* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download fiw
Survey
Document related concepts
History of botany wikipedia , lookup
Evolutionary history of plants wikipedia , lookup
Plant use of endophytic fungi in defense wikipedia , lookup
Plant stress measurement wikipedia , lookup
Plant nutrition wikipedia , lookup
Plant defense against herbivory wikipedia , lookup
Plant breeding wikipedia , lookup
Plant secondary metabolism wikipedia , lookup
Ornamental bulbous plant wikipedia , lookup
Plant ecology wikipedia , lookup
Plant physiology wikipedia , lookup
Plant reproduction wikipedia , lookup
Plant morphology wikipedia , lookup
Arabidopsis thaliana wikipedia , lookup
Ficus macrophylla wikipedia , lookup
Plant evolutionary developmental biology wikipedia , lookup
Transcript
Plant CellPhysiol. 41(1): 94-103 (2000) JSPP © 2000 Isolation and Characterization of an Arabidopsis Mutant, fireworks (fiw), Which Exhibits Premature Cessation of Inflorescence Growth and Early Leaf Senescence Masanobu Nakamura, Nobuyoshi Mochizuki and Akira Nagatani Laboratory of Plant Physiology, Department of Botany, Kyoto University, Kitashirakawa-Oiwake-Cho, Sakyo-Ku, Kyoto, 606-8502 Japan trast, the reproductive shoot or inflorescence is characterized by long stems, from which lateral cauline leaves, inflorescences, and solitary flowers emerge (Schultz and Haughn 1991). In the final stage of the development, inflorescence sets seeds and stops growing. Although the Arabidopsis inflorescence is structurally indeterminate and could develop an unlimited number of flowers, the actual shoot apical meristem stops proliferation after developing a predictable number of flowers (Shannon and MeeksWagner 1991, Bleecker and Patterson 1997). Senescence means whole-plant senescence in the life history of annual plants like Arabidopsis, and is coupled with monocarpic reproduction (Nooden and Leopold 1988, Bleecker and Patterson 1997, Nooden et al. 1997). The process includes cessation of elongation growth and inflorescence development, leaf yellowing and shedding (Nooden 1980, Thimann 1980, Halliday et al. 1996). To maximize its fitness, which means setting the maximum number of healthy seeds, vegetative tissues break down themselves partially, enlower their running costs, and translocate the resultant nutrients to seeds and reproductive tissues (Bleecker and Patterson 1997, Nooden et al. 1997). In this way, the vegetative tissue acts as a source in a later stage of development. In the process of whole-plant senescence, different parts of plants should senesce coordinately. How is this highly organized process regulated then? This question has long been argued and models have been proposed through many physiological analyses (Gan and Amasino 1997, Hensel et al. 1993, Kelly and Davies 1988, King et al. 1995, Nooden and Leopold 1988). In soybean and other monocarpic species, it has been shown that reproductive structures such as flowers and siliques could control the monocarpic senescence (Hamilton and Davies 1988). However, analysis of late-flowering and male-sterile mutants in Arabidopsis suggests that somatic tissue longevity is not under control of these structures in Arabidopsis (Hensel et al. 1993, Bleecker and Patterson 1997). Although some substance might act as a "death hormone", such a substance has never been identified. Genetic approach is a powerful tool to unravel the molecular mechanisms of various biological processes. With respect to inflorescence development, various mutants with short inflorescence have been isolated (Koorn- To examine the mechanism underlying the reproductive development in monocarpic plants, we screened for mutants that exhibit premature cessation of inflorescence growth in Arabidopsis. We identified a novel mutant line that exhibited earlier cessation of flower formation and inflorescence stem elongation. This mutant also exhibited accelerated rosette leaf senescence after the cessation of the inflorescence growth. We designated the mutant fireworks (fiw) because flowers and siliques were clustered at the top of the fiw inflorescence. The fiw mutation was a single, recessive mutation and mapped on the lower part of chromosome 4. The fiw phenotype was not observable during vegetative growth, but the inflorescence growth was arrested more than 7 d earlier than the wild type (WT). Microscopic observation revealed that the fiw apical meristem was structurally preserved. The premature arrest of growth was observed not only in the primary inflorescence but also in the lateral inflorescence, which is consistent with the global proliferative arrest observed later in WT. Regardless of such dramatic phenotypic features, the fiw plants bore normal flowers and set fully matured siliques. Key words: Arabidopsis thaliana — Dwarf — Meristematic activity — Mutant — Stem elongation — Whole-plant senescence. In the life cycle of rosette plants such as Arabidopsis, the developmental pattern of shoots changes dramatically before and after the onset of the reproductive growth. During the vegetative phase, a shoot is in a compressed form (rosette) and its internodes do not elongate. In conAbbreviations: ACL, ACAULIS loci in Arabidopsis; CAPS, cleaved, amplified, polymorphic sequences; Col, Columbia ecotype of Arabidopsis; ER, ERECTA locus in Arabidopsis; fiw, fireworks mutant of Arabidopsis; GPA, global proliferative arrest; Ler, Landsberg erecta ecotype of Arabidopsis; SSLP, simple sequence length polymorphism; T-DNA, transferred-DNA; TFL, TERMINAL FLOWER locus in Arabidopsis; WT, wild type. Correspondence to: Akira Nagatani, Laboratory of Plant Physiology, Department of Botany, Kyoto University, Kitashirakawa-Oiwake-Cho, Sakyo-Ku, Kyoto, 606-8502 