Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
doi: 10.18282/amor.v2.i3.103 REVIEW ARTICLE The war against cancer: Suicide gene therapy Muzeyyen Izmirli1,2*, Dilara Sonmez2, Bulent Gogebakan1,2 1 Mustafa Kemal University, School of Medicine, Department of Medical Biology, Hatay, Turkey Mustafa Kemal University, School of Medicine, Department of Molecular Biochemistry and Genetics, Hatay, Turkey 2 Abstract: The National Cancer Institute and the American Cancer Society announced that 1.6 million new cancer cases are projected to occur in the USA in 2016. One of the most innovative approaches against cancer is suicide gene therapy, in which suicide-inducing transgenes are introduced into cancer cells. When cancer treatments target the total elimination of tumor cells, there will be no side effects for normal cells. Cancer tissues are targeted through various targeted transport methods, followed by tissue-specific enzymes converting a systemically suitable prodrug into an active drug in the tumor. Suicidal genes are delivered by transporters, such as viral and non-viral vectors, into cancer cells. Suicide gene therapeutic strategies currently pursued are herpes simplex virus thymidine kinase gene with prodrug ganciclovir, cytosine deaminase gene, carboxyl esterase/irinotecan, varicella zoster virus thymidine kinase/6-methoxypurine arabinonucleoside, nitroreductase Nfsb/5-(aziridin-1-yl)-2,4-dinitrobenzamide, carboxypeptidase G2/4-[(2-chloroethyl) (2mesyloxyethyl)amino] benzoyl-L-glutamic acid, cytochrome p450-isofosfamide, and cytochrome p450-cyclophosphamide. The goal of this review is to summarize the different suicide gene systems and gene delivery vectors addressed to cancer cells, with a particular emphasis on recently developed systems. Finally, we briefly describe the advantageous clinical applications and potential side effects of suicide gene therapy. Keywords: suicide gene therapy; cancer; vector Citation: Izmirli M, Sonmez D, Gogebakan B. The war against cancer: Suicide gene therapy. Adv Mod Oncol Res 2016; 2(3): xx–xx; http://dx.doi.org/10.18282/amor.v2.i3.103. *Correspondence to: Muzeyyen Izmirli, Mustafa Kemal University, School of Medicine, Department of Medical Biology, Hatay, Turkey; [email protected] Received: 16th February 2016; Accepted: 12th April 2016; Published Online: 13th June 2016 Introduction In 2016, nearly 1.6 million new cases of cancer is projected to occur in the US[1]. Gene therapy delivers medicinal products via recombinant nucleic acid that regulates, repairs, replaces, adds, or deletes genetic sequences, which directly affects therapeutic, prophylactic, or diagnostic strategies. Gene therapy consists of two categories: germ line gene therapy and somatic gene therapy. Germ line gene therapy includes therapeutic or modified genes, which will be passed on to the next generation, while somatic gene therapy consists of genetic materials inserted into target cells but will not be passed on to the next generation[2]. Suicide gene therapy is a type of gene therapy using the insertion of genes into tumor cells from a viral or a bacterial gene, resulting in cancer cell death[3]. This therapy works on the basis of a cell’s self-destruction by a vector transferring the suicide gene that stimulates the apoptotic pathway with its product, thus allowing the conversion of a non-toxic prodrug into a lethal drug (Figure 1)[4]. This cancer therapy still remains as an integrated multimodality approach along with chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and surgery. Suicide gene therapy has been deemed safe and effective[5]. In this review, we discuss suicide gene therapy, summarizing the different suicide gene systems and gene delivery vectors. Moreover, we highlight several strategies that have been used in combination with suicide gene therapy and believe these approaches would be a useful resource in the future for new ideas. Copyright © 2016 Izmirli M, et al. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), permitting all non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 1 (online first, page number not for citation purpose) The war against cancer: Suicide gene therapy Figure 1. Mechanism of the HSV-TK suicide gene therapy system. (1) Suicide genes transferred into viral vectors and infected tumor cells; (2) Expression of the suicide gene and formation of the enzyme product; (3) The combination of the prodrug and enzyme caused the conversion from non-toxic to toxic drug; (4) Owing to the apoptotic pathway, tumor cells are destroyed, induced by a lethal drug. The mechanisms of suicide gene therapy Suicide gene therapy consists of different suicide systems. The most studied systems are herpes simplex virus thymidine kinase gene (HSV-TK) with prodrug ganciclovir (GCV), cytosine deaminase gene (CD), carboxyl esterase/irinotecan (CE/CPT-11), varicella zoster virus thymidine kinase/6-methoxypurine arabinonucleoside (Vzvtk/araM), nitroreductase Nfsb/5-(aziridin -1-yl)-2, 4-dinitrobenzamide (NTR/CB1954), carboxypeptidase G2/4-[(2-chloroethyl)(2-mesyloxyethyl) amino] benzoyl-L-glutamic acid (CPG2/CMDA), cytochrome p450-ifosfamide, and cytochrome p450- cyclophosphamide[6]. Additionally, there are other systems that are not widely used such as the purine nucleoside phosphorylase (PNP), linamarase, β-galactosidase, and nitroreductase[7]. Herpes simplex virus thymidine kinase/ganciclovir (HSV-TK/GCV). HSV-TK catalyzes the phosphorylation of GCV into GCV monophosphate. Cellular kinases then convert GCV monophosphate to GCV triphosphate, which is an analogue of deoxyguanosine triphosphate. GCV triphosphate incorporates DNA polymerase and this causes the termination of DNA replication and subsequently, apoptosis[8]. The potential immunogenicity of the viral enzyme limits the HSV/TK-GCV suicide system[9]. However, GCV triphosphate passively enters cells via gap junctions, which can potentially limit the overall therapeutic effects[4]. Incorrect GCV triphosphate incorporation into DNA leads to a delayed S-phase and the activation of several exonucleases and repair mechanisms of the G2-phase arrest cell cycle (Figure 2)[10]. Previous studies have found that apoptosis was induced by HSV-TK/GCV in several tumor cells including melanoma[11], glioma[12], leukemia[13], bladder cancer[14], intrahepatic metastasis of liver cancer[15], and prostate cancer[16]. Figure 2. The HSV-TK suicide gene therapy system 2 (online first, page number not for citation purpose) doi: 10.18282/amor.v2.i3.103 Izmirli M, et al. Varicella zoster virus thymidine kinase/6-methoxypurine arabinonucleoside (Vzvtk/ araM). The varicella zoster virus also expresses thymidine kinase (VZV-TK) that is responsible for the activation of anti-herpetic nucleoside acyclovir. 