Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Plant breeding wikipedia , lookup
Ecology of Banksia wikipedia , lookup
Arabidopsis thaliana wikipedia , lookup
Plant evolutionary developmental biology wikipedia , lookup
Fertilisation wikipedia , lookup
Plant reproduction wikipedia , lookup
Flowering plant wikipedia , lookup
18 The mating game: pollination and fertilization in flowering plants Laura K Wilhelmi and Daphne Preuss* Recent work has revealed signaling molecules that control pollination, including small peptides that mediate pollen recognition and glycoproteins that support pollen tube growth. The polarized growth of pollen tubes requires a calciummediated signal cascade, and cues derived from the haploid and diploid ovule cells guide pollen tubes to the eggs. Addresses Department of Molecular Genetics and Cell Biology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA *e-mail: [email protected] Current Opinion in Plant Biology 1999, 2:18–22 http://biomednet.com/elecref/1369526600200018 © Elsevier Science Ltd ISSN 1369-5266 Abbreviations AGP arabinogalactan protein PCP pollen coat protein SI self-incompatibility SLG S-locus glycoprotein SRK S-locus receptor kinase TTS transmitting tissue-specific glycoprotein Introduction Plants, like other organisms, invest enormous resources to find the most suitable mate. Although regulation of flowering time and insect pollination help ensure that pollen arrives at an appropriate flower, recent studies reveal the importance of communication between male and female cells in controlling plant mating. Cell signaling regulates recognition of pollen by the stigma, migration of pollen tubes through the pistil, delivery of sperm to the ovules, and finally, co-ordinated development of the zygote, endosperm, seed, and fruit (Figure 1). In this review, we summarize recent insights into the mechanisms that control pollination and fertilization. for SI: SLG encodes an extracellular glycoprotein and SRK encodes a receptor kinase localized to the plasma membrane [1•,2]. Mutations in either gene result in self-compatibility, as do transgenic constructs that reduce their expression levels [1•,3,4]. How do SLG and SRK enable plants to reject incompatible pollen? Current models propose an interaction with a pollen-specific S locus gene, initiating a phosphorylation cascade that results in pollen rejection. Although the SI response is often accompanied by a rapid and localized production of β-1,3 glucan, or callose, in the stigma, surprising recent studies demonstrate that callose is not required for SI [5]. In addition, though adhesion of pollen to the stigma is species specific [6], pollen binding affinity does not correlate with SI [7•]. One approach used to identify pollen-specific SI components relied on characterizing the structure of the S locus itself. This resulted in the identification of one promising gene, SLA (S-locus anther), that is disrupted by a retrotransposon insertion in several self-compatible mutants [8]. Linkage of this SLA sequence defect with a mutant phenotype initially led to proposals that SLA mediates SI in pollen [8]. Subsequent investigations, however, showed that many wild-type strains have a similar insertion within SLA, indicating that SLA is not necessary for a functional SI response [9]. Nonetheless, exploring the S-locus for other genes active in SI remains a valuable approach. Stigma cells use a variety of mechanisms to limit the success of inappropriate pollen. On dry stigmas, the transfer of water and nutrients to pollen grains is also controlled — foreign pollen often remains dehydrated. The invasion of pollen tubes into stigma cells is regulated in many species, including those with wet stigmas. These early checkpoints serve to block pollination before pollen consumes valuable resources within the pistil. Purification of pollen components that bind to SLG and SRK led to the exciting discovery that peptide signals may regulate SI [10••]. The extracellular pollen coating contains several proteins, including a large family of cysteine-rich peptides (pollen coat proteins or PCPs) released onto the stigma surface upon pollination [10••,11,12•]. Purified fractions containing these peptides bind to SLG, although their function