Japan. Tel, +81-75-753-4123; Fax, +81-75-753-4126; e-mail, nagatani® physiol.bot.kyoto-u.ac.jp 94 Inflorescence growth and senescence mutant neef et al. 1985, Shannon and Meeks-Wagner 1991, Bowman 1993, Kieber et al. 1993, Tsukaya et al. 1993, Szekeres et al. 1996). Most of them are categorized to be hormonal mutants (Bowman 1993, Li et al. 1996, Szekeres et al. 1996). These studies clearly indicate the importance of plant hormones for normal development of inflorescence. Nevertheless, these mutants provide us little information about the mechanism of whole-plant senescence. No sole plant hormone appears to be able to trigger the whole process, although some hormones clearly affect the process (Zacarias and Reid 1990, Grbic and Bleecker 1995, Bleecker and Patterson 1997, Gan and Amasino 1995). Some mutants such as acaulis (act) (Tsukaya et al. 1993, 1995, Hanzawa et al. 1997) and terminal flowerl (tfll) (Shannon and Meeks-Wagner 1991) show earlier cessation of inflorescence growth. The flower stalks of acl mutants (acll, acl2 and acl5), which are almost absent or are much reduced in length, exhibit premature arrest of reproductive development, which is followed by consequent reduction in the number of flowers. However, inflorescence meristems are structurally indeterminate in acl mutants (Tsukaya et al. 1993, 1995, Hanzawa et al. 1997). On the other hand, the inflorescence development of tfll-1 mutant is limited by production of a terminal floral meristem. In addition, the erecta mutation, which produces a compact inflorescence, is present in a Landsberg erecta (Ler) genetic background (Bowman 1993, Torii et al. 1996). The senescence phenotype of these mutants has not been examined intensively, but leaf senescence does not appear to be affected. To elucidate the mechanism underlying the inflorescence development, especially in the context of the wholeplant senescence, we screened for mutants that exhibit premature cessation of inflorescence growth. We isolated one recessive mutant line designated fireworks (fiw). In the fiw mutant, the primary as well as lateral inflorescence meristem stopped proliferation earlier and elongation of inflorescence internodes was severely inhibited. Interestingly, accelerated leaf senescence was observed as well in this mutant. Despite these dramatic phenotypic features, the fiw mutant did not show any characteristic phenotype during the vegetative phase. Further analysis of this mutant should provide us new insights into a highly complex senescing syndrome in monocarpic plants. 95 (Boehringer, Germany). The culture medium was solidified with 0.6% (w/v) of Phytagar (Gibco BRL). Seeds were soaked in the basal culture medium and cultured for 15 d. Seedlings were then transferred to rockwool moistened with hydroponic medium (Tsukaya et al. 1991). All the plants were grown in environmentally controlled growth chambers under continuous white light at 22°C except in the temperature shift-up experiments. Mutagenesis of Arabidopsis plant—Agrobacterium-mediated transferred-DNA (T-DNA) mutagenesis was performed using 28-day-old her plants (TO plant) by the in planta transformation method (Bechtold et al. 1993). Transformation vector pPCVICEn4HPT was a kind gift from Dr. R. Walden (Hayashi et al. 1992). About 800,000 seeds (Tl seeds) harvested from TO plants were plated on the basal culture media containing 22.5 fig m P 1 of hygromycin B. About 1,000 hygromycin-resistant Tl plants were selected and grown for further analysis. For establishment of mutagenized T2 lines, selected Tl plants were selfed and seeds were collected separately from each plant. Screening for short inflorescence mutation—T2 seeds of individual lines were grown to screen short inflorescence and early senescence mutants. One mutant line which showed a severe defect in inflorescence stem elongation was identified and designated fireworks (fiw). To characterize the fiw mutant, we backcrossed the T2 generation of fiw mutant twice to the wild type (WT). Morphological observations—Bolting plants grown as described above were used for size measurements. All measurements were made on several different plants. To follow the time course of flower formation, shoot apices were photographed every day and developing flowers and flower buds emerged directly from the primary inflorescence stems were numbered in the order of appearance. Inflorescence stems used for histological studies were obtained from plants grown under the same conditions. For microscopic analysis, stems and apical buds were fixed and cleared as described by Aida et al. (Aida et al. 1997). Chromosome mapping—A single plant showing the fiw phenotype (her background) was pollinated with Col pollen. A resultant Fl hybrid was selfed to generate a segregation F2 population of 57 mutants and 175 WT individuals. Small-scale preparation of plant genomic DNA was done by the method of Edwards et al. (Edwards et al. 1991). Linkage to known molecular markers was determined by simple sequence length polymorphism (SSLP) (Bell and Ecker 1994) and cleaved, amplified, polymorphic sequences (CAPS) (Konieczny and Ausubel 1993) using isolated individual genomic DNA and oligo nucleotide primers synthesized by Biologica (Nagoya, Japan). Chlorophyll analysis—Chlorophyll was extracted from the fresh 6th rosette leaves with N,N,-dimethyl formamide. The extracts were subjected to spectrophotometric measurements at 664 and 647 nm. Chlorophyll contents were calculated using the equation of Moran (Moran 1982). Results Materials and Methods Plant materials—The following plants were used: Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh. ecotype Landsberg erecta (her) and Columbia (Col). Seeds were surface sterilized in a solution of NaCIO ( C l > 1 . 