Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
t SBnereN AcepsN,Iy oF SctnucBs eNo Anrs, NovI S,q,o BRANCH INIsrtrurE oF AncuRBoMYTHoLocY Signs of Civilization Neolithic Symbol System of Southeast Europe @ 2009 by the following: Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts, Novi Sad Branch Institute of Archaeomythology Individual authors Copyright of Signs of Civilization poster by Aleksandar Kapuran Andrej Starovi6 States of America. No part of this book may be used or reproduced in any manner whatsoever without written permission except in the case of brief quotations in scholarly articles or reviews. All rights reserved. First Edition. Printed in the United Pubtishe{by the Institute of Archaeomythology 1645 Furlong Road Sebastopol, CA 95472 USA in collaboration with the Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts Novi Sad Branch Nikole Pabi6a 6 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia Edited by Joan Marler Miriam Robbins Dexter Design and Production by - Mario Zelaya Zelaya Designs 318 Schiappino Street Santa Rosa, CA 95409 USA Printed by Reach 360 Empire Industrial Court Santa Rosa, CA 95403 USA 1821 rsBN 0-9815249-L-5 CONTENTS Preface vii History and Acknowledgments viii of t xi Signs of Civilization: An Introduction On the Semantics of Neolithic Vassil Nikolov I xx Contributors to this Volume Altars I4l Pintaderas: 145 System 16I Towards'An Iirterpretation of Questions and Possibilities for their Use Tanya Y. Dzhanfezova xxi Signs of Civilization Symposium Poster I29 About the Origin and Evolution Neo-Eneolithic Signs and Symbols luliu Paul I Non-Verbal Messages on Anthropomorphic Figurines of the Vinda Culture Bogdan Brukner I The Trypillia-Cucuteni Sign on Painted Pottery a Taras Tkachuk The Vinda Signs in Archaeological Contexts: Ritual or Domestic Symbols? Signs and Sign Systems of the Trypillia t Andrej Starovi1 t The Danube Script and Other Ancient Writing Age 187 Incised Symbols in Neolithic and Bronze Greece and their Relation to the Old European Script Harald Haarmann I The Danube (Old European) Script: Ritual Use of Signs in the Balkan-Danube Region c. 5200-3500 BC I Shan M. Was There a Script in Final Neolithic I Life 63 Symbols and Signs of the Cucuteni-Tripolye Culture 87 I I \ t: Game One Chalcolithic Stefan Chohadzkiev t Signs 201 209 The Old Fairy Waiting, Pen in Hand, tr3 Netherworld Adrian Poruciuc 1n the I I *r ):l Gareth Owens I Lazarovici Challenging Some Myths About the T[rt6ria Tablets: Icons of the Danube Script Marco Merlini Greece? I93 The Connections Between Old European and Lithuanian Sash Ornamentation Vytautas Tumdnas Gheorghe Lazarovici C ornelia-Magda Adamantios Sampson 49 M.Winn Database for Signs and Symbols of Spiritual MikhailVideiko t7 Systems: A Typology of Distinctive Features I Culture I79 (s400-2750 BC) trl 213 CoxTRrBuToRs To THrs VoruME + Bogdan Brukner (Serbia), Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts, Novi Sad Branch. Stefan Chohadzhiev (Bulgaria), Department of Archaeology, Veliko Tarnwo University, Veliko Tarnovo. Iuliu Paul (Romania), pre_ and proto_Historical Research Centre,,,1 Decembrie l91gi, Uniu.rrity, Alba Iulia. Adrian poruciuc (Romania), Center for Indoeuropean and Balkan Studies, Literature, ,Al. Tanya Y. Dzhanfezova (Bulgaria), Department of Archaeology, Vetiko Tarnovo University, Veliko Tarnovo. Harald Haarmann (Finland), Institute of Archaeomythology, European Branch. C^ornelia-M agda Lazarovici (Romania), Institute of Archaeology, Iagi. Gheorghe Lazar ovici (Romania), prehistory Department,,,Eftime Murgu,, University, Regifa. Marco Merlini (Italy), prehistory Knowledge Project; Virtual Museum of European Roors; F-M.U. S.E.U.M project, Rome. I. nuJty of Cuza,, University, Iagi. Adamantios Sampson (Greece), Department of Mediterranean Studies, Universiiy ri" Aegean, Rhodes. "f Starovid (Serbia), Earty Neolithic ' Collection, National Museum, fi"fg.uA;. 