Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
JACC: HEART FAILURE VOL. 4, NO. 4, 2016 ª 2016 BY THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY FOUNDATION PUBLISHED BY ELSEVIER ISSN 2213-1779/$36.00 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jchf.2015.10.007 CLINICAL RESEARCH Myocardial Microvascular Inflammatory Endothelial Activation in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction Constantijn Franssen, MD,a Sophia Chen, BSC,a Andreas Unger, PHD,b H. Ibrahim Korkmaz, MSC,a,c Gilles W. De Keulenaer, MD, PHD,d Carsten Tschöpe, MD, PHD,e Adelino F. Leite-Moreira, MD, PHD,f René Musters, PHD,a Hans W.M. Niessen, MD, PHD,c Wolfgang A. Linke, PHD,b Walter J. Paulus, MD, PHD,a Nazha Hamdani, PHDa,b ABSTRACT OBJECTIVES The present study investigated whether systemic, low-grade inflammation of metabolic risk contributed to diastolic left ventricular (LV) dysfunction and heart failure with preseved ejection fraction (HFpEF) through coronary microvascular endothelial activation, which alters paracrine signalling to cardiomyocytes and predisposes them to hypertrophy and high diastolic stiffness. BACKGROUND Metabolic risk is associated with diastolic LV dysfunction and HFpEF. METHODS We explored inflammatory endothelial activation and its effects on oxidative stress, nitric oxide (NO) bioavailability, and cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP)-protein kinase G (PKG) signalling in myocardial biopsies of HFpEF patients and validated our findings by comparing obese Zucker diabetic fatty/Spontaneously hypertensive heart failure F1 hybrid (ZSF1)-HFpEF rats to ZSF1-Control (Ctrl) rats. RESULTS In myocardium of HFpEF patients and ZSF1-HFpEF rats, we observed the following: 1) E-selectin and intercellular adhesion molecule-1 expression levels were upregulated; 2) NADPH oxidase 2 expression was raised in macrophages and endothelial cells but not in cardiomyocytes; and 3) uncoupling of endothelial nitric oxide synthase, which was associated with reduced myocardial nitrite/nitrate concentration, cGMP content, and PKG activity. CONCLUSIONS HFpEF is associated with coronary microvascular endothelial activation and oxidative stress. These lead to a reduction of NO-dependent signalling from endothelial cells to cardiomyocytes, which can contribute to the high cardiomyocyte stiffness and hypertrophy observed in HFpEF. (J Am Coll Cardiol HF 2016;4:312–24) © 2016 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation. From the aDepartment of Physiology, Institute for Cardiovascular Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; bDepartment of Cardiovascular Physiology, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany; cDepartment of Pathology and Cardiac Surgery, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; dLaboratory of Physiology, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium; eDepartment of Cardiology and Pneumology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; and the fDepartment of Physiology and Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal. This study was supported by a Dutch Heart Foundation CVON (Cardiovasculair Onderzoek Nederland); ARENA (Approaching Heart Failure By Translational Research Of RNA Mechanisms) grant and European Commission grant FP7-Health-2010; MEDIA (MEtabolic Road to DIAstolic Heart Failure; 261409). The authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose. Drs. Franssen and Chen contributed equally to this work. Manuscript received July 13, 2015; revised manuscript received September 21, 2015, accepted October 1, 2015. Franssen et al. JACC: HEART FAILURE VOL. 4, NO. 4, 2016 APRIL 2016:312–24 M etabolic risk is increasingly recognized as mechanism of LV remodeling in HFpEF differs ABBREVIATIONS an important contributor to diastolic left from heart failure with reduced ejection frac- AND ACRONYMS ventricular (LV) dysfunction and to heart tion (HFrEF), where eccentric LV remodeling failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). results from cardiomyocyte cell death path- Recent longitudinal noninvasive studies over a ways 4-year time interval revealed close correlations apoptosis, or necrosis (13). It also differs from between diastolic LV stiffness and body mass index aortic stenosis (AS), where concentric LV (BMI) (1,2). These studies concluded that weight remodeling is induced by excessive systolic loss wall stress (14). To establish the validity of and 313 Microvascular Endothelial Inflammation in HFpEF reduction of central adiposity could such as accelerated dysfunction autophagy, monophosphate DM = diabetes mellitus eNOS = endothelial nitric oxide synthase HFpEF = heart failure with endothelial opment of HFpEF. Similar evidence was provided remodeling in HFpEF, the current study HFrEF = heart failure with by the ALLHAT trial (The Antihypertensive and compared microvascular endothelial inflam- reduced ejection fraction Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack matory activation and its effects on myocar- ICAM = intercellular adhesion Trial), which enrolled patients with arterial hyperten- dial oxidative stress, NO bioavailability, and molecule sion and 1 additional cardiovascular risk factor and cGMP content in biopsies of myocardial tissue NO = nitric oxide observed that