6-Methoxy purine arabinonucleoside (araM) plays the role of a prodrug for the VZV-TK enzyme. araM is monophosphorylated by VZV-TK, resulting in araM monophosphate (araMMP). Four cellular enzymes – AMP deaminase, adenyl succinate synthetaselyase, AMP kinase, and nucleoside diphosphate kinase – metabolize into the highly toxic adenine arabinonucleoside triphosphate (araATP). The VZV-TK suicide gene system has generally poor efficacy on the activated prodrug against some cancer cell types. However, it has been recently developed as improved potency anti-herpetic pyrimidine nucleoside analogues, including the novel prodrug (E)-5-(2-bromo vinyl)-2-deoxyuridine (BVDU) which is 80-fold more toxic to cells[6]. Cytosine deaminase/5-FC system (CD/5-FC). Cytosine deaminase is expressed by bacteria and yeast but not in mammalian cells. The CD enzyme catalyzes the hydrolytic deamination of cytosine into uracil. Hence, it converts 5-FC (non-toxic) to 5-FU (toxic), an important drug used in conventional cancer chemotherapy. It causes apoptosis via three pathways: thymidylate synthase inhibition, formation of 5-FU RNA, and formation of 5-FU DNA complexes[12]. 5-FU enters the nucleotide pathway and is converted to 5-fluoro-2′-deoxyuridine5′-monophosphate (5-FdUMP), 5-fluorouridine-diphosphate (5-FUDP), and 5-fluorouridine-triphosphate (5-FUTP). 5-FdUMP is an irreversible inhibitor of thymidylate synthase, resulting in the limitation of thymidine and inhibition of DNA synthesis. 5-FUDP is also converted to 5-FdUTP, which can be inserted into DNA to cause DNA damage and cell death. 5-FUTP can also be incorporated into RNA, replacing UTP and inhibiting RNA processing[3]. Previous studies have shown that apoptosis was induced by the CD/5-FC suicide system in several tumor cells, including in colon cancer (Figure 3)[17]. A uracil phosphoribosyl transferase (UPRT) gene, when inserted into the CD/5-FC system, improves it [18]. Importantly, this CD-UPRT/5-FC suicide system has been shown to be effective against 5-FU-resistant cancer cells. CD activity is highly increased by the FCU protein[19]. A number of clinical research have shown antitumor activities of the CD/5-FC suicide system in fibrosarcoma[20], glioma[21], breast cancer[22], prostate cancer[23], and metastatic formations of different origin[24]. Carboxyl esterase/irinotecan system (CE/CPT-11). Carboxyl esterase is a serine esterase, expressed in several tissues including serum, liver, and the intestines[25]. Carboxyl esterase participates in the metabolism of toxins or drugs and the resulting carboxylates are conjugated by other enzymes. This enhances the general bio-availability of many therapeutic agents. Irinotecan (or CPT-11) is a chemotherapy agent that is cleaved by carboxyl esterase to generate a potent antitumor effect via 7-ethyl-10-hydroxycamptothecin (SN-38), an inhibitor of topoisomerase I activity[26]. SN-38 is not soluble and only acts locally. It inhibits topoisomerase I, resulting in the accumulation of double-stranded DNA breaks in actively dividing cancer cells. This would then inhibit DNA replication and transcription. A preclinical study has found that CE/CPT-11 suicide system reduces tumor size[27]. NitroreductaseNfsb/5-(aziridin-1-yl)-2,4-dinitrobenzamide system (NTR/CB1954). Nitroreductase NfsB (NTR) is a flavoprotein, which plays a role by reducing Figure 3. The CD/5-FC suicide gene therapy system 3 doi: 10.18282/amor.v2.i3.103 (online first, page number not for citation purpose) The war against cancer: Suicide gene therapy quinones and nitro aromatics via NADPH or NADH. The prodrug 5-(aziridin-1-yl)-2,4-dinitrobenzamide (CB1954) is catalyzed by NTR, resulting in the production of a potent cellular cytotoxic agent [28]. Previous studies have found the presence of cytotoxic agents of the NTR/ CB1954 system in several tumor cells including in prostate cancer[29]. Carboxypeptidase G2/4-[(2-chloroethyl)(2-mesyloxyethyl) amino] benzoyl-L-glutamic acid system (CPG2/CMDA). Carboxypeptidase G2 (CPG2) is a bacterial enzyme which cleaves glutamic acid from the prodrug 4-[(2-chloroethyl)(2-mesyloxyethyl) amino] benzoyl-Lglutamic acid (CMDA). CPG2 gene mutants are created from the result of targeting CPG2 to the cell membrane and the expression of cell surface protein. CPG2 causes the production of a DNA cross-linking mustard drug, 4-[(2-chloroethyl)(2-mesyloxyethyl) amino] benzoic acid, which acts as a potent cytotoxic agent. Several cells expressing CPG2 are sensitive to CMDA, but some tumors are resistant to this toxin owing to limited uptake of the prodrug[29]. Once a suicide gene system has been elected, the suicide gene must be selectively transferred to the tumor cells[30]. Vectors enter via receptor-mediated endocytosis or membrane fusions. Targeted vectors require specific domains, which facilitate entries into the cytoplasm and nucleus via pathways that include endosomal, lysosomal, or nuclear pore complex. In designing suicide gene therapies, these determinative parameters affect the choice of vectors[6]. The optimal transporter should have minimum side effects and higher specificity, and would efficiently transfer genes to the target cells[30]. In summary, a vector has to have the ability to deliver. First of all, it must protect DNA from enzymatic degradation and must have receptors for specific targets on the cell membrane. When a vector passes into target cells, it must degrade its own membrane and deliver the cargo smoothly[31]. There are several transfer methods by using vectors, such as viral and non-viral vectors[30]: replication or pathogenic protein production with foreign therapeutic genes. The selection of viral system depends on several parameters: characteristics of the tumor type, suicide gene system, and therapeutic strategy. There are numerous viral vectors such