* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Subject, Topic and Topic Chain in Chinese
Sloppy identity wikipedia , lookup
Udmurt grammar wikipedia , lookup
Polish grammar wikipedia , lookup
Zulu grammar wikipedia , lookup
Modern Hebrew grammar wikipedia , lookup
Ancient Greek grammar wikipedia , lookup
Serbo-Croatian grammar wikipedia , lookup
Esperanto grammar wikipedia , lookup
Navajo grammar wikipedia , lookup
Lexical semantics wikipedia , lookup
Icelandic grammar wikipedia , lookup
Portuguese grammar wikipedia , lookup
Japanese grammar wikipedia , lookup
Latin syntax wikipedia , lookup
Kannada grammar wikipedia , lookup
Georgian grammar wikipedia , lookup
Chinese grammar wikipedia , lookup
English clause syntax wikipedia , lookup
Spanish grammar wikipedia , lookup
American Sign Language grammar wikipedia , lookup
Unique structures in Chinese Compared with English, Chinese is very different in sentence structure: • Double Nominals • 小美 眼晴很大 • Topic chain • 小美 眼晴很大, 鼻子很高, 長長的頭髮, __很惹 人愛 . Pioneering work: Li and Thompson • Li and Thompson (1976): Subject and Topic • Li and Thompson (1981): “One of the most striking features of Mandarin Chinese of Mandarin Chinese structure, and one that sets Mandarin apart from many other languages, is that in addition to the grammatical relations of “subject” and “direct object”, the description of Mandarin must also include the element “topic”. Because of the importance of “topic” in the grammar of Mandarin, it can be termed a topic –prominent language. ” (p.15) Subject, Topic and Topic Chain in Chinese Tsao, Feng-Fu 1990 Lecturer: Prof Liu Meichun 1. Introductory • Tsao (1979)’s two comments on Li and Thompson (1976): 1) They do not describe: How subject and topic are identified and differentiated how they interact in the grammar of Chinese 2) Topic is realized as a discourse notion, but their discussion is still sentence-oriented. 2. Subject in Chinese 2.1 Case Marking • “Basic Subject”: when an NP is the surface subject or direct object, it is not marked by any preposition. 我送一樣禮物給他 他莫名其妙被送了禮物 2.2 Position • Subject in Chinese occurs preverbally, but it can also be preceded by another NP identifiable as topic. 這個人我不喜歡,我爸爸也不喜歡 • Objects can sometimes occur unmarked between a subject and a verb. 他信寫完了 Question • Now if we have two unmarked NPs occurring preverbally, how do we know which is which? Animateness • Only inanimate objects (eg. 信) can be fronted, while animate object results cannot: 李小姐打了王先生 *王先生李小姐打了 • Semantic differentiation is called upon when syntax is blurred. 我雞不吃 • 雞: 1) ‘chicken as dish’ 2) ‘chicken as animal’ • Y.C Li (1972, 1984) : identify the surface subject in Chinese as the first unmarked animate NP to the left of the verb, otherwise, the unmarked NP immediately before the verb Two facts are neglected: 1) An indefinite subject occurs postverbally in a presentative sentence. 前面來了一個人! 2) Subjects, especially when they are identical with the speaker or the hearer, or the topic NP can often be deleted. identical with the speaker: __好想回家! identical with the hearer: __ 有沒有回家? Identical with the topic: 小王沒回家, 也沒去哪. 2.3 Referential Property • Basic subject is more referential than the object 他喜歡看書 non-referential 書是我的 referential a. 我要請客 b. 客來了 • Referential Asymmetry of Subject and Object 2.4 Behavior and Control Properties 2.4.1 Reflexivization and Imperativization 張三說李四在責備自己 a. ‘Zhang Sani said Li Sij is blaming himi.’ b. ‘Zhang Sani said Li Sij is blaming himselfj.’ 張三知道李四不喜歡他自己 b. ‘Zhang San knows that Li Sij doesn’t like himselfj.’ • Huang (1984) concludes that only Pro+自己 is a true reflexivization. Reflexivization • In this process, the controller is always the subject, but not topic unless it is also the subject, of the same clause. 張三,爸爸只顧他自己 a. ‘Zhang sani (Topic), (his) fatherj only looks after himselfi.’ b. ‘Zhang sani (Topic), (his) fatherj only looks after himselfi.’ Imperativization • Imperativization: Hashimoto (1971) 去 別去 別不去 • In Chinese, the imperative sentence has an underlying subject that can be optionally deleted. 2.4.2 Relativization and Conjunction Reduction • Keenan and Comrie (1977): The grammatical notions (i.e S, DO…) are universally utilized in the formation of relative clauses. • Accessibility Hierarchy (AH): SU > DO > IO > OBL > GEN > OCOMP • Unfortunately, this hierarchy doesn’t hold true when Chinese relativization is carefully examined and the confounding factor seems to be topic. Relativization • Relativization in Chinese seems to exhibit a close relation to the process of topicalization: 1. The deletion or pronominalization of the relativized NP are nearly identical with those for the deletion or pronominalization of topicalized NP. 