remains undefined. Curiously, the PCP genes neither map to the S locus, nor do their products bind to SLG in an allele-specific manner. Because genetic evidence suggests the male determinant of SI ought to be polymorphic and within the S-locus, a search for additional SLG-binding components may prove fruitful. Nonetheless, the strong sequence similarity between the PCPs and defensins, plant polypeptides with antifungal activity [12•], presents an intriguing possibility for peptide signaling during pollination. In self-incompatible Brassica species, self fertilization is inhibited at the stigma surface. A genetic and molecular characterization of self-incompatibility (SI) defined a complex polymorphic locus, which contains both male and female-specific genes [1•]. Recent studies conclusively demonstrate that two stigma-specific genes are necessary Immediately after pollination, compatible pollen grains absorb water and begin to form a pollen tube that invades the stigma. Whether stigma surfaces are wet or dry, lipids have been implicated in mediating pollen hydration [13,14,15•]. Mutations that eliminate the lipid-rich exudate of wet Nicotiana stigmas result in female sterility, and Pollen recognition at the stigma surface — the first line of defense The mating game Wilhelmi and Preuss 19 Figure 1 Anatomy of fertilization in flowering plants. (a) Representation of a typical pistil, consisting of a stigma, style, and ovary. Pollen grains land on the stigma surface and germinate pollen tubes which grow into the style through a central transmitting tract which contains the ovules. (b) Desiccated pollen grains land on the stigma cell surface; once compatible grains are hydrated, they are able to produce a pollen tube that carry two sperm to each ovule. sc, stigma cell; dp, desiccated pollen grain; hp, hydrated pollen grain; pt, pollen tube. (c) After exiting the style, pollen tubes enter the ovary, where they approach individual ovules. Each ovule contains a haploid female gametophyte, consisting of the egg and central cell nuclei (cn), that is surrounded by diploid integument tissue (it). The tubes grow up the funiculus and enter the micropyle, an opening in the ovule that allows the tube access to the female gametophyte. Fertilization of the egg by one sperm cell forms the zygote, and fusion of a second sperm cell with the two central cell nuclei forms the endosperm. fu, funiculus; pt, pollen tube. (a) (b) Stigma dp Pollen grain Growing pollen tube sc hp pt Style Transmitting tract (c) it cn Ovary Ovule egg fu pt Current Opinion in Plant Biology addition of lipids to the surface of these stigmas restores fertility [15•,16]. In plants with dry stigmas, long-chain lipids in the pollen coating are required for hydration [13,14]; delivery of those lipids may require oleosins — oil binding proteins that solubilize lipid droplets [17–19]. Though the application of short-chain lipids can cause pollen hydration even on dry stigmas [15•], it remains to be demonstrated if lipids alone can trigger a normal series of hydration events. Lipids may serve to form a water-tight seal between pollen and the stigma, facilitating the rapid transport of water through channels in the stigma and pollen membranes. The recent identification of an aquaporin-like gene within the Brassica S-locus may provide clues toward the regulation of this process [20]. Self-compatible mutants show reduced expression of this aquaporin, though the nature of the mutant defect remains to be demonstrated. Finally, it is reasonable to expect that several components contribute to pollen germination, some such as lipids or water channels that are shared among all plants and others, like flavonols, that play a species-specific role [21,22]. Pollen tube growth —organizing cell polarity Once pollen tubes invade the stigma, they grow through the style at rates that can approach 1 cm/hr. This polarized cell growth has been the focus of recent investigations: revealing parallels with systems as diverse as root hairs, yeast buds, and neural outgrowths. Small GTP-binding proteins are required for polarized secretion in many organisms; similarly, Rho GTPases are localized at the tips of pollen tubes and are essential for tube growth [23,24]. Rapid