a high BMI at enrollment was the stron- from NOX2 = NADPH oxidase 2 gest predictor for development of HFpEF (3). This Furthermore, we studied the ability of meta- finding was consistent with the high prevalence of bolic risk to induce HFpEF through myocardial overweight and obesity in large trials and registries microvascular endothelial inflammatory activation in of HFpEF outcome registries, which almost uniformly leptin-resistant, obese, hypertensive Zucker diabetic reported a median BMI value in HFpEF patients in fatty/Spontaneously hypertensive heart failure F1 excess of 30 kg/m2 . hybrid (ZSF1) rats. These rats develop HFpEF pheno- HFrEF, and AS LV cGMP = cyclic guanosine prevent diastolic LV dysfunction and eventual devel- HFpEF, controlling AS = aortic stenosis patients. preserved ejection fraction PKG = protein kinase G type after 20 weeks, which was evident from elevated LV filling pressures with preserved LV systolic SEE PAGE 325 function, increased lung weight because of pulmonary obesity, congestion, and increased stiffness of isolated myo- endothelial inflammatory activation, evident from cardial strips (15). At that time, a similar assessment of adhesion molecule expression, appears to be the myocardial microvascular endothelial inflammatory earliest (4). activation and its effects on oxidative stress, NO Endothelial inflammatory activation is associated bioavailability, cGMP content, and PKG signalling was with microalbuminuria, which was recently shown to performed, and results were compared to those in age- be associated with diastolic LV dysfunction (5) and to matched, lean hypertensive ZSF1 rats with normal predict development of HFpEF (6). When endothelial diastolic LV function and no lung congestion. In primates developing manifestation of diet-induced vascular damage inflammatory activation evolves to endothelial dysfunction, vasomotor responses become blunted as METHODS shown by a lower reactive hyperemic response (7), which provides both diagnostic and prognostic in- A detailed Methods section can be found in the Online formation in HFpEF (8,9). In HFpEF, endothelial Appendix. dysfunction also closely relates to worsening of HUMAN SAMPLES. Human HFrEF and HFpEF sam- symptoms (10), functional capacity (10), and pre- ples were procured from LV biopsies (HFrEF [n ¼ 43] capillary pulmonary hypertension (11). and HFpEF [n ¼ 36]). HFrEF and HFpEF patients were This prominent involvement of metabolic risk and hospitalized for HF and underwent transvascular LV endothelial inflammatory activation recently led to a endomyocardial biopsy because of suspected infil- new paradigm for development of HFpEF (12). In trative or inflammatory cardiomyopathy. Patients accordance with this paradigm, metabolic comorbid- were included if significant coronary artery disease ities drive LV remodeling and dysfunction in HFpEF (stenosis >50%) was ruled out by angiography and if through coronary microvascular endothelial inflam- histological analysis of the biopsy sample showed no mation, which alters paracrine signalling from endo- evidence of infiltrative or inflammatory myocardial thelial cells to surrounding cardiomyocytes. It is disease. Patients were classified as HFpEF if LVEF especially the fall in nitric oxide (NO)-cyclic guanosine was monophosphate (cGMP)-protein was <97 ml/m 2, and LV end-diastolic pressure was signalling predisposes kinase G (PKG) >50%, LV end diastolic volume index to >16 mm Hg (16). If LVEF was <45%, a patient was develop hypertrophy and high diastolic resting classified as HFrEF. AS patients (n ¼ 67) had severe AS tension. Microvascular endothelial dysfunction as a (mean aortic valve area ¼ 0.53 0.04 cm 2) without that cardiomyocytes 314 Franssen et al. JACC: HEART FAILURE VOL. 4, NO. 4, 2016 APRIL 2016:312–24 Microvascular Endothelial Inflammation in HFpEF concomitant coronary artery disease. Biopsy speci- NITRATE/NITRITE CONCENTRATION. Concentrations of mens from this group were procured from endomyo- nitrite/nitrate were measured in tissue homogenates cardial tissue resected from the septum (using the from 10 ZSF1-Ctrls, 10 ZSF1-HFpEF, 16 AS, 16 HFpEF, Morrow procedure) during aortic valve replacement. and 16 HFrEF samples by using a colorimetric assay The local ethics committee approved the study pro- kit (BioVision, Milpitas, California). tocol. Written informed consent was obtained from IMMUNOELECTRON MICROSCOPIC QUANTIFICATION all patients. Control human samples (n ¼ 4) were procured from patients with OF 3-NITROTYROSINE. A standard pre-embedding life-threatening immunogold electron microscopy protocol was used arrhythmia, suspected infiltrative heart disease or to quantify myocardial 3-nitrotyrosine in 6 ZSF1- myocarditis, and a preserved LVEF without coronary HFpEF and 6 ZSF1-Ctrl rat samples. artery disease who had histology rule out myocarditis or infiltrative pathology. Because of limited availability of human myocardial tissue, histological and biochemical determinations could only be performed in subgroups of patients, randomly selected by blinded investigators. MYOCARDIAL PKA, PKC, PKG, cGMP, AND CaMKII ACTIVITY. Kinase activities were assessed in myocar- dial homogenates. Activity levels of 10 ZSF1-HFpEF and 10 ZSF1-Ctrls were analyzed as described previously for protein kinase