* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Lecture 1 - Studentportalen
Kannada grammar wikipedia , lookup
Ukrainian grammar wikipedia , lookup
Chinese grammar wikipedia , lookup
Udmurt grammar wikipedia , lookup
Sanskrit grammar wikipedia , lookup
Old Irish grammar wikipedia , lookup
Lithuanian grammar wikipedia , lookup
English clause syntax wikipedia , lookup
Latin syntax wikipedia , lookup
Modern Hebrew grammar wikipedia , lookup
Preposition and postposition wikipedia , lookup
Zulu grammar wikipedia , lookup
Portuguese grammar wikipedia , lookup
Relative clause wikipedia , lookup
Malay grammar wikipedia , lookup
Old Norse morphology wikipedia , lookup
Ancient Greek grammar wikipedia , lookup
Ojibwe grammar wikipedia , lookup
Latvian declension wikipedia , lookup
Literary Welsh morphology wikipedia , lookup
Yiddish grammar wikipedia , lookup
Turkish grammar wikipedia , lookup
Spanish grammar wikipedia , lookup
Russian declension wikipedia , lookup
Grammatical number wikipedia , lookup
Arabic grammar wikipedia , lookup
Spanish pronouns wikipedia , lookup
Esperanto grammar wikipedia , lookup
Old English grammar wikipedia , lookup
Sotho parts of speech wikipedia , lookup
Romanian nouns wikipedia , lookup
Modern Greek grammar wikipedia , lookup
Swedish grammar wikipedia , lookup
Scottish Gaelic grammar wikipedia , lookup
Pipil grammar wikipedia , lookup
Polish grammar wikipedia , lookup
Serbo-Croatian grammar wikipedia , lookup
Erik Smitterberg ([email protected]) Dept. of English, Uppsala University A1/HS1 Grammar Spring Term 2011 Lecture 8. Pronouns II 1 Relative Pronouns Relative pronouns (who, whose, whom, that, which, what): o Occur in a relative clause and refer back to an antecedent (except what and -ever forms such as whoever). Relative clauses can be: Nonrestrictive – add information about the antecedent (e.g. The soldiers, who were tired, lay down = all of the soldiers were tired, and all of the soldiers lay down). Nonrestrictive clauses are often surrounded by commas in writing and by pauses in speech. Restrictive – limit the scope of the antecedent (e.g. The soldiers /who/that/ were tired lay down = not all soldiers were tired, and only those who were tired lay down). o Who and whom occur in both restrictive and nonrestrictive clauses, but only with animate antecedents (and sometimes with collective nouns) (e.g. The people/family who had been evicted stayed at a motel). In formal language, who is used as the subject of the relative clause (e.g. The people who saw you at the cinema were friendly); whom is used as the object (e.g. The people whom you saw at the cinema were friendly) and as prepositional complement (e.g. The people to whom you spoke at the cinema were friendly). In informal language, who is also used as the object of the relative clause (e.g. The people who you saw at the cinema were friendly) and as prepositional complement when the pronoun does not follow the preposition (e.g. The people who you spoke to at the cinema were friendly). NOTE. In some versions of UGE, there is an error on p. 309: in the relative clause to whom I was closest, whom is a prepositional complement of the preposition to, but is claimed to be an object in old versions of the book. o Which occurs in both restrictive and nonrestrictive clauses (but is rare in restrictive clauses esp. in AmE), but only with inanimate antecedents (e.g. The party, which was pretty boring, was over by midnight). Can be subject, object, or prepositional complement. Can refer back to a (part of a) clause (e.g. They are often late, which surprises me). In this function, which corresponds to Swedish vilket (e.g. De är ofta försenade, vilket förvånar mig). This type of which takes a singular verb. 1 Erik Smitterberg ([email protected]) Dept. of English, Uppsala University A1/HS1 Grammar Spring Term 2011 o o o NOTE. Since the rules for when interrogative which and relative which can be used are not identical, it is necessary to be able to separate interrogative from relative contexts. That is used with both animate and inanimate antecedents, but occurs only in restrictive relative clauses (see soldiers examples above). Can be subject, object, or prepositional complement, but cannot follow the preposition as prepositional complement (e.g. That is the film that I am talking about, but That is the film about which I am talking). In informal Standard English, the zero relative (Ø) is an alternative to that except as the subject of the relative clause. NOTE. allt vad = all that, not all what. Whose is a genitive relative pronoun that can be used with both animate and inanimate antecedents (e.g. That is the house whose roof has collapsed). Of which is sometimes preferred with inanimate antecedents in formal language (e.g. … the house /of which/ the roof /of which/ has …). What has no antecedent (e.g. What surprised me was his lack of commitment) and corresponds to Swedish vad som or det som; what can often be replaced by the rare construction that which in English. NOTE. Whoever/whichever/whatever can also be used without an antecedent in a generic sense ‘… (som) än’ (e.g. Whatever I do, I just cannot learn how to putt). Table 2. The occurrence of who, whom, which, that, and the zero relative (Ø) in relative clauses (which referring back to all or part of a clause excluded) Function Restrictive relative clause Non-restrictive relative clause Animate Inanimate Animate Inanimate antecedent antecedent antecedent antecedent Subject who, that that, whichb who which b Object whom, who, that, Ø that, which , Ø whom, who which a a a b a Prepositional whom, who , that , that , which , whom, who which a a complement Ø Ø Who, that, and the zero relative occur as prepositional complements only when they do not follow the preposition. b Which is very rare in restrictive relative clauses in AmE except as a prepositional complement immediately after the preposition, where that and the zero relative cannot be used (see above). a 2 Erik