Download The Impact of Non-uniform Electrodes on Performance and

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Voltage optimisation wikipedia , lookup

Rectifier wikipedia , lookup

Mains electricity wikipedia , lookup

Cavity magnetron wikipedia , lookup

Stray voltage wikipedia , lookup

Buck converter wikipedia , lookup

Alternating current wikipedia , lookup

Tetrode wikipedia , lookup

Mercury-arc valve wikipedia , lookup

Dynamic range compression wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
The Impact of Non-uniform Electrodes
on Performance and Gas Cross-over
Ed Wright, Emily Price, Jonathan Sharman
Johnson Matthey Technology Centre
Challenges for CCMs in PEMWE
Main target for PEMWE is cost reduction
• CCM one of the main focusses of cost reduction
• Thrifting PGM content in catalyst layers
•
Novel catalysts both supported and unsupported being developed
• Reducing membrane resistance
•
Thinner membranes
• Reducing hydrogen crossover
•
Modifying chemistry / adding recombination catalyst
• Need to do above while maintaining performance and durability
• Porous titanium current collectors also add a significant cost
• Tighter tolerances significantly increase costs
• CCM needs to interact well with the current collector to allow reduction
in hardware costs
Cell sealing of typical single cell
A mismatch between
seal height and MEA
step height may lead to
compression issues
Membrane expansion on
heating and hydrating may
affect sealing
Ti Plate
Ti Sinter
Seal
Steel Plate
Connection point to power supply
• Cell compressed by 9 bolts on edge, using fixed torque
• Assembly carried out at room temperature and with dry MEA
• Heating cell and hydrating MEA will lead to expansion of different
components and so may affect compression
Sinter thickness
1.4
Sinter Thickness / mm
1.3
1.2
1.1
1
0.9
0.8
GKN
Mott 1-9
Mott 10-17
Mott 18-25
All sinters nominally 1 mm thick
GKN sinters have 40 µm variation within a sheet and 90 µm across the batch
Mott sinters have <10 µm variation within a sheet and ~10 µm across the batch
Weight / Density shows similar trends
4
Surface profiles of typical sinters
GKN
GKN
-100
-200
-200
-250
-300
-300
-400
-500
-350
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
20
20.5
21
21.5
Mott
300
200
200
0
100
0
•
•
5
10
15
20
25
22.5
23
23.5
24
24.5
23
23.5
24
24.5
Mott
400
-200
22
30
35
40
45
50
0
20
20.5
21
21.5
22
22.5
Preparation method can have a significant effect on sinter
• Cutting method can affect long range shape (bowing)
Both sinters have similar roughness values
• Ra values of 10.9 and 10.2 for GKN and Mott respectively
• Gravity sintered (Mott) gives similar roughness above and below surface
• Pressure sintered (GKN) has flat top surface with deep pores
5
Complete anode plate assembly
200
GKN2c
Mott2a
Mott2b
Mott2c
Mott2d
Approximate CCM thickness
100
0
height / m
-100
Seal
Seal
-200
-300
-400
-500
Ti Plate
-600
•
•
•
0
100
Flow field / sinter
200
300
400
500
distance / mm
Ti Plate
600
700
800
900
Step height can vary up to 400 µm from plate depending on sinter and orientation
Hard for < 200 µm CCM to accommodate such variation
What are the effects of the non-uniform compression?
Experimental setup
• Baltic fuel cell QCF25 cell hardware used
• 5 x 5 cm active area
• Ti flowfield on anode and C flowfield on cathode
•
•
Ti sinter as anode current collector
SGL 10BB carbon paper as cathode current collector (420 µm thick)
• Compression measurement device fitted
•
•
Piston to control clamping force on active area
Linear transducer for displacement monitoring
• Current mapping included
•
•
S++ system fitted behind cathode flowfield
100 segments measured
• In house test station operating at 60 °C, ambient pressure, 500 ml min-1
water flow rate
• Hydrogen crossover measured with TCD
• Tests carried out with in-house MEAs
Effect of increased compression
•
MEA: IrO2 (2mg cm-2) | N117 | Pt black (1 mg cm-2)
•
Operation at 500 mA cm-2 (12.5 A total)
•
Compression increased from 0.5 – 5.5 bar (0.16 – 1.72 N mm-2) in 0.5 bar steps
•
Cell voltage drops by ~ 100 mV at 0.5 A cm-2 operating point as compression increased
•
Displacement of 60 µm occurs as clamping force increased – likely to be carbon paper compressing
8
Effect of increased compression - crossover
• Crossover decreases as compression increased
• All other cell parameters kept constant
• Crossover not expected to be affected by compression / operating
