* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download (Araneae, Gnaphosidae) along the altitudinal gradient of
Unified neutral theory of biodiversity wikipedia , lookup
Biodiversity action plan wikipedia , lookup
Introduced species wikipedia , lookup
Ecological fitting wikipedia , lookup
Habitat conservation wikipedia , lookup
Theoretical ecology wikipedia , lookup
Fauna of Africa wikipedia , lookup
Occupancy–abundance relationship wikipedia , lookup
Island restoration wikipedia , lookup
Biogeography wikipedia , lookup
Latitudinal gradients in species diversity wikipedia , lookup
Journal of Biogeography (J. Biogeogr.) (2005) 32, 813–831 ORIGINAL ARTICLE The distribution of ground spiders (Araneae, Gnaphosidae) along the altitudinal gradient of Crete, Greece: species richness, activity and altitudinal range M. Chatzaki1*, P. Lymberakis1, G. Markakis2 and M. Mylonas1,3 1 Natural History Museum of Crete, University of Crete, Irakleio, 2Technological Education Institute of Crete, Irakleio and 3Department of Biology, University of Crete, Irakleio, Greece ABSTRACT Aim To study the altitudinal variation of ground spiders (Araneae, Gnaphosidae) of Crete, Greece, as far as species composition, species richness, activity and range of distribution are concerned. Location Altitudinal zones (0–2400 m) along the three main mountain massifs of the island of Crete. Methods Thirty-three sampling sites were located from 0 to 2400 m a.s.l. on Crete, and sampled using pitfall traps. Material from the high-activity period of Gnaphosidae (mid-spring to mid-autumn) was analysed. Sampling sites were divided into five altitudinal zones of 500 m each. Statistical analysis involved univariate statistics (anova) and multivariate statistics, such as multidimensional scaling (MDS) and cluster analysis (UPGMA) using binomial data of species presence or absence. Results Species richness declines with altitude and follows a hump-shaped pattern. The activity pattern of the family, as a whole, is not correlated with altitude and is highly species-specific. In the highest zone, both species richness and activity decline dramatically. The altitudinal range of species distribution increases with altitude. On the Cretan summits live highly tolerant lowland species and isolated residents of the high mountains of Crete. Two different patterns of community structure are recorded. *Correspondence: M. Chatzaki, Natural History Museum of Crete, University of Crete, PO Box 2208, 71409 Irakleio, Crete, Greece. E-mail: [email protected] Main conclusions Communities of Gnaphosidae on Crete present two distinct structures following the altitudinal gradient, these being separated by a transitional zone between 1600 and 2000 m. This study supports previous results which show a hump-shaped decline in species richness of Gnaphosidae along altitudinal gradients, leading to a peak at 400–700 m, where an optimum of environmental factors exists. This makes this zone the meeting point of the often opportunistic lowland species with the older and most permanent residents of the island. Rapoport’s rule on the positive correlation of the altitudinal range of species distributions with altitude is also supported. The high activity recorded for the species that persist on the high mountains of Crete is indicative of a tolerant arachnofauna, and is considered to result from relaxation of competitive interactions with other species. This is related to a reduction in species numbers, shortening of the activity period on high mountains and the unique presence of high mountain species that thrive only there. As shown in our study, strategies to cope with altitude are species-specific. Therefore, there cannot exist one single model to describe how animals react to the change in altitude, even under the same environmental conditions. Keywords Activity, altitudinal gradient, altitudinal range, Crete, Gnaphosidae, ground spiders, Mediterranean, mountain ecology, pitfall traps, species richness. ª 2005 Blackwell Publishing Ltd www.blackwellpublishing.com/jbi doi:10.1111/j.1365-2699.2004.01189.x 813 M. Chatzaki et al. INTRODUCTION The effect of altitude on biodiversity has been a topic of great interest for many earlier and contemporary biogeographers. During the nineteenth century latitudinal and elevational gradients in diversity were considered direct responses to climatic changes and energy interactions in the environment (see historical review in Lomolino, 2001). These were later interpreted as the species-energy theory by Wright (1983). Recent researchers connected mountain ecology with the species–area relationship of island biogeography (MacArthur, 1972), because of the similar conditions prevailing for both types of ecosystems (small area, isolation, restricted spatial heterogeneity). The negative effect of latitude on species richness and latitudinal range, or Rapoport’s rule (Stevens, 1989) has also been correlated with the same phenomenon along altitudinal gradients (Stevens, 1992; Brown et al., 1996). The latter is explained as a result of the wider ecological tolerances of organisms at higher elevations, a crucial characteristic which they have to possess in order to withstand the wider climatic fluctuations to which they are exposed. Lawton et al. (1987) ascribed the effect of elevation on species richness to the following reasons: (1) reduction in productivity with elevation; (2) reduction in the total area; (3) reduction in resource diversity; and (4) harshness and unpredictability of the conditions prevailing at higher elevations. Two more phenomena have been related to the negative effect of altitude on species richness, the ‘mid-domain effect’ (Colwell & Lees, 2000) or ‘ecotone effect’ (Lomolino, 2001), i.e. the peak in species richness at mid elevations, due to the increasing overlap of species ranges towards the centre of a domain or minor peaks at transitions between elevational communities, and the ‘rescue effect’ (Brown & Kodric-Brown, 1977), i.e. the reduced likelihood of a population at higher elevations to be rescued by individuals dispersing from other zones when compared with populations at lower elevations. Stevens (1992) proposed the Rapoport-rescue hypothesis, which is the extension of the previous idea to species level, suggesting that species richness is inflated in lower latitudes/ altitudes by the emigration of high-altitude species at the margins of their ranges due to wider tolerance, while taxa from lower elevations cannot expand their upper limit of elevational range. In total, this would mean that extinction rates of species increase with elevation and so does isolation, in contrast to immigration rates, which decrease with elevation (Stevens, 1992; Lomolino, 2001). Although the negative effect of altitude on diversity is broadly documented (Lawton et al., 1987; McCoy, 1990; Stevens, 1992; Brown et al., 1996; Lomolino, 2001; Sanders, 2002), the pattern of diversity decline is still controversial. One group of scientists favours a monotonic decrease in species richness with increasing elevation (Claridge & Singhrao, 1978; Lawton et al., 1987; Wolda, 1987; Fernandes & Price, 1988; Sfenthourakis, 1992; Stevens, 1992 and references therein) and another group favours a hump-shaped pattern, where the peak of species richness occurs at an 814 intermediate elevation (Bosmans et al., 1986; McCoy, 1990; Colwell & Hurtt, 1994; Rahbek, 1997; Fleishman et al., 1998; Sánchez-Cordero, 2001; Grytnes & Vetaas, 2002; Sanders, 2002) (for a detailed review see also Lomolino, 2001 and Sanders, 2002). In insects, both patterns have been observed (Sanders, 2002 and references therein). According to McCoy (1990), the latter pattern is more pronounced in predominantly, or totally, herbivorous insects, such as Coleoptera, Homoptera and Hemiptera. Apart from species richness, changes that occur in the abundance of a species along altitudinal gradients are often similar to changes along its geographical range (Whittaker, 1952; Hagvar, 1976; Claridge & Singhrao, 1978; Randall, 1982). Abundance appears to be higher at the centre of a species range and lower near the edges (Brown, 1984; Brussard, 1984; Brown et al., 1996). The pattern of abundance of a species along altitudinal gradients must be highly species-specific, as it is related to many factors such as responses to climate changes, to food quantity and quality, to natural pressure of enemies and to interspecific competition (see Lawton et al., 1987 for detailed citations). Evidence for the value of Rapoport’s rule along elevation gradients emerges from surveys of plants, mammals, reptiles and insects (Stevens, 1992). More detailed surveys verify this rule for butterflies (Fleishman et al., 1998), grasshoppers (Claridge & Singhrao, 1978), ants (Sanders, 2002) and partially isopods (Sfenthourakis, 1992). According to Brown et al. (1996), Rapoport’s rule is closely related to general factors which limit the range of distributions along geographical or ecological gradients, i.e. increasing physical stress in one direction, and increasing numbers and impacts of biological enemies in the other. Therefore, it is a very dynamic, speciesspecific phenomenon, partly depending on global climatic changes and on human activities. Concerning spiders, not many detailed studies have been carried out focusing on the relationship between species richness and altitude or other of the above questions on a species level. Maurer & Hänggi (1991) presented the altitudinal variation of spider species in Switzerland, reporting a more or less linear decline and an abrupt decrease in the number of species above the timberline (only 7% of the total number of species of the country occur above 2300 m). Although very few species occupy the whole altitudinal range of the Swiss Alps (21 species), about half of the total arachnofauna have wide altitudinal range, their distribution extending from the valleys to the timberline. Referring to the invertebrate diversity (including spiders) at high altitudes of the Central Alps, Meyer & Thaler (1995) reported a gradual decline of species within the main life zones from 1800 to 3500 m and a stepwise decline of species at the main borders. Bosmans et al. (1986) studied the spider communities