Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
High Middle Ages wikipedia , lookup
England in the Late Middle Ages wikipedia , lookup
Capetian–Plantagenet rivalry wikipedia , lookup
Scotland in the Late Middle Ages wikipedia , lookup
Late Middle Ages wikipedia , lookup
Feudalism in the Holy Roman Empire wikipedia , lookup
Economy of Scotland in the High Middle Ages wikipedia , lookup
England in the Middle Ages wikipedia , lookup
High Medieval Europe in a Nutshell A REALLY Big Nutshell Ehrstein I. Carolingian Demise a. Fell apart under attack and subdivision (no primogeniture) b. Legacy i. Aristocratic families take over administrative units ii. Weak France – many nobles; little royal power iii. Government style lives on in England and “Germany” II. France a. Largest land area of Carolingian remains b. Most heavily disrupted by upheavals c. First to produce the classic feudal/manorial “systems” Feudalism/Manorialism a. Both too simplistic - are good models for intro to subject (like bogus atomic models in Physics/Chemistry) b. Describe the defensive reaction of society to the threats (Arabs, Hungarians and Vikings) and opportunities (grabbing land and being own lord) of the 9th-10th centuries Feudalism/Manorialism (cont) c. Feudalism - sets of relationships between individuals for the distribution of land (wealth) in exchange for obligation of service i. ii. Lord gives land (fief) to a lesser lord (vassal) in return for his service as a soldier. Vassal could subdivide land with the same arrangement. The king was the highest lord; knights generally the lowest. Spread-out military presence in the country (no central army) - quicker reactions to threats Feudalism/Manorialism (cont) d. Manorialism - sets of relationships between individuals for protection in exchange for service i. Lord’s fief (see above) had one or more manors (small agricultural communities) worked by peasants or serfs (bound to land but not slaves) for lord’s protection ii. Self-supporting communities throughout countryside to support dispersed military created by feudalism II. d. France (cont) Division of country resulted in Carolingian dynasty being destroyed Capetians - Hugh Capet elected by other nobles in 987 to be king e. i. Only ruled as first among equals with other nobles – created instability ii. Slowly built up power from base in Ile de France (area around Paris) iii. Spent period from 987 to 1328 wrangling with and overcoming overmighty vassals (especially English king!) and incorporating their lands into his II. f. France (cont) Valois i. Philip of Valois took throne in 1328 (edged out better claimant Edward III) ii. Plunged France into Hundred Year’s War (13371453) iii. Valois kings struggled with legacy of feudalism iv. End of Hundred Year’s War finally allowed for regrowth of French state III. “Germany” a. Aka Austrasia, Roman Empire, Holy Roman Empire b. Inherited the Carolingian tradition and stuck with it i. Idea of empire lasted until Napoleon! ii. Kept up the idea of aristocracy of service (like the Carolingian comes and missi) – idea only vaguely matched reality III. “Germany” (cont) c. d. e. HRE founded in 917 by Henry I of Saxony HR Emperors rapidly came into conflict with Popes over lay investiture (Investiture Struggle); who controls the wealth (land) and how does an emperor get to be emperor? Fighting with popes, idea of empire drew, and covering their rear drew HRE into Italy; wound up ruling pieces of it off and on for entire period. HRE by 1520 III. “Germany” (cont) f. Italian preoccupations, loss of investiture struggle, and papal interference created instability and central weakness i. ii. Germany continued devolving into increasing numbers of substates by late 13th c. (process started with Frederick Barbarossa getting rid of overmighty vassals c. 1180 – compare with France) HRE went from being state with Emperor as representative of universal Christian rule (like Charlemagne’s idea) to being essentially a German confederation IV. England a. Anglo-Saxon monarchy inherited Carolingian centralized gov’t b. 1066 – Norman Conquest i. William took Carolingian gov’t style and merged it with “perfect,” clean-slate feudalism ii. Created strong hybrid state with a tradition of law, not personal arrogation IV. England (cont) c. English/French history and power and kin relations deeply intermingled – but two very different states that led to their different constitutional histories i. ii. France – personal power of lords with overlay of vassalage; highly regionalized England – power devolved from a king; centralized and based from written law IV. England (cont) d. Plantagenets - Henry II to Richard II (11541399) i. ii. Ruled through period of English gov’t evolution Henry II (1154-1189) dueled with Pope over control of Church offices and clergy iii. John (1199-1216) – forced by barons to sign Magna Carta – essentially granted power to barons to control king’s national purse (as opposed to his personal wealth – negligible) IV. England (cont) e. Magna Carta – important that it allowed for a structured opposition/check on royal power Barons did rise seriously once more f. i. ii. Simon de Montfort and others rose to totally undermine Henry III; failed Until end of medieval English monarchs in 15th c. barons never united again – gov’t continued to evolve within a documentary context IV. England (cont) g. English territorial expansion matched gov’t strengthening i. Wales (1282) ii. Scotland (1290-1314) iii. Back to France! (1337) – Hundred Year’s War IV. England (cont) h. Hundred Year’s War fatally weakened English medieval state i. Need for money increases taxes and fees ii. Need for troops brutalizes English iii. Lack of attention on England allows for decay of ruler/ruled relationship IV. England (cont) i. j. Internal problems and leadership divisions led to War of Roses – conflict between two branches of royal family (Lancaster and York) Both sides devastated by 1485 – traditional top aristocracy almost wiped out IV. England (cont) k. War of Roses results i. Old barons essentially gone; new ones in the wings drawn from: ii. The gentry (lower level local nobility) schooled in law and violence iii. Gentry had learned that knowledge of law and use of power in Parliament was an effective tool iv. New kings (Tudors) had to deal with an established institution firmly embedded in the life of the nation