* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Confucian Worries about the Aristotelian Sophos
Obscurantism wikipedia , lookup
List of unsolved problems in philosophy wikipedia , lookup
Free will in antiquity wikipedia , lookup
Philosophical progress wikipedia , lookup
Philosophy in Canada wikipedia , lookup
Anti-intellectualism wikipedia , lookup
Natural philosophy wikipedia , lookup
Public sector ethics wikipedia , lookup
Virtue ethics wikipedia , lookup
Four causes wikipedia , lookup
Confucianism wikipedia , lookup
The Virtue Turn: Virtue Epistemology, Virtue Ethics and Chinese Philosophy 德性的轉向:德性知識論、德性倫理學與中國哲學 Confucian Worries about the Aristotelian Sophos Matthew D. Walker Yale-NUS College, Singapore Abstract Like the Confucian sage (shengren), the Aristotelian theoretically wise person (sophos) is a purported model of ethical and intellectual self-cultivation. Yet within comparative ethics, Confucian philosophers have tended either to reject Aristotle’s sophos as a viable exemplar of human flourishing, or at least to view Aristotle’s sophos with suspicion. Confucians have suggested in various ways that the Aristotelian sophos overvalues theoretically wise understanding at the expense of other, less-narrowly intellectual goods; that the theoretically wise understanding the sophos pursues is useless and of questionable value; and that the 1sophos’s way of life requires an alienating rupture with ordinary living. In light of contemporary philosophers’ renewed interest in the ancient conception of philosophy as a way of life, and in light of recent virtue-ethical and virtue-epistemological discussions of theoretical wisdom (sophia), its nature, and its value, such Confucian worries about Aristotle’s 1sophos possess more than historical interest. In this paper, then, I examine existing Confucian worries about the Aristotelian sophos as a model of self-realization. How strong are these worries? Do Aristotelians have good replies to them? And to what extent is the Aristotelian model of ethical and intellectual self-cultivation, the sophos, compatible with Confucian ideal of the sage?