Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Cardinality of Infinite Sets
There be monsters here!
At least serious weirdness!
Copyright © 2014 Curt Hill
Cardinality
• Recall that the cardinality of a set is
merely the number of members in a
set
• This makes perfect sense for finite
sets, but what about infinite sets?
• We may compare the sizes of such
infinite sets by attempting a one to
one correspondence between the
two
• It gets a little weird here and our
intuition does not always help
Copyright © 2014 Curt Hill
Some Definitions
• Sets A and B have the same
cardinality iff there is a one to one
correspondence between their
members
• Finite sets are obviously countable
• The notation for cardinality is the
same as absolute value
• If A = {1, 3, 4, 5, 9}
then |A|=5
Copyright © 2014 Curt Hill
Infinite Countable Sets
• An infinite set, A, is countable iff
there is a one to one
correspondence between A and the
positive integers
– We refer to this cardinality, 𝐴 = ℵ0
– Last symbol is the Hebrew Aleph, read
Aleph null or aleph naught
• If this is not the case then the infinite
set is uncountable
– There is an hierarchy of alephs
Copyright © 2014 Curt Hill
Counter Intuitive
• We would normally think that:
– If A B then |A|< |B|
• This is true for finite sets but not
necessarily for infinite sets
• Consider the positive even integers
• It is a subset of the positive integers
• Yet it is one to one with the positive
integers
– Thus is a countably infinite set and has
the similar cardinality
Copyright © 2014 Curt Hill
Countable
• The function f(x) = 2x where x is a
positive integer
• This a mapping from positive
integers to positive even integers
• This mapping is one to one
• The definition of countable is now
met for the even positives, so the
cardinality of positive evens is ℵ0
Copyright © 2014 Curt Hill
Hilbert’s Grand Hotel
• This paradox is attributed to David
Hilbert
• There is a hotel with infinite rooms
• Even when the hotel is “full” we can
always add one more guest
– They take room 1 and everyone else
moves down one room
• This boils down to the notion that
adding one to infinity does not
change infinity: +1 =
– Recall that infinity is not a real number
Copyright © 2014 Curt Hill
Another Countable
• The rationals are countable as well
• Use a matrix of integers
– One axis is the numerator
– The other the denominator
– Duplicate values ignored
• In a diagonal way enumerate each
rational
– That is set them in one to one with
positive integers
Copyright © 2014 Curt Hill
1
1
2
3
4
5
2
Count ‘em
3
4
5
1/1 2/1 3/1 4/1 5/1
1/2 2/2 3/2 4/2 5/2
1/3 2/3 3/3 4/3 5/3
1/4 2/4 3/4 4/4 5/4
1/5 2/5 3/5 4/5 5/5
Start at 1/1 and diagonally count each
non-duplicate.
1/1 is 1, 2/1 is 2, 1/2 is 3, 1/3 is 4, 3/1 is 5 …
Copyright © 2014 Curt Hill
Very Interesting!
• What we now see is three infinite
sets with the same cardinality
• A is the positive evens
A Z+ Q yet |A| | Z+ | |Q|
– All are ℵ0
• Thus, it is hard to think about
cardinality of infinite sets as exactly
the same as set size
• Much more similar to big O notation
• Where many details are largely ignored
Copyright © 2014 Curt Hill
Uncountable Sets
• If there are countable sets then
there must be uncountable sets
• The real numbers is such an infinite
set
– Cardinality ℵ1
• The book supplies a proof by
contradiction
– This will be similar
– See next slides
Copyright © 2014 Curt Hill
Reals Uncountable 0
• There exists a theorem that states
0.9999… is the same as 1.0
– The idea of the proof is that as the 9s
go to infinity the limit of the difference
is zero
– In other words however small you want
the difference between two distinct
reals to be we can make the difference
between these two less
• An uncountable set cannot be a
subset of a countable set
Copyright © 2014 Curt Hill
Reals Uncountable 1
• Assume that the reals between 0
and 1 are countable
• Then there is a sequence r1, r2, r3, …
• This sequence must have the
property that ri < ri+1
• Each rn has a decimal expansion
that looks like this:
0.d1d2d3d4d5…
where each d is a digit
Copyright © 2014 Curt Hill
Reals Uncountable 2
• Next look at any adjacent pair of
reals, rn and rn+1
• These two must be different at some
di
– If they are not we have numbered
identicals
– We also disallow that the lower one is
followed by infinite 9s and the higher
one by infinite zeros which would be
two representions of the same number
Copyright © 2014 Curt Hill
Reals Uncountable 3
• Now rn must have a non-nine
following di call it dj
– Otherwise we violated the no identicals
rule
• Create a new real rk that is rn with dj
incremented by 1
• We now have rn < rk < rn+1 which
contradicts our original assertion
• In fact we can insert an infinity of
such numbers by incrementing the
digits after dj
Copyright © 2014 Curt Hill
Reals Uncountable
Addendum
• In the last screen there was the
argument that there must be a nonnine in the sequence
• The symmetrical argument is that
there must be a non zero following
the rn+1
• Since we disallowed a …9999…
followed by …0000… we can shift
the argument to the second rather
than first
Copyright © 2014 Curt Hill
Results
• If A and B are countable then AB is
also countable
• If |A||B| |A||B| then |A|=|B|
– Schröder-Bernstein Theorem
• The existence of uncomputable
functions
– Functions that cannot be generated by
program
• Continuum hypothesis
– No cardinality numbers between
ℵ0 𝑎𝑛𝑑 ℵ1
Copyright © 2014 Curt Hill
Exercises
• 2.5
– 1, 3, 5, 17, 23
Copyright © 2014 Curt Hill