as adenoviruses, retroviruses, vaccinia viruses, poxviruses, adeno-associated viruses, herpes simplex viruses, and lentiviruses[32]. Adenoviruses. The most popular viral vector owing to their ability to introduce dividing and non-dividing cells[33]. Adenoviruses are DNA viruses without envelopes, consisting of double stranded linear DNAs and capsids. When adenoviruses enter the target cell via adenovirus receptor-mediated endocytosis into nasal, tracheal, and pulmonary epithelia, it is transported to the nucleus where viral genes and proteins are expressed. The suicide gene is inserted into the adenovirus genome, leading to the expression of the inserted gene in host cells (cancerous cells). However, the main challenge of this approach is that gene expression is temporary because adenoviruses do not integrate into the target cell genome. New methods, such as arming chimeric adenovirus-based vectors with the capacity to integrate into target cells’ genome, should be developed. There is also a serious problem with adenoviral-based gene therapy as it has the ability to arouse lethal and intense immune reactions in some patients, causing ornithine transcarbamylase deficiency and resulting in the death of a study patient due to an anaphylactic shock[34]. Herpes simplex virus (HSV). HSV has an envelope encasing its DNA. It enters target cells by receptor-mediated ligand glycoproteins (including gB, gH, and gL) into oral, ocular, genital epithelia, and nervous system cells[6]. Lentivirus. Lentivirus is a retrovirus with a single stranded RNA encased in an envelope. It has the ability to introduce dividing and non-dividing cells. The human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) is the most recognized member of lentiviruses. The ligands of the lentivirus bind to cluster differentiation 4 (CD4) receptors, which exist on CD4+ T cells, macrophages, and dendritic cells. The viral RNA is reverse transcribed into double-stranded DNA, which enters into the nucleus and is inserted into the target DNA[6]. Viral vectors Non-viral vectors Viruses are perfect vectors to transfer foreign DNA. It replicates its genome in host cell by integrating with host DNA, or via plasmid replication if it has a region of origin. Viral-based vectors are efficient means to transfer suicide genes into cancer cells. These vectors are designed by introducing therapeutic genes involved in viral There are several non-viral vectors, including physical vectors, cellular vectors, and inorganic vectors[35]: Vectors and cargo elements Physical vectors Physical vectors include the injection of naked 4 (online first, page number not for citation purpose) doi: 10.18282/amor.v2.i3.103 Izmirli M, et al. DNA, ballistic DNA injection, electroporation, sonoporation, magnetofection, and hydroporation[36]. Injection of Naked DNA. Naked DNA or plasmid injection is a type of non-viral vector. Direct injection of free DNA into targeted tissues (tumor tissues) has been shown to produce high levels of gene expression and causes the expression of tumor antigens that can function as a cancer vaccine. This method is simple and exhibits low cellular uptake. In short, the injection of naked DNA is used when low gene transfer efficiency can be changed by the activation of immunity. On the other hand, naked DNA is not suitable for systemic administration because of serum nucleases. Moreover, direct injection of naked DNA has other limitations – it is suitable for only a few applications involving tissues that are easily accessible to direct injection such as skin and muscle cells[4]. Ballistic DNA injection. This technology is also known as the gene gun, particle bombardment or micro projectile, and is a gene transfer technique that was first used in plants. Ballistic DNA injection consists of passing through the target tissue with DNA-coated heavy metal particles at adequate speeds. The metal particles could comprise silver, gold, or tungsten. Its advantage is the sensitive delivery of DNA doses[36]. On the other hand, the drawback of this technique is the short-term expression of transferred genes and cellular damage[37]. Electroporation. This technique is based on loading the cell membrane with high capacity electrical field for a nanosecond to open a pore. During this time, DNA molecules could pass through the pore in approximately ten seconds. However, cells can be damaged due to pulse duration and the severity of the electrical field during electroporation. Electrical strength must be about 700 V/ cm while the pulses must be in micro- or milliseconds[36]. Sonoporation. Sonoporation changes the permeability of cell plasma membrane with sonication. Therapeutic gene is delivered via a microbubble, of which its outer shell is covered with lipids, proteins, or synthetic biopolymers. The interior is suffused with air/nitrogen/ inert gas of high-molecular weight. Microbubbles are transferred with the therapeutic gene and circulated into the blood. Sonic waves bump with intensity in pulses over the target tissue[36,37]. Magnetofection. This technique is based on an in vitro research using magnetic nanoparticle-transferred therapeutic genes. This system captures and holds target cells with a magnet. Therapeutic genes can pass through cell membranes when the pulses of magnetic nanoparticles cause the degradation of cell membrane, enzymatic cleavage of cross-linking molecule, or charge interaction[36]. Hydroporation. This technique injects DNA solutions into the target tissue, which penetrates the cell membrane via hydrodynamic pressure. In literature, this technique has been used for gene therapy research of hepatic cells[36]. Cellular vectors Cellular vectors consist of bacterial and mammalian cell vectors. Bacterial vectors. Commonly used bacteria are obligate or facultative anaerobic bacteria such as strains of Clostridia, Bifidobacteria, and Salmonella. These have the ability to infect hypoxic areas of tumors and have presented efficient antitumor activity against chemoresistant cancer cell lines[35]. Bacterial vectors can be modified to deliver bacterially-expressed therapeutic genes[38]. Mammalian cell vectors. Several mammalian cells exhibiting tumor tropism have been recently suggested as transporters for gene therapy, such as bone marrow stromal