Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Genetically modified organism containment and escape wikipedia , lookup
Epigenetics of human development wikipedia , lookup
Genome evolution wikipedia , lookup
Microevolution wikipedia , lookup
Gene expression programming wikipedia , lookup
Designer baby wikipedia , lookup
Gene expression profiling wikipedia , lookup
Nutriepigenomics wikipedia , lookup
Genetically modified crops wikipedia , lookup
Journal of Experimental Botany, Vol. 54, No. 382, Regulation of Carbon Metabolism Special Issue, pp. 533±537, January 2003 DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erg039 Is trehalose-6-phosphate a regulator of sugar metabolism in plants? Peter J. Eastmond, Yi Li and Ian A. Graham1 Centre for Novel Agricultural Products, Department of Biology, University of York, Heslington, York YO10 5YW, UK Received 8 april 2002; Accepted 29 August 2002 Abstract It has recently emerged that many higher plants can synthesize trace amounts of trehalose. In arabidopsis disruption of the ®rst step of trehalose synthesis, catalysed by trehalose-6-phosphate synthase (TPS), has lethal consequences, demonstrating an important physiological role. It is not yet clear what the precise function of trehalose synthesis is, but there is mounting evidence that trehalose-6-phosphate is implicated in the regulation of sugar metabolism. Further work is necessary to con®rm this hypothesis and determine the underlying mechanism. Key words: Arabidopsis, trehalose, trehalose-6-phosphate, trehalose-6-phosphate synthase. Introduction Trehalose (a-D-glucopyranosyl-[1,1]-a-D-glucopyranoside) is a non-reducing disaccharide sugar composed of two glucose units joined by an a, a-1, 1 linkage. It is widely distributed in nature (Elbein, 1974) and functions as a stress protection metabolite and storage carbohydrate (Goddijn and van Dun, 1999). The biosynthesis of trehalose has been best studied in Escherichia coli and Saccharomyces cerevisiae and involves a two-step process catalysed by trehalose-6-phosphate synthase (TPS) and trehalose-6-phosphate phosphatase (TPP). Trehalose-6phosphate is formed from glucose-6-phosphate and uridine-5-diphosphoglucose by TPS and is then dephosphorylated to trehalose by TPP (Fig. 1). The occurrence of trehalose may be ubiquitous in plants Although the presence of trehalose is well documented in a few highly desiccation-tolerant plants such as Selaginella 1 lepidophylla and Myrothamnus ¯abellifolius (MuÈller et al., 1995), a general role for this sugar in angiosperms was dismissed until quite recently. The inability to detect trehalose led to the suggestion that the majority of higher plants had lost the ability to produce it (Crowe et al., 1992). However, the activity of trehalase, an enzyme responsible for the breakdown of trehalose to glucose, is present in numerous plants (MuÈller et al., 1995). By applying an inhibitor of trehalase called Validamycin A, Goddijn et al. (1997) were able to establish that tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) and potato (Solanum tuberosum) plants could accumulate detectable levels of trehalose. Subsequently, genes encoding TPS were cloned from Arabidopsis thaliana and S. lepidophylla and their function proven by complementation of a S. cerevisiae tps1D mutant (Blazquez et al., 1998; Zentella et al., 1999). These proteins contain a TPS domain at the N-terminus and a putative TPP domain at the C-terminus. However, the TPP domain lacks two consensus sequences that are conserved in phosphatases (LDYD|GD|T|LM| and GDDRSD; Thaller et al., 1998) and does not appear to be functional (Zentella et al., 1999). AtTPS1 is expressed in all arabidopsis tissues (Eastmond et al., 2002). Analysis of the arabidopsis genome reveals that there are ~11 TPS homologues that can be ascribed to one of two classes depending on the presence of phosphatase boxes in their TPP domain (Table 1). This same classi®cation is obtained by homology comparison with the S. cerevisiae TPS1 and TPS2 genes that encode the TPS and TPP, respectively (Leyman et al., 2001). Class I consists of four genes (including AtTPS1) that lack phosphatase boxes and class II consists of seven genes that contain phosphatase boxes. In agreement with this classi®cation, all of the class I genes contain 16 introns with conserved exon intron boundaries