Download In the previous chapter we discussed energy, and

Chapter 7: Impulse and Momentum
Tuesday, September 17, 2013
10:00 PM
In the previous chapter we discussed energy, and in this chapter we discuss momentum.
The concepts of momentum and energy provide alternative perspectives to Newton's
laws of motion and pathways into deeper understandings of Newtonian mechanics.
The basic understanding of Newton's second law that we have discussed so far is that the
acceleration of an object is caused by the net force acting on it. However, there are
situations where it is difficult to measure the force acting on an object, and so therefore
it's difficult to apply Newton's second law. For example, the force may act for only a very
short time, or over a very short distance, or both. This is the case in collisions, for
example; kicking a ball, hitting a baseball with a bat, a slap shot in hockey, hitting a tennis
ball with a racquet, a car collision, etc. In such situations, it's typical that the force varies
dramatically over a short time; this is much more complicated than the situations we've
dealt with so far, where we often assumed that the force acting is constant (which is a
reasonable approximation in some situations).
Ch7 Page 1
How then do we analyze such situations? Well, we can think about averaging the force to
make things simple. But should we average the force over time or over distance? Each of
the ideas has advantages and useful properties; averaging the force over time leads to
the concepts of impulse and momentum, whereas averaging the force over distance
leads to the concepts of work and energy, as we studied in the previous chapter.
Newton's second law of motion can be expressed in terms of these new concepts in the
following ways:
Impulse = change in momentum (impulse-momentum theorem)
Work = change in energy (work-energy theorem)
We'll see that there is a conservation principle for momentum, just as there is a
conservation principle for energy. Conservation principles are very useful in physics; the
world is a very complicated place, and so if you can identify some quantities that are
constant throughout the complicated processes that you are analyzing, then it gives you
something to hang on to. Conservation principles are useful in solving physics problems,
and often allow one to solve problems more simply and more directly than using
Newton's laws of motion by themselves.
If you dig deeper into things, you'll find that conservation principles are a consequence of
certain somewhat abstract symmetry principles. For example, the fact that momentum is
conserved is a consequence of the fact that the fundamental laws of physics are invariant
with respect to spatial translations. In other words, if you do an experiment here in St.
Catharines, and then slided your apparatus over to Buffalo, or Toronto, or anywhere,
then you will find that the experimental results are the same. This is a very deep
Ch7 Page 2
then you will find that the experimental results are the same. This is a very deep
connection between underlying symmetries of the universe and conservation principles;
our deepest understandings of the universe are currently expressed in these terms of
symmetry and invariance.
Other examples: Conservation of energy is a consequence of invariance with respect to
time translations, and conservation of angular momentum is a consequence of invariance
with respect to spatial rotations. This is the story in Newtonian mechanics, but similar,
and similarly deep (some would say more fundamental) symmetry principles apply in
quantum mechanics, too, and you'll encounter them eventually if you continue your
studies in this direction.
Back to the story of how to cope with forces when they vary wildly in magnitude over
very short times or over very short distances.
Ok, let's now explore the effect of impulse on motion. Recall from above that the
definition of impulse is the average force acting on an object multiplied by the time
interval over which the force acts:
How does impulse affect motion? Consider the following calculation:
This calculation suggests that the quantity mv may be important, and so it's worthwhile
giving it a name; we call it momentum. The relation that we've just derived above,
which describes the effect of impulse on motion, is called the impulse-momentum
theorem.
Ch7 Page 3
examples: tennis, baseball, hockey, catching an egg or water-balloon or a hard-thrown
ball, air-bag in a car
_________________________________________________________________
Example: A baseball of mass 150 g is thrown towards home plate with a speed of
100 km/h. The batter hits the ball with an impulse of 10 Ns so that it reverses its
motion. Determine the speed at which the ball leaves the bat.
Ch7 Page 4
_________________________________________________________________
Example: A tennis ball of mass 90 g arrives at your racquet with a speed of 80
km/h and you hit it directly back at a speed of 60 km/h.
(a) Determine the impulse that you exert on the ball.
(b) Determine the magnitude of the average force that you exert on the ball if it is
in contact with your racquet for 14 ms.
Solution: Choose "towards the right" to be the positive direction, and therefore
"towards the left" is the negative direction.
Ch7 Page 5
_____________________________________________________
Principle of conservation of momentum
Consider the impulse-momentum theorem,
Ch7 Page 6
Consider the impulse-momentum theorem,
If it happens that the impulse is zero, then the change in momentum will also be
zero. In other words, if the impulse acting on a system is zero, then the momentum
of the system is conserved.