along an altitudinal gradient in the French and Spanish Pyrénées (700–2475 m), concentrating mainly on the community structure and the zoogeographical patterns formed by the geographical distributions of the spider species. Although not analysed, their results favour the hump-shaped pattern of altitudinal distribution of the species Journal of Biogeography 32, 813–831, ª 2005 Blackwell Publishing Ltd Altitudinal distribution of ground spiders (at the zone 1100–1500 m). An ecological survey of ground spiders along altitudinal gradients in Norway (Otto & Svensson, 1982) demonstrated the same pattern of species decline from 0 to 800 m altitude, a positive correlation of the number of eurychronous species and of the range of altitudinal distribution, indicating the persistence of some widely distributed and easily dispersed species at high elevations. The abundance of spiders declines along altitudinal gradients of south Appalachian Mountains of North Carolina, Virginia and Maryland (McCoy, 1990) with maximum abundance recorded at low (but not the lowest) elevations. This study examined the distributional patterns (species richness, activity, altitudinal range and community structure) of the dominant family of ground spiders of Crete, Gnaphosidae, along the altitudinal gradient (0–2400 m) formed by three main mountain massifs, namely Lefka Ori, Psiloreitis and Dikti. It would seem that these ecological features are closely related to the history of the island and the way of formation of its fauna. Therefore, associations concerning the origin of the species occurring at different altitudinal zones and the possible ways they reached these zones are also given. Patterns of the above-mentioned ecological factors are first analysed on a regional–altitudinal base using altitude as a continuous parameter and then by dividing sites into five altitudinal zones of 500 m each. Details of special features of each mountain massif are analysed separately. MATERIALS AND METHODS Study area Geomorphology Crete is the largest island of the south Aegean island arc and is situated at its centre (3450¢–3540¢ N latitude, 2330¢– 2620¢ E longitude). It is the fifth largest island of the Mediterranean after Sicily, Sardinia, Cyprus and Corsica, its total surface covering 8.261 km2. Because of the intense tectonic dynamics occurring in this area, Crete presents a great geomorphological variation, being a ‘miniature continent’ (Rackham & Moody, 1996). Within such a small surface, a great variety of habitats and climatic factors are present, ranging from the insular character of the coasts to a fully continental character as one goes inland and approaches the high altitudes of its mountains. The main characteristic of the island geomorphology is the high percentage of mountainous regions, 39% of its surface being above 400 m, 12.5% above 800 m and 1.6% above 1600 m. Three main mountain massifs are situated along Crete: Lefka Ori in the western part, Psiloreitis in the central part and Lasithiotika Ori (Dikti and Thrypti) in the eastern part. Although the highest summit is found in Psiloreitis (2.456 m), the largest mountainous range is found in Lefka Ori: its highest summit is 2.453 m and there are another 56 summits over 2000 m. Journal of Biogeography 32, 813–831, ª 2005 Blackwell Publishing Ltd When referring to the main characteristics of the island, Bonnefont (1972) reports the decrease in altitude from west to east, and the great fragmentation and asymmetry between the north and south coast of Crete, the former being more hospitable than the latter. The southern slopes of the main mountain massifs of Crete are much steeper, with very steep slopes close to the coasts forming lots of gorges. Climate Crete has a typical Mediterranean climate with 5–7 months of arid, hot and dry summers, alternating with shorter periods of rainy, mild winters. There are not sufficient meteorological data, especially for the high mountains. However, there is a remarkable gradient of temperature, precipitation, winds and humidity across the main axes of the island, north to south, west to east and from the coasts inland and upwards. South, east and inland lowlands are warmer than the rest of the regions, both in summer and in winter, except for inland winters that are cooler than the coastal ones (Rackham & Moody, 1996). Mean annual temperatures are 2 C lower in the south than in the north of Crete (Pennas, 1977) and they fall 6 C per 1000 m altitude (Grove et al., 1991). The range of temperatures is much narrower near the coast than in the mountains, due to the more maritime character of the former (Strid, 1995). Although there are no records for precipitation above 900 m, Rackham & Moody (1996) estimate that at the top of Lefka Ori the annual precipitation must be as high as 2000 mm. In southern Lefka Ori, snow fall above 1400 m a.s.l. can be several metres, but the resulting water disappears into the porous crystalline limestone immediately after the snow melts in May. This harsh landscape forms the ‘high desert’, a term coined by Rackham & Moody (1996) to describe a unique environment that does not exist in the other two mountain massifs. Geological history The history of the south Aegean island arc dates back to the middle Miocene (15–11 Ma), when intense fragmentation and the first subductions of the Hellenic arc started to take place, transforming the southern parts of ‘Aegaiida’ (the united land mass comprising what is today the Hellenic peninsula and the Aegean Sea) into separated island forms (Dermitzakis & Papanikolaou, 1981; Le Pichon & Angelier, 1981). More recent evaluations of the geodynamic evolution of the Aegean area support the idea that such events that contributed to the separation of Crete initiated at least 26 Ma (Meulenkamp et al., 1988). Although there is not full agreement about the periods and duration of land connections of Crete with neighbouring continental areas, it is certain that Crete has been fully isolated since 5 Ma. Cretan mountains are quite new in geological time. Until the early Pliocene (5 Ma) Crete was composed of a mosaic of landmasses that did not exceed the altitude of 500 m 815 M. Chatzaki et al. (Meulenkamp et al., 1988). The altitudinal zone above 1500 m was formed as a result of pronounced uplifts that took place after the Pleistocene (1.5 Ma) (Meulenkamp et al., 1994). Vegetation Phrygana is the most widespread formation on the island, although irregularly distributed and showing a specific altitudinal zonation and ecological differentiations (Strid, 1995). Phrygana are found from sea level to the highest summits, but with the ratio of annual : perennial plant species decreasing from low to high altitudes. Lowland and middle altitude phrygana are composed of thorny aromatic shrubs such as: Sarcopoterium spinosum, Coridothymus capitatus, Phlomis cretica, P. lanata, P. fruticosa, Cistus spp., Genista acanthoclada, Calicotome villosa, Euphorbia spp., Balota spp. and others. At higher altitudes other species (chamephytes) such as Berberis cretica, Rhamnus saxatilis, Prunus prostrata, Satureja spinosa and Astragalus angustifolius dominate. Beyond the timberline, only scarce vegetation composed of small cushion-like shrubs exists. In the present study, habitats of this type are separated into phrygana near the coast (CP), inland phrygana (IP) and sub-alpine shrubs (SS), following the altitudinal gradient (Appendix 1). Maquis (M) on Crete are often intermixed with phrygana, the limits between the two being vague (Rackham & Moody, 1996). This is mainly due to overgrazing of the region. Apart from the above species, other typical maquis species are Ceratonia siliqua, P. terebinthus, shrub-like Quercus coccifera, Pistacia lentiscus, Arbutus unedo, Juniperus phoenicea, J. oxycedrus, Erica arborea and others usually reaching 1–2 m height, or even more. These formations may reach an altitude of c. 600 m. The upper limits of forest growth reach altitudes from 1600 m (southern slopes) to 1800 m (northern slopes). Pinus brutia (P) is the dominant species up to 1200 m. This is the commonest forest formation of Crete, being found from sea level to such altitudes. The rest of the woodland types on Crete are very scarce: the Quercus coccifera forest on the southern slopes of Psiloreitis (area of Rouvas, psi1000a) and the Cupressus sempervirens–Quercus coccifera–Acer sempervirens formations on the southern slopes of Lefka Ori (area of Anopoli, lo1200) are among the most characteristic ones. Clear altitudinal zonation, such as evergreen broadleaves–deciduous forests–conifer trees, does not exist on Crete (Rackham & Moody, 1996). Methodology and statistical analysis A total of 33 sampling sites were selected along the island of Crete (Fig. 1) starting from sea level and reaching the highest elevations of 2400 m. Sites include the most characteristic habitat types of the island, i.e. phrygana, maquis, areas close to wetlands, pine, kermes oak and cypress forests, and sub-alpine shrublands (see Appendix 1). Following the relative representation of these habitat types on Crete, the majority of sites are shrublands that are represented by different species associations, depending on the altitudinal zone. No urban areas were sampled; therefore, habitat diversity of the lowlands is not fully represented in this study. In all sites material was collected by pitfall traps, using ethylene glycol as a preservative. Pitfalls were set and changed at 2-month intervals except for the sites at Lefka Ori, where they were changed each month (see Appendix 1). Collection of material covered the period of high activity of the family Gnaphosidae, i.e. from mid-spring to mid-autumn. More than two samples were collected at each site. Spiders of this family were identified to species level and only mature individuals were counted. Because pitfall traps register Figure 1 Map of sampling sites on Crete. 