* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Clear guidance crucial to norovirus control
Traveler's diarrhea wikipedia , lookup
Trichinosis wikipedia , lookup
Herpes simplex wikipedia , lookup
Influenza A virus wikipedia , lookup
2015–16 Zika virus epidemic wikipedia , lookup
Neonatal infection wikipedia , lookup
Sexually transmitted infection wikipedia , lookup
Orthohantavirus wikipedia , lookup
Schistosomiasis wikipedia , lookup
Carbapenem-resistant enterobacteriaceae wikipedia , lookup
Hepatitis C wikipedia , lookup
Bioterrorism wikipedia , lookup
Human cytomegalovirus wikipedia , lookup
Leptospirosis wikipedia , lookup
Herpes simplex virus wikipedia , lookup
West Nile fever wikipedia , lookup
Oesophagostomum wikipedia , lookup
Hepatitis B wikipedia , lookup
Ebola virus disease wikipedia , lookup
Middle East respiratory syndrome wikipedia , lookup
Eradication of infectious diseases wikipedia , lookup
Foodborne illness wikipedia , lookup
Gastroenteritis wikipedia , lookup
Hospital-acquired infection wikipedia , lookup
Marburg virus disease wikipedia , lookup
Clinical Review Forum Clear guidance crucial to norovirus control In the second part a two-part series, Paul McKeown looks at the transmission, clinical features and future of norovirus Gastroenteritis or intestinal infectious disease (IID) remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality in developing countries. Additionally, despite the major public health advances that have improved beyond recognition the quality of our food, water and sanitation since the 19th century, they remain one of the most common illnesses in developed countries. Transmission of norovirus Transmission of noroviruses can be by person-to-person, environmental, foodborne and waterborne routes. Person-to-person spread: This is the primary mode of transmission. Noroviruses may be spread from person-to-person by the faecal-oral route and by vomiting (air-oral/mucous membrane spread), probably by causing widespread aerosol dissemination of virus particles, environmental contamination and subsequent indirect person-to-person spread. In some settings, particularly hospitals, transmission via vomiting may be more important than the established faecal-oral route of infection associated with other enteric pathogens.15 Environmental spread: Norovirus is known to be very effective at spreading directly in the environment. This is due to its ability to withstand drying, high temperatures and routine disinfection. Foodborne spread: Foods that are touched or handled and are not subjected to further cooking (above 60OºC), such as cold meats, salads or sandwiches are commonly implicated in foodborne norovirus infection.16 Filter-feeding bivalve molluscan shellfish such as oysters can harbour and concentrate viruses if they are grown in water contaminated with sewage.17,18 Waterborne spread: Water as a method of transmission of norovirus has been monitored for some time in the US by the Environmental Protection Agency. Outbreaks have repeatedly been traced to contaminated drinking water sources and recreational water.19,20 As well as water, ice is being increasingly recognised as vehicles for transmission of norovirus.21 In 2002, a large outbreak affecting almost 100 tourists from the Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland was traced to ice prepared with contaminated water in a number of skiing resorts in Andorra.22 Water is a very effective vehicle of transmission because the infectious dose is so tiny and the virus can pass through standard filters and survive the levels of chlorine used for drinking water antisepsis.19 Outbreaks Noroviruses are extremely effective outbreak pathogens; hardy, readily propagated in the environment and having a tiny infectious dose. They can survive for long periods on surfaces such as door handles, worktops and furnishings. Characteristically, the outbreaks noroviruses produce occur against a constantly changing background of waxing and waning activity. Extensive outbreaks were experienced across the northern hemisphere in 2001-2002; a smaller upsurge was seen in 2004-2005. That norovirus could produce a global pandemic of gastroenteritis was first recognised in the extensive global upsurge in 1995-1996.23 As a result, they have been responsible for some quite spectacular outbreaks. In Ireland, there have been a number of outbreaks in hotels that have each resulted in hundreds of cases of illness. In Japan in 1990, an outbreak resulted in more than 3,200 cases of illness among schoolchildren.24 Outbreaks will occur wherever people congregate, and have been reported in a variety of settings including: nursing homes, hospitals, cruise ships, aircraft and restaurants and events with catered meals.19,22,25-27 Since it is a community infection, outbreaks in congregate settings such as these are simply a reflection and a gauge of what is happening in the community. In Ireland, in 2002, 90% of reported outbreaks of IID (representing more than 150 outbreaks) were either confirmed or suspected as being caused by norovirus.28 Of these, about 70% occurred in hospitals and other healthcare settings. A similar proportion of healthcare-associated outbreaks occur in the UK and across the rest of Europe.29 Their management and control in any setting is challenging. Outbreaks in hotels, aircraft and cruise liners are invariably very expensive, in terms of direct and indirect costs and the potential damage to business. Outbreaks in hospitals and other healthcare settings have the potential to seriously disrupt the functioning of regional and even national health systems. The management and control in such settings can be extremely difficult.31,32 However, the situation is improving. The size of outbreaks is one measure of how well spread the outbreak pathogen is being contained. Over the past six or more years in Ireland, the size of outbreaks in hospitals and nursing homes has halved; a measure of how effectively infection control and public health professionals are more rapidly identifying and closing down outbreaks. Pathogenesis Information from volunteer studies has demonstrated that susceptibility to noroviral infection varies between individuals, due in part to previous exposure to the virus and FORUM April 2009 65 15. Novirus-OF/NH2* 1 26/03/2009 11:54:49 Forum Clinical Review to immunological status. Interestingly, noroviruses have recently been shown to bind in preferential