Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Cardinality of Infinite Sets There be monsters here! At least serious weirdness! Copyright © 2014 Curt Hill Cardinality • Recall that the cardinality of a set is merely the number of members in a set • This makes perfect sense for finite sets, but what about infinite sets? • We may compare the sizes of such infinite sets by attempting a one to one correspondence between the two • It gets a little weird here and our intuition does not always help Copyright © 2014 Curt Hill Some Definitions • Sets A and B have the same cardinality iff there is a one to one correspondence between their members • Finite sets are obviously countable • The notation for cardinality is the same as absolute value • If A = {1, 3, 4, 5, 9} then |A|=5 Copyright © 2014 Curt Hill Infinite Countable Sets • An infinite set, A, is countable iff there is a one to one correspondence between A and the positive integers – We refer to this cardinality, 𝐴 = ℵ0 – Last symbol is the Hebrew Aleph, read Aleph null or aleph naught • If this is not the case then the infinite set is uncountable – There is an hierarchy of alephs Copyright © 2014 Curt Hill Counter Intuitive • We would normally think that: – If A B then |A|< |B| • This is true for finite sets but not necessarily for infinite sets • Consider the positive even integers • It is a subset of the positive integers • Yet it is one to one with the positive integers – Thus is a countably infinite set and has the similar cardinality Copyright © 2014 Curt Hill Countable • The function f(x) = 2x where x is a positive integer • This a mapping from positive integers to positive even integers • This mapping is one to one • The definition of countable is now met for the even positives, so the cardinality of positive evens is ℵ0 Copyright © 2014 Curt Hill Hilbert’s Grand Hotel • This paradox is attributed to David Hilbert • There is a hotel with infinite rooms • Even when the hotel is “full” we can always add one more guest – They take room 1 and everyone else moves down one room • This boils down to the notion that adding one to infinity does not change infinity: +1 = – Recall that infinity is not a real number Copyright © 2014 Curt Hill Another Countable • The rationals are countable as well • Use a matrix of integers – One axis is the numerator – The other the denominator – Duplicate values ignored • In a diagonal way enumerate each rational – That is set them in one to one with positive integers Copyright © 2014 Curt Hill 1 1 2 3 4 5 2 Count ‘em 3 4 5 1/1 2/1 3/1 4/1 5/1 1/2 2/2 3/2 4/2 5/2 1/3 2/3 3/3 4/3 5/3 1/4 2/4 3/4 4/4 5/4 1/5 2/5 3/5 4/5 5/5 Start at 1/1 and diagonally count each non-duplicate. 1/1 is 1, 2/1 is 2, 1/2 is 3, 1/3 is 4, 3/1 is 5 … Copyright © 2014 Curt Hill Very Interesting! • What we now see is three infinite sets with the same cardinality • A is the positive evens A Z+ Q yet |A| | Z+ | |Q| – All are ℵ0 • Thus, it is hard to think about cardinality of infinite sets as exactly the same as set size • Much more similar to big O notation • Where many details are largely ignored Copyright © 2014 Curt Hill Uncountable Sets • If there are countable sets then there must be uncountable sets • The real numbers is such an infinite set – Cardinality ℵ1 • The book supplies a proof by contradiction – This will be similar – See next slides Copyright © 2014 Curt Hill Reals Uncountable 0 • There exists a theorem that states 0.9999… is the same as 1.0 – The idea of the proof is that as the 9s go to infinity the limit of the difference is zero – In other words however small you want the difference between two distinct reals to be we can make the difference between these two less • An uncountable set cannot be a subset of a countable set Copyright © 2014 Curt Hill Reals Uncountable 1 • Assume that the reals between 0 and 1 are countable • Then there is a sequence r1, r2, r3, … • This sequence must have the property that ri < ri+1 • Each rn has a decimal expansion that looks like this: 0.d1d2d3d4d5… where each d is a digit Copyright © 2014 Curt Hill Reals Uncountable 2 • Next look at any adjacent pair of reals, rn and rn+1 • These two must be different at some di – If they are not we have numbered identicals – We also disallow that the lower one is followed by infinite 9s and the higher one by infinite zeros which would be two representions of the same number Copyright © 2014 Curt Hill Reals Uncountable 3 • Now rn must have a non-nine following di call it dj – Otherwise we violated the no identicals rule • Create a new real rk that is rn with dj incremented by 1 • We now have rn < rk < rn+1 which contradicts our original assertion • In fact we can insert an infinity of such numbers by incrementing the digits after dj Copyright © 2014 Curt Hill Reals Uncountable Addendum • In the last screen there was the argument that there must be a nonnine in the sequence • The symmetrical argument is that there must be a non zero following the rn+1 • Since we disallowed a …9999… followed by …0000… we can shift the argument to the second rather than first Copyright © 2014 Curt Hill Results • If A and B are countable then AB is also countable • If |A||B| |A||B| then |A|=|B| – Schröder-Bernstein Theorem • The existence of uncomputable functions – Functions that cannot be generated by program • Continuum hypothesis – No cardinality numbers between ℵ0 𝑎𝑛𝑑 ℵ1 Copyright © 2014 Curt Hill Exercises • 2.5 – 1, 3, 5, 17, 23 Copyright © 2014 Curt Hill