7 % , 0.02% (v/v) Triton X-100) for 1 min and rinsed extensively with distilled water. Basal culture medium was composed of Murashige-Skoog inorganic salts (Murashige and Skoog 1962) supplemented with 2% (w/v) sucrose, B5 vitamins (Gamborg et al. 1968), and with or without hygromycin B Overall morphology of the fiw mutant—To better define the mechanisms involved in the control of the last stage of monocarpic development, we isolated an Arabidopsis mutant in which both cessation of inflorescence growth and leaf senescence occurred earlier. The mutant was designated as fireworks (fiw) after its characteristic inflorescence appearance. Fig. 1A and B show the outlook of 30-day-old plants of ihe fiw mutant and WT (her). The 96 Inflorescence growth and senescence mutant fiw mutant had a much shorter inflorescence than WT, suggesting that the inflorescence growth was arrested much earlier in the fiw mutant. The growth of lateral inflores- cence was suppressed as well. In addition, rosette leaves and other parts of the fiw mutant senesced much earlier in the fiw mutant than in WT (Fig. 2). Parts of rosette leaves Fig. 1 Phenotype of fiw mutant and WT. Side view of 30-day-old plants of fiw mutant (A) and WT (B). Top view of 33-day-old fiw mutant (C) and 33- (D) or 43- (E) day-old WT plant. (F): Magnified view of the topmost parts of the fiw mutant (left) and WT (right) inflorescence. Lateral shoots and flowers were removed from the stems of 33-day-old ./zw mutant or WT. Numbers indicate the order of flowers formed on the primary inflorescence stem. Photographs of fiw mutant in er (G) and ER (H) background. F2 fiw/fiw segregants from Fl hybrid between the fiw mutant (er/er, fiw/fiw) and Columbia WT (ER/ER, FIW/FIW) with or without er mutation were photographed. The ER plants were recognized by shapes of siliques and leaves and peduncle length. Bar=l cm (A, B, G and H), bar=l mm (C, D, E and F). Inflorescence growth and senescence mutant started to turn yellow or brown already around day 41 in the mutant (Fig. 2C), whereas the leaves appeared somewhat paler but still green even on day 47 in WT (Fig. 2F). Top view of the apical region of the fiw mutant (Fig. 1C) indicated that it had less flower buds than WT at the same age (Fig. ID). In theyhv apex, only small flower buds were observed. These flower buds did not grow any further. Hence, the fiw apex resembled an aged inflorescence apex of WT (Fig. IE). In addition, severe inhibition of internode elongation was observed in the topmost region of t\\Q fiw apex (Fig. 1C, F). As a result, mature siliques were clustered at the top of the fiw inflorescence. In contrast, development of flower buds and internode elongation appear to be coordinated in WT. A full series of developing flowers and fruits were placed at adequate intervals on WT stem even after the cessation of inflorescence growth (Fig. ID, E). Irrespective of these dramatic features at the reproductive stage, the fiw mutant was indistinguishable from WT at the vegetative stage (see below). Genetic analysis of the fiw mutation—The fiw mutants were backcrossed to WT Ler or Col. The Fl resembled WT in appearance. The F2 population segregated in a 3 : 1 (WT : mutant) ratio, suggesting that the fiw mutation was caused by a single recessive Mendelian allele (Table 1). Although the fiw mutant was isolated from T-DNA mutagenized Arabidopsis lines, it was not linked to a T-DNA insert (data not shown). Thus, the characterization of the fiw mutant in this study was done using backcrossed, TDNA non-bearing plants. To determine the map position of the FIW locus, genomic DNA was isolated from mutant segregants among Fig. 2 Leaf senescence of fiw mutant and WT. Rosette leaves of fiw mutant (A, C, E), and WT (B, D, F) were photographed on day 35 (A, B), 41 (C, D) and 47 (E, F). 97 Table 1 Phenotypic ratios in populations of fiw/fiw x FIW/FIW and fiw/FIW * fiw/FIW crosses Phenotype Crosses fiw/fiw* FIW/FIW fiw/FIW* fiw/FIW WT fiw Ratio 20 0 1:0 134 42 3.19: 1 the F2 population of a fiw x Col cross and analyzed for linkage to SSLP (Bell and Ecker 1994) and CAPS (Konieczny and Ausubel 1993) markers. No linkage between the fiw phenotype and the following SSLP markers was observed: nga63 and nga280 on chromosome 1; ngal68 on chromosome 2; ngal62 and nga6 on chromosome 3; nga225 and nga76 on chromosome 5. The fiw phenotype, Fig. 6 Photographs of apical regions of the fiw and WT inflorescence. The apical regions of the fiw mutant (A, C, E) and WT (B, D, F) were photographed from above on day 20 (A, B), 26 (C, D) and 31 (E, F). Flowers emerged directly from the primary inflorescence were numbered in the order of appearance. Flowers and flower buds with a diameter of over 300 /um were numbered. 98 Inflorescence growth and senescence mutant however, was found to be slightly linked to nga8 on chromosome 4 (data not shown). Of the CAPS markers examined, fiw was mapped between two CAPS markers B9 and PG11 on chromosome 4 (data not shown). There is no other related mutation around this map region except acaulisl (acll) (Tsukaya et al. 1993). Then, the allelism test between acll-2 and fiw was performed. The result indicated that ACL1 and FIW are independent loci (data not shown). So, we concluded that fiw is a novel locus. The ecotype her, which is the background of the fiw mutant, includes an endogenous dwarf mutation named erecta (er) (Torii et al. 1996). Thus, the original fiw line we isolated should be a fiw er double mutant. To reveal the genetic interaction between the FIW and ER loci, we 10 20 30 40 Total number of flowers 50 crossed the fiw mutant with Col to find that the fiw phenotype was independent of the ER locus. Nearly onefourth of the F2 progeny from Fl hybrid of fiw x WT Col