* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download 1 Section 1.1 – Inductive and Deductive Reasoning Objective #1
Survey
Document related concepts
Transcript
1 Section 1.1 – Inductive and Deductive Reasoning Objective #1: Understanding and Applying Inductive Reasoning Inductive Reasoning involves making generalizations from some very specific events or facts. One is making a prediction or a conclusion about an object or an event that is to occur in the future based upon a pattern or upon observations of previous occurrences. Such conclusions or predictions are called conjectures or hypotheses. There is no guarantee that the prediction or conclusion will be true. For example, if after noting summer after summer that there is a drought in Texas, one may conclude that this summer, there will be a drought in Texas. Another example would be seeing that the New England Patriots have had winning records season after season, one would predict that they will have a winning season this year. In Mathematics, inductive reasoning is used to predict what comes next in a sequence. In the next few examples, the next two objects in the sequence will be determined based upon the pattern of the sequence. Identify a pattern and then use the pattern to predict the next items: Ex. 1 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, __ , __ Solution: Since each number is 2 more than the previous number, we would predict that the next number would be 9 + 2 = 11 and the following one would be 11 + 2 = 13. Ex. 2 1, 3, 9, 27, 81, 243, __ , __ Solution: Since each number is three times the previous number, we would induce that the next two numbers would be 243•3 = 729 and 729•3 = 2187. Ex. 3: 1, 4, 9, 16, 25, 36, 49, __ , __ Solution: This one is a little more involved. But, notice: 1 4 9 16 25 36 49 \ / \ / \ / \ / \ / \ / + 3 + 5 + 7 + 9 +11 +13 2 To get the next number, we will add 15 to 49, which will gives us 64 and then add 17 to 64 to give us 81. Or, you may have realized that 2 this simple the list of the perfect squares. In other words, 1 = 1, 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 = 4, 3 = 9, 4 = 16, 5 = 25, 6 = 36, 7 = 49, so the next two 2 2 numbers in the sequence are 8 = 64 and 9 = 81. This indicates that there is more than one correct way of looking at a sequence and predicting what comes next. Ex. 4 1, 6, 4, 3, 7, 0, 10, – 3, 13, – 6, __ , __ The hint here is to look at every other number: 1, 6, 4, 3, 7, 0, 10, – 3, 13, – 6 \ /\ /\ / \ / \ / +3 +3 +3 +3 +3 So, the next number will be 16. If we look at the other set of numbers (not underlined), they are decreasing by 3, so the number that comes after the 16 will be – 6 – 3 = − 9. 1, 6, 4, 3, 7, 0, 10, – 3, 13, – 6, 16 \ /\ / \ / \ / \ / –3 –3 –3 –3 –3 Ex. 5 Solution: The number of little squares in the corners keeps increasing by one, so we would predict that there would be a little square in each of the four corners in the next item. Also, the little squares alternate between being shaded and not shaded, so we would expect the little squares to be unshaded in the next item. Ex. 6 Solution: Moving from left to right, the inside figure becomes the outside figure in the next item. So, the "Plus" sign inside the fourth figure will become the outside figure for the missing item. Moving from right to 3 left the outside figure becomes the inside figure so the quadrilateral on the outside the sixth figure will become the inside figure for the missing item. Objective #2: Understanding and Applying Deductive Reasoning. Deductive Reasoning involves reasoning from some general statements of fact (the premises) to a specific logical conclusion. Unlike inductive reasoning, the conclusion has to be valid given the premises. A conclusion that is proved to be true by deductive reasoning is a called a theorem. For example, if Ryan Howard struck out every time he went to bat in today’s game, you could conclude that he did not hit a homerun in today’s game. Another example would be if everyone in the St. Philip’s College Choir sings well and Renita Mitchell is a member of the St. Philip’s College Choir. Then, you could conclude that Renita Mitchell sings well. There is only one possible conclusion that can be made with deductive reasoning. Apply the given procedure for several different numbers and make a conjecture of how to calculate the numbers. Then use the variable n and deductive reasoning to prove the conjecture. Ex. 6 Select a number. Add 5. Double the result. Subtract 4. Subtract the original number. Solution: Select a # 4 9 15 25 Add 5 4+5=9 9 + 5 = 14 15 + 5 = 20 25 + 5 = 30 Double the result 2•9 = 18 2•14 = 28 2•20 = 40 2•30 = 60 Subtract 4 18 – 4 = 14 28 – 4 = 24 40 – 4 = 36 60 – 4 = 56 Subtract the original # 14 – 4 = 10 24 – 9 = 15 36 – 15 = 21 56 – 25 = 31 Notice that 10 is 6 more than 4, 15 is 6 more than 9, and so forth. We would guess the rule would be n + 6. Now, we will prove it using deductive reasoning: Select a #: n 4 Add 5: n+5 Double the result: 2(n + 5) = 2n + 10 Subtract 4: 2n + 10 – 4 = 2n + 6 Subtract the original #: 2n + 6 – n = n + 6 Ex. 7 Select a number. Multiply by 4. Add 8 to the result. Divide by 2. Subtract 4. Solution: Select a # 3 6 11 17 Multiply by 4 4•3 = 12 4•6 = 24 4•11 = 44 4•17 = 68 Add 8 to the result 12 + 8 = 20 24 + 8 = 32 44 + 8 = 52 68 + 8 = 76 Divide by 2 20 ÷ 2 = 10 32 ÷ 2 = 16 52 ÷ 2 = 26 76 ÷ 2 = 38 Subtract 4 10 – 4 = 6 16 – 4 = 12 26 – 4 = 22 38 – 4 = 34 Notice that 6 is double 3, 12 is double 6, and so forth. We would guess the rule would be 2n. Now, we will prove it using deductive reasoning: Select a #: n Multiply by 4: 4n Add 8 to the result: 4n + 8 Divide by 2: (4n + 8)/2 = 2n + 4 Subtract 4: 2n + 4 – 4 = 2n Determine the reasoning process that is shown in the following: Ex. 8 All of the books written by J.K. Rowling have been made into movies. Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone was a book written by J.K. Rowling. Therefore, Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone was made into a movie. Solution: Deductive Reasoning. Ex. 9 All of the books written by J.K. Rowling have been made into movies. Therefore, the novel that J.K. Rowling is currently writing will be made into a movie. Solution: Inductive Reasoning.