A (PKA) and PKC (17) and for PKG and cGMP (18). Ca2þ/calmodulin-dependent RAT SAMPLES. Obese ZSF1 rats were previously protein kinase II (CaMKII) activity was determined shown to develop HFpEF phenotype over a 20-week using a CaMKII assay kit (CycLex; MBL Corp., Woburn, lifespan (15) and are referred to as ZSF1-HFpEF MA), using 10 ZSF1-HFpEF and ZSF1-Ctrl samples. (n ¼ 8) in the present study. These rats are hypertensive and develop obesity and diabetes mellitus (DM) because of leptin resistance. ZSF1-lean rats are hypertensive but do not develop obesity or DM and have no HFpEF phenotype (15). The ZSF1-lean rats are referred to as ZSF1-Ctrls (n ¼ 8) in the present study. All rats were sacrificed at 20 weeks of age. WESTERN BLOTTING. Expression of total and phospho-proteins was measured in homogenized samples, as follows: expression of intercellular adhesion molecule (ICAM)-1 was measured in 16 ZSF1Ctrls, 16 ZSF1-HFpEF, 4 AS, 7 HFrEF, and 4 HFpEF samples; E-selectin in 6 AS, 8 HFrEF, and 8 HFpEF samples; endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) in 8 ZSF1-Ctrls, 8 ZSF1-HFpEF, 5 AS, 7 HFrEF, and 7 HFpEF samples; and kinases in 8 to 10 ZSF1-Ctrls and 8 to 10 ZSF1-HFpEF samples. IMMUNOFLUORESCENCE. Myocardial STATISTICAL ANALYSIS. Differences among groups were analyzed by 1-way followed by assessed by an unpaired Student t test. All analyses were performed using Prism version 6.0 software (GraphPad Inc., Lo Jolla, CA). RESULTS PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS. More HFpEF than HFrEF patients were hypertensive, and DM was more prevalent in HFpEF than AS patients (Table 1). BMI was higher in HFpEF than in AS patients. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor blockers, diuretic agents, and digoxin were more frequently used by HFpEF patients than by HFrEF patients, compared to AS patients. Aldosterone receptor antagonists were ex- used more by HFpEF patients than b AS patients, but pression was measured by immunofluorescence in were used even more frequently by HFrEF patients. frozen sections of 10- mm-thick rat myocardium sam- LV peak systolic pressure and LVEF were higher ples from 12 ZSF1-HFpEF and 12 ZSF1-Ctrls. in HFpEF patients than in HFrEF patients but IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY. For ICAM-1 ANOVA, Bonferroni-adjusted t test. Single comparisons were immunohistochem- were highest in AS patients. LV end-diastolic volume ical staining of myeloperoxidase (MPO), CD68, and index was lower in HFpEF patients than in HFrEF NADPH oxidase-2 (NOX2), paraffin-embedded myo- patients but were lowest in AS patients. LV end- cardial samples from 8 ZSF1-Ctrls and 8 ZSF1-HFpEF diastolic pressures were equally elevated in all pa- were used for MPO and CD68 analysis; and 8 ZSF1- tient groups. Ctrls, 8 ZSF1-HFpEF, 4 HFpEF, and 4 Ctrl patient MICROVASCULAR INFLAMMATION AND MACROPHAGE samples were used for NOX2 analysis. ACTIVATION IN HFpEF. Microvascular inflammation MYOCARDIAL HYDROGEN PEROXIDE QUANTIFICATION. and macrophage activation were assessed by analysis Hydrogen peroxide (H 2O 2) was assessed in human of expression of the vascular adhesion molecules and rat myocardial tissue homogenates from 10 ZSF1- ICAM-1 and E-selectin. Expression levels of both of Ctrls, 10 ZSF1-HFpEF, 16 AS, 16 HFrEF, and 16 HFpEF the markers were increased in HFpEF compared to samples. those in AS or HFrEF patients (Figures 1A and 1B), Franssen et al. JACC: HEART FAILURE VOL. 4, NO. 4, 2016 APRIL 2016:312–24 Microvascular Endothelial Inflammation in HFpEF T A B L E 1 Baseline Characteristics and Hemodynamics of Patients HFpEF (n ¼ 36) HFrEF (n ¼ 43) AS (n ¼ 67) Control (n ¼ 4) p Value (HFpEF vs. HFrEF) p Value (HFpEF vs. AS) 63.8 2.0 60.0 2.1 65.3 1.6 51 4 0.21 0.57 % of males 56 70 47 25 0.24 0.53 % of hypertension 78 16 58 — <0.0001 % of DM 47 30 26 — Age, yrs 0.16 0.07 0.047 BMI, kg/m2 30.4 1.0 27.5 0.8 28.1 0.6 — 0.023 0.031 GFR, ml/min/1.73 m2 72.9 2.3 73.3 2.7 68.9 18.5 — 0.49 0.2 % of atrial fibrillation 14 33 2 — 0.067 0.028 % taking medications ACEI/ARB 81 81 43 — 1.00 <0.0001 Beta-blocker 53 63 61 — 0.49 0.52 Diuretic agent 78 72 54 — 0.61 Aldosterone receptor antagonist 47 74 7 — 0.020 Digoxin 14 33 2 — 0.067 0.028 Statin 42 21 46 — 0.054 0.83 0.028 <0.0001 Metformin 17 14 3 — 0.76 0.049 Bronchodilators 17 19 9 — 1.00 0.34 Hemodynamics HR, beats/min 75 2 82 4 74 2 80 16 0.073 LVPSP, mm Hg 166 6 120 3 223 4 135 15 <0.0001 LVEDP, mm Hg 25.1 1.1 22.3 1.4 22.8 1.4 13 4 LVEDVI, ml/m2 80 3 127 5 55 2 78 23 <0.0001 <0.0001 58.4 2.1 29.4 1.5 64.0 1.2 73 3 <0.0001 0.016 % of LVEF 0.71 0.12 <0.0001 0.21 Values are mean SD or%. ACEI ¼ angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor; ARB ¼ angiotensin II receptor blocker; AS ¼ aortic stenosis; BMI ¼ body mass index; DM ¼ diabetes mellitus; HFpEF ¼ heart failure with preserved ejection fraction; HFrEF indicates heart failure with reduced ejection fraction; HR ¼ heart rate; LVEDP ¼ left ventricular end-diastolic pressure; LVEDVI ¼ left ventricular end-diastolic volume index; LVEF ¼ left ventricular ejection fraction; LVPSP ¼ left ventricular peak-systolic pressure. consistent with the comorbidity-induced proin- flammatory status of HFpEF patients. in cardiomyocytes, however, was comparable those in both HFpEF and control