Yet another way to say this is that if the net external force on a system is zero, then
the total momentum of the system is conserved.
Examples:
• Person sitting on a chair; what are the external and internal forces acting on the
person-chair system?
• Car accelerating forwards; what are the external and internal forces acting on the
driver-car system?
• Hockey stick hitting a puck; what are the external and internal forces acting on the
puck?
The principle of conservation of momentum is a generalization of Newton's third
law of motion. That is, the principle of conservation of momentum is considered to
be more fundamental than Newton's third law of motion, and furthermore
Newton's third law of motion can be derived from the principle of conservation of
momentum. Furthermore, the principle of conservation of momentum is more
general than Newton's third law of motion because the former applies to light and
fields as well as particles, whereas the latter applies only to particles. Furthermore,
because force is the derivative of momentum, one can get by without the force
concept as long as one uses momentum. This is true to an even greater extent in
more advanced approaches to physics (quantum mechanics, relativity, field
theories) where force is not very useful, but momentum is extremely useful.
The principle of conservation of momentum is useful in analyzing collisions,
explosions, etc. Consider the following example.
Example: A car of mass 1000 kg travelling east at 40 km/h collides with a car of mass
1500 kg going west at 50 km/h in a completely inelastic collision (i.e. they stick
together). Determine the velocity of the car/car combination immediately after the
collision.
Solution: In the moment of the collision, the net external force acting on the car-car
Ch7 Page 7
Solution: In the moment of the collision, the net external force acting on the car-car
system is zero, so we can use the principle of conservation of momentum.
The velocity of the two cars together after the collision is 14 km/h to the West.
________________________________________________________________
I wonder if kinetic energy is conserved in the previous problem? Let's check this
out:
Ch7 Page 8
out:
Kinetic energy is not conserved; since the gravitational potential energy
does not change for the cars (the collision takes place on level ground)
we conclude that mechanical energy is not conserved in the collision.
What happened to the lost kinetic energy? Where did it go?
_______________________________________________________
Collisions in two dimensions
We must be careful to recognize that momentum is a vector, not a scalar. In
situations where momentum is conserved, carefully note that this means that
each component of the momentum is separately conserved. This is illustrated
in the following example.
Example: A truck of mass 2000 kg travelling east at 60 km/h collides with a car of
mass 1000 kg going north at 80 km/h in a completely inelastic collision (i.e. they
stick together). Determine the velocity of the car/truck combination immediately
after the collision.
Solution: This is a two-dimensional problem, so we'll adopt the usual math-class
conventions:
Ch7 Page 9
Ch7 Page 10
This is the final velocity of the two cars together. If you prefer to express the velocity
in terms of its magnitude and direction, then:
Ch7 Page 11
Thus, the final velocity of the car-truck combination is 48.1 km/h at an angle of
33.7 degrees North of East.
________________________________________________________________
I wonder if kinetic energy is conserved in the previous problem? Check it out!
________________________________________________________________
Example: A rubber ball of mass 5 kg travelling to the right at 10 m/s collides with a
ball of mass 10 kg going to the left at 4 m/s. After the collision, the first ball moves
at a speed of 2 m/s to the left. Determine the velocity of the second ball
immediately after the collision.
Ch7 Page 12
Thus, the velocity of the second ball after the collision is 2 m/s to the right.
_____________________________________________________________
Is kinetic energy conserved in the previous example? Check it out!
_____________________________________________________________
Elastic and inelastic collisions
In many every-day collision problems, kinetic energy is not conserved; you've
seen this in the past few examples. However, there are some collisions where
kinetic energy is nearly conserved; a collision of two billiard balls is an example.
Even in this situation, you can understand that kinetic energy is not exactly
conserved, because there is a little sound when the billiard balls collide, and that
sound carries energy, which means that the final kinetic energy is very slightly
less than the initial kinetic energy.
In the ideal situation where the kinetic energy is exactly conserved in a collision,
and we do know that physics textbooks often deal with ideal situations in order
to keep things simple, the collision is called an elastic collision. A collision in
which kinetic energy is not conserved is called inelastic. The following example
illustrates an elastic collision.
Example: A block of mass 2.4 kg moving to the right with a speed of 5.6 m/s
collides head-on and elastically with a block of mass 1.6 kg that is initially at
rest. Determine the velocities of the blocks immediately after the collision.
Solution: The "head-on" phrase signifies that the motions take place in a single
straight line, both before and after the collision. The fact that the collision is
elastic means that kinetic energy is conserved. Choose "right" to be the
positive direction. What do you think will happen after the collision,
qualitatively?