Smitterberg ([email protected]) Dept. of English, Uppsala University A1/HS1 Grammar Spring Term 2011 2 Quantifying Pronouns Some, any, no, their compounds, and either/neither: o Some and any: Some is used about things that are assumed to exist; any is used about things that need not be assumed to exist. Some thus often occurs in positive statements (e.g. I have some pencils) while any often occurs in questions and negative statements (e.g. Do you have any pencils?). But this rule is not absolute; for instance, some occurs in questions when a positive answer is expected (e.g. Would you like some tea?). Some and any are not usually used with singular countable nouns (e.g. Do you have any pencils? with the plural noun pencils and She could not give me any advice with the uncountable noun advice, but Is there a good bookshop in this town? with the singular countable noun bookshop). However, two special functions where some or any is used with singular countable nouns are any with the meaning ‘vilken/vilket/vem/vad som helst’ (e.g. Any bookshop will do) and some to express enthusiasm and appreciation (e.g. This is some bookshop!). o No: Not + a/any and no are often interchangeable (e.g. There aren’t any matches in the box vs. There are no matches in the box). In questions and negative statements with comparatives, Swedish inte typically corresponds to no or not + any, not just to not (e.g. Vi kom inte längre vs. We got no further or We did not get any further). o Compounds: Someone, somebody, something, somewhere, somehow; anyone, anybody, anything, anywhere, anyhow; none, no one, nobody, nothing, nowhere. Note the spelling of no one as two words and the special form none. Only none is used before of (e.g. None of the books /is/are/ any good). Either a singular or a plural verb can be used after [none of + plural noun]. Swedish någon av often corresponds to one of (e.g. One of you must have our tickets [not *Someone of …]). Anyone, anybody, someone, somebody, no one, and nobody take singular verbs! o Either and neither: used about two people, things, etc. instead of any and none (e.g. Neither of the twins knows the way [usually singular verb]). Both vs. the two: both = stressed båda; the two = de två or unstressed båda. 3 Erik Smitterberg ([email protected]) Dept. of English, Uppsala University A1/HS1 Grammar Spring Term 2011 Every, each, and every-compounds: o Take singular verbs (e.g. Each of them has been checked; Everybody I know is here). o Swedish independent alla does not normally correspond to [all + plural verb] (e.g. Alla vet att Paris ligger i Frankrike vs. Everyone knows that Paris is in France). Exceptions include One size fits all. o Every, everyone, and everybody are not used before of, but every one ‘var och en’, ‘varenda en’ can be (e.g. I will eat every one of them). Large and small quantities: o In Swedish, the same word can sometimes be used with both uncountable and plural nouns (e.g. Vi har inte fått mycket regn/äpplen i år). This is sometimes impossible in English (e.g. much rain/many apples) – see p. 324 in UGE. o Little, a little, few, and a few: Little and few are negative (e.g. There is little time left ‘Det är inte mycket tid kvar’). A little and a few are positive (e.g. There is a little time left ‘Det är ännu lite tid kvar’). Little and a little are used with uncountable nouns; few and a few are used with plural nouns. o Much is chiefly used in questions and negative statements except in formal language. A /good/great/ deal (of) and the informal options plenty (of), a lot (of), and lots (of) can be used instead in positive statements (e.g. There is not much truth in what she is saying vs. There is a great deal of truth in what she is saying). o Swedish de flesta typically corresponds to English most, with no article before most: Generic reference (e.g. Most Swedes are against the death penalty). Specific reference (e.g. Most of the Swedes in the room were against the death penalty). o Less is used with uncountable nouns and with many units of measurement (e.g. We have less time than we thought; We have less than five minutes). In Standard English, fewer is used with other plural nouns (e.g. There are fewer people here now). o In Standard English, amount is used with uncountable nouns (e.g. a large amount of grass) and number with plural nouns (e.g. a large number of cars). NOTE. a + number of + plural verb (e.g. There were a large number of cars on the road); the + number of + singular verb (e.g. The number of hurricanes is alarmingly high). 4 Erik Smitterberg ([email protected]) Dept. of English, Uppsala University A1/HS1 Grammar Spring Term 2011 3 Some Other Pronouns One replaces a singular countable noun: o After an adjective (e.g. I want a green pen, not a red one). o After some pronouns (e.g. I want this pen, not that one). o After ordinal numerals (e.g. Another car crash? This is the third one this week!). o NOTE. See above for one of; see Lecture 7 for one corresponding to Swedish man. Each other and one another (note spelling!) are reciprocal pronouns (‘varandra’). o Note genitive forms (‘varandras’): each other’s, one another’s. Reference to gender-neutral noun phrases: o He, him, etc. (e.g. Everyone has to carry his own bag) are often considered sexist. o S/he, him or her, etc. (e.g. Everyone has to carry his or her own bag) are often awkward. NOTE: his or her own bag, not *his or hers own bag. o Plural pronouns (e.g. Everyone has to carry their own bag) are gaining ground, but are sometimes seen as informal. o Sometimes a paraphrase is suitable (e.g. All of them have to carry their own bags). 4 Exclamatory Pronouns What and – more rarely – such (e.g. /What/Such/ a lovely day!). o NOTE 1. The indefinite article follows exclamatory what and such before a singular countable noun (e.g. What a lovely day!). o NOTE 2. The indefinite article is not used in exclamations involving uncountable nouns (e.g. Ett sådant fint väder vi har! vs. What lovely weather we’re having!). 5