patients (Figure 2C). Findings Similarly, immunofluorescence showed increased were confirmed in ZSF1-HFpEF myocardium by the endothelial ICAM-1 and E-selectin expression levels presence of more NOX2-expressing macrophages than in ZSF1-HFpEF rats compared to those in ZSF1- in ZSF1-Ctrl. Similar to the human findings, NOX2 Ctrls (Figures 1C and 1D). ZSF1-HFpEF rats also expression levels were equal to those in car- had higher myocardial CD68 and MPO expres- diomyocytes sion levels than ZSF1-Ctrls, indicating monocyte/ (Figure 2D). Furthermore, NOX2 expression was also macrophage recruitment and neutrophil activation manifest in microvascular endothelial cells of ZSF1- (Figures 1E and 1F). HFpEF rats (Figure 2D), indicative of a systemic INCREASED OXIDATIVE STRESS IN HFpEF. To quan- proinflammatory status. of ZSF1-HFpEF and ZSF1-Ctrl rats tify myocardial oxidative stress, H 2O 2 concentrations DECREASED NO BIOAVAILABILITY IN HFpEF. Be- were measured and shown to be higher in HFpEF cause of the high oxidative stress, bioavailability of NO patients than in HFrEF and AS patients (Figure 2A), becomes jeopardized. NO bioavailability was therefore again comorbidity-induced assessed by measurement of myocardial nitrite/nitrate pro-inflammatory status of HFpEF patients. Findings concentrations in human biopsy samples. Nitrite/ were reproduced in ZSF1-HFpEF rats, which also nitrate concentration was indeed lower in HFpEF than consistent with the had increased myocardial H 2O 2 levels compared to in AS and HFrEF samples (Figure 3A). These findings those in ZSF1-Ctrls (Figure 2B). were also confirmed in the rat model (Figure 3B). To account for myocardial oxidative stress, we Furthermore, immunogold-labeled electron mi- compared NOX2 expression levels in HFpEF patients croscopy allowed for quantification of 3-nitrotyrosine with those in control subjects. Human HFpEF in myocardium contained more NOX2-expressing mac- (Figure 3C). 3-Nitrotyrosine formation reflects con- rophages than control patients (Figure 2C). Expression centration of peroxynitrite, which is generated from different myocardial cellular compartments 315 316 Franssen et al. JACC: HEART FAILURE VOL. 4, NO. 4, 2016 Microvascular Endothelial Inflammation in HFpEF APRIL 2016:312–24 F I G U R E 1 Microvascular Inflammation in HFpEF Patients and ZSF1-HFpEF Rats (A) ICAM-1 expression was higher in HFpEF than in AS (#p < 0.05 vs. AS;*p < 0.05 vs. HFrEF). (B) E-selectin levels were higher in HFpEF patients than in those with HFrEF and AS (#p < 0.05 vs. AS; *p < 0.05 vs. HFrEF). Expression levels of ICAM-1 (C) and E-selectin (D) were higher in ZSF1-HFpEF myocardium than in that of ZSF1-Ctrls (*p < 0.05). (E and F) ZSF1-HFpEF rats had higher levels of myocardial CD68 and MPO than ZSF1-Ctrls (*p < 0.05). AS ¼ aortic stenosis; Ctrls ¼ controls; HFpEF ¼ heart failure with preserved ejection fraction; HFrEF ¼ heart failure with reduced ejection fraction; ICAM ¼ intercellular adhesion molecule; MPO ¼ myeloperoxidase. Franssen et al. JACC: HEART FAILURE VOL. 4, NO. 4, 2016 APRIL 2016:312–24 Microvascular Endothelial Inflammation in HFpEF F I G U R E 2 Oxidative Stress in HFpEF Patients and ZSF1-HFpEF Rats (A) HFpEF patients had higher myocardial concentrations of H2O2 than AS and HFrEF (#p < 0.05 vs. AS; *p < 0.05 vs. HFrEF). (B) Myocardial H2O2 concentrations in ZSF1-HFpEF were higher than in ZSF1-Ctrl rats (*p < 0.05). (C) Expression of NOX2 was comparable in cardiomyocytes but tended to be higher in macrophages of HFpEF patients. (D) Expression of NOX2 was comparable in cardiomyocytes of ZSF1-Ctrl and ZSF1HFpEF rats. More NOX2-expressing macrophages were observed in ZSF1-HFpEF rats (*p < 0.05 vs. controls). NOX2 ¼ NADPH oxidase 2; other abbreviations as in Figure 1. superoxide anion and NO. 3-Nitrotyrosine expression patients (Figure 4A). In ZSF1-HFpEF rats, there was a was car- similar trend toward higher expression of the eNOS diomyocytes (Figures 3D and 3E). Its endothelial monomer than in ZSF1-Ctrl rats (Figure 4B). Levels of expression ZSF1-HFpEF eNOS dimers were equal among human groups and (Figure 3D), probably as a result of reduced NO between the 2 groups of rats (Figures 4C and 4D). bioavailability, whereas cardiomyocyte expression Phosphorylated, and hence activated, eNOS mono- remained unaltered (Figure 3E). mers tended to be higher in HFpEF than in HFrEF and UNCOUPLING OF NITRIC OXIDE SYNTHASE IN HFpEF. Endo- AS patients (p ¼ 0.06) and in ZSF1-HFpEF than in ZSF1- thelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) produces NO as a Ctrl rats (Figures 4E and 4F). Concentrations of active, dimer, but “uncouples” into monomers in the presence phosphorylated NO-producing dimer were lower in higher in endothelial tended to cells decrease than in in of inflammation/oxidative stress, producing superox- HFpEF patients than in AS (p ¼ 0.06) and HFrEF ide anion. HFpEF patients had significantly higher (p ¼ 0.07) patients (Figure 4G). In rats, phosphorylation expression of the eNOS monomer than HFrEF or AS of the eNOS dimer was similar (Figure 4H). 