Download intropig

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Super-resolution microscopy wikipedia , lookup

Light wikipedia , lookup

Photoacoustic effect wikipedia , lookup

Microscopy wikipedia , lookup

Surface plasmon resonance microscopy wikipedia , lookup

Mössbauer spectroscopy wikipedia , lookup

Fiber-optic communication wikipedia , lookup

Two-dimensional nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy wikipedia , lookup

Optical amplifier wikipedia , lookup

Anti-reflective coating wikipedia , lookup

Atmospheric optics wikipedia , lookup

Chemical imaging wikipedia , lookup

Ultrafast laser spectroscopy wikipedia , lookup

Night vision device wikipedia , lookup

Retroreflector wikipedia , lookup

Nonimaging optics wikipedia , lookup

Ellipsometry wikipedia , lookup

Photon scanning microscopy wikipedia , lookup

Passive optical network wikipedia , lookup

Atomic absorption spectroscopy wikipedia , lookup

Spectral density wikipedia , lookup

Nonlinear optics wikipedia , lookup

Thomas Young (scientist) wikipedia , lookup

Silicon photonics wikipedia , lookup

Optical tweezers wikipedia , lookup

Optical coherence tomography wikipedia , lookup

Optical rogue waves wikipedia , lookup

3D optical data storage wikipedia , lookup

Harold Hopkins (physicist) wikipedia , lookup

Magnetic circular dichroism wikipedia , lookup

Astronomical spectroscopy wikipedia , lookup

Photoreceptor cell wikipedia , lookup

Ultraviolet–visible spectroscopy wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Photopigments
Absorbance, absorbtance and corneal spectral sensitivities
Photopigment spectra are usually defined by their absorbance (or extinction, or photopigment
optical density) spectra. Absorbance (Aλ) is:
A  log( Iinc / Itrans ) ,
where Iinc is the incident light reaching the pigment and Itrans is the light transmitted through the
pigment (and Iabs = Iinc - Itrans is the light absorbed by the pigment). Absorbance spectra are
typically used to define photopigment spectra because their shape, when normalized (i.e., plotted
as a fraction of the maximum absorbance), is independent of pigment optical density (pigment
concentration). Please note that log (absorbance) values are tabulated in this database—please
check the notes in each case.
In contrast, the absorbtance spectra, like the spectral sensitivity of the human subject, broadens
as the optical density increases. Absorbtance (J) is related to Aaccording to the following
equation (see Knowles & Dartnall, 1977, p. 56):
J   1  10 DA ,
where D is the optical density of the photopigment. (Thus, when D is low the normalized
absorbance and absorbtance spectra are the same shape.) To compare an absorbance spectrum
with a corneally-measured human spectral sensitivity, requires several steps and assumptions.
First, we must know the effective optical density D in the intact, in situ photoreceptor, so that we
can calculate the absorbtance spectra, using the third equation above. Second, we must correct
for absorption by the prereceptoral filters that lie between the photoreceptor and the cornea.
Other factors, however, may also play a role. For example, the structure of the photoreceptor
itself causes incident light to be transmitted along the photoreceptor in patterns called waveguide
modal patterns (see Fig. 6 of Enoch, 1963). The fraction of the power of each modal pattern that
is transmitted inside the photoreceptor to its power outside the photoreceptor decreases with the
wavelength of the incident light, so that, in principle, the structure of the photoreceptor can
change its spectral sensitivity (see, for example, Enoch, 1961; Enoch & Stiles, 1961; Snyder,
1975; Horowitz, 1981). Yet, it is difficult to know precisely how waveguide factors will
influence the spectral sensitivity, or how to correct for them.
Photopigment spectra
In some species, it is possible to extract a photopigment from retinas and then to measure its
absorbance spectra in solution (e.g., frog rhodopsin; Dartnall, Goodeve & Lythgoe, 1936). For
the human cone pigments, however, most measurements, until very recently (see below), have
been made in situ, with the photopigment still in the outer segment. A principal method has been
microspectrophotometry (MSP).
In MSP work, the spectral transmission of a small measuring beam (passing transversely
through the outer segment of a single cone) is compared with that of a reference beam (passing
outside the cone) to derive the absorption spectrum of the outer segment (Bowmaker et al., 1978,
for example). MSP measurements, however, are subject to systematic distortions due to such
wavelength-dependent factors as light scattering, absorption by substances other than visual
pigment (including photo-products), and focusing errors (MacNichol et al., 1983). Many of these
problems can be avoided or reduced if, instead of an absorption spectrum, an action spectrum is
measured. This is accomplished in suction electrode recordings, in which a single human or
primate cone outer segment is drawn inside a small glass electrode, and its electrical (current)
response to lights of different wavelength recorded (for example, Baylor et al., 1984).
Both the suction electrode and MSP measurements have employed light stimuli that were
passed transversely through the outer segment, rather than axially as in normal vision. This
means that at the very least the axial optical density (D) of the photopigment must be known to
reconstruct the corneal spectral sensitivities (see above).
Recently, Merbs & Nathans (1992) have produced human cone photopigments from the DNA,
and have measured their difference spectra in solution. They find mean values for the
wavelength of maximum absorption of 426 and 532 nm for the S- and M-cone photopigments,
respectively, and 552 and 557 nm for the two polymorphic variants of the L-cone photopigment.
References
Baylor, D. A., Nunn, B. J. & Schnapf, J. L. (1984). The photocurrent, noise and spectral
sensitivity of rods of the monkey Macaca fascicularis. Journal of Physiology, 357, 575-607.
Bowmaker, J. K., Dartnall, H. J. A., Lythgoe, J. N. & Mollon, J. D. (1978). The visual pigments
of rods and cones in the rhesus monkey Macaca mulatta. Journal of Physiology (London), 274,
329-348.
Dartnall, H. J. A., Goodeve, C. F. & Lythgoe, R. J. (1936). The quantitative analysis of the
photochemical bleaching of visual purple solutions in monochromatic light. Proceedings of the
Royal Society of London A, 156, 158-170.
Enoch, J. M. (1961). Nature of the transmission of energy in the retinal receptors. Journal of the
Optical Society of America, 51, 1122-1126.
Enoch, J. M. & Stiles, W. S. (1961). The colour change of monochromatic light with retinal
angle of incidence. Optica Acta, 8, 329-358.
Enoch, J. M. (1963). Optical properties of the retinal receptors. Journal of the Optical Society of
America, 53, 71-85.
Horowitz, B. R. (1981). Theoretical considerations of the retinal receptor as a waveguide. In J.
M. Enoch & F. L. Tobey (Ed.), Vertebrate photoreceptor optics pp. 217-300). Berlin,
Heidelburg, New York: Springer-Verlag.
Knowles, A. & Dartnall, H. J. A. (1977). The photobiology of vision. In H. Davson (Ed.), The
Eye, Vol 2B London/New York: Academic.
MacNichol, E. F., Levine, J. S., Mansfield, R. J. W., Lipetz, L. E. & Collins, B. A. (1983).
Microspectrophotometry of visual pigments in primate photoreceptors. In J. D. Mollon & L. T.
Sharpe (Ed.), Colour Vision: Physiology and Psychophysics pp. 13-38). London: Academic
Press.
Merbs, S. L. & Nathans J. Absorption spectra of human cone pigments. Nature, 356, 433-435.
Snyder, A. W. (1975). Photoreceptor optics - theoretical principles. In A. W. Snyder, & R.
Menzel (Ed.), Photoreceptor optics pp. 38-55). Berlin, Heidelburg, New York: Springer-Verlag.