1ig*: Tkachuk (Ukraine), Deparrment of Tu"-ur Archaeology, National preserve of Monuments, Ancient Galich', Ivano _Frankivsk. Vytautas Tirmdnas (Lithuania), Lithuanian Institute of History, Department of Ethnology, Vlfniur. Mikhail Videiko (Ukraine), Institute of Archaeology, National Academy of Sciences, Kiev. Joan Marler, (USA), Institute of Archaeomythology, S ebastopol. Nikolov (Bulgaria), National Institute of JasSit Arcnaeology with Museum, Sofia. r - . Gareth Owens (Greece), ERASMUS Instirute, European Union Lifelong Learning f.gru_.., Technological Educational Institut!, CrJt., tvt. M. Winn (USA), Department of fna.n Anthropology, University of S outhern fvfirrirrlppi (emeritus). :,: ;:€. - !-,: z'2" ,t $, J) i f. -L+ & JF .a:1.!1 '€l"itt a .'"':.:7 Was There a Script in Final Neolithic G reece? GARETH OWENS This study concerns the question of whether there was a "script" in use in Greece in the Final Neolithic Period, c. 45oo-j200 BC, and ihether this may have influenced the scripts of the Bronze Age Aegean. Did the IndoEuropean speakers of Bronze Age Crete inherit, adopt and adapt a script from their linguistically related neighbors in tnL xeoftthic Balicanr, *uri as the Mycenaean Greeks would subsequ.eptly inherit, adopt and adapt a script from their linguistically related neighbors on Minoan Crete? -r INTRODUCTION I his study concerns the question of whether there was a "script" in use in Greece during the Final Neolithic period, c. 4500-3200 BC, and whether this may have influenced the scripts of the Bronze Age Aegean' For many years the earliest writing was assumed to have originated in Uruk, in Sumeria, Mesopotamia c' 3100 BC. Evidence from Egypt has now dated writing to c. 3400-3200 BC, while evidence from the Indus Valley suggests a date of 3500 BC forthe developmentof writing there.l According to E. Grumach and J. Sakellarakis (1966), the earliest evidence for writing in Europe comes from Minoan Crete on "Cretan Hieroglyphic" sealstones from Archanes Fourni, c. 2000 BC'2 In the 1980s, a system of writing was noticed in the Balkans of the Final Neolithic period. This was identified as "pre-writing" by Shan Winn (1981) and 1 For the latest developments in Early and Proto-Writing' see the Internet, the Modern Library of Alexandria, and especially the work of Dr. Dreyer of the German Archaeological Institute in Egypt and the work of Dr. Meadow of Harvard University in the Indus Valley, both predating the creation of writing in Sumeria. Curioser and curioser. It is perhaps with an open mind that one should consider the Danube/Old European Script of the European Neolithic. 2 It is of interest to note that the Minoan Linear A and "Cretan Hieroglyphic" Script, along with the masons' marks and potters' marks all constitute the Minoan system/code of Figure 1z The Renfrew 1973: Tdrtdria Tablets, Transylvania (after 177, fi7. 38). communication throughout the Bronze Age Aegean and beyond. It may help to see the Danube/Old European Script in a similar framework-'scripts' and 'marks' constituting a system/code of communication in the European Neolithic' See also Merlini (2008: 53-60)' His database for the Danube Script, DatDas, will undoubtedly start to bring light where there was chaos, much as the "GORILA" f,ve volume collection (Godart and Olivier 1976-1985) did for Minoan Linear A. The Danube/Old European Script of Neolithic Southeast Europe has become "studiable." Gareth Owens: Was There a Script in Final Neolithic Greece? 193 '7uIJAgE\t Emilia Masson (1984) who considered whether this a F 1 t t*fJ A 3 v ? \ * I rrl + *-- L -.i g ti\- A + * t ll + w (D northern Greece, as well as with Troy and Poliochni rt +rf :t H H Thessaloniki's excavations at Dispilio on the shore of Kastoria Lake in Macedonia. northern Greece. was first published.8 This was dated by the Dimokritos Laboratory in Athens to c. 5260 BC according to C-14 readings. The "inscription" from Dispilio (Figure 2) was subsequently republished a number of times (see, e.9., Hourmouziades 1996, 2002), along with what seems These tablets are extensively discussed by Hood (1967 : 99111) and Renfrew (1973a: 73-4, 106, 793-4,204, fig. 38). See also Renfrew (1973a, Pl. 8) for "proto-writing" from Bulgaria (Gradesnica and Karanovo) c. 4000 BC. It may be of note that two of the three Tdrtlria Tablets have suspension holes as do many "Cretan Hieroglyphic" clay documents. 