exhibited the fiw phenotype (data not shown). Moreover, these F2 fiw phenotype populations showed segregation in the er phenotype (Bowman 1993) (Fig. 1G, H). Developmental parameters of the fiw mutant—Fig. 3A shows the relationship between the number of flowers and the height of the primary inflorescence stem in the fiw mutant and WT. The fiw mutant set fewer flowers (19.0±4.1) on its shorter stems (65.6±26.7 mm) than WT (flowers, 33.6±3.4; inflorescence stems, 206±19.0mm). Although the number of flowers and the length of inflorescence stem varied significantly among the fiw individuals, they could be clearly distinguished from WT (Fig. 3A). Similar analysis on the upper part of the stem (from the topmost cauline leaf to the shoot apex) indicated that the reduction in elongation was much severer in the upper part (Fig. 3B). The length of the upper part of the fiw mutant was nearly 10% of that in WT (fiw, 12.5 ±4.8 mm; WT, 118±18.8mm). Since the variation among the fiw individuals was large, the plants with average sizes were chosen for further analysis. The fiw mutant was compared with WT with respect to several developmental parameters (Table 2). The number and size of rosette leaves were unaffected in the fiw mutants. The timing of the onset of inflorescence stem elongation, which reflects the timing of transition from vegetative to reproductive stage, was indistinguishable between the fiw mutant and WT. The number of cauline leaves was unaffected as well in the fiw mutant. Thus, the phenotype of the fiw mutant appears to be restricted to the reproductive stage. However, not all the aspects*of reproductive growth were affected in the fiw mutant. Growth of siliques was not disturbed in the fiw mutants. The size of flowers and peduncles were normal as well (data Table 2 Sizes and number of different organs in WT and fiw plants 10 20 30 40 50 fiw WT 18.4±0.5 18.8 + 0.8 8.6±0.5 8.9±0.9 Size of 6th rosette leaves (mm) length 24.5±3.8 width 11.1 ±1.9 26.1±3.9 12.1 + 1.5 Total number of flowers Fig. 3 Relationship between the number of flowers and the inflorescence length in the fiw mutant or WT individuals. Total number of flowers vs. lengths of primary inflorescence (A) and total number of flowers vs. lengths of upper part of primary inflorescence stem (B) were plotted. Upper part was defined here as the part of stem above the topmost cauline leaf. Solid circles, fiw mutant; solid triangles, WT. Each point represents an individual plant. The number of flowers was counted only for those directly emerged from primary inflorescence stems. Flowers and flower buds with a diameter of over 300 /urn corresponding to stage 9 or later as defined by Smyth et al. (Smyth et al. 1990) were counted. Numbers of flowers and lengths of stems were determined at least several days after the cessation of inflorescence growth. Bolting time (day) a Number of rosette leaves a Number of cauline leavesa 3.3±0.5 3.3±0.8 Length of siliques * (mm) 9.5±0.7 9.4±1.0 a Measured 30 d after germination. * Measured 45 d after germination. Each value represents the average±standard error of at least 10 plants. Inflorescence growth and senescence mutant not shown). The fiw mutants set fully fertile flowers although the number of flowers was reduced. Stem elongation—To further characterize the fiw phenotype, we examined the time course of the inflorescence stem elongation (Fig. 4A). The primary inflorescence initiated elongation around day 19 after germination both in the fiw and WT plants. However, the rate of growth started to decrease around day 25 and the growth completely stopped around day 29 in the fiw mutant. In contrast, WT stems continued to grow until about day 36. As shown in Fig.4B, the upper parts of the stem (from the topmost cauline leaf to the shoot apex) of both the fiw and WT initiated elongation around day 24. However, the elongation rate was greatly reduced in the fiw mutant from the beginning. The elongation ceased about 7 d earlier in the fiw mutant than in WT. Thus, the initiation of inflorescence growth was not affected in the fiw mutant but the cessation of growth occurred earlier in the fiw mutant. Next we observed epidermal cell layers of the fiw and WT inflorescence stems. As shown in Fig. 5A and B, the longitudinal cell length in the fiw mutant was greatly reduced compared with WT. In contrast, cell width was not 99 affected in the fiw mutant. These results are consistent with the gross morphology of the fiw inflorescence, namely, longitudinal elongation of the stem was severely inhibited whereas radial expansion appeared relatively normal (Fig. IF). Flower bud formation—The number of flowers was reduced in the fiw mutant (Table 2). Representative photographs of the shoot apices at different time points are shown in Fig. 6A-F. Shoot apices of 20-day-old fiw plants were indistinguishable from those of WT (Fig. 6A, B), and the number of flowers (flower buds) was nearly the same. On day 26, the number of flowers and the area of shoot apices covered with flower buds were slightly smaller in the fiw mutant compared with WT (Fig. 6C, D). Coincidentally, the elongation rate of fiw stems slowed down around day 25 (Fig. 4). On day 31, the difference between the fiw mutant and WT was obvious (Fig. 6E, F). Mature flowers with normal size pedicels were clustered at the top of the fiw inflorescence. The fiw apex totally lacked medium-sized flower buds, although small buds were present (Fig. 6E). In contrast, WT apex still bore a full series of developing flowers on day 31, although the area of shoot apex became slightly smaller than that on day 26 (Fig. 6D, F). As shown in Fig. 4, the fiw primary inflorescence had already ceased elongation at this time point, while WT inflorescence was still growing. 