Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Proton therapy wikipedia , lookup
Medical imaging wikipedia , lookup
Nuclear medicine wikipedia , lookup
Radiosurgery wikipedia , lookup
Industrial radiography wikipedia , lookup
Image-guided radiation therapy wikipedia , lookup
Radiation burn wikipedia , lookup
Backscatter X-ray wikipedia , lookup
XI. National Turkish Medical Physics Congress 14-18 November 2007 - Antalya The Quality of Image and Radiation Risk in mammography Carlo Maccia Medical Physicist CAATS 43 Bd du Maréchal Joffre – Bourg-La-Reine – FRANCE Introduction Subject matter : mammography (scope is breast cancer screening) The physics of the imaging system How to maintain the image quality while complying with dose requirements Main features of quality control Contents Introduction to the physics of mammography Important physical parameters The mammographic X-ray tube The focal spot size The high voltage generator The anti-scatter grid The Automatic Exposure Control The dosimetry Quality control Introduction to the physics of mammography X-ray mammography is the most reliable method of detecting breast cancer It is the method of choice for the Breast Screening Program in a variety of developed countries In order to obtain high quality mammograms at an acceptable breast dose, it is essential to use the correct equipment Main components of the mammographic imaging system A mammographic X-ray tube A device for compressing the breast An anti-scatter grid A mammographic image receptor (film, photostimulable plate, flat panel) An automatic Exposure Control System Main variables of the mammographic imaging system Contrast: capability of the system to make visible small differences in soft tissue density Sharpness: capability of the system to make visible small details (calcifications down to 0.1 mm) Dose: the female breast is a very radiosensitive organ and there is a risk of carcinogenesis associated with the technique Noise: determines how far the dose can be reduced given the task of identifying a particular object against the background The contrast Linear attenuation coefficients for different types of breast tissue are similar in magnitude and the soft tissue contrast can be quite small The contrast must be made as high as possible by imaging with a low photon energy (hence increasing breast dose) In practice, to avoid a high breast dose, a compromise must be made between the requirements of low dose and high contrast Variation of contrast with photon energy Contrast 1.0 Ca5 (PO4)3 OH Calcification of 0.1mm 0.1 •The contrast decreases by a factor of 6 between 15 and 30 keV •The glandular tissue contrast falls below 0.1 for energies above 27 keV 0.01 0.001 10 Glandular tissue of 1mm 20 30 40 50 Energy (keV) Contributors to the total unsharpness in the image Receptor unsharpness: (screen-film combination) can be as small as 0.1 - 0.15 mm (full width at half maximum of the point response function) with a limiting value as high as 20 line pairs per mm Geometric unsharpness: focal spot size and imaging geometry must be chosen so that the overall unsharpness reflects the performance capability of the screen Patient movement The breast dose Dose decreases rapidly with depth in tissue due to the low energy X-ray spectrum used Relevant quantity: The average glandular dose (AGD) related to the tissues which are believed to be the most sensitive to radiation-induced carcinogenesis The breast dose The breast dose is affected by: the breast composition and thickness the photon energy the sensitivity of the image receptor The breast composition has a significant influence on the dose The area of the compressed breast has a small influence on the dose the mean path of the photons < breast dimensions majority of the interactions are photoelectric Mean Glandular Dose (arb. Units) Variation of mean glandular dose with photon energy 20 •The figure demonstrates the rapid increase in dose with decreasing photon energy and increasing breast thickness 10 8 cm 2 1 •For the 8 cm thick breast there is a dose increase of a factor of 30 between photon energies of 17.5 and 30 keV 2 cm •At 20 keV there is a dose increase of a factor of 17 between thicknesses of 2 an 8 cm 0.2 10 20 30 40 (keV) Contributors to the image noise 1) the quantum mottle 2) the properties of the image receptor 3) the film development and display systems N.B. : both quantum mottle and film granularity contribute significantly to the total image noise for screen-film-mammography Contents Introduction to the physics of mammography Important physical parameters The mammographic X-ray tube The focal spot size The high voltage generator The anti-scatter grid The Automatic Exposure Control The dosimetry Quality control Contradictory objectives for the spectrum of a mammographic