5 Winn (2008:126-142), who now accepts the Danube Script as writing. 7 See also 194 in INSCRIPTIONS FROM THE FINAL NEOLITIIIC IN GREECE ln 1994, the "inscription" from the University of r (b) Hourmouziades (1996) draws dubious "parallels' with the Dispilio 'inscription' (A) by designating (B) as Minoan Linear A and (f ) as Old European Inscriptions. 4 of Sitagroi and Nea Nikomedeia g lr Figure 2a-b: (a) Drawing of the Dispilio 'inscrip-tion' from Kastoria c. 5260 BC (from TA NEA Newspaper 1994: 3); 3 communities on Lemnos.6 There are more than one thousand widespread signs from more than one hundred sites in the Balkans during the Transitional Copper Age.7 As copper working spread south from the Balkans to Greece, why not the idea qf a "script," too? The writing in question, however; is perhaps symbolic and religious, not a true "script," as such. v i+ Q Romania (Turdag, l. v + \ in BH\ $ 4 Balkans comes from places Tilrtdria, Gulmenila) and Bulgaria (Grade5nica, Karanovo), along with Vinda in Yugoslavia, which have connections with the Neolithic farming v v ,^ constituted a Vinda "script." They each concluded that the Vinda signs represented a "precursor" to writing. In 1961, at Tdrtdria in Romania, three baked clay tablets were found which were initially considered by some to have similarities with inscribed artefacts from Mesopotamia, but are now generally seen as local documents.3 The Tdrtdria Tablets (Figure 1) are now dated to the Vinda culture, c. 5300 B.C., i.e., within the European Neolithic period (see Lazarovici and Merlini 2008: 39 -52).4 It therefore appears that the Tdrtdria Tablets and associated signs of proto-writing from the Balkans, dated to the Neolithic period, are up to two thousand years before the appearance of writing in Mesopotamia, Egypt and the Indus Valley.s Proto-writing in the See Dimakopoulou (1996: l9I-7) for the Final Neolithic/ Chalcolithic/Transition Period and Kourtessi-Philippakis (1996: 178-182) for developments to the North. 6 See Renfrew et al. (1986) for a discussion of this important site in Macedonia. See also Srejovii (1988) for Vinda and related sites. See Starovie Q004) who states that the number of sites with script finds has now risen to more than one hundred. Signs of Civilization: Neolithic Symbol System of Southeast Europe to be another 'inscribed' object (Figure 3). Thus, the question was raised as to whether there may have been a script in Final Neolithic Greece, as there appears to have been in the neighboring contemporary Balkans and as there later was in Bronze Age Greece and Crete. In 1997, the Hellenic police confiscated a "Neolithic Treasure" which was put on display at the Athens Archaeological Museum. This "Neolithic Treasure" consisted of 53 gold objects (it is not known if they were found together) which could be dated to the Final Neolithic/Chalcolithic/Transitional Period c. 4500-3200 BC. One of these, #72,has marks which some would consider possibly to be signs of a script.e The most likely provenance of these objects is considered to be Macedonia or Thessaly in northern Greece. The same Neolithic gallery of the Athens Archaeological Museum, re-opened in the summer of 2004, contains clay stamps from Sesklo. Their existence presupposes a developed network of social and communal institutions. The owner of a stamp may have held a position in society,and might have used the the stamp to safeguard a private or communal product' The designs of the stamp are geometric, chiefly zigzag lines. Particularly interesting is a stamp on the top of a large spool, of which the cylindrical body is also full of incisions, perhaps early signs or symbols.l0 BALKAN "SCRIPTS'' AND MINOAI\ LINEAR A In 1992, J. T. Hooker, in discussing the Early Balkan "scripts" and the ancestry of Linear A, disagreed with the theory put forward by Harald Haarmann (1989), who had looked in detail at "Old European3'inscriptions, and who advocated cultural memory and diffusion as the explanation as to why about half of the signs of Minoan Linear A seem (according to him) to be similar to signs 8 For the Dispilio-Kastoria "inscription," see TA NEA Newspaper (1994):3. See also Hourmouziades (1996:5) for the "inscription" and rather dubious "parallels" with what are claimed to be Minoan Linear A and Old European Inscriptions; as well as Mikelakis (2000:16-19) and Hourmouziades (2002: 259-61) with references to other "inscriptions" and inscribed ostraka. 