38 Fig. 4 Elongation growth curves of the primary inflorescence of fiw mutant and WT. Total height (A) and the length above the topmost cauline leaf (B) of the primary inflorescence were measured daily. Solid circles, fiw mutant; solid triangles, WT. Vertical bars indicate standard errors. All measurements are the means of at least 4 different plants. Fig. 5 Microscopic observations of epidermis of the fiw mutant and WT stems. Differential interference contrast microscopic images of epidermal cell files of the primary inflorescence stem of the fiw mutant (A) and WT (B). Fifth internodes above the topmost cauline leaf of 30-day-old plants were observed. Bar=50/wm. 100 Inflorescence growth and senescence mutant Fig. 7 Time course analysis of flower formation on the primary inflorescence. The number of flowers were plotted against age. Plots are the results of a single plant which is a representative of either a.fiwmutant or WT in its elongation growth. Solid circles indicate data from fiw mutant and solid triangles indicate data from WT (materials of these plots were not the same as those used in Fig. 6). The number of the flowers that emerged directly from the primary inflorescence stems was counted during the course of stem elongation. Representative data are shown in Fig. 7. In the early stage of inflorescence development, the fiw mutant formed flower buds at almost a normal rate. However, the mutant plants stopped to form flowers a few days before cessation of stem elongation (Fig. 4, 7). In contrast, WT plants stopped flower formation much later (Fig. 7). Thus, we concluded that the growth arrest of the primary inflorescence meristem occurs earlier in the fiw mutant. To determine whether the inflorescence meristem of the fiw mutant was structurally altered, we observed the apical region under a microscope (Fig. 8A, B). Apices of the fiw and WT plants were fixed at day 30 and cleared for the observation. At this time point, the fiw mutant had already ceased flower formation (Fig. 6E, 7), whereas many flower buds were present on the shoot apex and flower formation was still in progress in WT (Fig.6F, 7). Regardless of the big difference in the gross appearance of shoot apices of the fiw mutant and WT (Fig. 6), the meristematic region of the fiw mutant appeared to be quite normal (Fig. 8). The inflorescence meristem was similar in size to that of WT. The number and arrangement of flower primordia (<50//m) were indistinguishable from those of WT. These observations suggest that the fiw mutation does not alter the structure of inflorescence meristem. Lateral inflorescence growth—In WT, elongation of lateral inflorescences started around day 25, which was about 6 d after the onset of the primary inflorescence elongation. The elongation growth of lateral inflorescences stopped within a few days after the cessation of primary inflorescence growth (representative data are shown in Fig. 9A). This phenomenon is referred to as global proliferative arrest (GPA) of inflorescence meristems (Hensel et al. 1994). Thus, we examined whether the same mechanism is working in the fiw mutant. Elongation of lateral inflorescences also started around day 25 in the fiw mutant. The elongation then stopped within a few days. As a result, most of the lateral inflorescences reached only 0-6 mm long (representative data are shown in Fig.9B). Thus, the ces- ^250 -•—primary -•-lateral 1 - A - lateral 2-1 -M-lateral 2-2 —t—lateral 2-3 0 *•< 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 Days B 250 - primary -lateral 1 -lateral 2-1 -lateral 2-2 -lateral 2-3 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 Days Fig. 8 Magnified view of apical regions of fiw and WT inflorescence. Differential interference contrast microscopic images of apical regions of fiw mutant (A) and WT (B), at 30 d old. Bar = 50 Fig. 9 Time course analysis of the elongation of inflorescence stems. Length of primary and lateral inflorescence stems was measured daily. Data from representative individuals were plotted (A; WT, B;fiw). Lateral 1, a lateral inflorescence subtended by a rosette leaf. Lateral 2-1 to 2-3, lateral inflorescence emerged from the first to third inflorescence nodes. Inflorescence growth and senescence mutant 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 Days Fig. 10 Time course analysis of chlorophyll content. Chlorophyll was extracted from the 6th rosette leaves. Solid circles indicate data from fiw mutant and solid triangles indicate data from WT. Vertical bars indicate standard errors. All measurements were made on at least 3 individual plants. sation of growth of the primary inflorescence and lateral inflorescences occurred almost simultaneously in the fiw mutant, which is consistent with the GPA model. Leaf senescence—As shown in Fig. 2, leaf senescence occurred earlier in the fiw mutant. To quantify this phenomenon, we measured the chlorophyll content of rosette leaves during the course of senescence (Fig. 10). The results indicated that a rapid decrease in the chlorophyll level in the fiw started as early as around day 30. In contrast, WT leaves still contained a certain amount of chlorophyll on day 60, although a moderate decrease in the chlorophyll content was observed over the period of the measurement (Fig. 10). Discussion In this report, we have described the initial characterization of an Arabidopsis short inflorescence and early senescence mutant, fiw. The fiw phenotype was due to a nuclear, recessive mutation (Table 1). Unlike other dwarf mutants, growth defects in the fiw mutant were restricted to a later stage of development. The timing of transition from the vegetative to reproductive stage was not altered. Nevertheless, it exhibited