By conservation of momentum,
Ch7 Page 13
By conservation of kinetic energy,
By multiplying each term in the second equation by 2, and using the
given value of the velocity of the second block before the collision,
these two equations reduce to
Ch7 Page 14
Summarizing what we've derived, the velocities of the two balls after the
collision are
Do these expressions for the velocities of the blocks after the collision
make sense? Can you check special cases? Do they correspond to what
you've experienced at the billiards table, or at the bowling alley?
To complete our problems, substitute the given values to obtain:
Do these results make sense?
_____________________________________________________
Let's consider the equations we just derived above (in the red box) for
Ch7 Page 15
Let's consider the equations we just derived above (in the red box) for
a few more minutes, so we can bring hockey and baseball and bowling
and billiards into the discussion.
You may have noticed that the faster you throw a tennis ball against a
wall, the faster it bounces back at you. If the wall were moving towards
you, instead of stationary, surely the same would be true, for the same
reason.
And indeed it is true, as you may have noticed from playing hockey or
baseball. For what is a baseball bat or a hockey stick but a small
moving wall? You can shoot a harder slap shot if a rebound comes
straight at you than if you are shooting the puck from rest. It's easier to
hit a home run off a fastball than it is off a knuckle ball or slow
breaking pitch. We can understand this by examining the equations
Let m1 be the mass of the ball or puck and let m2 be the mass of the
bat or stick. If you let the mass of the bat or stick be about 5 times
(or so) the mass of the ball or puck, you'll get a sense for this effect
by looking at the first equation: the greater you make the speed of
the ball or puck before the collision, the greater is its speed after
the collision.
A complete analysis of this situation would be much more complex.
The bat or stick is not motionless before the collision, and worse, it
is moving in a very complicated way, including both translation and
rotation. At impact, the player exerts complex forces on the bat or
stick.
But even ignoring all these complications, it's neat that we can get
a sense for why this effect occurs by examining the equations for a
much simpler phenomenon.
______________________________________________________
A good way to analyze the equations (in the previous red box)
mathematically is to look at special or extreme situations. For
example, if the two objects have the same mass, then to predict
what happens we can let m2 = m1 in the boxed equations to obtain
Ch7 Page 16
Thus, the incident object stops and all of its velocity is transferred
to the second object. You can see this in action at the billiards
table if you give the cue ball a little bit of back-spin, so that it slides
without spinning. If the cue ball makes a direct hit on a second ball
without spinning, then it does indeed stop dead and the second
ball moves off in the same direction and with the same speed
(nearly; the collision is not perfectly elastic) as the cue ball. If the
cue ball spins, then our analysis is not good enough to predict
what will happen, and we would have to take the cue ball's spin
into account.
As a second case, consider what happens if the second mass is
much greater than the first mass, so that the ratio of the first mass
to the second mass is close to zero:
This describes what happens when you throw a tennis ball against a
wall. The tennis ball bounces back with the same speed, but opposite
direction, that it had when it hit the wall. (The reality, of course, is
that the collision is not perfectly elastic, so the speed of the ball after
it bounces is always less than the in-going speed.) And the wall
doesn't move at all after the collision.
As a third case, consider what happens if the first mass is much
greater than the second mass, so that the ratio of the second mass to
the first mass is close to zero:
Ch7 Page 17
This describes what happens when a bowling ball strikes a single pin.
The mass of the bowling ball is much greater than the mass of the pin.
When the bowling ball strikes the pin it just keeps going in the same
direction at nearly the same speed, whereas the pin flies forward at
nearly double the speed of the incoming bowling ball.
________________________________________________________
What if, instead of the incoming object striking a stationary object, we
have two objects approaching each other in a head on elastic
collision?
Can you set up the equations for conservation of momentum and
conservation of kinetic energy and derive expressions for the final
velocities of the two objects? Try it! (Physics majors should definitely
try this as a test of their algebra skills.) Arrived at after a solid two
pages of algebra (more if you include absolutely every step), here are
my results:
There's a pleasing symmetry to the two expressions, isn't there? If
you interchange the two masses, the results for the two final
velocities should also be interchanged, and they are. Also, and this is
very important, if you set the "before" velocity of the second object
to zero, we should obtain, as a special case, the results of our
previous big calculation (in the earlier red box), and we do.
Ch7 Page 18
previous big calculation (in the earlier red box), and we do.
The result for the final velocity of the first object makes it clear that
the faster the incoming pitch, the faster the outgoing batted ball. Is
this clear?
________________________________________________________
The next example is a special case of the situation described by the
most recent boxed red equations.
Example: A block of mass m moving to the right with a speed of 4.3
m/s collides head-on and elastically with a block of mass 2m moving
to the left with a speed of 2.9 m/s. Determine the velocities of the
blocks immediately after the collision.