pollen tube growth also requires remodeling of pistil cell walls, and expansin and extensin-like activities required for cell wall loosening have been purified from maize pollen tubes [25,26]. Although polarized secretion and cell wall loosening are clearly required for pollen tube growth, additional activities are likely to provide signals that orientate the growing tubes. Calcium has long been implicated in directing tube growth, and exciting new evidence reveals the pathways and mechanisms by which pollen tubes react to calcium gradients [27,28]. Intriguingly, calcium gradients within pollen tubes oscillate in phase with pulses of tube growth [29,30•]. Identifying the source, concentration, and destination of the calcium ions that pulse across the pollen tube tip may provide important clues as to how calcium regulates cell polarity. Pathways known to be regulated by calcium are also under investigation, and a calcium-dependent protein kinase has been implicated in pollen tube reorientation [31]. Growing pollen tube tips exhibit high levels of a calcium-dependent, calmodulin-independent 20 Growth and development protein kinase (CDPK); localization of kinase activity changes with pollen tube orientation. Further, release of caged calcium ions on one side of the pollen tube apex induces a localized increase in calcium concentration, tube reorientation, and a corresponding increase in kinase activity adjacent to the site of release [28,31]. Pollen tube guidance — from the style to the ovules As pollen tubes travel through the style, many interactions between male and female cells facilitate inhibition of incompatible pollen tubes. In Nicotiana species, selfincompatible pollen tubes are arrested by S locus RNases [32,33]. These RNase molecules vary with each S allele, and current models suggest their import into or activity within incompatible pollen is regulated by a male-specific S-encoded protein. An intense search for this putative pollen component is underway. Unfortunately, analysis of the structure and function of the S-RNase genes themselves reveal few clues. Though active site residues have been identified [32], construction of chimeric RNases from different S alleles failed to identify functional domains [34]. Compatible pollen tubes import nutrients from the style extracellular matrix and respond to guidance signals as they travel through the transmitting tract. Arabinogalactan proteins (AGPs), abundant in stylar secretions, may provide important directional cues. The Yariv reagent, which binds AGPs, inhibits growth of lily and maize pollen, although a similar effect was not observed in all plants [35]. In Nicotiana tabacum, a transmitting tissue specific glycoprotein, TTS, exhibits a gradient of glycosylation that may attract and stimulate growth of pollen tubes to the base of the pistil [36,37]. Similar results, however, were not obtained with Nicotiana alata; despite 97% sequence identity and similar sugar modifications, the TTS homolog GaRSGP fails to exhibit a glycosylation gradient, attract pollen tubes or stimulate tube growth [38]. These recent studies warrant careful consideration and substantial work will be required to identify conserved style components that regulate the growth of pollen tubes. After exiting the style, pollen tubes grow toward the ovules, diploid structures that contain haploid female gametophytes (Figure 1). Though it was previously unclear which ovule tissues contribute to pollen tube guidance, recent studies show that both diploid and haploid female cells are important. Several diploid-specific mutations have been identified that alter ovule structure and function (see K Schneitz review, this issue pp 13–17, and [39•]). Some of these dramatically affect ovule morphology; not surprisingly, pollen tube guidance is also aberrant [40]. Other diploid-specific alterations reveal that morphologically normal ovules can also be defective in guiding pollen tubes [40,41]. In one case, female tissues from a self-sterile Arabidopsis mutant exhibit aberrant pollen tube guidance only in the presence of mutant pollen [41]. This suggests diploid pistil cells, including those that comprise the funiculus and integuments (Figure 1), may be required to attract, bind, and promote