voltage
9
Current mapping during compression
•
•
•
Compression stepped from 0.5 bar to 5.5 bar in 10 steps of 120s
Histograms show number of segments (%) operating within a current range
• Far left bar indicates number of inactive segments
At low compression 70% is inactive, at 2.75 bar 30% is inactive and at 5.5 bar
~ 10% is inactive
5.5bar
0.5 bar
2.75 bar
5.5bar
10
Segmented polarisation curve 2 bar
compression
50 A
15.6 A
• Uncoated Mott sinter used with 10BB cathode GDL
•
Test carried out after compression test so GDL may be compression set
• Significant performance difference between segments
• Some segments are saturated so not reporting true current density
• ~30% of area inactive
Segmented polarisation curve 5.5 bar
50 A
15.6 A
• Significant improvement in uniformity
• Still significant region inactive (15 – 20%)
• Fresh GDL may improve uniformity further
12
Overall Polarisation
3
Low Compression Voltage / V
High Compression Voltage / V
Low Compression Crossover / %
High Compression Crossover / %
2.5
2
1.5
1
0.5
0
0.5
1
Current Density / A cm
•
1.5
2
-2
Crossover can be seen to increase as current density increases
• Typically expect fixed diffusion through membrane and so lower
crossover at higher currents (increased O2 production)
• Effect more dramatic for lower compression / less uniform layer
Polarization curves and CVs
• Layers with lower catalyst loadings or novel OER catalysts can show
increased sensitivity to compression / contact resistance
• Effects cannot always be removed by increasing cell compression
• Over compression can crush carbon papers or crack plates
Data provided by SINTEF
14
Effect of sinter on catalyst layer
•
•
•
•
Larger gaps in sinter may lead to
inactive regions
Effect will be exaggerated for thin layers
Effect will be exaggerated for low
conductivity layers
Low activity regions may experience
high voltages increasing oxidation of
sinter and so rapidly deactivating
completely
Effect on low loading layers
3
• Conventional IrO2 layer
printed at ~ 2 mgIr cm-2
• Novel IrO2 layers printed
at ~ 1 mgIr cm-2
• Thin reinforced
membrane with
recombination catalyst
used for all samples
IrO2|Pt blk Voltage / V
novel IrO2|Pt blk Voltage / V
novel IrO2|Pt on C Voltage / V
2.5
IrO2|Pt blk Crossover / %
novel IrO2|Pt blk Crossover / %
novel IrO2|Pt on C Crossover / %
2
1.5
1
0.5
0
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
Current Density / A cm
1.4
1.6
1.8
2
-2
• Lower loading catalyst layers more sensitive to cathode catalyst layer
• Pt on C cathode will be thicker and more compressible than Pt black
Current Mapping
IrO2 black 2 mgIr cm-2 anode, Pt black
cathode, recom cat membrane, 5.5bar,
60oC
Novel IrO2 ~ 1 mgIr cm-2 anode, Pt black
cathode, recom cat membrane, 5.5bar,
60oC
Novel IrO2 1 mgIr cm-2 anode, Pt/C
cathode, recom cat membrane, 5.5bar,
60oC
• Current maps taken from highest current density
• Conventional 2 mgIr cm-2 layer shows most uniform activity
• Novel 1 mgIr cm-2 anode with Pt black cathode shows worst uniformity
• Novel 1 mgIr cm-2 anode with Pt on C cathode more uniform but not
as good as thicker commercial IrO2 layer
• Cathode / overall CCM thickness may be important for good contact
Conclusions
• Poor compression leads to non-uniform PEMWE performance
• Gas crossover increases with decreasing uniformity
•
Crossover seen to increase at high current densities for non-uniform layers
• Sinters vary considerably in thickness, curvature and contact with CCM
•
•
Thickness variations of similar magnitude to total CCM thickness
Poor compression / contact leads to non-uniform performance
• Novel OER catalysts or reduced loadings will exaggerate the effects
• Cathode type / thickness can help improve uniformity / crossover
• Thinner membranes will reduce the ability of the CCM to compensate for
hardware variations
• Machining components to give < 100 µm variation for plate / current
collector combination not practical
• CCM / Hardware interactions need to be well understood to help reduce
costs
Acknowledgements
• NOVEL Project partners particularly
• Magnus Thomassen, Tommy Mokkelbost and Alejandro Oyarce
Barnett at SINTEF
• Tom Smolinka and Thomas Lickert Fraunhofer ISE
The research leading to these results has received funding from the
European Union's Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) for the
Fuel Cells and Hydrogen Joint Technology Initiative under grant agreement
n° [303484] (Novel)