Solution:
Substituting the given values into equations (1) and (2), we obtain
Ch7 Page 19
Ch7 Page 20
_________________________________________________________
Another example of a collision in two dimensions
Example: A billiards ball moves with a velocity of vB to the right and strikes a
stationary billiards ball. After the elastic collision, one of the billiards balls
moves with speed v1 at an angle of 30 degrees from the horizontal line, and
the second ball moves with speed v2 at some other angle. Determine
expressions for v1, v2, and the unknown angle in terms of vB.
Solution: Remember that momentum is a vector quantity. In this situation,
momentum is conserved; this means that each component of the total
momentum is conserved. Because the collision is elastic, kinetic energy is also
conserved. Also, we'll assume that both balls have the same mass.
Ch7 Page 21
Conservation of momentum in the x-direction:
Conservation of momentum in the y-direction:
Conservation of kinetic energy:
We now have three independent equations for the three unknowns (the speeds
of the two balls after the collision and the unknown angle), so the problem is
solvable. The angle seems to be the biggest pain, so let's eliminate the angle as a
first step to solving the equations. A nice trick, worth remembering as a standard
trick to try in these types of situations, is to solve Equation 1 for cosine theta,
solve Equation 2 for sine theta, and then square the two expressions and add
them to eliminate theta:
Ch7 Page 22
There are two possible solutions here. The first solution, v1 = 0, leads to theta = 0
and v2 = vB. This solution represents the situation that the incident ball misses the
stationary ball, and just continues on with its original speed. This is not interesting.
(Although it is interesting that the solutions of the system of equations includes this
non-interesting possibility.) The interesting solution is
Ch7 Page 23
Substituting the expression for v1 into Equation 3, we obtain an expression for v2:
Substituting the expressions for v1 and v2 into Equation 2, we can solve for the angle
theta:
____________________________________________________________
One can't help but notice that the sum of the two angles in the previous
example is a right angle, a fact that will be familiar to all of you billiards players
out there. It's an exercise in algebra to adapt the method of the previous
example to prove that the two billiards balls always leave the collision so that
the angle between them is a right angle. (Of course, we assume that the balls
have the same mass and that the collision is elastic.)
Ch7 Page 24
Give it a try; a little algebra is good for you! (Physics majors should definitely do
this.)
_______________________________________________________________
Centre of Mass
The world is a very complicated place, as you know, with enormously
complicated processes going on. In this course, when we analyze the motion of a
tossed baseball, we don't consider the motion of each individual atom in the
baseball, but we rather treat the baseball as a whole.
This deserves a little more discussion. The motion of each individual atom in the
baseball is quite complicated, and analyzing the motions of all of the atoms in a
baseball is quite a long way beyond our capability. There are too many atoms,
their motions are too complex, and we have no way of measuring all of them to
see if our analysis would be correct, if it were even possible to carry out such an
analysis. The atoms are vibrating, jiggling, etc., in an extremely complex way.
Nevertheless, all of the complications are not very important, in a way. If all we
want to do is to figure out where the baseball will land when we throw it, and
that is the kind of thing that we want to do in this course, then we don't need to
consider all the complicated individual motions of each atom in the baseball. We
can quite successfully treat the motion of the baseball as a whole. This is what
we did starting back in Chapters 2 and 3, and it's what we continue to do: we
treat the extended object (baseball in this case) as if all of its mass were
concentrated at some "average" location; this average location is called the
centre of mass of the object.
For a an object of uniform density, the centre of mass of the object is at its
geometrical centre. If the density is not uniform, then the centre of mass will be
offset from the geometrical centre towards the part of the object where the
mass is more concentrated.
The centre of mass of an object need not lie within the object itself, which leads
to some interesting tricks. Consider a doughnut of uniform density; the centre of
mass is at the geometrical centre, right in the centre of the hole:
Ch7 Page 25
High-jumpers have figured out long ago how to make use of the fact that
the centre of mass of a human body is not within the body when the
body is contorted into a strange configuration. They have figured out how
to jump over a bar while their centre of mass actually passes below the
bar! Such efforts culminated in the invention of a technique called the
Fosbury Flop after Dick Fosbury, who used it to win the gold medal at the
1968 Olympics.
The following shows some pretty videos of a high-jumper doing the
Fosbury Flop, over and over and over again; however, don't listen to
everything they say about science (for example, no, power is not force
divided by time), but what they do say about the rotation of the body at
take-off is critical, and notice how the jumper arches his back and places
his arms and legs.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qB0Fq3UXEqA
Formula for centre of mass of several "point" objects:
Ch7 Page 26
For continuous mass distributions, one can use a similar formula involving
integration. You'll learn how to do this if you take MATH 1P02 or MATH 1P05.