cells (MSC)[39], neural stem cells (NSC)[40], endothelial progenitor precursor, and blood outgrowth endothelial cells[41]. MSCs are pluripotent progenitor cells, which maintain and regenerate diverse tissues after injury and during chronic inflammation. These features have led to the use of MSCs as gene delivery transporters for tumor cells[42]. NSCs have an inherent tumor tropism and are therefore reliable delivery agents for target therapeutic gene products to primary and metastatic tumors[43]. Blood outgrowth endothelial cells are withdrawn to the tumor vasculature. In addition, erythrocyte ghosts are also used as vectors for suicide gene therapy[44]. Inorganic vectors Calcium phosphate, silica, gold, and several magnetic compounds. These are inorganic particles that are used as vectors for gene transport. Their structures have different formats and porosities. An example of biocompatible structures is silica-coated nanoparticles, which can be used for gene therapy[45]. There are several studies that highlight silica and magnetic inorganic nanoparticles (such as Fe3O4 and MnO2) for gene delivery[46,47]. One of the main candidates that is currently investigated for gene therapy is gold nanoparticles, which are recommended for transferring nucleic acids into tumors[46]. Nanoparticles. A novel form of gene transfer vehicle is nanoparticles that include a cationic core. They have been investigated as effective suicide gene vectors for gene therapy. Nanoparticles have the ability to diffuse within the tumor tissue via passive transport and have enhanced 5 doi: 10.18282/amor.v2.i3.103 (online first, page number not for citation purpose) The war against cancer: Suicide gene therapy permeability and retention effect in tumor tissues. This is a combined result of an increased permeability of tumor blood vessels and a decreased rate of clearance within the tumor[48]. This method is usually used for interference RNA delivery but not for DNA plasmid delivery[4]. Synthetic or natural biodegradable particles. Synthetic or natural biodegradable particles are composed of three subtypes, which are: polymeric-based vectors [poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA), polylactic acid (PLA), chitosan, dendrimers, polymethacrylates], cationic lipid-based vectors (cationic liposomes, cationic emulsions, solid lipid nanoparticles), and peptide-based vectors (poly-L-lysine, protamine). Cationic liposomes and cationic polymers are commonly used as non-viral gene delivery methods to deliver genes into cells[49]. Negatively charged liposomes can interact spontaneously with negatively charged DNA to form clusters of aggregated vesicles along the nucleic acid. Liposomes with suicidal genes can interact with negatively charged cell membranes. The interaction of DNA and liposomes, or polyplexes, leads to the formation of lipoplexes[50]. Liposomes have some advantages including the capacity to transport large amounts of genetic material. Their physico-chemical versatilities allow innumerous modifications and liposomes can be easily and inexpensively produced on a large scale. Moreover, liposomes are safer than viral vectors owing to their reduced chance for insertional mutagenesis or side effects from immune reactions to the vector. However, liposomes have some disadvantages including poor levels of transfection, considerable reduction of biological activity by serum components, and toxic effects[51,52]. Gene transport using liposomes was first demonstrated using a synthetic lipid, N-[1-(2,3- dioleyloxy)propyl]-N,N,N-trimethyl ammonium chloride (DOTMA). DOTMA contains unilamellar liposomes, which interact with DNA to form lipid-DNA complexes. Subsequently, DOTMA facilitates the fusion of suicide gene complex with the plasma membrane of target cells, resulting in both uptake and expression of the DNA[53]. Cancer-specific promoters There are several cancer-specific promoters, including epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), human epidermal growth factor receptor/neu (Her2/Neu), carcinoma embryonic antigen (CEA), vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR)[54], cluster differentiation 71 (CD71), CD44, CD133, breast cancer 1 (BRCA1), BRCA2, stage-specific embryonic antigen-4 (SSEA-4)[55], prostate-specific antigen (PSA), folate receptor (FR), transferrin receptor (TfR), mucins, tumor resistance anti- gen-1-60 (TRA-1-60), cyclooxygenase (Cox), cytokeratin 18, cytokeratin 19, telomerase (hTERT)[6], and chimeric antigen receptors (CAR)[56]. Gene promoters regulate the expression of related genes in cells and consequently, promoters are used as biomarkers via regulation of the genes. Promoters of the mentioned genes are engineered into DNA constructs, effectively driving the expression of suicide gene cancer therapy. Therefore, cancer suicide genes are expressed only in tumor cells. EGFR (ErbB1). This receptor is present on healthy and cancerous cells. The number of EGFR receptors may differ on cells. The number of EGFR receptors is approximately 3×104 on healthy glial cells and approximately 2–3×106 on tumor cells. The recombinant adenoviral vector and genetically engineered variable fragment antibodies target EGFR receptors of ovarian and breast cancers[57]. Her2 (ErbB2) is a member of the human epidermal growth factor receptors. Over-expressed Her2 indicates poor prognosis in breast and other cancers. Genetically engineered agents of suicide gene therapy are delivered to this receptor by viral vectors in gene therapy[58]. Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA). This is a cancer biomarker that is shed by tumor cells into the blood, and thus is routinely detected. It is also the target for vectors delivering therapeutic genes[59]. Folic acid receptor (FR). Folic acid plays a role in the synthesis and repair of genomic DNA and RNA, as well as methylation reactions. Folic acid cannot directly penetrate the cell membrane. In fact, it penetrates by endocytosis through the FR. Hence, FR is absolutely over-expressed on the surfaces of various tumor types including ovarian, kidney, lung, brain, endometrial, colorectal, pancreatic, gastric, prostate, testicular, bladder, head and neck, breast, and lung cancers. Therefore, FR is viewed as a therapeutic target that may provide an effective option for targeted suicide cancer therapy[60]. Cluster of differentiation 44 (CD44). This is present on cells from a variety of tissues, including those of epithelial origin such as prostate, ductal epithelium of the breast, mucosa, lungs, and bladder of cancerous cells. CD44 variant 6 and CD133 are specific to epithelial cancers and are used as lentivirus-driven suicidal genes[61]. Transferrin receptor (TfR). Transferrin carries iron into cells, which in turn express the TfR. Iron-bound Tf is transported by TfR, which is over-expressed in tumor cells[62]. One of the therapeutic strategies of suicide cancer therapy is to decrease the level of iron[63]. Mucins. Mucins are glycosylated proteins on cell surfaces and their major function involves imparting protection against inflammation, bacteria, virus, pollutants, and pH, among other things. The structure and localization of 6 (online first, page number not for citation purpose) doi: 10.18282/amor.v2.i3.103 Izmirli M, et al. mucins are specific for every cell type, and mucins play key roles in cell-cell and cell-extracellular matrix interactions as well as in cell signaling for cancerous cells. Specific expression of mucins is important for tumor progression and therefore can be used as biomarkers and therapeutic targets in epithelial cancers[64]. Moreover, mucins are present on breast, pancreatic, and ovarian cancer cells. MUC-1/Z is also a form of mucin and is exploited for the production of specific antibodies. These antibodies lead as vectors with the therapeutic transporter to cancer cells[65]. Telomerase. Telomerase is a form of RNA polymerase and is generally over-expressed in cancerous cells. Therefore, it is used as a promoter of suicidal genes in cancer cells. For example, such strategies involve the transduction of ovarian cancers with HSV-TK under the telomerase promoter[66]. Cytokeratin 18 and 19 (CK18-19). Cytokeratins are present in epithelial cells and are biomarkers of the neoplasms of epithelial cells. They can occur during tumor genesis and metastasis. Moreover, cytokeratins are biomarkers of differentiation into one of the three germ layers for human embryonic stem cells[6]. Stage-specific embryonic antigen-4 (SSEA-4) and tumor resistance antigen 1-60 (TRA-1-60). SSEA-4 is a glycoprotein and is expressed in embryonic stem cells during embryonic development. It is identified as a biomarker for cancerous embryonic testes and ovaries. TRA-1-60 is also a marker for human embryonic stem cells and carcinomatous cells. TRA-1-60 is also suggested as a biomarker for testes and ovarian cancer stem cells. These biomarkers of pluripotency are expressed upon the differentiation of cells[67]. Cyclooxygenase (Cox). It is also known as prostaglandin-endoperoxide synthase (PTGS) and is responsible for catalyzing prostaglandins, prostacyclin, and thromboxane. Aspirin inhibits Cox. Due to the expression of the Cox gene in colorectal cancer, it is used as a biomarker in suicide gene therapy[67]. Chimeric antigen receptors (CAR). CARs are cell surface antigens and are known as artificial T-cell receptors and chimeric immune receptors. CARs present another autologous cell-based therapy aiming at tumorassociated cell surface antigens. CARs are engineered receptors and add an optional specificity onto an immune effector cell. Therefore, CARs are composed of parts from different sources. This approach brings together the permanence of cytotoxic T-cells with the specificity of monoclonal antibodies and expansion potential[68]. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). VEGF is a growth factor and it stimulates vasculogenesis and angiogenesis. VEGF is expressed by cancer cells and it stimulates the proliferation of endothelial and cancerous cells. The inhibition of angiogenesis and vasculogenesis is a new target for cancer in suicide gene therapy. Liu et al. investigated a model of suicide gene therapy system using anti-VEGF with a triple-gene vector expressing VEGF-shRNA and CD/TK[69]. Clinical applications Gene therapy is a good alternative to conventionally used medical therapies and holds a great promise for the treatment of various diseases, especially cancer [70,71]. At present, most of the clinical applications in suicide gene therapy have been aimed at the treatment of cancer (64.4% of all gene therapies)[71]. Suicide gene therapies have targeted several cancers including lung, gynecological, skin, urological, neurological, and gastrointestinal tumors as well as hematological malignancies and pediatric tumors[71]. Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) and medulloblastoma. GBMs and medulloblastomas are the most regularly found and most aggressive form of brain tumors in adults[72]. GBM treatment involves conventional cancer therapy including chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and surgery as well as suicide gene therapy. Eight patients with GBM were treated with a HSV-TK gene-bearing liposomal vector, followed by the systemic application of GCV. Connexin 43 (Cx43), which is differently expressed in different glioblastoma cell lines, was used as a biomarker[73]. This therapy resulted in a greater than 50% reduction of tumor volume in two patients and showed local effects in the remaining patients[74]. Mesothelioma and lung cancer. Mesothelioma is a deadly cancer of the pleura[75]. In a previous study, human PA1STK cell line transduced with the HSV-TK gene was directly infused into malign pleural effusions and subsequently, GCV was infused intravenously for seven days. However, this study did not achieve the desired suicide therapy effect[76]. Lung cancer is the deadliest type of cancer[1] and this has facilitated the growth of targeted cancer suicide gene therapy trials. CD/5-FC suicide and NTR/CB1954 systems are used on small cell lung cancer (SCLC)[77,78]. In this cancer, insulinoma-associated 1 (INSM1) promoter and nuclear factor kappa B (NFκB) are used as biomarkers[79]. Gastrointestinal cancers. These cancers include gastric, hepatocellular, pancreatic, and colon cancers. Gastric cancer is the fourth most common type of cancer and the second highest cause of death[1]. Hepatocellular carcinoma is the sixth most prevalent cancer and the third most frequent cause of cancer-related death[1]. Many