816 Journal of Biogeography 32, 813–831, ª 2005 Blackwell Publishing Ltd Altitudinal distribution of ground spiders Table 1 Altitudinal zones on Crete: altitudinal limits, code names, number of sites and number of species sampled to each one of them Altitudinal zone (m) Code name Number of sites Number of species 0–499 500–999 1000–1499 1500–1999 2000–2400 ZER LOW MID TOP PEAK 14 6 6 4 3 44 39 28 19 5 activity patterns of arthropods and are only partly affected by the population size of taxa (Maelfait & Baert, 1975), quantitative data were not used for further statistical analysis. The effect of seasonality on activity patterns is the subject of another paper (M. Chatzaki et al., unpubl. data), therefore in the present study it was reduced by using mean values of samples at each site. It is for this reason that winter material was not included in the analysis so that samples within the high-activity period of the family could be considered as equal sampling units as regards seasonality. In order to balance sampling effort for all sites, the number of individuals per sample was transformed to the number of individuals per 100 trap days and the mean values of samples per site were used for each species (Appendix 2). The same transformation was used for the whole family, by summing the above mean values of all species at each site. Sites were divided into five altitudinal zones of 500 m each, starting from sea level. Table 1 shows the number of sites included in each of the above zones as well as the species richness of each zone. Species collector curves were created with EstimateS6b1a (version 6.5.6 for WindowsTM, 1985–2000). Basic statistical tests were conducted with Statistica 6.0 (Statsoft Inc., 1984–2001) and SPSS8 (SPSS Inc., 1989–1997, Standard version). Two-way anova was first used to test for the significance of differences in species richness and activity among sites in relation to the mountain massif and the altitudinal zone they belong. Multidimensional scaling (MDS) (James & McCulloch, 1990) conducted with PRIMER5.2.2 (Primer-E Ltd, 2001) was used in order to visualize the similarities among sites of the investigation based on the species recorded on them. The ordination was based on the Bray–Curtis distance on presence-absence data. Cluster analysis (UPGMA), based on Jaccard’s coefficient of similarity (Krebs, 1998), was performed in order to detect in more detail the stability of patterns along the mountains of Crete and the ecological factors that influence faunal similarities among sites. RESULTS Species composition Table 2 shows the species recorded at each altitudinal zone. In total, 54 species of ground spiders were recognized. Nine Journal of Biogeography 32, 813–831, ª 2005 Blackwell Publishing Ltd species do not occur in the first altitudinal zone (Drassodes oreinos, Gnaphosa bithynica, Haplodrassus minor, H. signifer, Micaria dives, Poecilochroa senilis1, Scotophaeus scutulatus, Synaphosus palearcticus and Drassyllus sp.). Nine species can be characterized as exclusively lowland species, occurring only up to 500 m (Berinda ensigera, Berlandina plumalis, Leptodrassus hadjissaranti, L. manolisi, Micaria pygmaea, Nomisia sp., Scotophaeus peninsularis, Trachyzelotes lyonneti, Z. nilicola). Above 2000 m there are five species in total. Drassodes oreinos, a recently described species (Chatzaki et al., 2002b), and G. bithynica, being present only at Lefka Ori and Psiloreitis (Chatzaki et al., 2002a), are recorded on the Cretan mountains above 1200 m and 1600 m respectively. The remaining species – Z. creticus, Z. subterraneus and Z. labilis – occur at all elevational zones of Crete, the first being Cretan endemic, the second Palearctic and the third presenting unclear taxonomical status (Chatzaki et al., 2003). Among these species, G. bithynica and Z. creticus were not present at Dikti mountain. Apart from the above-mentioned differences, some species present deviations concerning the upper limit of their distributions at the three main mountain massifs. For instance, Pterotricha lentiginosa, Callilepis cretica, Zelotes caucasius and Z. subterraneus reach 1950 m in Psiloreitis and 1750 m in Dikti, but do not exceed 800 or 1600 m in Lefka Ori. Species richness Species collector curves were created using all sites together (Fig. 2) and each altitudinal zone separately (Fig. 3). The last two zones were combined in one graph because the number of sites at each zone was very limited. At the zones ZER and MID as well as when all sites are analysed together, the curves are asymptotic and sampling may therefore be considered as saturated. At the zones LOW and TOP-PEAK a plateau of species numbers is roughly reached. In all cases there is a decrease in standard deviation of the number of species as the number of sites increases (SDALL SITES ¼ 4.97–0.48; SDZER ¼ 5.22–1.02; SDLOW ¼ 7.86–1.61; SDMID ¼ 5.82– 1.15; SDTOP-PEAK ¼ 4.93–2.12). Species richness at sites along the altitudinal gradient is presented in Fig. 4 and shows a hump-shaped decline with altitude, which may be described by a quadratic equation. Pearson’s correlation indicates a significant negative correlation between the two variables (R ¼ )0.738, P < 0.001). The highest numbers of species are recorded at the sites between 400 and 700 m. Species numbers decline continuously after 1000 m altitude, and they fall abruptly after 2000 m to three or four species per site. Species richness of Gnaphosidae was tested against the five altitudinal zones and the three mountain massifs (anova, Table 3). Differences are significant among altitudinal zones, 1 Poecilochroa senilis is nevertheless recorded from other lowland sites not included in this study. Similarly S. scutulatus is recorded from Gavdos island, south of Crete. 817 M. Chatzaki et al. Table 2 Species composition of the family Gnaphosidae for each altitudinal zone on Crete 60 Anagraphis pallens Berinda amabilis Berinda ensigera Berlandina plumalis Callilepis cretica Camillina metellus Cesonia aspida Cryptodrassus creticus Drassodes lapidosus Drassodes lutescens Drassodes oreinos Drassodes serratichelis Drassyllus praeficus Drassyllus pumiloides Drassyllus sp. Gnaphosa bithynica Haplodrassus creticus Haplodrassus dalmatensis Haplodrassus minor Haplodrassus signifer Leptodrassus albidus Leptodrassus femineus Leptodrassus hadjissaranti Leptodrassus manolisi Leptodrassus pupa Micaria albovittata Micaria coarctata Micaria dives Micaria pygmaea Nomisia excerpta Nomisia ripariensis Nomisia sp. Poecilochroa senilis Pterotricha lentiginosa Scotophaeus peninsularis Scotophaeus scutulatus Setaphis carmeli Synaphosus palearcticus Synaphosus trichopus Trachyzelotes adriaticus Trachyzelotes barbatus Trachyzelotes lyonneti Trachyzelotes malkini Zelotes caucasius Zelotes creticus Zelotes daidalus Zelotes cf. ilotarum Zelotes labilis Zelotes minous Zelotes nilicola Zelotes scrutatus Zelotes solstitialis Zelotes subterraneus Zelotes tenuis 818 ZER + + + + + + + + + + + + + LOW + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + MID + + + + TOP PEAK + + + + + 30 20 0 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 Number of sites + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + Figure 2 Species collector curve. Data points represent average species numbers (from 100 replicates) computed for the given number of sites. but not among mountain massifs. Species numbers at the sites of each mountain massif are shown in Fig. 5. A quadratic equation may describe the species richness decline in Psiloreitis. In the other two mountains, regression cannot be described by a similar equation, despite the significantly negative correlation between number of species and altitude. Activity + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 40 10 + + + + + Number of species 50 Species name + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + Mean activity of the family as a whole is not correlated with altitude (Pearson’s correlation R ¼ )0.083, P ¼ 0.323, Fig. 6). However, when the sum of means of all species is divided by the number of species present at each site, Pearson’s correlation becomes significant (R ¼ 0.645, P < 0.001). Contrary to species richness, mean activity per species is positively correlated with altitude (Fig. 7). There are no significant differences in family activity among altitudinal zones or among mountain massifs (Table 3). The interaction of the two factors is not significant. Therefore sites of the study area can be treated as a uniform geographical area. About half of the species (46%) present their maximum activity [or potential midpoint, sensu Grytnes & Vetaas (2002)] at the first zone, although many of them have a wide altitudinal range (see next paragraph, and Fig. 8). Testing the 25 most abundant species separately, the mean activity of most of them is not significantly different at the five zones (Table 4). Four species show significant differences in their mean activity (i.e. A. pallens, D. oreinos, P. lentiginosa and Z. tenuis). Two of them present their maxima at higher altitudes above 1000 m and are quantitatively more concentrated at these elevations than the rest of the species. Range of distribution + Because there is no significant effect of the regional variation on either species richness or activity (Table 3), analysis on the range of altitudinal distribution was conducted without taking into account regional subdivision. Journal of Biogeography 32, 813–831, ª 2005 Blackwell Publishing Ltd Altitudinal distribution of ground spiders LOW 35 Number of species Number of species ZER 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 0 2 4 MID Number of species Number of species 25 20 15 10 5 0 2 4 6 8 10 8 10 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 0 2 4 Number of sites 6 Number of sites Table 3 Two-way anova test for the comparison of mean values of species richness and activity of Gnaphosidae between sites belonging to different altitudinal zones and different mountain massifs (* ¼ significant at a ¼ 0.05) 25 y = –5E-06x2 + 0.0044x + 17.601 2 R = 0.7194 20 Number of spp 10 35 30 0 8 TOP-PEAK 35 Figure 3 Species collector curve for each altitudinal zone separately. Data points represent average species numbers (from 100 replicates) computed for the given number of sites. 