whereas the class II genes contain two or three introns. This suggests an early evolutionary divergence of the two classes. Vogel et al. (2001) have reported that two class II To whom correspondence should be addressed. Fax: +44 (0)1904 432860. E-mail: [email protected] Journal of Experimental Botany, Vol. 54, No. 382, ã Society for Experimental Biology 2003; all rights reserved 534 Eastmond et al. Fig. 1. A schematic diagram of the pathway of trehalose metabolism and its relationship to glycolysis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. G-6-P is glucose-6-phosphate, UDPG is uridine-5-diphosphoglucose, T-6-P is trehalose-6-phosphate, TRE is trehalose, TPS is trehalose-6-phosphate synthase, TPP is trehalose-6-phosphate phosphatase, and HXK is hexokinase. TPS homologues (AtTPS7 and AtTPS8), although expressed, appear to lack both TPS and TPP activity. In S. cerevisiae trehalose synthesis is carried out by a holoenzyme complex, which consists of TPS1, TPS2 and regulatory subunits TSL1 and TPS3 (Bell et al., 1998). One possible explanation for the existence of plant proteins containing TPS and TPP domains that lack catalytic activity is that they play a role in the formation of a complex. Interestingly, AtTPS1 contains a unique N-terminal extension, which is not found in other arabidopsis TPS homologues and shares sequence homology with parts of TSL1 (Leyman et al., 2001). This domain might substitute for the regulatory role of TSL1 (Leyman et al., 2001). TPS has also been identi®ed as a 14-3-3 binding protein, along with key regulatory enzymes of plant primary metabolism such as nitrate reductase and sucrose phosphate synthase (Moorhead et al., 1999). It remains to be determined whether 14-3-3 binding regulates trehalose synthesis. Arabidopsis also contains TPP homologues (Class III), which lack a TPS domain (Table 1). Two class III proteins were isolated by multi-copy suppression of the heatsensitive phenotype of the S. cerevisiae tps2D mutant (Vogel et al., 1998). However, although the proteins contain phosphatase boxes the level of homology to known TPP proteins is relatively low and it has been suggested that their true physiological function might be to phosphorylate substrates other than T-6-P (Leyman et al., 2001). Trehalase genes have been identi®ed from soybean (Glycine max) and arabidopsis (Aeschbacher et al., 1999; MuÈller et al., 2001). In contrast to TPS, arabidopsis appears to house a single trehalase gene (Table 1). A survey of gene sequence databases shows that cDNA sequences have been described for the majority of the arabidopsis genes putatively associated with trehalose metabolism (Table 1). Only two members of class I and one member of class III are not represented (Table 1). This constitutes evidence that the majority, if not all, of these genes are expressed. Work now needs to focus on temporal and spatial regulation of the different genes throughout plant development. TPS homologues have also been described in a taxonomically diverse set of plant species including wheat (Triticum aestivum), soybean, potato, tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum), and the common ice plant (Mesembryanthemum crystallinum). It is emerging that trehalose may, in fact, be ubiquitous among higher plants, but that the levels are generally extremely low. These data strongly suggest that there is a generic role for trehalose synthesis. Trehalose-6-phosphate is implicated in the regulation of sugar metabolism Researchers have genetically engineered plants to synthesize trehalose in an attempt to increase their desiccation tolerance. Surprisingly, over-expression of heterologous TPS genes from S. cerevisiae or E. coli in plants resulted in signi®cant morphological growth defects and altered metabolism (Goddijn et al., 1997; Romero et al., 1997). These phenotypes could best be interpreted in the context of changes in carbon allocation between source and sink tissues and led to speculation that some aspect of trehalose metabolism might be implicated in sugar signalling (Goddijn and Smeekens, 1998; Goddijn and van Dun, 1999). Although the over-expression data were suggestive of an important role for trehalose metabolism in plants the phenotypes described could be due to `knock-on' effects caused by perturbation of metabolism. More recently, a genetic approach has been