_____________________________________________________________
Example: Determine the centre of mass for the system of three identical coins.
_____________________________________________________________
Example: Determine the centre of mass of the two bars considered as one unit.
Ch7 Page 27
Strategy: Pretend that the mass of each bar is concentrated at its
geometrical centre.
_______________________________________________________________
The following argument is meant to justify treating an extended object,
such as a baseball, as a point particle. We have tacitly made this
assumption throughout the course, and indeed it's an excellent model
and approximation to reality in most cases, but it's nice if we can provide
a clear justification for the validity of this model, the "particle model."
If there are no external forces on a system, then momentum is
conserved, which implies that the velocity of the centre of mass of the
system is also conserved. You can see that this is true as follows; we'll
derive the relation for the x-component, and the arguments for the ycomponent and z-component of momentum are the same. Start with
the relation for the x-component of the centre of mass, assuming that
there are three point-objects undergoing a collision (the argument is
the same no matter how many point objects there are):
Ch7 Page 28
Now divide each term of the previous equation by a suitable time interval, to
obtain:
The right side of the previous equation represents the x-component of the
total momentum of the three particles. If there are no external forces
acting on the system, then the quantity on the right side of the previous
equation is conserved, because momentum is conserved. This means that
the quantity on the left side of the equation is also conserved. If we extend
the argument to the other two components of momentum, this means that
if no external forces are acting on the system, the velocity of the centre of
mass of the system is constant (i.e., conserved).
You can also think of the quantity on the left side of the previous equation
as the x-component of the centre of mass momentum of the system of
three particles.
This kind of reasoning justifies treating a baseball as if all of its mass is
concentrated at its centre of mass when solving kinematics problems,
doesn't it? (Well, the baseball is a continuous mass distribution, so we
really should use calculus here, but you get the idea, I hope.)
_________________________________________________________
Two fun devices/phenomena
Galileo's cannon
Try dropping a basketball with a tennis ball sitting on top of it. Can you
analyze the situation to explain why the tennis ball shoots up with such a high
speed? What simplifying assumptions are reasonable in your calculation?
http://ap.smu.ca/demos/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=78&Itemid=85
Newton's cradle
This was a popular "executive" toy a few decades ago.
Ch7 Page 29
This was a popular "executive" toy a few decades ago.
Here's a Newton's cradle in action:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fWSgm5aMsbU
Also see
http://ap.smu.ca/demos/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=85&Itemid=85
_______________________________________________________________
Additional problems and solutions:
Example: Bob, who has a mass of 75 kg, can throw a 500 g rock with a speed
of 30 m/s. The distance through which his hand moves as he accelerates the
rock forward from rest until he releases it is 1.0 m.
a. Determine the constant force Bob exerts on the rock.
b. If Bob is standing on frictionless ice, what is his recoil speed after releasing
the rock?
Solution: Bob clearly has a "rifle-arm."
Ch7 Page 30
____________________________________________________________
Example: A firecracker in a coconut blows the coconut into three
pieces. Two pieces of equal mass fly off south and west, perpendicular to each
other, at 20 m/s. The third piece has twice the mass as the other two. Determine
the speed and direction of the third piece.
Solution:
Ch7 Page 31
_______________________________________________________________
Example: A 10 g bullet is fired into a 10 kg wood block that is at rest on a wood
table. The block, with the bullet embedded, slides 5.0 cm across the table.
Determine the speed of the bullet. (The coefficient of friction is 0.20.)
Solution:
Ch7 Page 32
_______________________________________________________________
Example: A 1500 kg weather rocket accelerates upward at 10.0 m/s 2. It explodes
2.00 s after liftoff and breaks into two fragments, one twice as massive as the other.
Photos reveal that the lighter fragment traveled straight up and reached a
maximum height of 530 m. What were the speed and direction of the heavier
fragment just after the explosion?
Ch7 Page 33
_______________________________________________________________
Example: The figure shows a collision between three balls of clay. The three hit
simultaneously and stick together. Determine the speed and direction of the
resulting blob of clay just after the collision.
Ch7 Page 34
________________________________________________________
Example: A 20 g ball is fired horizontally toward a 100 g ball that is hanging
motionless from a 1.0-m-long string. The balls undergo a head-on, elastic
collision, after which the 100 g ball swings out to a maximum angle of 50 degrees.
Determine the initial speed of the 20 g ball.
Ch7 Page 35
Ch7 Page 36
Ch7 Page 37