clear pleiotropic phenotype in the reproductive stage. Elongation of the inflorescence stems including lateral ones was arrested much earlier in the fiw mutant. Flower formation stopped earlier as well. In addition, its rosette leaves senesced much earlier than those in WT. The fiw mutant and other inflorescence stem mutants —Genetic analysis of the fiw mutant suggested that it defines a novel locus. The fiw mutation was mapped between two CAPS markers B9 and PG11 on chromosome 4 101 (data not shown). No related mutation is known around this map region except acll, (Tsukaya et al. 1993). An allelism test between acll-2 and fiw confirmed that ACL1 and FIW are independent loci. The acl mutants {acll, 2 and 5) resemble the fiw mutant in some ways (Tsukaya et al. 1993, 1995, Hanzawa et al. 1997). These mutants exhibit earlier growth arrest of the inflorescence. However, there are clear differences between the fiw and acl mutants. The elongation defect of fiw was limited to the stem (Table 2). In contrast, acl mutations affect elongation growth in both vegetative and reproductive organs (Tsukaya et al. 1993, 1995, Hanzawa et al. 1997). In addition, the acll and acl2 mutations are complemented by a temperature shift-up from 16°C to 28°C, whereas the fiw phenotype was not temperature dependent (data not shown). Arabidopsis ecotype Landsberg includes a kind of dwarf mutation called erecta (er), which alters the morphology of the inflorescence stem (Bowman 1993, Torii et al. 1996). We examined the relationship between the FIW and ER loci genetically. The cross experiment between fiw (Ler background) and Col revealed that there is no strong interaction between these two loci (Fig. 1G, H). Plant hormones and the fiw mutant—Plant hormones affect various aspects of plant development. Mutants aberrant in the hormonal states exhibit pleiotropic phenotype. Some hormonal mutants exhibit the dwarf phenotype (Koornneef and van den Veen 1980, Bowman 1993). However, growth defects are observed in multiple organs throughout the life cycle in such mutants. In addition, a number of dwarf mutants, including hormone-related ones, show reduced apical dominance (Estelle and Somerville 1987, Chory et al. 1991, Clouse et al. 1996). In contrast, growth defects in the fiw mutant are restricted to a certain stage of development. The growth of lateral inflorescence stems is suppressed rather than enhanced in the fiw mutant (Fig. IB, 9). Thus, it is not likely that the fiw mutant is a simple hormonal mutant. Exogeneously applied gibberellic acid induces internode elongation (Jacobsen and Olszewski 1993). To test whether gibberellin can restore the fiw phenotypic features, the fiw plants were grown in the presence of exogenous gibberellin. Although gibberellin induced stem elongation in the fiw mutant, the extent of the response was comparable to that observed in WT (data not shown). Neither severe deficiency in the internode elongation at the topmost part of the stem nor the early leaf senescence phenotype was restored by gibberellin. Hence, the gibberellin defect does not appear to be the primary cause of the fiw phenotype. Some plant hormones control leaf senescence. Treatment of Arabidopsis plants with ethylene or abscisic acid promotes the premature onset of the senescence syndrome (Zacarias and Reid 1990, Grbic and Bleecker 1995, Ble- 102 Inflorescence growth and senescence mutant ecker and Patterson 1997). On the contrary, elevated cytokinin delays leaf senescence (Gan and Amasino 1995). Therefore it is possible that some hormonal derangement has occurred in the fiw mutants. However, it is difficult to explain the fiw phenotype simply by the deficiency in one of these hormones. Mutants deficient in these hormones exhibit pleiotropic phenotype throughout the life cycle (Kieber et al. 1993, Chaudhury et al. 1993, Leon-Kloosterziel et al. 1996), whereas the fiw phenotype is strictly restricted to the later stage of development. Apical morphology and meristem identity of the fiw mutant—One of the inflorescence mutants, tfll-1 (Shannon and Meeks-Wagner 1991), shares some phenotypic features in common with the fiw mutant. Both mutants have shorter inflorescence stems and set fewer solitary flowers. However, the mechanism causing such a phenotype appears to be different in these mutants. In tfll-1, inflorescence, which is normally indeterminate in Arabidopsis, forms the terminal floral meristem. In contrast, the central region of the apical meristem of the fiw mutant remained domed and undeterminated even after the cessation of inflorescence development (Fig. 8). In addition, the tfll-1 mutant shows an early flowering phenotype which was not observed in the fiw mutant (Shannon and Meeks-Wagner 1991). Thus, the FIW protein appears to be involved neither in the establishment of inflorescence meristem nor the maintenance of its indeterminate state. The term GPA was proposed by Hensel et al. (Hensel et al. 1994) referring to the natural growth cessation observed in Arabidopsis ecotype Ler after setting a predictable number of flowers on the primary inflorescence meristem (Shannon and Meeks-Wagner 1991). Two major features of GPA are (1) the structure of the shoot apex is preserved even after GPA. The arrested inflorescences have a potential to re-initiate proliferation (Bleecker and Patterson 1997), and (2) the growth of the primary and lateral shoot apical meristems is arrested simultaneously within a few days. As discussed above, the shoot apex of fiw mutants remained normal in size and phyllotaxis even after cessation of growth (Fig. 8). Lateral inflorescence stems ceased to grow within a few days after the cessation of primary inflorescence stem elongation (Fig. 9). Thus, it appears as