317 318 Franssen et al. JACC: HEART FAILURE VOL. 4, NO. 4, 2016 APRIL 2016:312–24 Microvascular Endothelial Inflammation in HFpEF F I G U R E 3 Decreased Myocardial NO-Bioavailibility in HFpEF (A) Myocardial nitrite/nitrate concentrations were lower in HFpEF than in AS and HFrEF patients and lower in HFrEF than in AS patients (*p < 0.05 HFpEF vs. AS; #p < 0.05, HFpEF vs. HFrEF; *p < 0.05, HFrEF vs. AS). (B) Myocardial nitrite/nitrate concentrations were lower in ZSF1-HFpEF than in ZSF1-Ctrl rats (*p < 0.05 vs. controls). (C) Immunogold-labeled electron microscopy showed myocardial localization of 3-nitrotyrosine. (D) 3-Nitrotyrosine expression tended to decrease more in endothelial cells of ZSF1-HFpEF than those of ZSF1-Ctrl rats. (E) 3-Nitrotyrosine expression was similar in cardiomyocytes of ZSF1-HFpEF and ZSF1-Ctrl rats. NO ¼ nitric oxide; other abbreviations as in Figure 1. DECREASED ACTIVITY cGMP IN bioavailability, CONCENTRATION HFpEF. Because soluble PKG cGMP, which regulates PKG activity. PKG activity and of decreased NO cGMP concentration were indeed lower in myocar- guanylate AND cyclase (sGC) dium of ZSF1-HFpEF rats than in ZSF1-Ctrl rats activity falls. This leads to reduced production of (Figures 5A and 5B). PKG lowers cardiomyocyte Franssen et al. JACC: HEART FAILURE VOL. 4, NO. 4, 2016 APRIL 2016:312–24 Microvascular Endothelial Inflammation in HFpEF F I G U R E 4 Endothelial eNOS in HFpEF (A) Expression of eNOS monomer was higher in HFpEF than in AS and HFrEF and higher in HFrEF than in AS (#p < 0.05 vs. AS; *p < 0.05 vs. HFrEF). (B) A similar trend was observed in a comparison between ZSF1-HFpEF and ZSF1-Ctrl rats. (C and D) eNOS dimer concentrations were comparable in AS, HFrEF, and HFpEF patients as well as in ZSF1-HFpEF and ZSF1-Ctrl rats. (E and F) eNOS momomer phosphorylation tended to be higher in HFpEF patients and in ZSF1-HFpEF rats. (G and H) eNOS dimer phosphorylation tended to be lower in HFpEF patients but was comparable in rats. eNOS ¼ endothelial nitric oxide synthase; other abbreviations as in Figure 1. 319 320 Franssen et al. JACC: HEART FAILURE VOL. 4, NO. 4, 2016 APRIL 2016:312–24 Microvascular Endothelial Inflammation in HFpEF stiffness through phosphorylation of titin, the giant higher in HFpEF patients than in AS patients. The intracellular protein responsible for cardiomyocyte- high prevalence of a metabolic risk profile in HFpEF based stiffness (15,17–19). Activity and expression of patients in the present study was consistent with other protein kinases and phosphatases, reported to findings of the recent MEDIA (The MEtabolic Road to modulate titin phosphorylation (19), were measured as DIAstolic Heart Failure) European HFpEF registry well. Activity levels of PKC and PKA in ZSF1-HFpEF rats (23). This registry was the first to report the preva- were not significantly different from those in ZSF1- lence of metabolic syndrome in HFpEF and observed Ctrl rats (Figures 5C and 5D). There were no significant that 85% of HFpEF patients satisfied National differences between the expression levels of the Cholesterol Education Program III criteria of meta- active, phosphorylated state of extracellular signal- bolic syndrome. regulated kinase (ERK) and those of ZSF1-HFpEF rats Expression of adhesion molecules favors myocar- and Ctrl rats (Figure 5E). CaMKII also lowers car- dial infiltration of inflammatory cells, which was diomyocyte stiffness through titin phosphorylation evident in the current study in HFpEF patients and (20). CaMKII activity was increased in ZSF1-HFpEF rats in ZSF1-HFpEF rats, respectively, by the presence of compared to that in ZSF1-Ctrl rats (Figure 5F), and NOX2-producing macrophages and by the high altered CaMKII activity, therefore, fails to explain the expression levels of of CD68 and MPO. In contrast to increased cardiomyocyte stiffness observed in previ- viral myocarditis, the myocardial presence of macro- ous experiments in ZSF1-HFpEF rats (15). Finally, titin phages in HFpEF is not accompanied by evidence can also be affected by dephosphorylating protein of cardiomyocyte cell death (24,25). A recent study phosphatases (PP) such as PP1 and PP2a (19). Both of provided an explanation for this intriguing finding, the proteins were increased in ZSF1-HFpEF compared observing that macrophages activated by obesity to those in ZSF1-Ctrl rats (Figures 5G and 5H). had a distinct proinflammatory phenotype (26). Hitherto, macrophage activation was conceived to DISCUSSION proceed either to an M1 phenotype with potent pro- The present study provides comprehensive evidence for microvascular endothelial activation, high oxidative stress, eNOS uncoupling, and low NO levels in LV myocardium of HFpEF patients. These findings were reproduced in leptin-resistant, obese, hypertensive ZSF1 rats, which develop HFpEF after 20 weeks, in contrast to lean hypertensive ZSF1 rats, which maintain normal LV function after a similar time period. The present study also demonstrated that low myocardial NO level was associated with reduced myocardial cGMP/PKG signalling in ZSF1HFPEF rats. A similar reduction was previously demonstrated in LV myocardium of HFpEF patients and shown to be associated with titin hypo- phosphorylation which contributes to high myocardial diastolic stiffness (18). MICROVASCULAR INFLAMMATION. In the present inflammatory properties or to an M2 phenotype with anti-inflammatory properties. However, when macrophages are activated by obesity, a distinct phenotype is induced with low production of