ways to a number of histo-blood group antigens (complex carbohydrates found on many different cell types, including gastrointestinal epithelial cells; three distinct antigens exist: A, B, and O). The result of this is that people with blood group B are partially protected against infections with genogroup 1, and that people with blood group O are partially protected genogroup 2 viruses (responsible for most human disease). The virus produces histological changes in the epithelium of the small intestine within 24 hours with blunting of jejunoileal villi. These will heal almost completely over the following two to eight weeks. Clinical features Illness due to norovirus is characterised by acute, rapid onset of nausea, vomiting, abdominal cramps and occasional diarrhoea. Vomiting is generally the principal symptom (although it may be reduced or absent). It is usually of sudden onset and may be projectile, resulting in widespread soiling. Not uncommonly, the patient may experience sudden, spontaneous projectile vomiting with little warning; so sudden, in fact, that they may have insufficient time to reach the lavatory. This is particularly true in the case of elderly people or those with limited mobility. As a result, there can be considerable public environmental soiling and significant risk of more widespread dissemination of the virus. As the projectile vomiting can be very forceful, the vomitus tends to become partially aerosolised; the resultant mist being capable of wide distribution, an important consideration when cleaning and decontaminating affected area. Prolonged diarrhoea can also be a feature, especially in children.30 Recently in Ireland, cases in which diarrhoea has been the sole gastrointestinal symptom have been increasingly reported.31 The patient may complain of other symptoms including headache, muscle aches, chills and fever.32 As many as 30% of cases may be asymptomatic. The incubation period generally ranges from 15 to 48 hours. Prior to the advent of electron microscopy and RT-PCR, diagnosis of outbreaks was based on a series of clinical criteria known as Kaplan’s Criteria33 which, with only slight revision, is still used for early identification of a possible norovirus outbreak. The illness is generally mild, lasting between one and three days and in mild cases, a few hours. Small amounts of clear fluids are all that is required in treatment terms for the vast majority of cases; recovery is usually rapid. If severe, the vomiting may result in dehydration, especially in the elderly and very young. Rarely, disease may be extremely severe with prostration, marked systemic upset, markedly reduced levels of consciousness and disseminated intravascular coagulopathy.34 The period of infectivity can be deceptively long; viral shedding can continue for some time, perhaps several days, after full recovery from noroviral infection. Moreover, outbreaks have been associated with pre-symptomatic, symptomatic and post-symptomatic food handlers.32 Control measures Outbreaks due to norovirus are not eradicable, but they are controllable. There is a large body of evidence that simple interventions can minimise the spread of noroviruses: Scrupulous handwashing: This is the most effective pre- vention and control measures at minimising the spread of norovirus infection. Immediate cleaning and disinfection: Following an episode of vomiting or faecal soiling: since a single vomiting individual can distribute viral particles across a wide area, immediate cleaning and decontamination of the soiled area is essential with particular attention being paid to those areas touched by hands. Isolation: Exclusion of ill staff from work or isolation of groups of ill people (patients or residents of a nursing home) as affected cohorts is necessary. Regardless of the setting, these fundamental interventions form the basis of control of outbreaks. Exclusion of ill staff for at least 48 hours after the last episode of vomiting or diarrhoea (given the length of time noroviruses are shed following recovery) and training of staff to rapidly seal off, clean and decontaminate the affected area, have been shown to be effective ways of limiting spread. In order to eradicate the virus from surfaces, it is necessary to use a strong (1:1000) hypochlorite solution on hard surfaces. In order to decontaminate soft furnishings, steam cleaning is required. There is a range of advice on minimising the impact of norovirus in various settings available on the HPSC website www.ndsc.ie Within healthcare settings, certain factors in hospitals appear to contribute to promoting transmission of norovirus including: close patient contact; susceptible patients; movement of patients and staff; hygiene (if sub-optimal); and throughput of visitors and other staff.31 In healthcare settings, an early, rapid response to an outbreak is the key to its control. Having an agreed hospital/nursing home outbreak plan in place is the best method for ensuring uniformity and effectiveness of response.31 Once an outbreak is suspected, the prompt establishment of a control team to oversee the management of the outbreak is essential.31 The future Noroviruses, like all viruses, are evolving. Upsurges in activity, as have been seen before, can be expected in the future. Straightforward guidance with clear descriptions of roles, responsibilities and interventions are crucial for effective control of this infection. In order to decontaminate soiled areas, trials using various ‘fogging’ products – antiviral disinfectants administered in a mist to mimic the distribution of viruses during episodes of vomiting – are underway. Initial results are moderately promising. Vaccination is one of the most cost-effective approaches to reducing the morbidity and mortality caused by microbial agents, and as a result, extensive studies looking at the feasibility of producing a norovirus vaccine have been conducted in several centres. Despite it being such a common and generally mild condition, there may be a strong argument for targeted use of such a vaccine in certain settings.35 At the moment, however, vaccine development is still at a very early stage. Paul McKeown is a consultant in public health medicine with the Health Protection Surveillance Centre The first part of this article was published in the March issue of Forum (2009; 26(3): 51-52). References on request 66 FORUM April 2009 15. Novirus-OF/NH2* 2 26/03/2009 11:55:05