if GPA occurred earlier in the fiw mutant. However, some phenotypic features of the fiw mutant can not be explained simply by the accelerated GPA. Floral development and internode elongation coordinately cease during the course of GPA in WT. As a result, the shoot apex bears flowers and flower buds of various sizes at normal intervals. In contrast, flower buds that exceeded a certain size continued to grow even after the cessation of internode elongation in the fiw mutant, which resulted in the appearance characterized by many siliques clustered at the top of the stem. In addition, WT plants do not exhibit GPA when developing siliques are continuously removed (Hensel et al. 1994). However, this phenomenon was not observed in the fiw mutant (data not shown). Relationships between the fiw pleiotropic phenotypic features—The phenotype of the fiw mutant included earlier cessation of internode elongation, earlier cessation of flower formation at the shoot apex, and earlier leaf senescence. These three major phenotypic features became visible more or less simultaneously. The reduction in the rate of stem elongation was recognized around day 25 after sowing (Fig. 4). The number of solitary flowers ceased to increase around day 26 (Fig. 7). The decrease of chlorophyll content in rosette leaves started around day 30 (Fig. 10). Among them, leaf senescence appears to start a little later than the others. However, the onset of the reduction in protein and carbohydrate contents precedes the decrease in leaf chlorophyll by several days (Hensel et al. 1993). Thus, it is likely that some process of leaf senescence already started several days before day 30 in the fiw mutant. Thus, it is difficult to speculate about the causal relationships between these phenotypes. One intriguing possibility is that the fiw mutation affects a key event which triggers these three processes. Although the fiw mutation caused earlier cessation of internode elongation and flower formation, the growth of individual flowers appeared to be less affected. When GPA occurs, flowers and flower buds appear to cease to grow coordinately in WT. In contrast, flower buds that exceeded a certain size continued to grow after the cessation of the apical growth in the fiw mutant. Thus, the growth of the shoot apex and flower buds appears to be uncoupled to some extent in the fiw mutant. The analysis of late-flowering and male-sterile mutants in Arabidopsis suggested that somatic tissue longevity is not governed by reproductive development (Hensel et al. 1993). However, both the leaf senescence and proliferative arrest of meristem started earlier in the fiw mutant. Hence, there might be a common mechanism which regulates both processes. Alternatively, an acute arrest of growth at the apex may have caused abnormal leaf senescence through an unusual pathway or vice versa. In any case, grafting experiments in future should help determine which part of the plant generates the signal to senesce. We thank Dr. Y. Komeda (Hokkaido Univ.) for kindly providing us acll-2 seeds. This study was supported in part by a grant from the Program for Promotion of Basic Research Activities for Innovative Biosciences, a grant from "Research for the Future" Program of the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS-RFTF96L00601), and a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research on Priority Areas (A) "Molecular Mechanisms Controlling Multicellular Organization of Plant" (no. 10182206) from the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports and Culture of Japan. Inflorescence growth and senescence mutant References Aida, M., Ishida, T., Fukaki, H., Fujisawa, H. and Tasaka, M. (1997) Genes involved in organ separation in Arabidopsis: an analysis of the cup-shaped cotyledon mutant. Plant Cell 9: 841-857. Bechtold, N., Ellis, J. and Pelletier, G. (1993) In planta Agrobacterium mediated gene transfer by infiltration of adult Arabidopsis thaliana plants. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris. Life Sci. 316: 1194-1199. Bell, C.J. and Ecker, J.R. (1994) Assignment of 30 microsatellite loci to the linkage map of Arabidopsis. Genomics 19: 137-144. Bleecker, A.B. and Patterson, S.E. (1997) Last exit: senescence, abscission, and meristem arrest in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 9: 1169-1179. Bowman, J. (1993) Arabidopsis: an Atlas of Morphology and Development. Springer-Verlag, New York. Chaudhury, A.M., Letham, S., Craig, S. and Dennis, E.S. (1993) ampl-a. mutant with high cytokinin levels and altered embryonic pattern, faster vegetative growth, constitutive photomorphogenesis and precocious flowering. Plant J. 4: 907-916. Chory, J., Nagpal, P. and Peto, C.A. (1991) Phenotypic and genetic analysis of det2, a new mutant that affects light-regulated seeding development in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 3: 445-459. Clouse, S.D., Langford, M. and McMorris, T.C. (1996) A brassinosteroid-insensitive mutant in Arabidopsis thaliana exhibits multiple defects in growth and development. Plant Physiol. I l l : 671-678. Edwards, K., Johnstone, C. and Thompson, C. (1991) A simple and rapid method for the preparation of plant genomic DNA for PCR analysis. Nycl. Acids Res. 19: 1349. Estelle, M.A. and Somerville, C. (1987) Auxin-resistant mutants of Arabidopsis thaliana with an altered morphology. Mol. Gen. Genet. 206: 200-206. Gamborg, O.L., Miller, R.A. and Ojima, K. (1968) Nutrient requirements of suspension cultures of soybean root cells. Exp. Cell Res. 50: 151-158. Gan, S. and Amasino, R.M. (1995) Inhibition of leaf senescence by autoregulated production of cytokinin. Science 270: 1986-1988. Gan, S. and Amasino, R.M. (1997) Making sense of senescence: molecular genetic regulation and manipulation of leaf senescence. Plant Physiol. 