6 Number of sites Number of sites 15 10 5 0 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 Region (d.f. ¼ 2) Altitude (d.f. ¼ 4) Interaction (region · altitude, d.f. ¼ 6) Species richness Activity F P-value F P-value 0.98 4.38 0.507 0.393 0.017* 0.796 1.712 0.656 0.79 0.207 0.589 0.589 Altitude (m) Figure 4 Correlation graph of the number of Gnaphosidae species at the sites along the altitudinal gradient of Cretan mountains. The Pearson’s correlation coefficient is significant (R ¼ )0.738, P < 0.001). The quadratic equation is also statistically significant (R2 ¼ 0.629, F2,28 ¼ 23.72, P < 0.001). In total, species that occur only at low (up to 500 m, 17%) or mid-elevations (up to 1000 m, 30%) represent about half of the total fauna of this family (Fig. 8)2. The following two zones are the elevational limit for nine and 153 species (17% and 28% of the total number of species respectively). Of the five species which reach the last zone, three have a wide altitudinal range (from sea level to 2400 m) and two present a narrower range. In total, 14 species were found at a single zone and another 15 were found at two (26–28% of the total number of species for each case). The remaining species were found in more than two altitudinal zones, showing a greater range of altitudinal tolerance. As seen in Fig. 9, altitudinal range of species is 2 In this figure, discontinuities of the altitudinal range of distribution (see Table 2) were not taken into account. 3 In the zone 1500–1999 m, there is a sampling gap between 1650 and 1950 m, so that the limits of the altitudinal range of the species recorded here are not necessarily the highest limit for this zone. However, four of the above species (H. dalmatensis, P. lentiginosa, Z. caucasius and M. coarctata) were found at 1800 m as well (data not included in this analysis). Journal of Biogeography 32, 813–831, ª 2005 Blackwell Publishing Ltd positively correlated with altitude following a statistically significant linear equation (F1,54 ¼ 15.1, P < 0.001). Multivariate analyses Multidimensional scaling Ordination of sites using Bray–Curtis distance on binomial data is seen in Fig. 10 (stress ¼ 0.13). Sites in black circles belong to the highest altitudinal zone and are clearly separated from the rest of sites. Apparently this ordination is mainly caused by the two mountain species D. oreinos and G. bithynica, which appear only at the sites of higher elevations and by the absence of most of the rest of species (see Appendix 2). Sites belonging to the other zones are arranged in clusters of close vicinity, one after the other, indicating a gradual replacement of species along the altitudinal gradient. Cluster analysis For the calculation of similarity within and between sites of each mountain massif, Jaccard’s index was used. In the dendrograms created by cluster analysis (UPGMA) (Fig. 11) five main clusters are observed at the level of 0.46–0.49 similarity: 819 M. Chatzaki et al. Lefka Ori 25 24 22 20 Individuals/100 trapdays Number of species 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 15 10 5 4 2 0 0 250 500 750 1000 1250 1500 1750 2000 2250 0 2500 0 500 1000 Altitude (m) Psiloreitis 22 20 Number of species 2000 2500 Figure 6 Sum of mean activity of Gnaphosidae species (total number of individuals per 100 trap days) along the altitudinal gradient of Cretan mountains. Pearson’s correlation coefficient is not significant (R ¼ )0.083, P ¼ 0.323). 24 18 16 14 12 10 3 8 6 2 0 0 250 500 750 1000 1250 1500 1750 2000 2250 2500 Altitude (m) Dikti 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 Individuals/100 trapdays 2.5 4 Number of species 1500 Altitude (m) 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 Altitude (m) Figure 7 Mean activity of Gnaphosidae species (total number of individuals per 100 trap days divided by the number of species at each site) along the altitudinal gradient of Cretan mountains. Pearson’s correlation coefficient is significant (R ¼ 0.645, P < 0.001). 0 250 500 750 1000 1250 1500 1750 2000 Altitude (m) 2500 Maximum activity 2000 Altitudinal zone (m) Figure 5 Species richness of Gnaphosidae at the sites of the three main mountain massifs of Crete. Regression analysis shows that a quadratic equation is statistically significant only for the sites of Psiloreitis (R2 ¼ 0.812, F2,10 ¼ 21.62, P < 0.001). Pearson’s correlation coefficient at all three mountains is statistically significant (RLO ¼ )0.637, P ¼ 0.033; RPSI ¼ )0.866, P < 0.001; RDIKT ¼ )0.642, P ¼ 0.031). 1500 1000 500 (a) Most of the sites of the first (0–499 m or ZER) and some of the sites of the second zone (500–999 m or LOW), belonging to the mountains Psiloreitis and Dikti. (b) Sites of the third (1000–1499 m or MID) and most of the sites of the second zone, belonging to the same mountains. This cluster also includes one site from Lefka Ori at 1200 m (lo1200). (c) Sites lo50, psi50 and psi1200 with no obvious regional or altitudinal association. (d) Sites of the fourth zone (1500–1999 m or TOP). (e) Sites of the fifth zone (2000–2400 m or PEAK). 820 0 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 Species rank 35 40 45 50 55 Figure 8 Altitudinal range of Gnaphosidae species along the altitudinal gradient of Cretan mountains. It is noteworthy that sites of Lefka Ori usually remain outside the main clusters (for instance lo800, lo20, lo30). Although an analysis on the effect of habitat type on the sites ordination could not be performed, because it is correlated Journal of Biogeography 32, 813–831, ª 2005 Blackwell Publishing Ltd Altitudinal distribution of ground spiders Species ZER LOW MID TOP PEAK P-value A. pallens C. creticus C. metellus C. cretica D. lapidosus D. lutescens D. oreinos D. praeficus D. pumiloides D. serratichelis H. creticus H. dalmatensis M. albovittata M. coarctata N. excerpta P. lentiginosa T. adriaticus T. malkini Z. caucasius Z. creticus Z. cf. ilotarum Z. labilis Z. scrutatus Z. subterraneus Z. tenuis 0.286 0.151 0.195 0.082 0.037 0.167 0 0.318 0.050 0.025 0.041 0.095 0.040 0.287 0.753 1.012 0.155 0.610 1.363 0.476 0.081 0.678 0.518 1.308 1.427 0.100 0.515 0.068 0.038 0.170 0.379 0 1.121 0.123 0 0.167 0.012 0.036 0.112 0.509 1.433 0 0.630 0.780 0.095 0.216 0.528 0.331 0.836 1.596 0.027 0.658 0.040 0.034 1.434 0.274 0.257 2.613 0.100 0.040 0.371 0.133 0.010 0.056 0.553 4.418 0.030 0.218 0.687 0.477 0.358 0.206 0.043 0.425 0.193 0.105 1.395 0 0 0 0.045 1.528 0.533 0.027 0.042 0.550 0.160 0 0.074 0.275 4.274 0.080 0 1.761 0.143 0.000 0.630 0.027 0.590 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.672 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.266 0 1.181 0 0.383 0 0.000* 0.120 5.990 7.300 0.260 4.220 0.000* 0.300 3.040 5.830 1.740 6.270 7.100 2.150 4.800 0.010* 8.570 1.250 3.440 7.750 5.920 2.550 0.280 2.150 0.030* gradient on Crete, in addition to the historical events that contributed to the formation of this fauna, the insular character of the study area, and the effect of human activities on the island. Arguments for this effect, on each of the main issues of this study, are given below. Community structure Along the altitudinal gradient of Crete, two main patterns of community structure are evident: (1) that of the first zone, from sea level to 1500 m, where there are many species with similar activity, thus forming a well balanced fauna, and (2) that of the higher zone, above 1600 m, where the number of species declines considerably and very few species dominate. In between these two zones, there is an intermediate transitional zone, which in a stricter sense, extends further up to 2000 m, leaving the summits forming an extreme community. As shown by MDS (Fig. 10) and by cluster analysis (Fig. 11) this 3000 2500 Altitudinal range(m) Table 4 Mean activity per zone of the 25 most abundant Gnaphosidae species occurring at least along three altitudinal zones. P-values (after Bonferroni correction for multiple comparison) of the anova test (d.f. ¼ 4, 28; * ¼ significant at a ¼ 0.05) 2000 1500 1000 500 y = 0.5353x + 618.22 2 R = 0.2186 0 0 DISCUSSION Gnaphosidae is one of the most diverse and the most abundant of the spider families on the ground floor in Crete and in Mediterranean habitats in general. This is documented in all arachnological studies in the area (Christophe, 1974; Assi, 1986; Deltshev & Blagoev, 1994; Urones et al., 1995; Chatzaki, 1998; Chatzaki et al., 1998; Majadas & Urones, 2002; Lymberakis, 2003). Most species show a large distribution area, and they are more diverse in temperate climates and arid ecosystems. In these environments most species have wide ecological preferences forming quite homogenous communities, not strongly related to habitat types. On Crete, most Gnaphosidae are xerophilous or present high tolerance to high temperatures and aridity and very few have narrower, more specialized niche (Chatzaki, 2003). Therefore, most species are widespread along the island, despite its high heterogeneity in most ecological features (i.e. climate, humidity, geology, vegetation, and especially geomorphology). Similarly, the character of this family, as described above, greatly affects its response to the altitudinal Journal of Biogeography 32, 813–831, ª 2005 Blackwell Publishing Ltd 1000 1500 2000 2500 Altitude(m) Figure 9 Altitudinal range of Gnaphosidae species along the altitudinal gradient of Cretan mountains. Pearson’s correlation coefficient is significant (R ¼ 0.472, P < 0.001). Linear regression is also significant (F1,54 ¼ 15.1, P < 0.001). ZER LOW PEAK TOP Dimension 2 with altitude (Pearson’s correlation coefficient R ¼ 0.771, P < 0.001), differences in habitat type of these sites may explain their isolation (see Appendix 1). 500 MID Dimension 1 Figure 10 MDS ordination based on the Bray–Curtis dissimilarity matrix of species presence–absence. Filled circles: sites at zone ‘PEAK’, triangles: sites at zone ‘TOP’, open circles: sites at zone ‘MID’, filled squares: sites at zone ‘LOW’, X: sites at zone ‘ZER’. 