X-ray tube The ideal X-ray spectrum for mammography is a compromise between : to achieve a high contrast and high signal to noise ratio (low photon energy) to keep the breast dose ALARA (high photon energy) The X-ray spectrum in mammography In a practice using a screenfilm, it may not be possible to vary the SNR because the film may become over or underexposed The figure gives the conventional mammographic spectrum produced by a Mo target and a Mo filter Number of photons (arbitrary normalisation) X-ray spectrum at 30 kV for an X-ray tube with a Mo target and a 0.03 mm Mo filter 15 10 5 10 15 20 25 30 Energy (keV) Main features of the X-ray spectrum in mammography Characteristic X-ray lines at 17.4 and 19.6 keV and the heavy attenuation above 20 keV (position of the Mo K-edge) Reasonably close to the energies optimal for imaging breast of small to medium thickness A higher energy spectrum is obtained by replacing the Mo filter with a material of higher atomic number with its K-edge at a higher energy (Rh, Pd) W can also be used as target material Options for an optimum X-ray spectrum in mammography Several scientific works have demonstrated that contrast is better for the Mo/Mo target/filter combinations This advantage decreases with increasing breast thickness Using Rh/Rh for target/filter combination brings a substantial dose saving for bigger breasts while keeping an acceptable contrast level Options for an optimum X-ray spectrum in mammography Focal spot size and imaging geometry: The overall unsharpness U in the mammographic image can be estimated by combining the receptor and geometric unsharpness U = ([ f2(m-1)2 + F2 ]1/2) / m where: f: effective focal spot size m: magnification F: receptor unsharpness (equation 1) Overall unsharpness (mm) Variation of the overall unsharpness with the image magnification and focal spot 0.8 0.15 0.10 •For a receptor unsharpness of 0.1 mm 0.4 •Magnification can only improve unsharpness significantly if the focal spot is small enough 0.2 0.1 0.05 0.01 1.0 1.5 Magnification 2.0 •If the focal spot is too large, magnification will increase the unsharpness Contents Introduction to the physics of mammography Important physical parameters The mammographic X-ray tube The focal spot size The high voltage generator The anti-scatter grid The Automatic Exposure Control The dosimetry Quality control The focal spot size Ideally, for the screening unit a single-focus X-ray tube with a 0.3 focal spot is recommended For general mammography purposes, a dual focus X-ray tube with an additional fine focus (0.1) to be used for magnification techniques exclusively is required The size of the focal spot should be verified (star pattern, slit camera or pinhole method) yearly or when resolution decays rapidly Target/filter combination The window of the X-ray tube should be beryllium (not glass) with a maximum thickness of 1 mm The typical target/filter combinations nowadays available are: Mo + 30 m Mo W + 60 m Mo W + 40 m Pd Mo + 25 m Mo W + 50 m Rh Rh + 25 m Rh X-ray tube filtration Total permanent filtration 0.5 mm of Al or 0.03 mm of Mo (recommended by ICRP 34) The beam quality is defined by the HVL A better index of the beam quality is the total filtration which can be related to the HVL using published data State-of-the-art specifications for screen-film mammography A nearly constant potential waveform with a ripple not greater than that produced by a 6-pulse rectification system The tube voltage range should be 25 - 35 kV The tube current should be at least 100 mA on broad focus and 50 mA on fine focus. The range of tube current exposure time product (mAs) should be at least 5 - 800 mAs It should be possible to repeat exposures at the highest loadings at intervals < 30 seconds Contents Introduction to the physics of mammography Important physical parameters The mammographic X-ray tube The focal spot size The high voltage generator The anti-scatter grid The Automatic Exposure Control The dosimetry Quality control Why an anti-scatter grid ? Effects of scatter may significantly degrade the contrast of the image and the need for an efficient anti-scatter device is evident The effect is quantified by the : Contrast Degradation Factor (CDF) : CDF=1/(1+S/P) where: S/P : ratio of the scattered to primary radiation amounts Calculated values of CDF: 0.76 and 0.48 for breast thickness of 2 and 8 cm respectively [Dance et al.] The anti-scatter grid Two types of anti-scatter grids available: stationary grid: with high line density (e.g. 80 lines/cm) and an aluminium interspace material moving grid: with about 30 lines/cm with paper or cotton fiber interspace The performance of the anti-scatter grid can be expressed in terms of the contrast improvement (CIF) and Bucky factors (BF) The anti-scatter grid: performance indexes The CIF