* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Limiting Infarct Size in ST-Segment Myocardial Infarction
Electrocardiography wikipedia , lookup
Heart failure wikipedia , lookup
Cardiac contractility modulation wikipedia , lookup
Antihypertensive drug wikipedia , lookup
Jatene procedure wikipedia , lookup
Drug-eluting stent wikipedia , lookup
Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia wikipedia , lookup
History of invasive and interventional cardiology wikipedia , lookup
Ventricular fibrillation wikipedia , lookup
Quantium Medical Cardiac Output wikipedia , lookup
Remote ischemic conditioning wikipedia , lookup
JACC: HEART FAILURE VOL. 3, NO. 11, 2015 ª 2015 BY THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY FOUNDATION ISSN 2213-1779/$36.00 PUBLISHED BY ELSEVIER INC. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jchf.2015.08.003 EDITORIAL COMMENT Limiting Infarct Size in ST-Segment Myocardial Infarction The Holy Grail of Reperfusion Therapy* Eric R. Bates, MD A cute thrombotic occlusion of a coronary ar- device to reduce left ventricular wall stress before tery usually produces myocardial ischemia establishing myocardial reperfusion. Ten Yorkshire that can result in myocardial infarction if swine underwent 90-min balloon occlusion of the reperfusion is not restored. Reperfusion injury from mid left anterior descending artery: 5 were random- reintroduction of blood and oxygen into the ischemic ized to primary reperfusion for 120 min without me- area at risk can result in additional myocyte cell death chanical support before humane killing and 5 were (1,2). Whereas early reperfusion therapy has been treated with a left ventricular axial flow catheter shown to reduce infarct size by decreasing ischemic (Impella CP, Abiomed Inc., Danvers, Massachusetts) injury time and results in lower morbidity and mor- during an additional 60 min of ischemia time and tality rates (3), little progress has been made in during a similar 120-min reperfusion time before decreasing the additional impact of reperfusion humane killing. This swine model of ischemia– injury on infarct size despite 3 decades of effort reperfusion (1,2,4). Although many interventions targeting reper- experimental methodology to evaluate reperfusion fusion injury have seemed promising in experimental injury was uniquely sophisticated. Changes in left studies, they have failed to reduce infarct size consis- ventricular pressure–volume curves were assessed tently or improve clinical outcome in clinical trials using a conductance catheter system and left ven- and have not been endorsed by clinical practice tricular wall stress was evaluated by 3-dimensional guideline committees as effective therapeutic strate- echocardiography. Tissue protein levels were quan- gies (5). Nevertheless, reperfusion injury is a popular titated from sham-operated controls and infarct pre-clinical research area and the enthusiasts remain zones to measure cardioprotective signaling and optimistic that a therapeutic breakthrough will even- apoptosis tually be achieved. infarct size as a percent of left ventricular area were injury is regulation. well-established, Apoptosis and but the myocardial also measured. SEE PAGE 873 As expected, the axial flow catheter reduced left In this issue of JACC: Heart Failure, Kapur et al. (6) ventricular wall stress and myocardial oxygen de- evaluated the therapeutic benefit of mechanical pre- mand. The authors demonstrated activation of a conditioning on ischemic myocardium at risk for “myocardial protection program” in the myocardial infarction in a swine model of acute coronary occlu- infarct zone with upregulation of a cardioprotective sion signaling system that decreased apoptosis and resul- using a percutaneous circulatory support ted in a 43% reduction in myocardial infarct size. They concluded that mechanical preconditioning of *Editorials published in JACC: Heart Failure reflect the views of the the myocardium, despite an additional 1 hr of total authors and do not necessarily represent the views of JACC: Heart Failure ischemic time, may reduce infarct size and the sub- or the American College of Cardiology. From the Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan. Dr. Bates has reported that he has no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose. sequent development of heart failure after STsegment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). The authors are to be congratulated for conducting an elegant pre-clinical physiology study and further 884 Bates JACC: HEART FAILURE VOL. 3, NO. 11, 2015 NOVEMBER 2015:883–5 Limiting Infarct Size elucidating an interesting molecular and cellular 1 h of symptom onset and that the mortality rate is regulatory system. However, the clinical translation only 1 percent if reperfusion is successful within this of infarct size reduction with mechanical pre- golden hour (9,10). conditioning seen in this study is less obvious, espe- Second, there are no compelling clinical data sup- cially when one considers that the total ischemic time porting the premise that left ventricular support de- was relatively short by clinical standards and the vices improve prognosis in STEMI. In the fibrinolytic reduction in infarct size was quite large despite a era of reperfusion, intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) longer ischemic time. Animal models are limited by counterpulsation improved reperfusion rates and the fact that abrupt balloon occlusion of a normal decreased reocclusion rates during fibrinolysis, pre- artery is different than thrombotic occlusion of an sumably by augmenting diastolic coronary blood inflamed atherosclerotic human artery with distal flow. However, primary PCI with stenting and dual embolization. Also, human infarct size is additionally antiplatelet therapy produces high reperfusion rates modulated by intermittent or persistent infarct artery and low reocclusion rates, with no additional benefit occlusion, collateral circulation, oxygen demand, and gained with IABP counterpulsation in decreasing microvascular reperfusion; and patients are