Download Lab announcements – 2 lab quiz week before spring break

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Nucleophilic acyl substitution wikipedia , lookup

Pseudo Jahn–Teller effect wikipedia , lookup

Liquid–liquid extraction wikipedia , lookup

Redox wikipedia , lookup

Chemical potential wikipedia , lookup

Colloidal crystal wikipedia , lookup

Thermomechanical analysis wikipedia , lookup

Marcus theory wikipedia , lookup

Lewis acid catalysis wikipedia , lookup

Oganesson wikipedia , lookup

Physical organic chemistry wikipedia , lookup

Acid dissociation constant wikipedia , lookup

Click chemistry wikipedia , lookup

Stability constants of complexes wikipedia , lookup

Chemical reaction wikipedia , lookup

Vapor–liquid equilibrium wikipedia , lookup

Unbinilium wikipedia , lookup

PH wikipedia , lookup

George S. Hammond wikipedia , lookup

Catalysis wikipedia , lookup

Rate equation wikipedia , lookup

Thermodynamics wikipedia , lookup

Thermometric titration wikipedia , lookup

Thermodynamic equilibrium wikipedia , lookup

Ununennium wikipedia , lookup

Chemical thermodynamics wikipedia , lookup

Organosulfur compounds wikipedia , lookup

Stoichiometry wikipedia , lookup

Transition state theory wikipedia , lookup

Bioorthogonal chemistry wikipedia , lookup

Determination of equilibrium constants wikipedia , lookup

Chemical equilibrium wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
February 18, 2002
Lab announcements – 2nd lab quiz week before spring break
photocopy before turning in or study before turning in
-same as 101/other 102 sections
be extra careful with dilutions this week (Expt. 21)
Most chemical reactions do not go to completion.
chemical equilibrium – two opposing reactions occur
simultaneously at the same rate
‘equilibrium’ doesn’t necessarily mean ‘equal’ amounts of
reactants and products – in fact, it usually doesn’t.
Equilibrium constant – measure of this balance
aA +
Kc
=
bB ?
[C]c[D]d
[A]a[B]b
Kc
cC +
dD
(*at equilibrium*)
- is a measure of the extent to which a reaction occurs
- is determined experimentally
- changes with Temp
- not affected by initial concentration
- equation specific
no (l) or (s) in the expression, just substances in state (aq) or (g) (in
mol/L). (We’ll discuss other ways to express gas later.)
Kc can be related to thermodynamics (end of chapter)
K has no units
Kc >> 1 mostly products
Kc << 1 mostly reactants
February 18, 2002
Consider the following system in a 1.0 L flask at a certain temp:
PCl5 (g)
?
[PCl3][Cl2] = Kc
[PCl5]
Initially 1.0 mol PCl5 is added to the empty flask. At
equilibrium, 0.60 mol each of PCl3 (g) and Cl2 (g) are present.
What is Kc?
init
eq.
1.0 mol
0.60 mol PCl3 x
PCl3 (g) + Cl2 (g)
0
0.60 mol
0
0.60 mol
1 mol PCl5 = 0.60 mol PCl5 used
1 mol PCl3
1.0 mol PCl5 init - 0.60 mol PCl5 used = 0.40 mol PCl5 remains
Kc =
[0.60/1.0][0.60/1.0]
[0.40/1.0]
= 0.90
Consider this system in a 2.00 L flask at a certain temp:
SO2 (g) + NO2 (g) ?
SO3(g) + NO (g)
Kc = 3.00
Initially 1.00 mole each of SO 2 and NO2 were added to the flask.
What are the equilibrium concentrations of all the species in the
reaction?
can go ‘backwards’ – calculate []eq from Kc
February 18, 2002
2.0 L flask
SO2 (g) + NO2 (g)
init. 1.0 mol
?
1.0 mol
SO3(g) + NO (g)
0
Kc = 3.00
0
what are concentrations of species at equilibrium?
eq.
1.0 mol
- x mol
Kc =
1.0 mol
- x mol
[SO3][NO]
[SO2][NO2]
x mol
x mol
= [x/2.0][x/2.0]
[1.0-x/2.0][1.0-x/2.0]
it might have been easier to work in molarity to begin with:
eq.
0.5 M
-yM
Kc =
Kc =
0.5 M
-yM
[SO3][NO]
[SO2][NO2]
[y]2
[0.5 – y]2
yM
=
yM
[y][y]
[0.5 - y][ 0.5 - y]
= 3.00
take square root of both sides
Kc =
[y]
[0.5 – y]
= 1.73
y = 1.73(0.5 – y)
y = 0.866 – 1.73y
2.73y = 0.866
y = 0.317 M (conc. products)
0.5 M - 0.317 M = 0.183 M (conc. reactants)
February 18, 2002
A more difficult example:
A
init 0
init 0
eq. x
Kc
=
+
B
0
0
?
x
[C][D]
[A][B]
C
0.600 mol
0.300 M
0.300-x
=
2.00 L container
+ D
0.200 mol
0.100 M
Kc = 24.0
0.100-x
[0.300 – x][0.100 – x]
[x][x]
0.0300 - 0.400x + x2
x2
24.0x2 = x2 + 0.400x – 0.0300
23.0x2 + 0.400x – 0.0300 = 0 use quadratic equation
24.0 =
− b ± b 2 − 4ac
2a
x=
− 0.40 ± ( 0.40) 2 − 4( 23.0)( −0.030)
2(23.0)
x = 0.028 or
-0.046 – this one doesn’t make any sense.
[A],[B] = 0.028 M
[C] = 0.300 – 0.028 M = 0.272 M
[D] = 0.100 – 0.028 M = 0.072 M
February 18, 2002
When system is not in equilibrium, we can calculate a similar
term called the ‘reaction quotient’, Q. This helps us diagnose
the direction of a particular reaction.
aA +
Q
=
bB ?
[C]c[D]d
[A]a[B]b
cC +
dD
(*not at equilibrium*)
If Q = Kc system is at equilibrium
If Q > Kc system moving toward reactants (too much product)
If Q< Kc system moving toward products (too much reactant)
Ex.
?
H2 (g) + I2 (g)
0.22M 0.22M
?
2HI (g)
0.66M
Kc = 49.0
is the system at equilibrium?
Kc
=
[HI]2 =
[H2][I2]
=
9.0 system is not at equilibrium. Moving toward
products.
H2 (g) +
init
eq.
0.22M
0.22-x
I2 (g)
0.22M
0.22-x
[0.66]2 .
[0.22][0.22]
?
2HI (g)
Kc = 49.0
0.66M
0.66+2x
work out on your own what the equilibrium concentrations would be.