the growth of pollen tubes. Conclusive evidence that the haploid gametophyte is also required for pollen tube targeting has come from the identification of an Arabidopsis strain that contains a balanced chromosomal translocation [42••]. Heterozygotes that carry this translocation have a normal genetic complement; in these plants, half of the meioses undergo adjacent chromosome segregation, resulting in lethal chromosome imbalances in the meiotic products. Consequently, although all of the ovules have genetically normal diploid cells, half contain aborted gametophytes. In these plants, pollen tubes fail to approach the abnormal gametophytes, though normal ovules have associated pollen tubes. Although these studies reveal that a female gametophyte is important for guidance, the female gametophyte might induce the surrounding diploid tissue to emit guidance cues. The next generation — from gametophytes to seeds Gene expression in pollen tubes and female gametophytes is required for successful reproduction, but few genetic screens aimed at identifying haploid-specific (gametophytic) mutants have been performed. Diploid-specific (sporophytic) mutations dramatically reduce fertility and are relatively easy to isolate; in contrast, male or femalespecific gametophytic defects cause at most a 50% reduction in seed yield. Recently, progress has been made toward identifying large numbers of defects in Arabidopsis gametophytes. One approach has relied on following the transmission of a heterozygous T-DNA insertion to the next generation; biased transmission indicates a defect in the fertility of the male and/or female gametophytes that carry the insertion [43,44]. Alternatively, genes with interesting haploid-specific roles in development can be identified by careful characterization of mutants with defective pollen morphology [45,46]. The genomes contributed by the male and female gametophytes may be fundamentally different, due to heritable epigenetic modifications (genetic imprinting) that alter gene expression patterns. In a recent study, crosses between Arabidopsis diploids, tetraploids, and hexaploids were performed to cause imbalances in the maternal and paternal contributions to the embryo and endosperm [47•]. An excess of maternal genomes (for example when a tetraploid female is pollinated by a diploid male) inhibits the development of the endosperm and results in the formation of small embryos, whereas an excess of paternal genomes causes embryos and endosperm to grow larger than normal. More severe imbalances can result in seedling lethality; for example, tes (tetraspore) and std (stud) mutants are defective in pollen cytokinesis and form polyploid sperm that lead to genetic imbalances and embryo abortion [48,49]. Finally, maternal effect genes that regulate embryonic The mating game Wilhelmi and Preuss development in Arabidopsis have been identified through gene trapping, a transposon insertion screen that results in the fusion of a reporter gene carried on the transposon to chromosomal genes [50]. Mutations in MEDEA, a homolog of Drosophila Polycomb genes, cause embryo abortion when transmitted through females. Though the number of genes that can be imprinted is unknown, genetic strategies aimed at isolating maternally or paternally imprinted loci will likely prove worthwhile. The co-ordinated formation of embryos, endosperm, seeds, and fruit is likely to require the exchange of multiple developmental signals, and mutations that affect this signaling have been identified. Arabidopsis mutants known as fie (fertilisation-independent endosperm) or fis (fertilisation-independent seed) [51•,52], inappropriately initiate development of the endosperm before fertilization takes place. Mutant fie and fis alleles often fail to be transmitted through female gametophytes. Even when fertilization of these aberrant gametophytes takes place, the defect in developmental co-ordination results in embryo lethality. Regulation of fruit development likely requires a distinct set of genes; mutation of a MADS-box gene (AGL8 or FRUITFULL) was recently shown to interrupt fruit development, without affecting the formation of seeds [53]. Conclusion Plant reproduction occurs in a competitive environment — choosing among