used to establish directly that AtTPS1 is essential in arabidopsis (Eastmond et al., 2002). Disruption of AtTPS1 leads to an embryo lethal phenotype. Embryo development is arrested at the onset of seed maturation when storage reserve deposition is initiated. TPS1 is transiently up-regulated at this same developmental stage and is required for the full expression of seed maturation marker genes (2S2 and OLEOSN2). Sucrose levels in the seed also increase at this stage (Eastmond et al., 2002) and may be involved in triggering maturation via sugar signalling (Wobus and Weber, 1999). In vitro culture of tps1 mutant embryos at low sucrose concentrations partially overcomes the block in development Regulation of sugar metabolism 535 Table 1. A list of putative genes that are likely to be involved in trehalose metabolism in Arabidopsis thaliana Class I, II and III sequences were retrieved from the Munich Information Centre for Protein Sequences (MIPS) arabidopsis annotation database (http://mips.gsf.de/proj/thal/db/index.html) based on psiBLAST searches with both AtTPS1 and AtTPPB as query sequences. mRNA is described as `Yes' when either EST or cDNA sequences corresponding to each gene are present in public databases. Gene MIPS code TPS domain TPP domain Phosphatase boxes mRNA Function Reference Class I: putative trehalose-6-phosphate synthases with an N-terminal TPS domain, but without phosphatase boxes in their C-terminal TPP domain AtTPS1 At1g78580 + + ± Yes Yes Blazquez et al., 1998 AtTPS2 At1g16980 + + ± Yes + + ± No AtTPS3 At1g17000a AtTPS4 At4g27550 + + ± No Class II: putative trehalose-6-phosphate synthases/phosphatases with both N-terminal TPS and C-terminal TPP domains AtTPS5 At4g17770 + + + Yes AtTPS6 At1g68020 + + + Yes AtTPS7 At1g06410 + + + Yes No Vogel et al., 2001 AtTPS8 At1g70290 + + + Yes No Vogel et al., 2001 AtTPS9 At1g23870 + + + Yes AtTPS10 At1g60140 + + + Yes AtTPS11 At2g18700 + + + Yes Class III: putative trehalose-6-phosphate phosphatases consisting only of the TPP domain AtTPPA At5g51460 ± + + AtTPPB At1g78090 ± + + At1g22210 ± + + At1g35910 ± + + At2g22190 ± + + At4g12430 ± + + At4g22590 ± + + a At4g39770 ± + + At5g10100 ± + + At5g65140 ± + + Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vogel et al., 1998 Vogel et al., 1998 Trehalase Yes Yes MuÈller et al., 2001 a At4g24040 Indicates putative pseudogenes. suggesting that the AtTPS1 function is linked in some way to sugar metabolism (Eastmond et al., 2002). A preliminary report on the complementation of tps1 with the E. coli TPS gene fused to the AtTPS1 promoter suggests that it is the catalytic activity of the enzyme rather than some regulatory property of the protein that is essential for arabidopsis embryo development (Schluepmann et al., 2001). Plants could therefore require T-6-P or trehalose. Paul et al. (2001) have reported that tobacco plants expressing E. coli TPS accumulate more T-6-P and display increased rates of photosynthesis per unit leaf area under saturating light, whereas those expressing TPP display reduced photosynthetic rates. These data suggest a correlation with T-6-P levels rather than trehalose and imply that T-6-P either directly or indirectly controls carbon assimilation. Exogenous trehalose has also been shown to affect plant metabolism and gene expression (MuÈller et al., 1998; Wingler et al., 2000). However, it remains to be proven whether these effects are physiologically relevant. In some yeasts, including S. cerevisiae, TPS1 plays a critical role in the regulation of glycolysis (Thevelein and Hohmann, 1995). Teusink et al. (1998) have proposed that glycolysis operates via an autocatalytic (or `turbo') principle in which ATP is consumed to drive the catabolism of glucose prior to it being replenished by subsequent metabolism (Fig. 1). As a consequence, when the supply of glucose increases abruptly, glycolysis is predisposed to use ATP faster than it can be generated, causing metabolism to stall (Teusink et al., 1998). In S. cerevisiae the tps1D mutant is unable to grow on glucose (Thevelein and Hohmann, 1995) and it appears that TPS1 is required to restrict the in¯ux of glucose into glycolysis thereby preventing a stall (Teusink et al., 1998). The phenotype of transgenic tobacco over-expressing E. coli TPS (Paul et al., 2001) and the phenotype of the arabidopsis tps1 mutant (Eastmond