Enzymol 1997, 283:494-506. 3. Le Goff X, Utzig S, Simanis V: Controlling septation in fission yeast: finding the middle, and timing it right. Curr Genet 1999, 35:571-584. 4. Boveri T: Zellen-studien IV. Über die Natur der Centrosomen. Jena, Fischer; 1901. 5. Chang L, Gould KL: Sid4p is required to localize components of the septation initiation pathway to the spindle pole body in fission yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2000, 97:5249-5254. 6. Guertin DA, Chang L, Irshad F, Gould KL, McCollum D: The role of the Sid1p kinase and Cdc14p in regulating the onset of cytokinesis in fission yeast. EMBO J 2000, 19:1803-1815. 7. Hou MC, Salek J, McCollum D: Mob1p interacts with the Sid2p kinase and is required for cytokinesis in fission yeast. Curr Biol 2000, 10:619-622. 8. Morgan DO: Regulation of the APC and the exit from mitosis. Nat Cell Biol 1999, 1:E47-E53. 9. Balasubramanian MK, McCollum D, Surana U: Tying the knot: linking cytokinesis to the nuclear cycle. J Cell Sci 2000, 113:1503-1513. 10. Cerutti L, Simanis V: Controlling the end of the cell cycle. Curr Opin Genet Dev 2000, 10:65-69. 11. Nurse P, Thuriaux P, Nasmyth K: Genetic control of the cell division cycle in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Mol Gen Genet 1976, 146:167-178. R550 Current Biology Vol 10 No 15 12. Marks J, Fankhauser C, Simanis V: Genetic interactions in the control of septation in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. J Cell Sci 1992, 101:801-808. 13. Balasubramanian MK, McCollum D, Chang L, Wong KC, Naqvi NI, He X, Sazer S, Gould KL: Isolation and characterization of new fission yeast cytokinesis mutants. Genetics 1998, 149:1265-1275. 14. Fankhauser C, Simanis V: The cdc7 protein kinase is a dosage dependent regulator of septum formation in fission yeast. EMBO J 1994, 13:3011-3019. 15. Sohrmann M, Schmidt S, Hagan I, Simanis, V: Asymmetric segregation on spindle poles of the Schizosaccharomyces pombe septum-inducing protein kinase Cdc7p. Genes Dev 1998, 12:84-94. 16. Schmidt S, Sohrmann M, Hofmann K, Woollard A, Simanis V: The Spg1p GTPase is an essential, dosage-dependent inducer of septum formation in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Genes Dev 1997, 11:1519-1534. 17. Furge KA, Wong K, Armstrong J, Balasubramanian M, Albright CF: Byr4 and Cdc16 form a two-component GTPase-activating protein for the Spg1 GTPase that controls septation in fission yeast. Curr Biol 1998, 8:947-954. 18. Cerutti L, Simanis V: Asymmetry of the spindle pole bodies and spg1p GAP segregation during mitosis in fission yeast. J Cell Sci 1999, 112:2313-2321. 19. Sparks CA, Morphew M, McCollum D: Sid2p, a spindle pole body kinase that regulates the onset of cytokinesis. J Cell Biol 1999, 146:777-790. 20. Komarnitsky SI, Chiang YC, Luca FC, Chen J, Toyn JH, Winey M, Johnston LH, Denis CL: DBF2 protein kinase binds to and acts through the cell cycle-regulated MOB1 protein. Mol Cell Biol 1998, 18:2100-2107. 21. Ohkura H, Hagan IM, Glover DM: The conserved Schizosaccharomyces pombe kinase plo1, required to form a bipolar spindle, the actin ring, and septum, can drive septum formation in G1 and G2 cells. Genes Dev 1995, 9:1059-1073. 22. Mulvihill DP, Petersen J, Ohkura H, Glover DM, Hagan IM: Plo1 kinase recruitment to the spindle pole body and its role in cell division in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Mol Biol Cell 1999, 10:2771-2785.