proinflammatory cytokines because of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor g (PPAR g) partially inhibiting induction of nuclear factor kappa-light chain-enhancer of activated B cells (NF kB). This last effect results from the abundance in obesity of free fatty acids such as palmitate, which stimulate PPAR g activity. A recent study also demonstrated that development of HFpEF was associated with monocytosis and monocyte differentiation into M2 macrophages (27). OXIDATIVE STRESS. Myocardial H 2 O 2 concentration was significantly higher in HFpEF patients than in both HFrEF and AS patients. Similarly, ZSF1- study, myocardial expression levels of E-selectin and HFpEF rats had higher myocardial H 2O 2 concentra- ICAM-1 were upregulated in HFpEF patients and tions than ZSF1-Ctrl animals. H 2O 2 results from ZSF1-HFpEF rats (Figure 6). Upregulated myocardial conversion of superoxide anion by superoxide dis- expression of vascular cell adhesion molecule (VCAM) mutase, and the high H 2O 2 concentrations therefore and myocardial microvascular rarefaction compatible suggested increased superoxide anion production with microvascular inflammation was previously in HFpEF. Possible sources of superoxide anion reported in HFpEF (21,22). Because findings in HFpEF production are NADPH oxidases (NOX2, NOX4), patients were similar to those in ZSF1-HFpEF rats, we uncoupled NO synthases (eNOS, iNOS), xanthine attribute the endothelial inflammatory activation in oxidase, HFpEF patients to their metabolic risk profile. HFpEF localization of NOX2 expression was immunohis- patients had significantly higher BMI than AS and tochemically visualized in myocardial tissue from HFrEF patients, and the prevalence of DM was also HFpEF patients and ZSF1-HFpEF rats. Upregulation and mitochondria (Figure 6). Cellular Franssen et al. JACC: HEART FAILURE VOL. 4, NO. 4, 2016 APRIL 2016:312–24 Microvascular Endothelial Inflammation in HFpEF F I G U R E 5 Decreased PKG Activity and cGMP Concentration in HFpEF (A and B) Myocardial PKG activity and cGMP concentration were lower in ZSF1-HFpEF than in ZSF1-Ctrl rats. (C and D) Comparable activity levels of PKC and PKA were seen in ZSF1-HFpEF and ZSF1-Ctrl rats. (E) Comparable expression levels of phosphorylated ERK were seen in ZSF1-HFpEF and ZSF1-Ctrl rats. (F) Expression of CaMKII was higher in ZSF1-HFpEF than in ZSF1-Ctrl rats. (G and H) Higher expression of PP1 and PP2a was seen in ZSF1-HFpEF than in ZSF1-Ctrl rats (*p < 0.05). CaMKII ¼ Ca2þ/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II; cGMP ¼ cyclic guanosine monophosphate; ERK ¼ extracellular signal-regulated kinase; PKA ¼ protein kinase A; PKC ¼ protein kinase C; other abbreviations as in Figure 1. 321 322 Franssen et al. JACC: HEART FAILURE VOL. 4, NO. 4, 2016 APRIL 2016:312–24 Microvascular Endothelial Inflammation in HFpEF F I G U R E 6 Downstream Effects of Microvascular Inflammation in HFpEF Myocardium Systemic inflammation induces inflammatory activation of the endothelium of myocardial microcirculation. This leads to enhanced endothelial expression of adhesion molecules such as ICAM-1, VCAM, and E-selectin. Because of inflammatory activation, NOX2 is upregulated in endothelial cells. This results in oxidative stress, increased levels of H2O2, uncoupling of eNOS, decreased NO bioavailability, and formation of 3-nitrotyrosine. In cardiomyocytes, decreased NO bioavailability leads to less stimulation of sGC, reduced formation of cGMP, and diminished PKG activity. Lack of PKG activity is associated with decreased titin phosphorylation and increased passive stiffness of cardiomyocytes. cGMP can also be generated by NPs which activate pGC. Because of the low cGMP concentration, the latter pathway failed to compensate for the decreased NO-bioavailability. cGMP ¼ cyclic guanosine monophosphate; eNOS ¼ endothelial nitric oxide synthase; H2O2 ¼ hydrogen peroxide; ICAM-1 ¼ intercellular adhesion molecule-1; NO ¼ nitric oxide; NOX2 ¼ NADPH nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate oxidase 2; NPs ¼ natriuretic peptides; pGC ¼ particulate guanylate cyclase; PKG ¼ protein kinase G; sGC ¼ soluble guanylate cyclase; VCAM ¼ vascular cell adhesion molecule. of macro- reduced 3-nitrotyrosine expression in endothelial phages and microvascular endothelium but not in NOX2 expression cells. 3-Nitrotyrosine formation reflects peroxynitrite cardiomyocytes. The current findings of upregulated concentration, which is generated from superoxide endothelial NOX2 expression and unaltered NOX2 anion and NO. Because of increased H2O 2 concentra- expression in cardiomyocytes in HFpEF myocar- tion, the trend for reduced 3-nitrotyrosine in endo- dium support the assertion that myocardial re- thelial cells of HFpEF myocardium probably resulted modeling endothelial from low NO production. The latter was consistent activation, in contrast to HFrEF, where myocardial with the low nitrite/nitrate concentrations observed remodeling is driven by cardiomyocyte cell death in triggered ZSF1-HFpEF rats. Reduced NO production can be in by HFpEF was is observed driven upregulated NOX2 by in activity within cardiomyocytes (28). myocardium of both HFpEF patients and explained by eNOS uncoupling, which was confirmed NO-cGMP-PKG SIGNALLING. Similar to NOX2 ex- in both