et al., 2002) could also be interpreted as the consequence of glycolytic deregulation. The mechanism by which TPS1 controls glycolysis in yeasts is not fully understood, but the predominant site of action is believed to be the initial enzymatic step, catalysed by hexokinase (HXK) (Thevelein and Hohmann, 1995) (Fig. 1). TPS1 is also necessary for carbon catabolite repression of gene expression in S. cerevisiae (Thevelein and Hohmann, 1995), which is believed to operate through HXKII-mediated sugar signalling (Entian and Frohlich, 1984). In plants, sugars also act as global regulators of gene expression (Smeekens, 2000) and a similar sensing role has been proposed for HXK (Jang et al., 1997). T-6-P 536 Eastmond et al. is a potent inhibitor of S. cerevisiae HXKII in vitro (Blazquez et al., 1993) providing a potential means of biochemical regulation. However, restoration of wild-type T-6-P levels in tps1D only partially rescues glycolytic function suggesting that the TPS1 gene product is also required for the correct control of glycolysis (Noubhani et al., 2000; Bonini et al., 2000). Furthermore, it has been reported that expression of a T-6-P-insensitive HXK from Schizosaccharomyces pombe in either wild type or HXKde®cient S. cerevisiae does not cause deregulation of glycolysis, suggesting that hexokinase might not be the sole target of T-6-P/TPS1 regulation (Leyman et al., 2001). In arabidopsis T-6-P is not an inhibitor of AtHXK1 or AtHXK2 activity in vitro (Eastmond et al., 2002). Similarly, T-6-P has no effect on HXK activity from spinach (Spinacia oleracea) leaf extracts (Wiese et al., 1999). Furthermore, although mutations in HXKII can rescue growth of tps1D on glucose in S. cerevisiae (Thevelein and Hohmann 1995), attempts to rescue arabidopsis tps1 embryo growth in vivo using HXK antisense suppression and in vitro using the inhibitor glucosamine have failed (Eastmond et al., 2002). These data do not support a role for HXK in T-6-P-mediated regulation in plants and point towards another cellular target. However, it cannot be dismissed that arabidopsis contains a T-6-P-sensitive HXK since the gene family has not been exhaustively studied. Although TPS is clearly important in higher plants much remains to be ascertained about the physiological role of trehalose synthesis. It is probable that this role is generic and involves the regulation of sugar metabolism by T-6-P. However, de®nitive proof of this hypothesis remains to be provided and will depend on identifying cellular target(s) of T-6-P action. References Aeschbacher RA, MuÈller J, Boller T, Wiemken A. 1999. Puri®cation of the trehalose GMTRE1 for soybean nodules and cloning of its cDNA. GMTRE1 is expressed at a low level in multiple tissues. Plant Physiology 119, 489±496. Bell W, Sun W, Hohmann S, Wera S, Reinders A, De Virgilio C, Wiemken A, Thevelein JM. 1998. Composition and functional analysis of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae trehalose synthase complex. Journal of Biological Chemistry 273, 33311±33319. Blazquez MA, Lagunas R, Gancedo C, Gancedo JM. 1993. Trehalose-6-phosphate, a new regulator of yeast glycolysis that inhibits hexokinases. FEBS Letters 329, 51±54. Blazquez MA, Santos E, Flores CL, Martinez-Zapater JM, Salinas J, Gancedo C. 1998. Isolation and molecular characterization of the Arabidopsis TPS1 gene, encoding trehalose-6-phosphate synthase. The Plant Journal 13, 685±690. Bonini BM, Van Vaeck C, Larsson C, Gustafsson L, Ma P, Winderickx J, Van Dijck P, Thevelein JM. 2000. Expression of Escherichia coli otsA in a Saccharomyces cerevisiae tps1 mutant restores trehalose 6-phosphate levels and partly restores growth and fermentation with glucose and control of glucose in¯ux into glycolysis. Biochemical Journal 350, 261±268. Crowe JH, Hoekstra FA, Crowe LM. 1992. Anhydrobiosis. Annual Review of Physiology 54, 579±599. Eastmond PJ, van Dijken AJ, Spielman M, Kerr A, Tissier AF, Dickinson HG, Jones JD, Smeekens SC, Graham IA. 2002. Trehalose-6-phosphate synthase 1, which catalyses the ®rst step in trehalose synthesis, is essential for Arabidopsis embryo maturation. The Plant Journal 29, 225±235. Elbein AD. 1974. The metabolism of a,a-trehalose. Advances in Carbohydrate Chemistry and Biochemistry 30, 227±256. Entian KD, Frohlich KU. 1984. Saccharomyces cerevisiae mutants provide evidence of