Download Determining Influenza Virus Shedding in Different Time Points in

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Hepatitis C wikipedia , lookup

Chickenpox wikipedia , lookup

Swine influenza wikipedia , lookup

Middle East respiratory syndrome wikipedia , lookup

Human cytomegalovirus wikipedia , lookup

2015–16 Zika virus epidemic wikipedia , lookup

Influenza wikipedia , lookup

Ebola virus disease wikipedia , lookup

Orthohantavirus wikipedia , lookup

West Nile fever wikipedia , lookup

Norovirus wikipedia , lookup

HIV wikipedia , lookup

Marburg virus disease wikipedia , lookup

Hepatitis B wikipedia , lookup

Pandemic wikipedia , lookup

Henipavirus wikipedia , lookup

Herpes simplex virus wikipedia , lookup

Influenza A virus wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Determining Influenza Virus Shedding in Different Time Points in Madin
Darby Canine Kidney Cell Line
Asghar Abdoli*1; Hoorieh Soleimanjahi1; Masoomeh Kheiri2; Abbas Jamali2; Azam Jamaati1
1- Department of Virology, School of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
2-Influenza Unit, Institute Pasteurof Iran, Tehran, Iran
[email protected]
Background & Objectives: Since cell supernatants are harvested after culture and tested for
the presence of influenza infectious viruses, the residual infectious viruses may still be
present immediately after virus inoculation and washing cells. This observable fact may lead
to a false positive in reporting virus infectivity assay.
Methods: In the present research, influenza virus progeny production in Madin Darby canine
kidney (MDCK) cells with Multiplicities of Infection (MOI) in different time points was
investigated and the results were analyzed by end point tests and immune florescence assay.
Result: The amount of residual virus could be influenced by the MOI, virus ligands and cell
receptors affinity, cell density and permissiveness on the virus attachment level. When the
higher amount of virus MOI used, we can get much higher titers of residual virus. These
effects are probably reflecting the presence of unattached viruses to cell receptors or perhaps
rebounded viruses from cell receptors.
Conclusion: In conclusion, the cell-based procedures proved to be useful tools for
monitoring of influenza virus switching from transcription to replication and release of the
virus particles. They cannot be carried out rapidly, but are as sensitive and specific as the
molecular assays.
Keywords: Influenza Virus; MDCK; Shedling
310