HFpEF patients and ZSF1-HFpEF rats. eNOS pression, revealed uncoupling switches eNOS from the NO producing myocardial 3-nitrotyrosine expression in ZSF1-Ctrl dimer to the superoxide anion generating monomer and in (29). Apart from eNOS uncoupling, the present study endothelial cells, with less expression in cardio- also observed modified eNOS phosphorylation in myocytes. Development of HFpEF failed to affect HFpEF patients, with a higher phosphorylation of 3-nitrotyrosine expression in cardiomyocytes but monomeric eNOS increasing superoxide production immunoelectron ZSF1-HFpEF rats was microscopy localized mainly Franssen et al. JACC: HEART FAILURE VOL. 4, NO. 4, 2016 APRIL 2016:312–24 Microvascular Endothelial Inflammation in HFpEF and a lower phosphorylation of dimeric eNOS CONCLUSIONS decreasing NO production. Low NO production affects sGC activity and results in decreased levels of Microvascular inflammatory endothelial activation, cGMP and low PKG activity (Figure 6). This was pre- high oxidative stress, eNOS uncoupling, and impaired viously observed in human HFpEF myocardium cGMP-PKG signalling were observed in LV myocar- (18) and was currently confirmed in ZSF1-HFpEF dium of HFpEF patients. Similar changes were myocardium. Low PKG activity increases diastolic reproduced in obese, leptin-resistant, hypertensive stiffness through reduced phosphorylation of the ZSF1 rats, which developed a HFpEF phenotype after giant cytoskeletal protein titin (Figure 6) (30,31). 20 weeks, but not in lean, hypertensive ZSF1 rats. The phosphorylation and distensibility of titin are Because of these findings, myocardial microvascular also affected by phosphatases and other kinases, such inflammation induced by metabolic comorbidities as PKCa , PKA, ERK and CaMKII (20,30,31). In the could be an important contributor to development of present study, ZSF1-HFpEF rats showed higher HFpEF. expression levels of PP1 and PP2a. PKC, PKA, and ERK activity levels were comparable, but CaMKII activity REPRINT REQUESTS AND CORRESPONDENCE: Prof. was increased. Phosphorylation of titin by CaMKII Dr. Walter J. Paulus, ICaR-VU, VU University Medical augments titin distensibility (32) and the higher Center, Van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081 BT Amster- CaMKII activity therefore cannot explain the high dam, the Netherlands. E-mail: [email protected]. cardiomyocyte resting tension previously observed in ZSF1-HFpEF rats (15). The latter more likely results from imbalanced activities of PKG and PERSPECTIVES phosphatases. STUDY LIMITATIONS. Except for immunohistochem- ical assessment of NOX2 expression, the present study compared myocardial tissue of HFpEF patients to tissue of HFrEF and AS patients because of limited availability of myocardial tissue from control subjects. This limitation was partially accounted for by inclusion of an animal model consisting of obese and lean ZSF1 rats (15). Both HFpEF and HFrEF patients were investigated following admission for acute heart failure. An inflammatory component related to the acute heart failure episode could have contributed to COMPETENCY IN MEDICAL KNOWLEDGE: Metabolic comorbidities such as obesity and DM induce chronic endothelial inflammation of the coronary microvasculature, which reduces myocardial NO bioavailability, PKG activity and cGMP concentration. The latter predisposes to cardiomyocyte stiffness and hypertrophy, both of which are characteristic for HFpEF. TRANSLATIONAL OUTLOOK: Future therapeutic strategies in HFPEF should target the metabolic risk-induced chronic inflammation of the myocardial microvasculature. the microvascular inflammation. REFERENCES 1. Borlaug BA, Redfield MM, Melenovsky V, et al. Longitudinal changes in left ventricular stiffness: a community-based study. Circ Heart Fail 2013;6: 944–52. 2. Wohlfahrt P, Redfield MM, Lopez-Jimenez F, et al. Impact of general and central adiposity on ventricular-arterial aging in women and men. J Am Coll Cardiol HF 2014;2:489–99. 3. Davis BR, Kostis JB, Simpson LM, et al. Heart failure with preserved and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction in the antihypertensive and lipidlowering treatment to prevent heart attack trial. Circulation 2008;118:2259–67. 4. Chadderdon SM, Belcik JT, Bader L, et al. Proinflammatory endothelial activation detected by molecular imaging in obese nonhuman primates coincides with onset of insulin resistance and progressively increases with duration of insulin resistance. Circulation 2014;129: 471–8. 5. Katz DH, Selvaraj S, Aguilar FG, et al. Association of low-grade albuminuria with adverse cardiac mechanics: findings from the hypertension genetic epidemiology network (HyperGEN) study. Circulation 2014;129:42–50. 6. Brouwers FP, de Boer RA, van der Harst P, et al. Incidence and epidemiology of new onset heart failure with preserved vs. reduced ejection fraction in a community-based cohort: 11-year follow-up of PREVEND. Eur Heart J 2013;34:1424–31. 7. Bonetti PO, Pumper GM, Higano ST, Holmes DR, Kuvin JT, Lerman A. Noninvasive identification of patients with early coronary atherosclerosis by assessment of digital reactive hyperemia. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;44:2137–41. 