hexokinase PII as a bifunctional enzyme with catalytic and regulatory domains for triggering carbon catabolite repression. Journal of Bacteriology 158, 29±35. Goddijn O, Smeekens S. 1998. Sensing trehalose biosynthesis in plants. The Plant Journal 14, 143±146. Goddijn OJM, van Dun K. 1999. Trehalose metabolism in plants. Trends in Plant Science 4, 315±319. Goddijn OJM, Verwoerd TC, Voogd E, Krutwagen RW, de Graaf PT, van Dun K, Poels J, Ponstein AS, Damm B, Pen J. 1997. Inhibition of trehalase activity enhances trehalose accumulation in transgenic plants. Plant Physiology 113, 181± 190. Jang J-C, Leon P, Zhou L, Sheen J. 1997. Hexokinase as a sugar sensor in higher plants. The Plant Cell 9, 5±19. Leyman B, Van Dijck P, Thevelein JM. 2001. An unexpected plethora of trehalose biosynthesis genes in Arabidopsis thaliana. Trends in Plant Science 6, 510±513. Moorhead G, Douglas P, Cotelle V, et al. 1999. Phosphorylationdependent interactions between enzymes of plant metabolism and 14-3-3 proteins. The Plant Journal 18, 1±12. MuÈller J, Aeschbacher RA, Wingler A, Boller T, Wiemken A. 2001. Trehalose and trehalase in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiology 125, 1086±1093. MuÈller J, Boller T, Wiemken A. 1995. Trehalose and trehalase in plants: recent developments. Plant Science 112, 1±9. MuÈller J, Boller T, Wiemken A. 1998. Trehalose affects sucrose synthase and invertase activities in soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.) roots. Journal of Plant Physiology 153, 255±257. Noubhani A, Bunoust O, Rigoulet M, Thevelein JM. 2000. Reconstitution of ethanolic fermentation in permeabilized spheroplasts of wild-type and trehalose-6-phosphate synthase mutants of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. European Journal of Biochemistry 267, 4566±45576. Paul M, Pellny T, Goddijn O. 2001. Enhancing photosynthesis with sugar signals. Trends in Plant Science 6, 197±200. Romero C, Belles JL, Vaya JL, Serrano R, Culianez-Macia FA. 1997. Expression of the yeast trehalose-6-phosphate synthase gene in transgenic tobacco plants: pleiotropic phenotypes include drought tolerance. Planta 201, 293±297. Schluepmann H, Dijken A, Smeekens S. 2001. Trehalose-6phosphate is necessary for Arabidopsis embryogenesis. American Society of Plant Biologists, Meeting Abstract No. 979 (http:// www.rycomusa.com/aspp2001/public/P56/1102.html). Smeekens S. 2000. Sugar-induced signal transduction in plants. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology 51, 49±81. Teusink B, Walsh MC, van Dam K, Westerhoff HV. 1998. The danger of metabolic pathways with turbo design. Trends in Biochemical Science 23, 162±169. Thaller MC, Schippa S, Rossolini GM. 1988. Conserved sequence motifs among bacterial, eukaryotic, and archaeal phosphatases that de®ne a new phosphohydrolase superfamily. Protein Science 7, 1647±1652. Thevelein JM, Hohmann S. 1995. Trehalose synthase: guard to the Regulation of sugar metabolism 537 gate of glycolysis in yeast? Trends in Biochemical Science 20, 3±10. Vogel G, Aeschbacher RA, MuÈller J, Boller T, Wiemken A. 1998. Trehalose-6-phosphate phosphatases from Arabidopsis thaliana: identi®cation by functional complementation of the yeast tps2 mutant. The Plant Journal 13, 673±683. Vogel G, Fiehn O, Jean-Richard-dit-Bressel L, Boller T, Wiemken A, Aeschbacher RA, Wingler A. 2001. Trehalose metabolism in Arabidopsis: occurrence of trehalose and molecular cloning and characterization of trehalose-6-phosphate synthase homologues. Journal of Experimental Botany 52, 1817± 1826. Wiese A, Groner F, Sonnewald U, Deppner H, Lerchl J, Hebbeker U, FluÈgge U, Weber A. 1999. Spinach hexokinase I is located in the outer envelope membrane of plastids. FEBS Letters 461, 13±18. Wingler A, Fritzius T, Wiemken A, Boller T, Aeschbacher RA. 2000. Trehalose induces the ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase gene, ApL3, and starch synthesis in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiology 124, 105±114. Wobus U, Weber H. 1999. Seed maturation: genetic programmes and control signals. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 2, 33±38. Zentella R, Mascorro-Gallardo JO, Van Dijck P, et al. 1999. A Selaginella lepidophylla trehalose-6-phosphate synthase complements growth and stress-tolerance defects in a yeast tps1 mutant. Plant Physiology 119, 1473±1482.