9 See Dimakopoulou (1998), especially nos. 12, 16 and 53, for the possible "inscriPtion." Figure 3z Another "inscribed" obiect from Dispilio (after Hourmouziades 2002). of the Old European/Danube script. Haarmann (1995, 1998) continued his discussion about the nature ofthe Old Euroiean civilization and its script, and believed that in Minoan Crete, writing was "revived" in the late third millennium BC (see Haarmaan 2008: 6l:76).11 He claimed that the Old European heritage was best preserved in the system of Linear A, with half of its sign inventory reflecting an Old European origin' In 1999, the present author, while discussing the earlier scholarship on Balkan Neolithic Scripts, did not accept the direct to Minoan Script, while that the idea of writing possibility the keeping open might have travelled from the Balkans to Greece and Crete during the Final Neolithic period along with other descent theory from Balkan technology such as metalworking (see Owens 1999b). BALKANS, GREECE AND CRETE WITHIN THE FRAMEWORI( OF INDO.EUROPEAN It may be of interest to chart scholarship over the last quarter of a centuy on the subject of a Neolithic "script" 10 The Sesklo seals (6012,6013,6016 and 12521) arc Middle Neolithic while the possible inscribed stamped spool (16600) is from Thessaly of the Late or Final Neolithic period' One sign does seem to resemble the trident sign from Linear A' l1 Although the present author disagrees with Haarmaan on many points concerning the Aegean scripts, in a spirit of constructive criticism and international collaboration' his conceptual framework however is to be welcomed in trying to bring order to the overall Picture in Neolithic and Bronze Age Southeast EuroPe. Gareth Owens: Was There a Script in Final Neolithic Greece? 195 and civilization in the Balkans.r2 In 1973 there were different views as to whether the users of a script in the Final Neolithic would have been Indo-European speakers. Marija Gimbutas and James Mallory both saw the Balkan Neolithic civilization as pre- and non-Indo-European. Gimbutas dated the expansion of the Indo-European Kurgan people in three waves spanning from the 4s to the 3rd millennium BC, later revising this to also include the 5th millennia B.C. Mallory placed it at the earlier end of this timescale while Renfrew, on the other hand, was beginning to question the whole dating of prehistory. In 1987, Renfrew published the results of hii own reconstruction by concluding, in Archaeology and Language (1987: 288), "It seems likely that the first Indo-European languages came to Europe from Anatolia around 6000 B.C., together with the first domesticated plants and animals, and that they were in fact spoken by the first farmers of Europe." Mallory (1989) has offered a revised version of the traditional position advocated by Gimbutas, and he would date the Indo-European expansion in the late fifth millennium BC.13 The last decade and a half has also seen a number of works which have contributed. to varying degrees, to an increased understanding of Neolithic civilization. ln 1996, the best introductory and comprehensive work on Neolithic Greece was published by the Museum of Cycladic Art in Athens.la This work, 12See Gimbutas (I973:l-20), Mallory Q973:21-65), and Renfrew (L973a) for the state of play some thirty years ago. In addition, see Renfrew (1973b: 263-76). The ideas in Renfrew's 1973 paper were further developed in Archaeology and Language some 15 years later. See also Gimbutas 7977 for her revised position. 