8. Akiyama E, Sugiyama S, Matsuzawa Y, et al. Incremental prognostic significance of peripheral endothelial dysfunction in patients with heart failure with normal left ventricular ejection fraction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012;60:1778–86. 9. Lam CSP, Brutsaert DL. Endothelial dysfunction: a pathophysiologic factor in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012;60:1787–9. 10. Borlaug BA, Olson TP, Lam CSP, et al. Global cardiovascular reserve dysfunction in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010;56:845–54. 11. Farrero M, Blanco I, Batlle M, et al. Pulmonary hypertension is related to peripheral endothelial dysfunction in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Circ Heart Fail 2014;7:791–8. 12. Paulus WJ, Tschöpe C. A novel paradigm for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: comorbidities drive myocardial dysfunction and remodeling through coronary microvascular endothelial inflammation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013; 62:263–71. 13. González A, Ravassa S, Beaumont J, López B, Díez J. New targets to treat the structural 323 324 Franssen et al. JACC: HEART FAILURE VOL. 4, NO. 4, 2016 APRIL 2016:312–24 Microvascular Endothelial Inflammation in HFpEF remodeling of the myocardium. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011;58:1833–43. cardiac titin’s spring elements. J Mol Cell Cardiol 2013;54:90–7. 14. Grossman W, Paulus WJ. Myocardial stress and hypertrophy: a complex interface between biophysics and cardiac remodeling. J Clin Invest 2013;123:3701–3. 21. Westermann D, Lindner D, Kasner M, et al. Cardiac inflammation contributes to changes in the extracellular matrix in patients with heart failure and normal ejection fraction. Circ Heart Fail preserved ejection fraction: evidence of M2 macrophage activation in disease pathogenesis. J Card Fail 2015;21:167–77. 28. Zhang M, Perino A, Ghigo A, Hirsch E, Shah AM. NADPH oxidases in heart failure: poachers or gamekeepers? Antioxid Redox Signal 2011;4:44–52. 2013;18:1024–41. Myocardial titin hypophosphorylation importantly contributes to heart failure with preserved ejection fraction in a rat metabolic risk model. Circ Heart Fail 2013;6:1239–49. 22. Mohammed SF, Hussain S, Mirzoyev SA, et al. Coronary microvascular rarefaction and myocardial fibrosis in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Circulation 2014;131:550–9. 29. Silberman GA, Fan T-HM, Liu H, et al. Uncoupled cardiac nitric oxide synthase mediates diastolic dysfunction. Circulation 2010;121: 519–28. 16. Paulus WJ, Tschöpe C, Sanderson JE, et al. How to diagnose diastolic heart failure: a consensus statement on the diagnosis of heart failure with normal left ventricular ejection fraction by the Heart Failure and Echocardiography Associations of the European 23. Dobre D, Girerd N, Rossignol P, et al. Comparison of the echocardiographic definition of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction using the 2007 ESC and the 2009 EAE/ASE recommendations in metabolic syndrome patients. Eur Heart J 2014;35 Suppl:1037. 30. Krüger M, Kötter S, Grützner A, et al. Protein kinase G modulates human myocardial passive stiffness by phosphorylation of the titin springs. Circ Res 2009;104:87–94. 15. Hamdani N, Franssen C, Lourenço A, et al. Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 2007;28:2539–50. 17. Hamdani N, Bishu KG, von FrielingSalewsky M, Redfield MM, Linke WA. Deranged myofilament phosphorylation and function in experimental heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Cardiovasc Res 2013;97:464–71. 18. Van Heerebeek L, Hamdani N, Falcão-Pires I, et al. Low myocardial protein kinase g activity in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Circulation 2012;126:830–9. 24. Van Heerebeek L, Borbély A, Niessen HWM, 31. Zile MR, Baicu CF, Ikonomidis J, et al. Myocardial stiffness in patients with heart failure et al. Myocardial structure and function differ in systolic and diastolic heart failure. Circulation 2006;113:1966–73. and a preserved ejection fraction: contributions of collagen and titin. Circulation 2015;131: 1247–59. 25. Van Heerebeek L, Hamdani N, Handoko ML, et al. Diastolic stiffness of the failing diabetic heart: importance of fibrosis, advanced glycation end products, and myocyte resting tension. Circulation 2008;117:43–51. 32. Hamdani N, Krysiak J, Kreusser MM, et al. Crucial role for Ca2(þ)/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase-II in regulating diastolic stress of normal and failing hearts via titin phosphorylation. Circ Res 2013;112:664–74. 19. Linke WA, Hamdani N. Gigantic business: titin 26. Kratz M, Coats BR, Hisert KB, et al. Metabolic dysfunction drives a mechanistically distinct properties and function through thick and thin. Circ Res 2014;114:1052–68. proinflammatory phenotype in adipose tissue macrophages. Cell Metab 2014;20:614–25. KEY WORDS endothelium, heart failure, inflammation, nitric oxide, oxidative stress 20. Hidalgo CG, Chung CS, Saripalli C, et al. The multifunctional Ca(2þ)/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II delta (CaMKIId) phosphorylates 27. Glezeva N, Voon V, Watson C, et al. Exaggerated inflammation and monocytosis associate with diastolic dysfunction in heart failure with A PPE NDI X For a detailed Methods section, please see the online version of this article.