821 M. Chatzaki et al. dik0a dik50 psi200a psi200b dik300 psi300a si300bp psi750 lo30 dik350 psi1000b dik700 psi650 dik800 psi1000a psi1000c dik1200 dik1450 lo1200 psi1650 lo50 psi50 psi1200 lo800 dik0b lo20 psi0 lo1650 dik1750 psi1950 lo2000 lo2400 psi2200 0.17 0.31 0.46 0.60 Coefficient latter zone is very isolated and does not relate to any of the other zones which form a smooth gradient of ecological variation following the altitudinal gradient. In this sense, the Cretan summits represent ecological islands. From 1000 m upwards species are gradually filtered out depending on their tolerance to high mountain harshness, and, in most cases, they are not replaced by others. The fauna of the two higher zones is formed by: (1) lowland species that can hardly reach these elevations, and hence they are found at the margins of their distributional range (mostly Mediterranean species, i.e. A. pallens, M. coarctata, N. excerpta, T. adriaticus, Z. caucasius, Z. scrutatus), (2) species with wide elevational range, but with potential midpoint at higher elevations, and hence better adapted to the Cretan mountains (mostly endemic or palearctic species, i.e. C. cretica, D. lapidosus, D. serratichelis, D. praeficus, H. creticus, H. dalmatensis, P. lentiginosa, Z. creticus, Z. labilis, Z. subterraneus), and (3) species that dominate exclusively at the higher altitudes of Crete (D. oreinos and G. bithynica). For Gnaphosidae, the timberline does not always play an important role for the community structure, as the main variation of this fauna occurs at higher elevations than 1600– 1700 m. In cluster analysis (Fig. 11), sites at these elevations are sometimes clustered with those at lower elevations (Psiloreitis) and sometimes with those at higher elevations (Lefka Ori and Dikti), clearly indicating the transitional character of the fauna at this zone. Sites at this zone share some of the most tolerant species with the lowland sites, and the high-altitude species with the summits. For other spider families on Crete, which are probably more dependent on the vegetation type of their habitat due to their way of life and foraging, such as Linyphiidae, Salticidae and Theridiidae, there is a better defined species replacement above 1600 m as was demonstrated by Lymberakis (2003) in a study at Lefka Ori. At the same mountain, the effect of the timberline is also proved for other taxa, such as isopods (Lymberakis et al., 2004), in which it separates two almost distinct faunas, 822 0.75 a b c d e Figure 11 Cluster analysis (UPGMA) using Jaccard’s index of similarity among the sites of the three mountain massifs of Crete: Lefka Ori (lo), Psiloreitis (psi) and Dikti (dik). as far as species composition is concerned. Accordingly, in a similar study at the high altitudes of the Central Alps, Meyer & Thaler (1995) concluded that the decrease in species diversity at the timberline is more drastic in phytotrophic, than in zootrophic and saprotrophic orders. The reason why Gnaphosidae present a comparatively homogenous character along the altitudinal gradient, which changes abruptly only above 2000 m, lies in the high tolerance of its species towards aridity and temperature extremes. Among the spider families mentioned above, Gnaphosidae is the only one that presents peaks of activity within the dry season (M. Chatzaki et al., unpubl. data), the other families emerging earlier in springtime (Chatzaki et al., 1998). At least some species are able to modify their annual cycle on the high mountains of Crete, with peaks of activity during the more predictable months (August/September), so they can easily adapt to the harsh conditions of this environment (M. Chatzaki et al., unpubl. data). Because they live on the ground, the change of vegetation above the timberline does not affect them directly, but only through the decline of food availability resulting from the reduction of habitat diversity and complexity. Moreover, some authors (Swan, 1963; Mani, 1968, 1990; Edwards, 1987) emphasize the importance of windblown organic material for the survival of organisms at zones above the tree line. They postulate that at these elevations the abundance of this aeolian material is much greater than the primary productivity so as to constitute the main food resource for alpine organisms. Swan (1963) attributed the presence and feeding of spiders of the family Salticidae at 6700 m in Mt Everest to air-blown flies and collembolans. Being generalist predators, Gnaphosidae, apparently, can survive even if food quality changes, provided it is enough to support their survival. Cluster analysis shows that the main factor inducing faunal similarity within mountain sites is the close vicinity and geographical orientation of the sites. However, the overwhelming factor which induces similarity is similar elevation rather Journal of Biogeography 32, 813–831, ª 2005 Blackwell Publishing Ltd Altitudinal distribution of ground spiders than close geographical location (Fig. 11). Despite their statistical insignificance, minor differences in both, patterns of species richness decline (Fig. 5) and species composition, are probably related to more severe climatic conditions and the wildness of the landscape of Lefka Ori, leading to an earlier species decline and absence of the less tolerant species. Species richness The hump-shaped decline of species richness is verified for Gnaphosidae along the Cretan mountains. The same pattern is repeated in the Cretan flora (Lymberakis, 2003), although the abrupt decline of species richness occurs at lower elevations associated with the timberline. Similar results are presented in other studies on spiders (Otto & Svensson, 1982; Bosmans et al., 1986; McCoy, 1990) or other animals (McCoy, 1990; Colwell & Hurtt, 1994; Rahbek, 1997; Fleishman et al., 1998; Sánchez-Cordero, 2001; Grytnes & Vetaas, 2002; Sanders, 2002). Data on several animal taxa studied until now on Crete such as Coleoptera (Trichas, 1996), land snails (Vardinoyannis, 1994), Isopoda (Lymberakis et al., 2004), or on mountains of continental Greece (Sfenthourakis, 1992) are not very helpful in revealing the pattern of species richness decline, either because the altitudinal gradient of sites starts from mid elevations (above 500–600 m) or because data are combined into zones: in both cases it cannot be deduced whether there is a linear decline of species richness or there is a peak hidden within the first altitudinal zone. The results of our study cannot be due to a sampling artefact, because the study was conducted from sea level to the highest points of the island, so no sampling error may have occurred due to restricted elevational range of the study area (see McCoy, 1990 and Lomolino, 2001). Sanders (2002) attributed the peak in species richness of ants in western US to the increase of the area at mid elevations and to the increased overlap of species distributions at the same elevations (or ‘mid-domain’ effect, Colwell & Lees, 2000). McCoy (1990) and Fleishman et al. (1998) interpreted their results on different groups of invertebrates by putting forward two biological hypotheses: (1) the prediction that ‘ends are bad’ because of climatic severity and predation at lower elevations, climatic severity and resource scarcity at upper elevations, and (2) the prediction that ‘middle is good’, relating species richness to elevation via primary productivity, which is considered to peak at mid elevations (Janzen, 1973; Janzen et al., 1976). A final hypothesis that cannot be overlooked is the extent of human disturbance at lower elevations, which may reduce species diversity (Wolda, 1987; McCoy, 1990; Sanders, 2002). In the case of Cretan Gnaphosidae, species richness is maximized at the zone 400–700 m. To them the lower end is ‘bad’ because of both the higher danger of predation and of the human disturbance. Sites below this elevation are greatly changed by intense urbanization, which seems to have caused a gradual degradation of the environment even in ‘natural’ habitats. Human activities are not definitely related to species Journal of Biogeography 32, 813–831, ª 2005 Blackwell Publishing Ltd reduction, as, at least for some taxa (such as land snails), they may also introduce new species in a region (Mylonas, 1984). It should be noted that in the present study, no habitats close to urban regions or to cultivations were analysed. The study of these environments might change our results in favour of a pattern similar to the linear decline of species along altitudinal gradients. As mentioned previously, primary productivity does not seem to affect very much generalist predators; therefore, the ‘middle is good’ hypothesis may not be a very robust factor in the present study. Concerning the mid-domain effect, one has to consider the way of formation of the Cretan mountain fauna and the characteristics of the family under investigation. Crete is the only insular system where such research is being carried out, all previous studies mentioned above, referring to old continental areas. Due to its isolation, a less balanced and perhaps impoverished fauna is to be expected (Gillespie & Roderick, 2002), especially in mountains, where a truly alpine fauna is actually missing and has never been established. The period of high altitude existence on Crete is very short for enhancing the speciation of a great number of species, confined only to them. The exclusively high mountain species of Crete (i.e. Gnaphosa bithynica and Drassodes oreinos), probably reflecting distributional relicts, are very few for creating a second peak of richness at higher elevations. Therefore, there cannot exist a clear ecotone effect, as for instance in the Pyrénées where a peak is observed at 1100–1500 m (Bosmans et al., 1986), because there are not two distinct faunas, meeting at an intermediate zone to form a peak of species diversity. At the elevations where the peak of species richness is observed on Crete, there is an optimum of environmental factors that involves: (1) the relaxation of intense urbanization and agricultural activities when compared with the lowest zone, (2) good climatic equilibrium between temperature and humidity, and (3) greater habitat diversity and stability of climate when compared with the higher zones. These features make this zone the meeting point of the often opportunistic lowland species of the coastline with the older and most permanent residents of the island. Wolda (1987) and McCoy (1990) argued that sampling regimes play an important role in the outcome of such a survey, suggesting that continuous sampling over long periods of time may lead to a monotonic pattern of species decline, while short-term sampling may lead to mid-elevational peaks. McCoy (1990) also admits that his own results would favour the monotonic pattern if his sampling had been for a longer duration. The argument here is that, in lower elevations, climatic conditions permit wider temporal variation of species activity. Therefore, short-term sampling is not sufficient to accumulate a high percentage of species diversity, and so underestimates it, leading to an ‘artificial’ hump-shaped pattern. Our results show that even with longterm sampling, hump-shaped patterns define species richness, at least when not all habitat types (including urban regions) are investigated. 