113: 313-319. Grbic, V. and Bleecker, A.B. (1995) Ethylene regulates the timing of leaf senescence in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 8: 595-602. Halliday, K., Devlin, P.F., Whitelam, G.C., Hanhart, C. and Koornneef, M. (1996) The ELONGA TED gene of Arabidopsis acts independently of light and gibberellins in the control of elongation growth. Plant J. 9: 305-312. Hamilton, D.A. and Davies, P.J. (1988) Export of organic materials from developing fruits of pea and its possible relation to apical senescence. Plant Physiol. 86: 951-955. Hanzawa, Y., Takahashi, T. and Komeda, Y. (1997) ACL5: an Arabidopsis gene required for internodal elongation after flowering. Plant J. 12: 863-874. Hayashi, H., Czaja, I., Lubenow, H., Schell, J. and Walden, R. (1992) Activation of a plant gene by T-DNA tagging: auxin-independent growth in vitro. Science 258: 1350-1353. Hensel, L.L., Grbic, V., Baumgarten, D.A. and Bleecker, A.B. (1993) Developmental and age-related processes that influence the longevity and senescence of photosynthetic tissues in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 5: 553564. Hensel, L.L., Nelson, M.A., Richmond, T.A. and Bleecker, A.B. (1994) The fate of inflorescence meristems is controlled by developing fruits in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 106: 863-876. Jacobsen, S.E. and Olszewski, N.E. (1993) Mutations at the SPINDLY locus of Arabidopsis alter gibberellin signal transduction. Plant Cell 5: 887-896. Kelly, M.O. and Davies, P.J. (1988) The control of whole plant senescence. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 7: 139-173. Kieber, J.J., Rothenberg, M., Roman, G., Feldmann, K.A. and Ecker, 103 J.R. (1993) CTR1, a negative regulator of the ethylene response pathway in Arabidopsis, encodes a member of the raf family of protein kinases. Cell 12: 427-441. King, G.A., Davies, K.M., Stewart, R.J. and Borst, W.M. (1995) Similarities in gene expression during the postharvest-induced senescence of spears and natural foliar senescence of asparagus. Plant Physiol. 108: 125-128. Konieczny, A. and Ausubel, F.M. (1993) A procedure for mapping Arabidopsis mutations using co-dominant ecotype-specific PCR-based markers. Plant J. 4: 403-410. Koornneef, M., Elgersma, A., Hanhart, C.J., van Loenen-Martinet, E.P., van Rijn, L. and Zeevaart, J.A.D. (1985) A gibberellin insensitive mutant of Arabidopsis thaliana. Physiol. Plant. 65: 33-39. Koornneef, M. and van den Veen, J.H. (1980) Induction and analysis of gibberellin sensitive mutants in Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh. Theor. Appl. Genet. 58: 257-263. Leon-Kloosterziel, K.M., Gil, M.A., Ruijs, G.J., Jacobsen, S.E., Olszewski, N.E., Schwartz, S.H., Zeevaart, J.A. and Koornneef, M. (1996) Isolation and characterization of abscisic acid-deficient Arabidopsis mutants at two new loci. Plant J. 10: 655-661. Li, J., Nagpal, P., Vitart, V., McMorris, T.C. and Chory, J. (1996) A role for brassinosteroids in light-dependent development of Arabidopsis. Science 272: 398-401. Moran, R. (1982) Formulae for determination of chlorophyllous pigments extracted with N,7V-dimethylformamide. Plant Physiol. 69: 1376-1381. Murashige, T. and Skoog, F. (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassay with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol. Plant. 15: 473-497. Nooden, L.D. (1980) Senescence in the whole plant. In Senescence in Plants. Edited by Thimann, K.V. pp. 219-258. CRC press, Boca Baton, France. Nooden, L.D., Guiamet, J.J. and John, I. (1997) Senescence mechanisms. Physiol. Plant. 101: 746-753. Nooden, L.D. and Leopold, A.C. (1988) Senescence and Aging in Plants. Academic Press, London. Schultz, E.A. and Haughn, G.W. (1991) LEAFY, a homeotic gene that regulates inflorescence development in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 3: 771781. Shannon, S. and Meeks-Wagner, D.R. (1991) A mutation in the Arabidopsis TFL1 gene affects inflorescence meristem development. Plant Cell 3: 877-892. Smyth, D.R., Bowman, J.L. and Meyerowitz, E.M. (1990) Early flower development in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2: 755-767'. Szekeres, M., Nemeth, K., Koncz-Kalman, Z., Mathur, J., Kauschmann, A., Altmann, T., Redei, G.P., Nagy, F., Schell, J. and Koncz, C. (1996) Brassinosteroids rescue the deficiency of CYP90, a cytochrome P450, controlling cell elongation and de-etiolation in Arabidopsis. Cell 85: 171-182. Thimann, K.V. (1980) The senescence of leaves. In Senescence in Plants. Edited by Thimann, K.V. pp. 85-115. CRC Press, Boca Baton, France. Torii, K.U., Mitsukawa, N., Oosumi, T., Matsuura, Y., Yokoyama, R., Whittier, R.F. and Komeda, Y. (1996) The Arabidopsis ERECTA gene encodes a putative receptor protein kinase with extracellular leucine-rich repeats. Plant Cell 8: 735-746. Tsukaya, H., Naito, S., Redei, G.P. and Komeda, Y. (1993) A new class of mutations in Arabidopsis thaliana, acaulis 1, affecting the development of both inflorescences and leaves. Development 118: 751-764. Tsukaya, H., Inaba-Higano, K. and Komeda, Y. (1995) Phenotypic characterization and molecular mapping of an acaulis2 mutant of Arabidopsis thaliana with flower stalks of much reduced length. Plant Cell Physiol. 36: 239-246. Tsukaya, H., Ohshima, T., Naito, S., Chino, M. and Komeda, Y. (1991) Sugar-dependent expression of the CHS-A gene for chalcone synthase from petunia in transgenic Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 97: 1414-1421. Zacarias, L. and Reid, M.S. (1990) Role of growth regulators in the senescence of Arabidopsis thaliana leaves. Physiol. Plant. 80: 549-554. (Received August 30, 1999; Accepted November 2, 1999)