the available mating partners requires an amazing array of cell signaling interactions. Recent investigations of pollination in self-compatible and self-incompatible plants have unearthed a complex set of genetic and molecular controls, active in both diploid and haploid cells. Though many important molecules have been defined, discerning those that play general, rather than species-specific, roles remains a challenge for the future. References and recommended reading Papers of particular interest, published within the annual period of review, have been highlighted as: • of special interest •• of outstanding interest 1. Nasrallah JB: Signal perception and response in the interactions of • self-incompatibility in Brassica. Essays Biochem 1997, 32:143-160. Comprehensive review of the genetic and molecular basis of self-incompatibility in Brassica oleracea and related species. 2. Stein JC, Dixit R, Nasrallah ME, Nasrallah JB: SRK, the stigmaspecific S locus receptor kinase of Brassica, is targeted to the plasma membrane in transgenic tobacco. Plant Cell 1996, 8:429-445. 3. Stahl RJ, Arnoldo MA, Glavin TL, Goring DR, Rothstein SJ: The self-incompatibility phenotype in Brassica is altered by the transformation of a mutant S locus receptor kinase. Plant Cell 1998, 10:209-218. 4. 5. 6. Conner JA, Tantikanjana T, Stein JC, Kandasamy MK, Nasrallah JB, Nasrallah ME: Transgene-induced silencing of S locus genes and related genes in Brassica. Plant J 1997, 11:809-823. Sulaman W, Arnoldo MA, Yu K, Tulsieram L, Rothstein SJ, Goring DR: Loss of callose in the stigma papillae does not affect the Brassica self-incompatibility phenotype. Planta 1997, 203:327-331. Strauss E: How plants pick their mates. Science 1998, 281:503. 21 7. • Luu D-T, Heizmann P, Dumas C: Pollen–stigma adhesion in kale is not dependent on the self-(in)compatibility genotype. Plant Physiol 1997, 115:1221-1230. A quantitative measurement of the binding force between pollen and the stigma in the first hour following pollination. Interestingly, both compatible and incompatible Brassica pollen was shown to bind with equal efficiencies to stigmas. 8. Boyes DC, Nasrallah JB: An anther-specific gene encoded by an S locus haplotype of Brassica produces complementary and differentially regulated transcripts. Plant Cell 1995, 7:1283-1294. 9. Pastuglia M, Ruffio-Chåble V, Delorme V, Gaude T, Dumas C, Cock JM: A functional S locus anther gene is not required for the self-incompatibility response in Brassica oleracea. Plant Cell 1997, 9:2065-2076. 10. Stephenson AG, Doughty J, Dixon S, Elleman C, Hiscock S, •• Dickinson HG: The male determinant of self-incompatibility in Brassica oleracea is located in the pollen coating. Plant J 1997, 12:1351-1359. An elegant bioassay was developed, that enabled purification and characterization of the pollen component of self-incompatibility. For this assay, the pollen coating was extracted from self-compatible and incompatible pollen. Reconstitution of this coating onto other pollen grains confirmed that male self-incompatibility can be controlled by factors in the pollen coat. 11. Stanchev BS, Doughty J, Scutt CP, Dickinson H, Croy RRD: Cloning of PCP1, a member of a family of pollen coat protein (PCP) genes from Brassica oleracea encoding novel cysteine-rich proteins involved in pollen–stigma interactions. Plant J 1996, 10:303-313. 12. Doughty J, Dixon S, Hiscock SJ, Willis AC, Parkin IAP, Dickinson HG: • PCP-A1, a defensin-like Brassica pollen coat protein that binds the S locus glycoprotein, is the product of gametophytic gene expression. Plant Cell 1998, 10:1333-1347. Extracts of the pollen coating were shown to contain small peptides that bind to SLG, the stigma-specific component of the Brassica self-incompatibility response. Cloning the corresponding gene revealed sequences with similarity to peptides involved in anti-fungal defenses. Interestingly, the PCP gene was expressed after meiosis, suggesting that it is regulated by a haploid-specific promoter. 13. Preuss D, Lemieux B, Yen G, Davis RW: A conditional sterile mutation eliminates surface components from Arabidopsis pollen and disrupts cell signaling during fertilization. Genes Dev 1993, 7:974-985. 