823 M. Chatzaki et al. Activity Mean activity of Gnaphosidae is not correlated with altitude, contrary to the activity per species which is positively correlated with altitude. This, in combination with the decline of species richness along altitudinal gradients of Crete, indicates that species which are able to reach higher altitudes can become very active and thrive at these elevations, thus counterbalancing the differences in species numbers among altitudinal zones. The same phenomenon was observed in the spiders of the Central Alps (Meyer & Thaler, 1995). Reasons that explain this are the following: 1. Shortening of the favoured period for reproduction with altitude produces a concentration of the activity period towards the warmer and most predictable months, i.e. summer and early autumn. As our data correspond to this period, it is evident that higher numbers of individuals will be recorded, although not throughout the year. 2. Reduction in species numbers with altitude releases competitive interactions among the remaining, tolerant species which then find the optimum conditions to augment their population size (Brown et al., 1996). 3. Presence of newly appearing high-altitude species at the higher zones (1200–1600 m), where there are still many of the lowland representatives, causes an inflation of the total activity of the family. McCoy (1990) reports a negative correlation in the abundance of spiders with altitude. As he used sweep nets as sampling method, he collected spiders from the vegetation layer and not from the ground floor (hence not Gnaphosidae). Apparently, these spiders are more vulnerable to change of vegetation with altitude (see Community structure) and that is why they are not favoured at higher elevations. Instead, Gnaphosidae seem to be the most tolerant among other spider families as shown in a comparative analysis on a family level at Lefka Ori (Lymberakis, 2003). This is also reported by other authors (Otto & Svensson, 1982) and may be due either to competitive release or to physiological/behavioural adaptations which allow members of this family to overcome harsh conditions at higher elevations. Moreover, some species become even more abundant there (see Table 4). This ecological pattern is followed by species of some other families that belong to the same guild (wandering spiders) such as Lycosidae, Philodromidae and Thomisidae (Lymberakis, 2003). In all cases this is due to the new appearance of species which occur above a certain altitude. Therefore, competitive interaction is probably the reason for the observed patterns. The positive correlation between activity of invertebrate taxa and altitude is not very common on Crete, as shown in Lymberakis (2003). The author reports a positive correlation in some families of Coleoptera (such as Curculionidae and Tenebrionidae), in Opiliones, Homoptera, Dictyoptera, Lepidoptera and Diptera, but a negative correlation in other families of Coleoptera (such as Carabidae and Scarabaeidae), in Hymenoptera and slugs. A less apparent pattern of activity is documented for scorpions, diplopods, isopods, chilopods and 824 land snails. According to Lawton et al. (1987) …‘there is no general tendency for species to increase in abundance at higher elevations’, and this must be related to the many factors contributing to this parameter, i.e. species’ physiological tolerances on the one hand and intensity of climate’s harshness, latitude and other local factors on the other. Altitudinal range Our results fully conform to Rapoport’s rule. Most of the species present occupy a great range of altitudinal distribution (76% more than 500 m and 46% more than 1000 m). This is related both to wide ecological tolerances of the family analysed here and to historical reasons, which favoured the formation of the high-altitude fauna mainly by tolerant lowland species, rather than by truly alpine members of the family. The latter would represent a less thermophilous arachnofauna and would probably have narrower altitudinal ranges. In the absence of these species, the pattern observed by members of the family on Crete is mainly a reflection of climate change along the altitudinal gradient. Under these circumstances, Rapoport’s rule remains as the only logical consequence. CONCLUSIONS Gnaphosidae present a rather unique character along the altitudinal gradients of Crete. They consist of a great number of species with wide ecological tolerances, so that they occupy wide altitudinal ranges much more than any other spider family in the same area. Rapoport’s rule and a hump-shaped decline of species richness are the main characteristics of their altitudinal distribution. Two kinds of community structure are observed, one that characterizes lower elevations (up to 1000 m) and one that is observed at the summits. Activity of the family as a whole does not correlate with altitude as it is highly species-specific. The ecological profile of Gnaphosidae, as well as historical components of the formation of the Cretan mountains are mainly responsible for these characteristics. The Mediterranean/insular character of the study area and the continuous degradation, especially of the lowland areas near the coasts, are thought to influence the composition and the response of organisms there. The great variety of results among studies that deal with this topic indicates that the factors governing these phenomena are not yet clear. Reasons which add to this controversy are the following: use of different taxa, different latitudes at which studies are carried out, special ecological or historical conditions prevailing at each study area, differences in sampling method, the duration and the geographical range of the sampling in each survey (Lawton et al., 1987; McCoy, 1990; Lomolino, 2001). Our results add to this general idea that there is not a single overriding factor which defines the response of organisms to environmental gradients, but rather a combination of factors, the intensity of which depends largely on the local conditions and the history of a region, and on the special characteristics of each taxon. Journal of Biogeography 32, 813–831, ª 2005 Blackwell Publishing Ltd Altitudinal distribution of ground spiders ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This work was conducted in the framework of the PhD thesis of the first author, which was funded by the Alexander Onassis Public Benefit Foundation and by the University of Crete. We are grateful to colleagues of the Natural History Museum of the University of Crete for helping in the collection and sorting of the material, and to Dr K. Thaler and Dr B. Knoflach for their help in the identification of species. We are also grateful to John Murphy for linguistic revision of the manuscript. REFERENCES Assi, F. (1986) Recherches ecologiques sur le peuplement des araignées d’ une garrigue du Liban, p. 186. PhD thesis, Université de Paris IV. Bonnefont, J.C. (1972) La Crète, étude morphologique, p. 845. PhD thesis, Université de Paris, Lille, France. Bosmans, R., Maelfait, J.-P. & De Kimpe, A. (1986) Analysis of the spider communities in an altitudinal gradient in the French and Spanish Pyrénées. Bulletin of the British Arachnological Society, 7, 69–76. Brown, J.H. (1984) On the relationship between abundance and distribution of species. American Naturalist, 124, 255– 279. Brown, J.H. & Kodric-Brown, A. (1977) Turnover rates in insular biogeography: effect of immigration on extinction. Ecology, 58, 445–449. Brown, J.H., Stevens, G.C. & Kaufman, D.M. (1996) The geographical range: size, shape, boundaries, and internal structure. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 27, 597–623. Brussard, P.F. (1984) Geographic patterns and environmental gradients: the central-marginal model in Drosophila revisited. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 15, 25–64. Chatzaki, M. (1998) Systematics and phenology of ground living spiders of the island group Gavdos - Gavdopoula, p. 150. Master Thesis, University of Crete (in Greek). Chatzaki, M. (2003) Ground spiders of Crete (Araneae, Gnaphosidae): taxonomy, ecology and biogeography, p. 452. PhD Thesis, University of Crete (in Greek). Chatzaki, M., Trichas, A., Markakis, G. & Mylonas, M. (1998) Seasonal activity of the ground spider fauna in a Mediterranean ecosystem (Mt Youchtas, Crete, Greece). Proceedings of the 17th European Colloquium of Arachnology, Edinburgh, (ed. by P.A. Selden), 235–243. British Arachnological Society, Burnham Beeches, Bucks. Chatzaki, M., Thaler, K. & Mylonas, M. (2002a) Ground spiders (Gnaphosidae; Araneae) of Crete (Greece). Taxonomy and distribution. I. Revue suisse de Zoologie, 109, 559–601. Chatzaki, M., Thaler, K. & Mylonas, M. (2002b) Ground spiders (Gnaphosidae, Araneae) of Crete and adjacent areas of Greece. Taxonomy and distribution. II. Revue suisse de Zoologie, 109, 603–633. Chatzaki, M., Thaler, K. & Mylonas, M. (2003) Ground spiders (Gnaphosidae; Araneae) of Crete and adjacent areas of Journal of Biogeography 32, 813–831, ª 2005 Blackwell Publishing Ltd Greece. Taxonomy and distribution. III: Zelotes and allied genera. Revue suisse de Zoologie, 110, 45–89. Christophe, T. (1974) Etude écologique du peuplement d’ araignées d’ une litière de châtaigneraie (forêt de Montmorency, Val d’ Oise). Publications du laboratoire de Zoologie, Ecole Normale Supérieure, Paris, 3, 1–126. Claridge, M.F. & Singhrao, J.S. (1978) Diversity and altitudinal distribution of grasshoppers (Acridoidea) on a Mediterranean mountain. Journal of Biogeography, 5, 239–250. Colwell, R.K. & Hurtt, G.C. (1994) Nonbiological gradients in species richness and a spurious Rapoport effect. The American Naturalist, 144, 570–595. Colwell, R.K. & Lees, D.C. (2000) The mid-domain effect: geometric constraints on the geography of species richness. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 15, 70–76. Deltshev, C. & Blagoev, G. (1994) Biotopical distribution and seasonal activity of model species of the family Gnaphosidae (Araneae) in Zemen gorge (SW Bulgaria). Arachnologische Mitteilungen, 7, 20–30. Dermitzakis, M.D. & Papanikolaou, D.I. (1981) Paleogeography and geodynamics in the Aegean area during Neogene. Annales Geologiques des Pays Helleniques, 30, 245–289 (in Greek). Edwards, J.S. (1987) Arthropods of alpine aeolian ecosystems. Annual Review of Entomology, 32, 163–179. Fernandes, G.W. & Price, P.W. (1988) Biogeographical gradients in galling species richness. Oecologia, 76, 161–167. Fleishman, E., Austin, G.T. & Weiss, A.D. (1998) An empirical test of Rapoport’s rule: elevational gradients in montane butterfly communities. Ecology, 79, 2482–2493. Gillespie, R.G. & Roderick, G.K. (2002) Arthropods on islands: colonization, speciation, and conservation. Annual Review of Entomology, 47, 595–632. Grove, A.T., Mooney, J. & Rackham, O. (1991) Crete and the South Aegean Islands: effects of changing climate on the environment. Robinson College, Oxford, 445 pp. Grytnes, J.A. & Vetaas, O.R. (2002) Species richness and altitude: a comparison between null models and interpolated plant species richness along the Himalayan altitudinal gradient, Nepal. The American Naturalist, 159, 294–304. Hagvar, S. (1976) Altitudinal zonation of the invertebrate fauna on branches of birch (Betula pubescens Ehrh). Norwegian Journal of Entomology, 23, 61–74. James, F.C. & McCulloch, C.E. (1990) Multivariate analysis in ecology and systematics: panacea or Pandora’s box? Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 21, 129–166. Janzen, D.H. (1973) Sweep samples of tropical foliage insects: effects of season, vegetation types, elevation, time of day, and insularity. Ecology, 54, 687–708. Janzen, D.H., Ataroff, M., Farinas, M., Reyes, S., Rincon, N., Soler, A., Soriano, P. & Vera, M. (1976) Changes in the arthropod community along an elevational transect in the Venezuelan Andes. Biotropica, 8, 193–203. Krebs, C.J. (1998) Ecological methodology, 2nd edn. AddisonWesley, Longman Inc. Publishers, Benjamin/Cummings, NY. 825 M. Chatzaki et al. Lawton, J.H., MacGarvin, M. & Heads, P.A. (1987) Effects of altitude on the abundance and species richness of insect herbivores on bracken. Journal of Animal Ecology, 56, 147– 160. Le Pichon, X. & Angelier, J. (1981) The Aegean Sea. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 300, 357– 372. Lomolino, M.V. (2001) Elevation gradients of species-density: historical and prospective views. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 10, 3–13. Lymberakis, P. (2003) Altitudinal differentiation of the fauna of Lefka Ori, Crete, p. 233. PhD thesis. University of Athens (in Greek). Lymberakis, P., Mylonas, M. & Sfenthourakis, S. (2004) Altitudinal variation of oniscidean communities on Cretan mountains. The biology of terrestrial isopods, V. Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on the Biology of Terrestrial Isopods, Crustaceana Monographs, 2 (ed. by, S. Sfenthourakis, P.B. de Araujo, E. Hornung, H. Schmalfuss, S. Taiti and K. Szlavecz), pp. 217–230. Brill, Leiden–Boston. MacArthur, R.H. (1972) Geographical ecology: patterns in the distributions of species. Harper & Row, New York. Maelfait, J.P. & Baert, L. (1975) Contribution to the knowledge of the arachno- and entomofauna of different wood-habitats. Part I: sampled habitats, theoretical study of the pitfall method, survey of the captured taxa. Biologisch Jaarboek Dodonaea, 43, 179–196. Majadas, A. & Urones, C. (2002) Communauté d’ araignées des maquis méditerranéens de Cyticus oromediterraneus Rivas Mart. & al. Revue Arachnologique, 14, 31–48. Mani, M.S. (1968) Ecology and biogeography of high altitude insects. Dr W. Junk N.V. Publisher, The Hague. Mani, M.S. (1990) Fundamentals of high altitude biology. Oxford & IBH Publishing, New Delhi, Bombay, Calcutta. Maurer, R. & Hänggi, A. (1991) Katalog der Schweizerischen Spinnen. Documenta faunistica Helvetiae, 12, 2–33. McCoy, E.D. (1990) The distribution of insects along elevational gradients. Oikos, 58, 313–322. Meulenkamp, J., Wortel, M., Van Wamel, W., Spakman, W. & Hoogerduyn Strating, E. (1988) On the Hellenic subduction zone and the geodynamic evolution of Crete since the late Middle Miocene. Tectonophysics, 146, 203–215. Meulenkamp, J.E., Van der Zwaan, G.J. & Van Wamel, W.A. (1994) On Late Miocene to recent vertical motions in the Cretan segment of the Hellenic arc. Tectonophysics, 234, 53–72. Meyer, E. & Thaler, K. (1995) Animal diversity at high altitudes in the Austrian Central Alps. Arctic and alpine biodiversity: patterns, causes and ecosystem consequences (ed. by F. Stuart, I. Chapin and C. Körner), pp. 97–108. SpringerVerlag, Berlin. Mylonas, M. (1984) The influence of man: a special problem in the study of the zoogeography of terrestrial molluscs on the Aegean islands. World-wide snails. Biogeographical studies in non-marine Mollusca (ed. by A. Solem & C.A. van Bruggen), pp. 249–259. E.J. Brill and Dr. W. Backhuys, Leiden. 826 Otto, C. & Svensson, B.S. (1982) Structure of communities of ground-living spiders along altitudinal gradients. Holarctic Ecology, 5, 35–47. Pennas, P. 1977. The climate of Crete, p. 105. PHD Thesis. Aristotle University of Thessaloniki. Rackham, O. & Moody, J. (1996) The making of the Cretan landscape. Manchester University Press, Manchester & NY, 237 pp. Rahbek, C. (1997) The relationship among area, elevation, and regional species richness in Neotropical birds. The American Naturalist, 149, 875–902. Randall, M.G.M. (1982) The dynamics of an insect population throughout its altitudinal distribution: Coleophora alticolella (Lepidoptera) in Northern England. Journal of Animal Ecology, 51, 993–1016. Sánchez-Cordero, V. (2001) Small mammal diversity along elevational gradients in Oaxaca, Mexico. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 10, 63–76. Sanders, N.J. (2002) Elevational gradients in ant species richness: area, geometry, and Rapoport’s rule. Ecography, 25, 25–32. Sfenthourakis, S. (1992) Altitudinal effect on species richness of Oniscidea (Crustacea; Isopoda) on three mountains in Greece. Global Ecology and Biogeography Letters, 2, 157– 164. Stevens, G.C. (1989) The latitudinal gradient in geographical range: how so many species coexist in the tropics. The American Naturalist, 133, 240–256. Stevens, G.C. (1992) The elevational gradient in altitudinal range: an extension of Rapoport’s latitudinal rule to altitude. The American Naturalist, 140, 893–911. Strid, A. (1995) Desertification in the White Mountains of Crete. A botanical study with special reference to the effects of grazing and wildfires. Environment Research Program 1991–1994: Climatology and Natural Hazards. Desertification in the Mediterranean area, 78 pp. Swan, L.W. (1963) Aeolian zone. Science, 140, 77–78. Trichas, A. (1996) Ecology and biogeography of ground Coleoptera in South Aegean (composition, temporal and biotopical variation and zoogeography of the families Carabidae and Tenebrionidae), p. 395. PhD thesis. University of Crete (in Greek). Urones, C., Jerardino, M. & Barrientos, J.A. (1995) Datos fenologicos de Gnaphosidae (Araneae) capturados con trampas de caida en Salamanca (Espana). Revue Arachnologique, 11, 47–63. Vardinoyannis, K. (1994) Biogeography of land snails in the south Aegean island arc, p. 330. PhD thesis, University of Athens (in Greek). Whittaker, R.H. (1952) A study of summer foliage insect communities in the Great Smoky Mountains. Ecological Monographs, 22, 1–44. Wolda, H. (1987) Altitude, habitat and tropical insect diversity. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 30, 313–323. Wright, D.H. (1983) Species-energy theory: an extension of species-area theory. Oikos, 41, 496–506. Journal of Biogeography 32, 813–831, ª 2005 Blackwell Publishing Ltd Altitudinal distribution of ground spiders BIOSKETCHES Maria Chatzaki’s research focuses on taxonomy and island biogeography of spiders. She is interested in recognizing the origins of the Greek spider fauna as a result of the interplay between palaeogeography and the special characteristics of the taxa under consideration. Petros Lymberakis is the curator of the vertebrate collection at the NHMC. His research focuses on ecology and biogeography of small vertebrates in the Eastern Mediterranean. Georges Markakis is Associate Professor of Biostatistics in the Technological Education Institute of Crete. He has a PhD in probability and fuzzy logic and has also experience in many specialized statistical methods dealing with biological and ecological problems. He is interested in designing and applying expert systems for water management. Moisis Mylonas is a Professor in the Department of Biology of the University of Crete and Director of the NHMC. He is mainly interested in evolutionary island ecology and conservation ecology. Editor: Philip Stott Appendix 1 Sites description: code names of sites and number of samplings at each one of them (in parentheses); period of each sampling; habitat type; altitudinal zone; number of active traps and active days for each sampling. Asterisks in the ‘Period’ column indicate cases in which the number of active days was considered as shorter than the total duration of sampling because of snow cover during winter time Code names (number of samples/site) l020 (4) l030 (3) l050 (3) 10800 (7) l01200 (6) l01600 (8) Period Habitat type Altitudinal zone Number of active days Number of active traps 25/4/96–26/6/96 26/6/96–25/8/96 25/8/96–29/10/96 13/3/97–7/5/97 25/4/96–26/6/96 26/6/96–22/8/96 22/8/96–30/10/96 25/4/96–25/6/96 25/6/96–20/8/96 20/8/96–30/10/96 28/3/91–5/5/91 5/5/91–8/6/91 8/6/91–6/7/91 6/7/91–4/8/91 4/8/91–8/9/91 8/9/91–5/10/91 9/3/92–5/4/92 28/3/91–5/5/91 5/5/91–8/6/91 8/6/91–6/7/91 6/7/91–4/8/91 4/8/91–8/9/91 8/9/91–5/10/91 29/7/90–1/9/90 1/9/90–17/10/90 28/3/91–5/5/91 5/5/91–8/6/91 8/6/91–6/7/91 6/7/91–4/8/91 4/8/91–8/9/91 8/9/91–5/10/91 CP ZER FW ZER FW ZER P LOW M MID SS TOP 62 59 66 55 61 57 67 54 56 69 38 34 28 28 36 27 28 38 34 28 28 36 27 35 46 39 34 28 28 35 28 18 17 