13 See Renfrew (1987), for the more controversial position, and Mallory (1989) for the revised traditiondl poritiorpon the Indo-European problern held a decade ago. Mallory asked (1989:180) "ifthe Indo-Europeans were in Cret6'Sinbe 6000 B.C., why can't we read LinearA?" See Owens (1996a:163206, Pls. XVI-XXD for the present author's opinion that it is possible to both "read" and more importantly to "understand" Linear A. title of the exhibition and book was translated from Greek as "Neolithic Culture," whereas POLITISMOS 14 The could have been better translated as "civilization." The exhibition was in Athens, February 1996 to May 1997, and the catalogue was published in 1996. This work offers a framework in which Greece can be placed and understood by pre-historians. historians (see Theocharis 197 3 I l98l). t96 Neolithic Culture in Greece (Papathanassopoulos 1996) covered subjects such as habitation, agriculture, tools, pottery, stone vessels, weavingbasketry, metallurgy, figurines and models, jewellery, exchanges and relations, burial customs and perhaps most importantly, in regard to writing, seals-as well as an extensive catalogue of 333 objects. This work offered a panorama of Neolithic civilization in Greece, based upon more than one thousand sites, by a new generation of scholars, and was the first attempt at such an overview in almost a quarter of a century since the works of D. R. Theocharis. Reference should also be made to the important work of D. Schmandt-Besserat (1978) who systematically studied thousands of clay tokens from the Neolithic period and claimed to have identified an administrative system that could be described as prewriting.l5 The largest collection of fourth millennium tokens is from Uruk which has also produced the first evidence of writing in Mesopotamia c. 3100 BC., thus supporting the link from tokens to writing and indeed justifying the term "pre-writing." For the "inscriptions" from Final Neolithic Greece, along with the Tdrtdria Tablets and Vinda Signs from the "proto-writing" is perhaps more appropriate as they may well be the first stages of a script as opposed to the administratively related but distinct token svstem.16 ' Balkans_, however, the term 15 See the work of Schmandt-Besserat over a decade and a half from "The Earliest Precursors of Writing" (1978: 5059), culminating in How Writing Carne About (1992), with her important conclusions based upon a large data base of tokens. In addition, see Robinson (1995), for a well illustrated account of writing over the last 5000 years, and (1995:52-67) on Proto-Writing; and F. Coulmas (1989) for a discussion of the relation between writing and language and (1989: 1-54) for "Theoretical Perspectives on Pre- and Proto-Writing." See R. Rudgley (1998), in which he uses archaeology and anthropology to argue that the Stone Age civilization was much more advanced than is commonly credited. This work is interesting but takes the argument further than the evidence allows. 16 Whether these scripts will ever be deciphered is quite another matter. See Pope (1999); Robinson (1995; 68155) for sections on Cuneiform, Egyptian Hieroglyphs, Linear B, Mayan Glyphs and Undeciphered Scripts; and Coulmas (1989:. 205-24) for discussions on achieving a decipherment. Signs of Civilization: Neolithic Symbol System of Southeast Europe ' In the latter half of the 1990's at the end of the twentieth century AD, the question of whether the Neolithic ancestors of the Minoans were likely to Was there a "script" in Final Neolithic Greece and, if so, did this t'script" influence Minoan Crete? Did the Indo-European speakers of Bronze Age Crete inherit, have been speaking an Indo-European language has adopt and adapt a script from their linguistically related neighbors in the Neolithic Balkans, much as the Mycenaean Greeks would subsequently adopt and adapt a script from their linguistically related Minoan recently been discussed by Owens (1996a, 1997, 1999 a & b, 2000) and Renfrew (1998).1? The latter in discussing the present author's position, wrote: The suggestion that Minoan should be regarded as an Indo-European language has indeed been put neighbours on Crete? forward by a number of scholars, more recently Owens ACKNOIYLEDGEMENT (1996a: 194). He accepts.the likelihood that the Minoan The aulhor expresses