hetero- infarct size or mortality, even with cardiogenic shock geneous, live in uncontrolled environments, have (11,12). Nor is there any clinical evidence that higher comorbidities, and are treated with medications that systemic cardiac output, higher mean arterial pres- may affect ischemic injury (4). In short, there are sure, or lower pulmonary capillary wedge pressure many conflicting clinical factors that might impact obtained with the use of a percutaneous left ventric- cardioprotective signaling pathways and make it very ular support device improves clinical outcomes difficult for a promising reperfusion injury therapy to compared with IABP counterpulsation (13). Support show devices do increase bleeding complications, inflam- clinical benefit outside of a rigorously controlled laboratory experiment, especially given mation, and cost. the success already achieved in decreasing the com- So, although I applaud the investigators for con- plications of myocardial ischemia with reperfusion ducting an excellent pre-clinical study that demon- therapy. strates that left ventricular unloading activates The theory behind the hypothesis of this study cardioprotective signaling pathways in the infarct that further reductions in ischemic time will not zone that decrease infarct size in a large animal improve clinical outcomes and that mechanical cir- model, culation can reduce infarct size are based on 2 major conditioning with a percutaneous left ventricular clinical assumptions that need to be challenged. assist device will not translate into a successful First, Kapur et al. (6) claim that recent data have clinical strategy that reduces myocardial infarct confirmed that “more rapid primary reperfusion does size. Delaying reperfusion therapy for 1 h and not improve clinical outcomes” in STEMI (6). The routinely inserting an expensive percutaneous sup- citation used to support the statement refers to a port device before primary PCI is not a clinically population-level analysis where recent decreases in plausible strategy. Therefore, until the big break- annual door-to-balloon time at the population level through in reducing infarct size by decreasing were not associated with a parallel decrease in mor- reperfusion injury is attained, time to treatment tality (7). However, using the same dataset, will I would remain the predict most that mechanical modifiable variable pre- in Nallamothu et al. demonstrated that shorter patient- decreasing infarct size in STEMI. Current efforts to specific associated decrease total ischemia time by earlier activation of consistently at the individual level with lesser in- emergency medical services, direct transport to a hospital and 6-month mortality rates (8). The hospital with PCI capability, prehospital activation of discordance in the 2 analyses is explained by an the increasing mortality risk in the growing and changing rapid performance of primary PCI remains the best primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) strategy to decrease myocardial infarct size in population that has resulted in the recent absence of STEMI (14). door-to-balloon times were cardiac catheterization laboratory, and association between annual door-to-balloon time and changes in mortality at the population level, despite REPRINT REQUESTS AND CORRESPONDENCE: Dr. the consistent association between door-to-balloon Eric R. Bates, CVC Cardiovascular Medicine, University time and mortality at the patient level. In fact, it of Michigan Medical Center, 1500 E. Medical Center has been demonstrated that STEMI can be aborted Drive, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-5869. E-mail: ebates in 15% of patients if reperfusion is restored within @umich.edu. Bates JACC: HEART FAILURE VOL. 3, NO. 11, 2015 NOVEMBER 2015:883–5 Limiting Infarct Size REFERENCES 1. Kloner RA. Current state of clinical translation of cardioprotective agents for acute myocardial infarction. Circ Res 2013;113:451–63. 2. Ibáñez B, Heusch G, Ovize M, Van de Werf F. Evolving therapies for myocardial ischemia/ reperfusion injury. J Am Coll Cardiol 2015;65: 1454–71. 3. Van de Werf F. The history of coronary reperfusion. Eur Heart J 2014;35:2510–5. 4. Vander Heide RS, Steenbergen C. Cardioprotection and myocardial reperfusion: pitfalls to clinical application. Circ Res 2013;113: 464–77. 5. O’Gara PT, Kushner FG, Ascheim DD, et al. 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013;61:485–510. 6. Kapur NK, Qiao X, Paruchuri V, et al. Mechanical pre-conditioning with acute circulatory support before reperfusion limits infarct size in acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol HF 2015;3: 873–82. 7. Menees DS, Peterson ED, Wang Y, et al. Doorto-balloon time and mortality among patients undergoing primary PCI. N Engl J Med 2013;369: 901–9. 8. Nallamothu BK, Normand SL, Wang Y, et al. Relation between door-to-balloon times and mortality after primary percutaneous coronary intervention over time: a retrospective study. Lancet 2015;385:1114–22. 10. Weaver WD, Cerqueira M, Hallstrom AP, et al. Prehospital-initiated vs hospital-initiated thrombolytic therapy. JAMA 1993;270:1211–6. 11. Patel MR, Smalling RW, Thiele H, et al. Intraaortic balloon counterpulsation and infarct size in patients with acute anterior myocardial infarction without shock: the CRISP AMI randomized trial. JAMA 2011;306:1329–37. 12. Thiele H, Zeymer U, Neumann FJ, et al. Intraaortic balloon support for myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock. N Engl J Med 2012;367:1287–96. 13. Werdan K, Gielen S, Ebelt H, Hochman JS. Mechanical circulatory support in cardiogenic shock. Eur Heart J 2014;35:156–67. 9. Taher T, Fu Y, Wagner GS, et al. Aborted myocardial infarction in patients with ST-segment elevation: insights from the Assessment of the Safety and Efficacy of a New Thrombolytic 14. Bates ER, Jacobs AK. Time to treatment in patients with STEMI. N Engl J Med 2013:389–92. Regimen-3 Trial Electrocardiographic substudy. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;44:38–43. KEY WORDS myocardial infarct size, myocardial infarction, reperfusion injury 885