16 18 9 9 9 11 15 14 33 35 36 37 35 35 25 39 37 35 38 39 37 24 24 34 34 31 37 37 40 Journal of Biogeography 32, 813–831, ª 2005 Blackwell Publishing Ltd 827 M. Chatzaki et al. Appendix 1 continued Code names (number of samples/site) l02000 (6) l02400 (1) psio (3) psi50 (3) psi200a (4) psi200b (2) psi300a (3) psi300b (3) psi650 (2) psi750 (2) psi1000a (3) psi1000b (3) psi1000c (2) psi1200 (2) psi1650 (4) psi1950 (4) psi2200 (2) diktoa (3) diktob (3) 828 Period Habitat type Altitudinal zone Number of active days Number of active traps 29/7/90–1/9/90 1/9/90–16/10/90 SS PEAK 35 45 32 34 29 29 34 29 35 61 60 67 60 60 67 75 70 54 57 71 63 71 63 65 65 67 66 52 69 52 69 54 69 63 54 69 63 52 69 89 70 78 75 45 80 78 75 45 80 47 60 61 63 62 62 79 61 28 27 28 28 8 14 14 14 10 10 10 16 16 13 16 20 20 19 18 19 18 18 18 19 20 18 18 17 17 19 19 20 20 16 17 19 19 12 15 14 14 18 17 17 18 14 14 20 19 20 17 19 16 8/6/91–6/7/91 6/7/91–4/8/91 4/8/91–7/9/91 7/9/91–6/10/91 29/7/90–1/9/90* 25/4/96–25/6/96 25/6/96–26/8/96 26/8/96–31/10/96 25/4/96–25/6/96 25/6/96–26/8/96 26/8/96–31/10/96 22/4/00–6/7/00 6/7/00–14/9/00 14/9/00–7/11/00 12/3/01–8/5/01 20/4/99–30/6/99 30/6/99–1/9/99 24/2/99–20/4/99 20/4/99–30/6/99 30/6/99–1/9/99 16/3/99–20/5/99 20/5/99–26/7/99 26/7/99–30/9/99 19/4/99–10/6/99 10/6/99–18/8/99 19/4/99–10/6/99 10/6/99–18/8/99 16/4/99–9/6/99 9/6/99–17/8/99 17/8/99–19/10/99 16/4/99–9/6/99 9/6/99–17/8/99 17/8/99–19/10/99 19/4/99–10/6/99 10/6/99–18/8/99 22/4/99–20/7/99 20/7/99–29/9/99 14/4/00–2/7/00 2/7/00–14/9/00 14/9/00–30/10/00 24/3/01–12/6/01 14/4/00–2/7/00 2/7/00–14/9/00 14/9/00–30/10/00 24/3/01–12/6/01 15/9/00–31/10/00 31/10/01–13/6/01* 26/3/99–26/5/99 26/5/99–28/7/99 28/7/99–28/9/99 3/3/99–4/5/99 4/5/99–22/7/99 22/7/99–22/9/99 SS M PEAK ZER CP ZER IP ZER IP ZER FW ZER FW ZER IP LOW IP LOW M MID IP MID M MID IP MID SS TOP SS TOP SS PEAK CP ZER FW ZER Journal of Biogeography 32, 813–831, ª 2005 Blackwell Publishing Ltd Altitudinal distribution of ground spiders Appendix 1 continued Code names (number of samples/site) dikt50 (3) dikt300 (3) dikt350 (2) dikt700 (3) dikt800 (2) dikt1200 (2) dikt1450 (2) dikt1750 (2) Period Habitat type Altitudinal zone Number of active days Number of active traps 6/4/97–2/6/97 2/6/97–7/8/97 7/8/97–10/10/97 21/4/00–12/7/00 12/7/00–11/10/00 9/3/01–6/5/01 4/5/99–23/7/99 23/7/99–23/9/99 15/4/99–8/6/99 8/6/99–4/8/99 4/8/99–28/9/99 5/5/99–23/7/99 23/7/99–23/9/99 26/5/99–28/7/99 28/7/99–28/9/99 11/5/00–5/8/00 5/8/00–2/10/00 11/5/00–5/8/00 5/8/00–2/10/00 M ZER IP ZER IP ZER IP LOW IP LOW IP MID SS MID SS TOP 57 66 64 82 91 58 80 61 54 57 55 79 61 63 62 85 59 85 59 14 14 14 10 13 8 20 18 19 18 18 18 17 19 19 14 14 15 15 Journal of Biogeography 32, 813–831, ª 2005 Blackwell Publishing Ltd 829 830 A. pallens B. amabilis B. ensigera B. plumalis Cal. cretica Cam. metellus Ces. aspida Crypt. creticus D. lapidosus D. lutescens D. oreinos D. serratichelis D. pumiloides D. praeficus G. bithynica H. creticus H. dalmatensis H. minor H. signifer L. albidus L. femineus L. hadjissaranti L. manolisi L. pupa M. albovittata M. coarctata M. dives M. pygmaea N. excerpta N. ripariensis P. senilis P. lentiginosa S. peninsularis S. scutulatus S. carmeli S. palearcticus S. trichopus 0.10 0.45 0 0 0.21 0 0.23 0 0 0.27 0 0 0 0 0 0.10 0.30 0 0 0 0.09 0 0 0 0 0.20 0 0 2.09 0 0 1.08 0.09 0 0 0 0 20 LO 0.19 0 0.30 0 0 0.19 0 0 0.19 0 0 0 0 0.55 0 0 0.55 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.19 0 0 0 0 0 30 0.23 0.20 0.24 0 0 0 0 0 0.34 0.74 0 0 0 0.56 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.49 0 0 2.31 0 0 0.14 0 0 0 0 0 50 0 0.50 0 0 0 0.24 0.23 0 0.43 0 0 0 0.12 0 0 0.41 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.09 0 0 0.10 0 0 0.23 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.22 0 0.21 0 0 0 0.31 0 0.10 0 0 0.10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.28 0 0 2.99 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.53 0 0 0 0 0 0.28 0.17 0 0 1.62 0.98 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.14 0 0 0.20 0 0 2.86 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5.09 0 0 0 3.29 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.04 0 0 0 0.52 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.23 0.30 0 0 0.24 0 0.61 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.60 0 0 0.12 0.12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 800 1200 1600 2000 2400 0 PSI 0.33 0.33 0 0 0.49 0 0 0 0 0.17 0 0.17 0 0 0 0.17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.17 0.58 0 0 2.83 0.50 0 2.99 0 0 0.50 0 0 50 0.24 0 0 0 0.46 1.42 0 0 0 0.41 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.08 0 0 0.61 0 0 4.50 0 0 0 0 0 0.15 0.07 0 0 0.16 0.22 0 0 0 0.07 0 0.07 0 0.07 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.08 0 0 0 0.14 0 0 0.36 0.07 0 1.97 0 0 0 0 0 0.40 0 0 0 0.21 0 0 0 0 0.15 0 0 0.37 1.04 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.07 0 0.22 0.07 0 0 0.15 0.07 0 0.08 0 0 0 0 0.53 0.4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.08 0 0 0 1.91 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.17 1.33 0 0 0.38 0 0 0.84 0 0 0.09 0 1.51 0.12 0 0 0 0.48 0.09 0 0 0 0.14 0 0 0.07 0.71 0 0.10 0 0 0 0 0.07 0 0 0 0 0.36 0 0 0.87 0 0.10 2.55 0 0 0 0 0 0.08 0 0 0 1.17 0.08 0 0.11 0.09 0 0 0 0.09 1.28 0 0 0 0 0 0.11 0.75 0 0 0.08 0.21 0 0.21 0 0.47 0.08 0 2.81 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.86 0 0 0 4.72 0 0 0 0.26 8.12 0 1.96 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.26 0.09 0 0.51 0 0 2.87 0 0 0 0 0 0.23 0 0 0 0.07 0 0 0 0 0.29 0 0 0 1.46 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.08 0 0 0 0 0.07 0.19 0 0.20 0 0 1.73 0 0 0.10 0 0.38 0 0 0 0 0.09 0.24 0 0 0.09 0.82 0 0.12 0.24 0.52 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.48 0 0 0.24 0 0 0 0 0 0.08 0 0 0 0.38 0 0 0 0.24 0.24 0 0.12 0 4.20 0 0 0.57 0 0.24 0 0 0 0 0 0.06 0 0 0 1.66 0 0 5.86 0 0 0 0.06 0 0.11 0 0 0 2.91 0 0 0 0 0.18 1.17 0 0.11 2.13 0 1.22 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.90 0 0 4.24 0 0 0 0 0 0.31 0 0 0 0.14 0 0 0 0 0 2.65 0 0 0 1.82 0 0.64 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.84 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.89 0 0 0 0.41 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.453 0.58 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.167 0 0 0.081 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.161 0 0.163 0 0 0.329 0 0 0.1655 0 0 0 0 0 200a 200b 300a 300 b 650 750 1000a 1000b 1000c 1200 1650 1950 2200 0a DIK 0.12 0 0.27 0 0.12 0 0 0.08 0 0.07 0 0 0 0 0 0.09 0.36 0 0 0.07 0 0.08 0 0 0 0.07 0 0.09 0 0.27 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0b 0.32 0.11 0 0 0.22 0.76 0.18 0 0 0.13 0 0.11 0.13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.11 0 0 0.54 0 0 0.34 0 0 0.13 0 0 50 0.52 0 0 0 0 0.15 0.12 0.12 0 0 0 0 0.12 0.26 0 0.22 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.10 0 0 0.56 0 0 1.76 0 0 0 0 0 0.30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.09 0 0 0 0.06 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.09 0 0 0.28 0 0 0.13 0 0 0 0 0 0.17 0 0 0 0.40 0 0 0 0.34 1.66 0 0 0.24 1.66 0 0.49 0 0.10 0 0.10 0.10 0 0 0 0 0.10 0.10 0 0.33 0 0 1.34 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.98 0 0 0 0.15 0.19 0 0 0.21 1.62 0 0 0.07 0 0 0 0.07 0 0 0 0 0.14 0 0 0.10 0 0 0.07 0 0.07 0 0 0 0.08 0 0 0 0.75 0 0 0 3.14 0.59 0.51 0 0 2.01 0 0.08 0.08 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.08 0 0 0.17 0 0 5.91 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.66 0 0 0 0.42 0 0.73 0 0 0.84 0 0.08 0.14 0 0.17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.42 0 0.23 0 0 8.65 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.01 0 0 0 0.95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.16 0 0 0 0 0 7.15 0 0 0 0 0 300 350 700 800 1200 1450 1750 Appendix 2 Mean number of individuals per 100 trap days at each site of the study area. Sites are coded by mountain massif (LO, Lefka Ori; PSI, Psiloreitis; DIK, Dikti) and by altitude M. Chatzaki et al. Journal of Biogeography 32, 813–831, ª 2005 Blackwell Publishing Ltd T. T. T. T. Z. Z. Z. Z. Z. Z. Z. Z. Z. Z. Z. Z. adriaticus barbatus lyonneti malkini aerosus caucasius cf. ilotarum creticus daidalus labilis minous nilicola scrutatus solstitialis subterraneus tenuis 0 0 0 0 0 0.97 0 0 0.14 0.61 0 0 0.18 0 3.31 0.46 0 1.22 0.19 0 0 0.37 0.50 0 0 0.19 0 0 0.77 0 0 1.65 0.34 0 0 1.85 0 0.57 0 1.25 0 0 0 0 0.14 0 0.96 3.25 0 0.18 0 0.15 0 0.13 0 0.57 0.14 0.33 0.12 0 0 0 2.18 1.70 0 0 0 0 0 0.33 0 1.94 0 0.18 0 0 0 0 0 0.21 0 0 0 0 0 0.95 0 0.57 0 0.30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.80 0 0.96 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.59 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.12 0 0.53 0 0.12 0 0.84 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.26 1.83 0 0 0.33 0 3.33 0 2.75 0 0.67 0 0 1.17 0 2.84 0.50 0 0 0.08 0.52 0 0.63 0 0 0.25 1.51 0.17 0 0.81 0.09 2.28 1.32 0 0 0.07 0.49 0 4.71 0 0 0.14 1.42 0 0 1.37 0.08 0.28 0.47 0 0 0 1.38 0 3.56 0 1.83 0.07 1.06 0 0 0.44 1.21 1.90 2.62 0 0 0.37 0.33 0 1.08 0.63 0 0.08 2.32 0 0 1.25 1.43 0.78 1.17 0 0 0 0.39 0 1.17 0 0 0 0.84 0 0 0.31 0 0.20 2.61 0 0 0 0.52 0 1.19 0 0 0.08 0.48 0 0 0.45 0.08 0.53 0.24 0 0 0 0.15 0 1.46 0 0 0 0.18 0 0 0 0 0.29 0.17 0 0 0 0.28 0 0.68 0.77 0 0 0.43 0 0 0.96 0 0.47 0.75 0 0 0 0.60 0 0.17 0 0 0 0.09 0 0 0 0 0.51 0.78 0.18 0 0 0 0 1.27 0 0.92 0 0.13 0 0 0.18 0 0.37 0 0.32 0 0 0 0 0.30 0 0 0 0.44 0 0 0.11 0 0.84 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.82 0 0 0 0.91 0 0 0 0 1.14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.15 0 0 0 1.5605 0.369 0 0 0 0 0 0.332 0 0 0.1235 0.241 0.322 3.528 0 0 0.62 0.20 0 0.47 0 0 0 0.13 0 0.47 0.15 0.85 0.40 0.72 0 0 0 2.08 0 0.33 0 0 0.11 0.22 0.11 0 0.22 0.11 2.94 0.99 0 0 0.12 0.45 0 2.83 0 0 0.35 0.86 0.63 0 0.56 0 1.40 0.39 0 0 0 0 0 0.13 0 0 0 0.17 0 0 0.08 0 0.90 1.66 0 0 0 1.80 0 0.81 0.53 0 0 0.68 0 0 0.19 0 0.57 3.16 0 0 0 0.63 0 0.69 0 0 0 0.40 0 0 0.07 0 1.06 1.12 0 0 0 0.17 0 0.29 2.15 0 0 0.13 0 0 0.08 0 0.25 0 0 0 0 0.39 0 0.59 0 0 0 0.54 0 0 0 0 1.13 0 0 0 0 0 0 4.97 0 0 0 0.86 0 0 0 0 0.38 0 Altitudinal distribution of ground spiders Journal of Biogeography 32, 813–831, ª 2005 Blackwell Publishing Ltd 831