那個小孩子(Subject)很喜歡妳 那個小孩子(Topic) 他很喜歡你 _____很喜歡你的那個小孩子 ?他很喜歡你的那個小孩子 Constraint • a pronominal copy of a topic governed by BA or a preposition cannot be deleted: 那個小孩,我經常跟他打架 *那個小孩,我經常跟_____打架 我經常跟他打架的那個小孩 *我經常跟_____打架的那個小孩 那本書,我把它放在你的桌子上 *那本書,我把______放在你的桌子上 Tsao (1987) • The function of BA: to move an NP, in most cases a direct object, to the preverbal position to mark it as a secondary topic of a special kind. • The BA NP is not an object NP, even though it might originate as one. Relativization 2. The general governing principle: if the possessive NP can become topic in a so-called “double nominative” construction, then it can also be relativized. • Only the possessing NP can be relativized. a. 那位眼睛很漂亮的小姐 b. *那位小姐很漂亮的眼睛 Topic is relativized • ‘Double nominative construction’ can also appear in relative clauses. a. 那群人,你看我,我看你,一點主意也沒有 b. 你看我,我看你,一點主意也沒有的一群人 • The pragmatic functions of topic construction and the relative clause seems to be different. • “Relative clause” in English serves to ‘ground’ the referent, but in Chinese, it serves to topicalize a referent: a. 他[那個獨生子]戴眼鏡 b. 他那個戴眼鏡的獨生子 non-restrictive Subject in presentative clause • “Telesopic-presentative” construction- a special type of serial verb construction: 從前有一個小男孩,三歲的時候爸爸就死了 ( There was once a boy whose father died when he was three.) 他有一個妹妹,很喜歡看電影 (He has a sister who is very fond of movies.) 2.4.3 Coreferential NP Deletion Equi-NP deletion: • Two cases demonstrated that subject is involved: 1) Desiderative verb: 想 *老張想老李去 老張想去 2) The embedded subject of “pivotal construction” 老張答應/同意/打算去 Co-referential • When an intensive subject (i.e. 自己) appears in the embedded sentence, it is understood to be coreferential with the subject of the matrix verb • 老張不想自己去 • When the embedded sentence is a passive one, the deleted NP is understood to be the derived subject. • 老張不想__被人欺負 • When the embedded passive sentence is put in the active form, the sentence becomes ungrammatical. a. *老張 不想人欺負他 as topic b. *老張 不想人欺負__ Subject controls • The controller is the subject of the matrix verb and the victim is the subject of the embedded verb, basic or derived. Topic does not have this property. a. 老張I 爸爸j想______*i;j去 Properties of Subject in Chinese a. Subject is always unmarked by preposition. b. By position, subject can be identified as the animate NP to the left of the verb; otherwise the NP immediately before the verb. c. Subject always bears some selectional relation to the main verb of the sentence. d. Subject tends to have a specific reference. e. Subject plays an important role in the following coreferential pronominalization, and Equi-NP deletion. 26 3. Topic in Chinese 3.1 General Properties of Topic (Li & Thompson 1976): a. Topic is always definite in the sense defined by Chafe (1976) b. Topic need not have any selectional relation with any verb in a sentence. c. Topic is not determined by the verb. d. The functional role of topic can be charaterized as the ‘center attention’ e. Topic does not control verb agreement. f. Topic invariably occupies the S-initial position. g. Topic plays no role in such processes as reflexivization, passivization, Equi-NP deletion, and imperativization 3.2 Properties of Topic in Chinese • Li and Thompson fails to take care of the fact that topic may, and often does, extend its semantic domain over several clauses to form a topic chain and it is control of what has been called Topic-NP deletion in the chain. Revision of f and g • f. Topic invariably occupied the clause-initial position unless it is deleted or pronominalized by the topic that appears at the first clause in the same chain. g. Topic, except in clauses in which it is also subject, plays no role in such processes as reflexivization, passivization, Equi-NP deletion, and imperativization. Topic • One specific topic property of Chinese: It can be separately from the rest of the sentence by a pause or by one of the four pause article a, ya, ne, me and ba. a. 這棵樹的葉子啊,有小有大,真難看 b. *這棵樹的啊,葉子有小有長,真難看 4. Comparison of Subject and Topic • A topic can be regarded as a topic only at the discourse level; at clause level it may be regarded as several things. 他打我 那棵樹花小,葉子大,很難看,所以我沒買 ‘ The tree (topic), (its) flowers are small. (Its) leaves are big. (It) was ugly; so I didn’t buy (it).’ Summary • Subject: - syntactic notion - domain over a VP node • Topic: - domain over a clause as well as a sentence • A sentence in Chinese: a topic chain 話題組 Implication (by Liu) • In English writing: • Which one is more coherent? • My mom is beautiful. She has big eyes and long hair. She looks like a movie star. • My mom is beautiful. Everyone likes her big eyes and long hair. My father said that she is a movie star.