gratitude to Kalliope language of the Late Bronze Age was the descendent (Crete), Gillian Trench (Oxford) and Simon Bennett (London) for many stimulating discussions over the years and for information on world developments in the history of writing. I also thank colleagues in the of the Proto-Minoan spoken by the first, Neolithic inhabitants of Crete, brought by them from western Anatolia. His position is thus to be distinguished from that of scholars such as Palmer (1958, 1965) who relate the Minoan language to the Luwian of the later Bronze Age of western Anatolia, the presence of which in Crete would be the product of more recent population movements (Renfrew 1998: 259). The present author ended his paper on "Evidence forthe MinoanLanguagd' (Owens 1996a)$fsuggesting Proto-Indo-European-Pelasgian-Anatolian language was spoken in the Neolithic Aegean, i.e., Neolithic Anatolia, Crete, Hellas and Thrace.r8 that a CONCLUSION One may perhaps conclude, in a cyclical rather than in a linear manner, by re-stating the question in the title. 17 See C. Renfrew, "Word of Minos: The Minoan Contribution to Mycenaean Greek and the Linguistic Geography of the Aegean Bronze Age," Mycenaean Seminar given in London (5-ll-97). A summary was published in 1998 in the Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 42: 225. See Renfrew (1998:.239-64) for a revised version of this paper. See Owens (1997: LO3-40) and (1999a:15-55) as well as (2000:237-54) for productive comments on and constructive Nikolidaki Archaeology Department of Belgrade University, Serbia, for their hospitality in May 2003, and I thank.the organizers of the "Signs of Civilization Symposium' May 2004 in Novi Sad which, unfortunately, I was unable to attend due to my having to do military service in the Hellenic Army as a Hoplite upon being awarded Hellenic Citizenship. I also most warmly thank Joan Marler and Miriam Robbins Dexter of the Institute of Archaeomythology for their kind understanding, exceptional patience and international spirit of collaboration, between the New and Old Worlds, of which Marija Gimbutas would have been most oroud. criticism of Yves Duhoux's paper on the Minoan language(s) (1998, 1-40). Of course there are still many unresolved issues in [ndoEuropean studies and many of them are discussed in two texts edited by J. P. Mallory and D.Q. Adams: Encyclopedia of IndoEuropean Culture (7997) andthe Oxford Introduction to Protorlndo-European and the Proto-Indo-European WorM (2006). 18 Gareth Owens: Was There a Script in Final Neolithic Greece? r97 StcNs oF CrvrLrzArIoN Neolithic Symbol System of Southeast EuroPe + On May 25-29,2004, researchers in various disciplines from Eastern and Western Europe and North America met in Novi Sad-in the heanland of the Neolithic Vinda culture-to take part in the international symposium, "Signs =, of Civilization," sponsored by the Institute of Archaeomythology and the Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts, Novi Sad Branch. The symposium was motivated bY two questions: What is the general state of interest and accumulated among archaeologists knowledge ' *e and other investigators concerning the signs and symbols of Neolithic : Europe? And what is the prevailing attitude among specialists concerning the conffoversial idea that an early form of writing developed in Southeast Europe during the 66 and 5ft millennia BC? This volume contains the collected papers from the Novi Sad symposium which represent a wide spectrum of approaches to the study of Neolithic systems of visual communication. The symposium was a testament to the necessity of international collaboration which encourages respecfful discourse between colleagues who hold a variety of different perspectives. The subject of the signs and symbols of Neolithic Europe-and specifically the emergence of early writing-is a potent subject for future elaborations which will continue to benefit from international, interdisciplinary cooperation between researchers in a broad range offields' Serbian Academl of Sciences and Arts, Novi Sad Branch Institute of ArchaeomYthologY rsBN 0-9815249-1-5