relates the contrast with the grid to that without the grid while The BF gives the increase in dose associated with the use of grid CIF and BF values for the Philips moving grid B re a s t Th ic k n e s s (c m ) 2 CIF BF 1.25 1.68 4 1.38 1.85 6 1.54 2.06 8 1.68 2.24 Automatic exposure control device (AEC) The system should produce a stable optical density (OD variation of less than 0.2 ) in spite of a wide range of mAs Hence the system should be fitted with an AEC located after the film receptor to allow for quite different breast characteristics The detector should be movable to cover different anatomical sites on the breast and the system should be adaptable to at least three filmscreen combinations Contents Introduction to the physics of mammography Important physical parameters The mammographic X-ray tube The focal spot size The high voltage generator The anti-scatter grid The Automatic Exposure Control The dosimetry Quality control Breast dosimetry in screen-film mammography There exists a small risk of radiation induced cancer associated with X-ray examination of the breast Achieving an image quality at the lowest possible dose is therefore required Hence breast dosimetry The Average Glandular Dose (AGD) is the dosimetry quantity generally recommended for risk assessment Dosimetry quantities The AGD cannot be measured directly but it is derived from (ESAK) measurements with the standard phantom for the actual technique set-up of the mammographic equipment The Entrance Surface Air Kerma (ESAK) free-in-air (i.e. without backscatter) has become the most frequent used quantity for patient dosimetry in mammography For other purposes (compliance with reference dose level) one may refer to ESD which includes backscatter Dosimetry quantities ESAK can be determined by: a TLD dosemeter calibrated in terms of air kerma free-in-air at a HVL as close as possible to 0.4 mm Al with a standard phantom a TLD dosemeter calibrated in terms of air kerma free-in-air at a HVL as close as possible to 0.4 mm Al stuck to the patient skin (appropriate backsactter factor should be applied to Entrance Surface Dose measured with the TLD to express ESAK) Note : due to low kV used the TLD is seen on the image a radiation dosemeter with a dynamic range covering at least 0.5 to 100 mGy (better than 10% accuracy) How have IQ and dose standards been developed in European guidelines ? Digital should not be worse than film-screen systems IQ : Contrast detail measurements using CDMAM test object Dose : breasts simulated with PMMA Anatomy of a normal breast The female breast is a complex organ It is important to know tissues at risk for tumor induction Incident air-kerma and conversion factor Experimental set-up for the measurement of the Half Value Layer (HVL) Average Glandular Dose AGD = K.g.c.s where : k = Entrance Surface Air Kerma g = incident air-kerma conversion factor for breast thicknesses (50% water, 50% fat) c = glandularity factor s = x-ray spectrum correction factor Average Glandular Dose Average Glandular Dose Average Glandular Dose Contents Introduction to the physics of mammography Important physical parameters The mammographic X-ray tube The focal spot size The high voltage generator The anti-scatter grid The Automatic Exposure Control The dosimetry Quality control Why Quality Control ? BSS requires Quality Assurance for medical exposures Principles established by WHO, (ICRP for dose), guidelines prepared by EC, PAHO,… A Quality Control program should ensure: The best image quality With the least dose to the breast Hence regular check of important parameters Parameters to be considered by a QC program (1) X-Ray generation and control Focal Spot size (star pattern, slit camera, pinhole) Tube voltage (reproducibility, accuracy, HVL) AEC system (kV and object thickness compensation, OD control, short term reproducibility...) Compression (compression force, compression plate alignment) Bucky and image receptor Anti Scatter grid Screen-Film (grid system factor) (inter-cassette sensitivity, screen/film contact) Parameters to be considered by a QC program (2) Film Processing Base line Film and processor Darkroom (temperature, processing time) (sensitometry) (safelights, light leakage, film hopper,.….) Film Processing Viewing Box Environment (brightness, homogeneity) Parameters to be considered by a QC program (3) System Properties Reference Dose Image Quality (entrance surface dose) (spatial resolution, image contrast, noise threshold contrast visibility, exposure time) Summary To achieve the best image quality while keeping the breast dose at the ALARA level is the final goal to be reached when consistently using a film-screen or digital mammography equipment. Implementing a well defined QC protocol can effectively contribute to the achievement of such a goal.