14. Hülskamp M, Kopczak SD, Horejsi TF, Kihl BK, Pruitt RE: Identification of genes required for pollen-stigma recognition in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J 1995, 8:703-714. 15. Wolters-Arts M, Lush WM, Mariani C: Lipids are required for • directional pollen-tube growth. Nature 1998, 392:818-821. A stigma mutant that lacks an oil-rich exudate was used to define lipid molecules required for pollen hydration and germination on Nicotiana stigmas. Interestingly, only certain lipids were found to have high levels of activity, and these lipids also rescued pollen hydration in Arabidopsis mutants that lack lipids in the pollen coating. 16. Goldman MHS, Goldberg RB, Mariani C: Female sterile tobacco plants are produced by stigma specific cell ablation. EMBO J 1994, 13:2976-2984. 17. de Oliveira DE, Franco LO, Simoens C, Seurinck J, Coppieters J, Botterman J, Van Montagu M: Influorescence-specific genes from Arabidopsis thaliana encoding glycine-rich proteins. Plant J 1993, 3:495-507. 18. Robert LS, Gerster JL, Allard S, Cass L, Simmonds J: Molecular characterization of two Brassica napus genes related to oleosins which are highly expressed in the tapetum. Plant J 1994, 6:927-933. 19. Ross JHE, Murphy DJ: Characterization of anther-expressed genes encoding a major class of extracellular oleosin-like proteins in the pollen coat of Brassicaceae. Plant J 1996, 9:625-637. 20. Ikeda S, Nasrallah JB, Dixit R, Preiss S, Nasrallah ME: An aquaporinlike gene required for the Brassica Self-incompatibility response. Science 1997, 276:1564-1566. 21. Mo Y, Nagel C, Taylor LP: Biochemical complementation of chalcone synthase mutants defines a role for flavonols in functional pollen. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1992, 89:7213-7217. 22. Burbulis IE, Iacobucci M, Shirley BW: A null mutation in the first enzyme of flavonoid biosynthesis does not affect male fertility in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 1997, 8:1013-1025. 22 Growth and development 23. Lin Y, Wang Y, Zhu J, Yang Z: Localization of a Rho GTPase implies a role in tip growth and movement of the generative cell in pollen tubes. Plant Cell 1996, 8:293-303. 40. Hülskamp M, Schneitz K, Pruitt RE: Genetic evidence for a long-range activity that directs pollen tube guidance in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 1995, 7:57-64. 24. Lin Y, Yang Z: Inhibition of pollen tube elongation by microinjected anti-Rop1Ps antibodies suggests a crucial role for Rho-type GTPases in the control of tip growth. Plant Cell 1997, 9:1647-1659. 41. Wilhelmi LK, Preuss D: Self-sterility in Arabidopsis due to defective pollen tube guidance. Science 1996, 274:1535-1537. 25. Rubinstein AL, Marquez J, Suarez-Cervera M, Bedinger PA: Extensinlike glycoproteins in the maize pollen tube wall. Plant Cell 1995, 7:2211-2225. 26. Cosgrove DJ, Bedinger P, Durachko DM: Group I allergens of grass pollen as cell wall-loosening agents. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1997, 94:6559-6564. 27. Malhó R, Read ND, Trewevas AJ, Pais MS: Calcium channel activity during pollen tube growth and reorientation. Plant Cell 1995, 7:1173-1184. 28. Malhó R, Trewevas AJ: Localized apical increases of cytosolic free calcium control pollen tube orientation. Plant Cell 1996, 8:1935-1949. 29. Messerli M, Robinson KR: Tip localized Ca2+ pulses are coincident with peak pulsatile growth rates in pollen tubes of Lilium longiflorum. J Cell Sci 1997, 110:1269-1278. 30. Holdaway-Clarke TL, Feijo JA, Hackett GR, Kunkel JG, Hepler PK: • Pollen tube growth and the intracellular cytosolic calcium gradient oscillate in phase while extracellular calcium influx is delayed. Plant Cell 1997, 9:1999-2010. Fluorescent calcium reporter molecules were used to follow fluxes in the calcium gradient in pollen tubes. Importantly, the gradient fluctuations that occurred at the pollen tube tip were in phase with the pulsating growth of pollen tubes. 31. Moutinho A, Trewevas AJ, Malhó R: Relocation of a Ca2+-dependent protein kinase activity during pollen tube reorientation. Plant Cell 1998, 10:1499-1509. 32. Dodds PN, Clarke AE, Newbigin E: A molecular perspective on pollination in flowering plants. Cell 1996, 85:141-144. 33. Lee HS, Huang S, Kao T: S proteins control rejection of incompatible pollen in Petunia inflata. Nature 1994, 367:560-563. 34. Zurek DM, Mou B, Beecher B, McClure B: Exchanging sequence domains between S-RNases from Nicotiana alata disrupts pollen recognition. Plant J 1997, 11:797-808. 35. Roy S, Juah GY, Hepler PK, Lord EM: Effects of Yariv phenyglycoside on cell wall assembly in the lily pollen tube. Planta 1998, 204:450-458. 36. Cheung AY, Wang H, Wu HM: A floral transmitting tissue-specific glycoprotein attracts pollen tubes and stimulates their growth. Cell 1995, 11:383-393. 37. Wu HM, Wang H, Cheung AY: A pollen tube growth stimulatory glycoprotein is deglycosylated by pollen tubes and displays a glycosylation gradient in the flower. Cell 1995, 11:395-403. 38. Sommer-Knudsen J, Lush WM, Bacic A, Clarke AE: Re-evaluation of the role of a transmitting tract-specific glycoprotein on pollen tube growth. Plant J 1998, 13:529-535. 39. Baker SC, Robinson-Beers K, Villanueva JM, Gaiser C, Gasser CS: • Interactions among genes regulating ovule development in Arabidopsis thaliana. Genetics 1997, 145:1109-1124. A thorough examination of the genetic control of ovule development in Arabidopsis. Epistasis tests are performed with several developmental mutants, and a comprehensive model for ovule formation is presented. 42. Ray S, Park S-S, Ray A: Pollen tube guidance by the female •• gametophyte. Development 1997, 124:2489-2498. A creative investigation of the contribution of the female gametophyte to pollen tube guidance in Arabidopsis. A translocation heterozygote was used to show that pollen tubes target only ovules that contain a viable female gametophyte. 43. Feldmann KA, Coury DA, Christianson ML: Exceptional segregation of a selectable marker (KanR) in Arabidopsis identifies genes important for gametophytic growth and development. Genetics 1997, 147:1411-1422. 44. Howden R, Park SK, Moore JM, Orme J, Grossniklaus U, Twell D: Selection of T-DNA-tagged male and female gametophytic mutants by segregation distortion in Arabidopsis. Genetics 1998, 149:621-631. 45. Chen Y-CS, McCormick S: sidecar pollen, an Arabidopsis thaliana male gametophytic mutant with aberrant cell divisions during pollen development. Development 1996, 122:3243-3253. 46 Park SK, Howden R, Twell D: The Arabidopsis thaliana gametophytic mutation gemini pollen 1 disrupts microspore polarity, division asymmetry and pollen cell fate. Development 1998, 125:3789-3799. 47. • Scott RJ, Spielman M, Bailey J, Dickinson HG: Parent-of-origin effects on seed development in Arabidopsis thaliana. Development 1998, 125:3329-3341. Crosses between Arabidopsis strains of different ploidy illustrate the requirement for a balanced male and female contribution to seed development. Imbalances resulted in dramatic alterations in the size and developmental program of the embryo and endosperm. 48. Spielman M, Preuss D, Li F-L, Browne WE, Scott RJ, Dickinson HG: TETRASPORE is required for male meiotic cytokinesis in Arabidopsis thaliana. Development 1997, 124:2645-2657. 49. Hülskamp M, Parekh NS, Grini P, Schneitz K, Zimmermann I, Lolle SJ, Pruitt RE: The STUD gene is required for male-specific cytokinesis after telophase II of meiosis in Arabidopsis thaliana. Dev Bio 1997, 187:114-124. 50. Grossniklaus U, Vielle-Calzada J-P, Hoeppner MA, Gagliano WB: Maternal control of embryogenesis by MEDEA, a Polycomb group gene in Arabidopsis. Science 1998, 280:446-450. 51. Chaudhury AM, Ming L, Miller C, Craig S, Dennis ES, Peacock WJ: • Fertilization-independent seed development in Arabidopsis thaliana. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1997, 94:4223-4228. These studies [51•,52] describe the identification of mutations that cause endosperm development and seed coat ripening in the absence of fertilization. Although the resulting seeds do not contain a viable embryo, this approach is an important step toward understanding parthenogenic development. 52. Ohad N, Margossian L, Hsu Y, Williams C, Repetti P, Fischer RL: A mutation that allows endosperm development without fertilization. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1996, 93:5319-5324. 53. Gu G, Ferrandiz C, Yanofsky MF, Martienssen R: The FRUITFULL MADS-box gene mediates cell differentiation during Arabidopsis fruit development. Development 1998, 125:1509-1517.