Americans are affected by pancreatic cancer[1] and a 7 doi: 10.18282/amor.v2.i3.103 (online first, page number not for citation purpose) The war against cancer: Suicide gene therapy growing number of people are diagnosed with colon cancer[82]. Suicide gene systems including HSV-TK have been used to treat gastrointestinal cancers. Several biomarkers including CEA, CD44, CD133, and hTERT are investigated on gastrointestinal cancer cells[80]. These biomarkers facilitate early diagnosis for the abovementioned cancer types and are targets for diagnostic molecular imaging and targeted therapies[41,81]. Gynecological and andrological cancers. These include prostate cancer, endometrial cancer, and ovarian cancer. Prostate cancer is the second leading cause of death in men in the United States[1]. There are numerous studies on HSV-TK suicide genes, 5-FC+GCV prodrug therapy, NTR/CB1954, and nitro reductase system on prostate cancer. Several biomarkers including prostatespecific antigen (PSA), prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA), androgen, C-X-C chemokine receptor type 4 (CXCR4), and epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM) have been identified for prostate cancer[82–84]. Consequently, promoters of the aforementioned genes are incorporated into the constructs of cancer suicide genes, which are expressed in prostate cancer cells [61,65]. Endometrial cancer is the most common cancer affecting the gynecologic system and ovarian cancer is the deadliest cancer among all female gynecologic cancers[85]. HSV-TK suicide gene system and SSEA-4, TRA1-60, CD44, CD133, BRCA1 as well as BRCA2 biomarkers are used in endometrial and ovarian cancer therapies[55]. Breast cancer. Breast cancers are diagnosed in about 229,060 women in the USA[86]. HSV-TK suicide gene system and Her2/neu proto-oncogene, along with the epidermal growth factor variant III (EGFRvIII) biomarkers, are used for breast cancer suicide gene therapy[54]. sion, suicide gene therapy is a hopeful approach in overcoming cancer. Highly specific research efforts are necessary to address these existing shortcomings in developing suicide gene therapy into a real benefit for cancer patients. Conclusion 7. Currently, there are different available vectors and several delivery and effector systems for suicide gene therapy, and these techniques are being used for cancer therapy. Suicide gene therapy has demonstrated that a drug that is injected at a distant site of the primary tumor tissue can still efficiently affect the primary tumor. Moreover, suicide gene therapy enhances the immune system’s response on primary and metastatic tumor tissues. However, there are obvious problems associated with the therapy, which include the activation of specific prodrugs, introduction of suicide genes into cancerous cells without damaging healthy cells, and host immune response to the vector and suicide gene product [34]. Furthermore, preclinical applications have only been undertaken in animal models for short periods. Thus, the lifetime risk of mutagenesis in a human is difficult to predict [87]. In conclu- Conflict of interest The authors declare no potential conflict of interest with respect to the research, authorship and/or publication of this article. References 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2016. CA Cancer J Clin 2016; 66(1): 7–30. doi: 10.3322/caa c.21332. Wirth T, Parker N, Ylä-Herttuala S. History of gene therapy. Gene 2013; 525(2): 162–169. doi: 10.1016/j.gen e.2013.03.137. Biasco L, Baricordi C, Aiuti A. Retroviral integrations in gene therapy trials. Mol Ther 2012; 20(4): 709–716. doi: 1 0.1038/mt.2011.289. Duarte S, Carle G, Faneca H, Pedroso de Lima MC, Pierrefite-Carle V. Suicide gene therapy in cancer: Where do we stand now? Cancer Lett 2012; 324(2): 160–170. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2012.05.023. Curigliano G, Cardinale D, Suter T, Palataniotis G, de Azambuja E, et al. Cardiovascular toxicity induced by chemotherapy, targeted agents and radiotherapy: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines. Ann Oncol 2012; 23(7): 155–166. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mds293. Malecki M. Frontiers in suicide gene therapy of cancer. J Genet Syndr Gene Ther 2012; 3(4): 1000119. doi: 10.417 2/2157-7412.1000119. Zarogoulidis P, Darwiche K, Sakkas A, Yarmus L, Huang H, et al. Suicide gene therapy for cancer; Old dog new tricks?. J Genet Syndr Gene Ther 2013; 4(4): 1000139. doi: 10.4172/2157-7412.1000139. Balfour HH Jr. Antiviral drugs. N Engl J Med 1999; 340(16): 1255–1268. doi: 10.1056/NEJM1999042234016 08. Dong JY, Woraratanadharm J. Gene therapy vector design strategies for the treatment of cancer. Future Oncol 2005; 1(3): 361–373. doi: 10.1517/14796694.1.3.361. Sancar A. Mechanisms of DNA excision repair. Science 1994; 266(5193): 1954–1956. doi: 10.1126/science.78011 20. Wei SJ, Chao Y, Hung YM, Lin WC, Yang DM, et al. Sand G2-phase cell cycle arrests and apoptosis induced by ganciclovir in murine melanoma cells transduced with herpes simplex virus thymidine kinase. Exp Cell Res 1998; 241(1): 66–75. doi: 10.1006/excr.1998.4005. Fischer U, Steffens S, Frank S, Rainov NG, Schulze-Os- 8 (online first, page number not for citation purpose) doi: 10.18282/amor.v2.i3.103 Izmirli M, et al. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. thoff K, et al. Mechanisms of thymidine kinase/ganciclovir and cytosine deaminase/5-fluorocytosine suicide gene therapy-induced cell death in glioma cells. Oncogene 2005; 24(7): 1231–1243. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1208 290. Bondanza A, Hambach L, Aghai Z, Nijmeijer B, Kaneko S, et al. IL-7 receptor expression identifies suicide genemodified allospecific CD8+ T cells capable of self-renewal and differentiation into antileukemia effectors. Blood 2011; 117(24): 6469–6478. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010 -11-320366. Tang W, He Y, Zhou S, Ma Y, Liu G. A novel Bifidobacterium infantis-mediated TK/GCV suicide gene therapy system exhibits antitumor activity in a rat model of bladder cancer. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 2009; 28: 155. doi: 10.1186/1756-9966-28-155. Kakinoki K, Nakamoto Y, Kagaya T, Tsuchiyama T, Sakai Y, et al. Prevention of intrahepatic metastasis of liver cancer by suicide gene therapy and chemokine ligand 2/monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 delivery in mice. J Gene Med 2010; 12(12): 1002–1013. doi: 10.1002/jg m .1528. Nasu Y, Saika T, Ebara S, Kusaka N, Kaku H, et al. Suicide gene therapy with adenoviral delivery of HSV-tK gene for patients with local recurrence of prostate cancer after hormonal therapy. Mol Ther 2007; 15(4): 834–840. doi: 10.1038/sj.mt.6300096. Negroni L, Samson M, Guigonis JM, Rossi B, PierrefiteCarle V, et al. Treatment of colon cancer cells using the cytosine deaminase/5-fluorocytosine suicide system induces apoptosis, modulation of the proteome, and Hsp 90β phosphorylation. Mol Cancer Ther 2007; 6(10): 2747–2756. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-07-0040. Kanai F, Kawakami T, Hamada H, Sadata A, Yoshida Y, et al. Adenovirus-mediated transduction of Escherichia coli uracil phosphoribosyltransferase gene sensitizes cancer cells to low concentrations of 5-fluorouracil. Cancer Res 1998; 58(9): 1946–1951. Richard C, Duivenvoorden W, Bourbeau D, Massie B, Roa W, et al. Sensitivity of 5-fluorouracil-resistant cancer cells to adenovirus suicide gene therapy. Cancer Gene Ther 2007; 14(1): 57–65.doi: 10.1038/sj.cgt.7700980. Mullen CA, Coale MM, Lowe R, Blaese RM. Tumors expressing the cytosine deaminase suicide gene can be eliminated in vivo with 5-fluorocytosine and induce protective immunity to wild type tumor. Cancer Res 1994; 54(6): 1503–1506. Ichikawa T, Tamiya T, Adachi Y, Ono Y, Matsumoto K, et al. In vivo efficacy and toxicity of 5-fluorocytosine/cytosine deaminase gene therapy for malignant gliomas mediated by adenovirus. Cancer Gene Ther 2000; 7(1): 74–82. doi: 10.1038/sj.cgt.7700086. Pandha HS, Martin LA, Rigg A, Hurst SC, Stamp GW, et 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. 33. al. Genetic prodrug activation therapy for breast cancer: A phase I clinical trial of erbB-2-directed suicide gene expression. J Clin Oncol 1999; 17(7): 2180–2189. Freytag SO, Stricker H, Pegg J, Paielli D, Pradhan DG, et al. Phase I study of replication-competent adenovirus-mediated double-suicide gene therapy in combination with conventional-dose three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy for the treatment of newly diagnosed, intermediate- to high-risk prostate cancer. Cancer Res 2003; 63(21): 7497–7506. Topf N, Worgall S, Hackett NR, Crystal RG. Regional' pro-drug' gene therapy: Intravenous administration of an adenoviral vector expressing the E. coli cytosine deaminase gene and systemic administration of 5-fluorocytosine suppresses growth of hepatic metastasis of colon carcinoma. Gene Ther 1998; 5(4): 507–513. doi: 10.1038/ sj.gt.3300611. Felgner PL, Gadek TR, Holm M, Roman R, Chan HW, et al. Lipofection: A highly efficient, lipid-mediated DNAtransfection procedure. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1987; 84(21): 7413–7417. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.21.7413. Fillat C, Carrió M, Cascante A, Sangro B. Suicide gene therapy mediated by the herpes simplex virus thymidine kinase gene/ganciclovir system: Fifteen years of application. Curr Gene Ther 2003; 3(1): 13–26. doi: 10.2174/156 6523033347426. Forner A, Llovet JM, Bruix J. Chemoembolization for intermediate HCC: Is there proof of survival benefit? J Hepatol 2012; 56(4): 984–986. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.201 1.08.017. Freytag SO, Khil M, Stricker H, Peabody J, Menon M, et al. Phase I study of replication-competent adenovirus-mediated double suicide gene therapy for the treatment of locally recurrent prostate cancer. Cancer Res 2002; 62(17): 4968–4976. Conrad C, Hüsemann Y, Niess H, von Luettichau I, Huss R, et al. Linking transgene expression of engineered mesenchymal stem cells and angiopoietin-1-induced differentiation to target cancer angiogenesis. Ann Surg 2011; 253(3): 566–571. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181fcb5d8. Hacein-Bey-Abina S, Le Deist F, Carlier F, Bouneaud C, Hue C, et al. Sustained correction of X-linked severe combined immunodeficiency by ex vivo gene therapy. N Engl J Med 2002; 346(16): 1185–1193. doi: 10.1056/NEJ Moa012616. Mahato RI. Non-viral peptide-based approaches to gene delivery. J Drug Target 1999; 7(4): 249–268. doi: 10.3109/10611869909085509. Lu Y, Madu CO. Viral-based gene delivery and regulated gene expression for targeted cancer therapy. Expert Opin Drug Deliv 2010; 7(1): 19–35. doi: 10.1517/1742524090 3419608. Hacein-Bey-Abina S, Von Kalle C, Schmidt M, McCor- 9 doi: 10.18282/amor.v2.i3.103 (online first, page number not for citation purpose) The war against cancer: Suicide gene therapy 34. 35. 36. 37. 38. 39. 40. 41. 42. 43. 44. 45. marck MP, Wulffraat N, et al. LMO2-associated clonal T cell proliferation in two patients after gene therapy for SCID-X1. Science 2003; 302(5644): 415–419. doi: 10.11 26/science.1088547. Hung SC, Deng WP, Yang WK, Liu RS, Lee CC, et al. Mesenchymal stem cell targeting of microscopic tumors and tumor stroma development monitored by noninvasive in vivo positron emission tomography imaging. Clin Cancer Res 2005; 11(21): 7749–7756. doi: 10.1158/10780432.CCR-05-0876. Yin X, Yu B, Tang Z, He B, Ren J, et al. Bifidobacterium infantis-mediated HSV-TK/GCV suicide gene therapy induces both extrinsic and intrinsic apoptosis in a rat model of bladder cancer. Cancer Gene Ther 2013; 20(2): 77–81. doi: 10.1038/cgt.2012.86. Ramamoorth M, Narvekar A. Non viral vectors in gene therapy – An overview. J Clin Diagn Res 2015; 9(1): GE01–GE06. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2015/10443.5394. Gascón AR, delPozo-Rodríguez A, Solinís MÁ. Non-viral delivery systems in gene therapy. In: Martin F (editor). Gene therapy – Tools and potential applications. InTech 2013; p. 3–17. doi: 10.5772/52704. Gardlik R, Behuliak M, Palffy R, Celec P, Li CJ. Gene therapy for cancer: Bacteria-mediated anti-angiogenesis therapy. Gene Ther 2011; 18(5): 425–431. doi: 10.1038/gt. 2010.176. Kosaka H, Ichikawa T, Kurozumi K, Hambara H, Inoue S, et al. Therapeutic effect of suicide gene-transferred mesenchymal stem cells in a rat model of glioma. Cancer Gene Ther 2012; 19(8): 572–578. doi: 10.1038/cgt.2012.3 5. Zhao Y, Lam DH, Yang J, Lin J, Tham CK, et al. Targeted suicide gene therapy for glioma using human embryonic stem cell-derived neural stem cells genetically modified by baculoviral vectors. Gene Ther 2012; 19(2): 189– 200. doi: 10.1038/gt.2011.82. Leng A, Yang J, Liu T, Cui J, Li XH, et al. Nanoparticle-delivered VEGF-silencing cassette and suicide gene expression cassettes inhibit colon carcinoma growth in vitro and in vivo. Tumour Biol 2011; 32(6): 1103–1111. doi: 10.1007/s13277-011-0210-5. Malecki M, Malecki R. Ovarian cancer suicide gene therapy with genetically engineered, transgenically expressed, intracellular scFv antibodies against anti-oxidative enzymes. Proc S Dak Acad Sci 2008; 87: 249–260. Kim SU. Neural stem cell-based gene therapy for brain tumors. Stem Cell Rev 2011; 7(1): 130–140. doi: 10.1007 /s12015-010-9154-1. Dudek AZ. Endothelial lineage cell as a vehicle for systemic delivery of cancer gene therapy. Transl Res 2010; 156(3): 136–146. doi: 10.1016/j.trsl.2010.07.003. Pérez-Martínez FC, Carrión B, Ceña V. The use of nanoparticles for gene therapy in the nervous system. J Alzheimers Dis 2012; 31(4): 697–710. doi: 10.3233/JAD-20 46. 47. 48. 49. 50. 51. 52. 53. 54. 55. 56. 57. 58. 59. 12-120661. Guo X, Huang L. Recent advances in nonviral vectors for gene delivery. Acc Chem Res 2012; 45(7): 971–979. doi: 10.1021/ar200151m. Sokolova V, Epple M. Inorganic nanoparticles as carriers of nucleic acids into cells. Angew Chem Int Edit 2008; 47(8): 1382–1395.doi: 10.1002/anie.200703039. Iyer AK, Khaled G, Fang J, Maeda H. Exploiting the enhanced permeability and retention effect for tumor targeting. Drug Discov Today 2006; 11(17–18): 812–818. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2006.07.005. Kawakami S, Higuchi Y, Hashida M. Nonviral approaches for targeted delivery of plasmid DNA and oligonucleotide. J Pharm Sci 2008; 97(2): 726–745. doi: 10.1002/jps. 21024. Al-Dosari MS, Gao X. Nonviral gene delivery: Principle, limitations, and recent progress. AAPS J 2009; 11(4): 671–681.doi: 10.1208/s12248-009-9143-y. Simões S, Filipe A, Faneca H, Mano M, Penacho N, et al. Cationic liposomes for gene delivery. Expert Opin Drug Deliv 2005; 2(2): 237–254. doi: 10.1517/174252 47.2.2.237. Morille M, Passirani C, Vonarbourg A, Clavreul A, Benoit JP. Progress in developing cationic vectors for non-viral systemic gene therapy against cancer. Biomaterials 2008; 29(24–25): 3477–3496. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.200 8.04.036. Lyden D, Hattori K, Dias S, Costa C, Plaikie P, et al. Impaired recruitment of bone-marrow-derived endothelial and hematopoietic precursor cells blocks tumor angiogenesis and growth. Nat Med 2001; 7(11): 1194–1201. doi: 10.1038/nm1101-1194. Mangipudi SS, Canine BF, Wang Y, Hatefi A. Development of a genetically engineered biomimetic vector for targeted gene transfer to breast cancer cells. Mol Pharm 2009; 6(4): 1100–1109. doi: 10.1021/mp800251x. Wright JD, Barrena Medel NI, Sehouli J, Fujiwara K, Herzog TJ. Contemporary management of endometrial cancer. Lancet 2012; 379(9823): 1352–1360. doi: 10.101 6/S0140-6736(12)60442-5. Kalos M, Levine BL, Porter DL, Katz S, Grupp SA, et al. T cells with chimeric antigen receptors have potent antitumor effects and can establish memory in patients with advanced leukemia. Sci Transl Med 2011; 3(95): 95ra73. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3002842. Heimberger AB, Sampson JH. The PEPvIII-KLH (CDX110) vaccine in glioblastoma multiforme patients. Expert Opin Biol Ther 2009; 9(8): 1087–1098. doi: 10.1517/1471 2590903124346. Dreier B, Mikheeva G, Belousova N, Parizek P, Boczek E, et al. Her2-specific multivalent adapters confer designed tropism to adenovirus for gene targeting. J Mol Biol 2011; 405(2): 410–426. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2010.10.040. Kuroki M, Arakawa F, Khare PD, Kuroki M, Liao S, et al. 10 (online first, page number not for citation purpose) doi: 10.18282/amor.v2.i3.103 Izmirli M, et al. 60. 61. 62. 63. 64. 65. 66. 67. 68. 69. 70. 71. Specific targeting strategies of cancer gene therapy using a single-chain variable fragment (scFv) with a high affinity for CEA. Anticancer Res 2000; 20(6A): 4067–4071. Assaraf YG, Leamon CP, Reddy JA. The folate receptor as a rational therapeutic target for personalized cancer treatment. Drug Resist Updat 2014; 17(4–6): 89–95. doi: 10.1016/j.drup.2014.10.002. Zhang SS, Han ZP, Jing YY, Tao SF, Li TJ, et al. CD133+ CXCR4+ colon cancer cells exhibit metastatic potential and predict poor prognosis of patients. BMC Med 2012; 10:85.doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-10-85. Habashy HO, Powe DG, Staka CM, Rakha EA, Ball G, et al. Transferrin receptor (CD71) is a marker of poor prognosis in breast cancer and can predict response to tamoxifen. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2010; 119(2): 283–293. doi: 10.1 007/s10549-009-0345-x. Neves S, Faneca H, Bertin S, Konopka K, Düzgüneş N, et al. Transferrin lipoplex-mediated suicide gene therapy of oral squamous cell carcinoma in an immunocompetent murine model and mechanisms involved in the antitumoral response. Cancer Gene Ther 2009; 16(1): 91–101. doi: 10.1038/cgt.2008.60. Jonckheere N, Skrypek N, Van Seuningen I. Mucins and pancreatic cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2010; 2(4): 1794–1812. doi: 10.3390/cancers2041794. Torres MP, Chakraborty S, Souchek J, Batra SK. Mucin-based targeted pancreatic cancer therapy. Curr Pharm Des 2012; 18(17): 2472–2481. doi: 10.2174/138161281120 92472#sthash.GEG1sx5o.dpuf. Plumb JA, Bilsland A, Kakani R, Zhao JQ, Glasspool RM, et al. Telomerase-specific suicide gene therapy vectors expressing bacterial nitroreductase sensitize human cancer cells to the pro-drug CB1954. Oncogene 2001; 20(53): 7797–7803. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1204954. Malecki M, Anderson M, Beauchaine M, Seo S, Tombokan X, et al. TRA-1-60+, SSEA-4+, Oct4A+, Nanog+ clones of pluripotent stem cells in the embryonal carcinomas of the ovaries. J Stem Cell Res Ther 2012; 2(5): 130. Grupp SA, Kalos M, Barrett D, Aplenc R, Porter DL, et al. Chimeric antigen receptor-modified T cells for acute lymphoid leukemia. N Engl J Med 2013; 368(16): 1509–1518. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1215134. Liu T, Ye L, He Y, Chen X, Peng J, et al. Combination gene therapy using VEGF-shRNA and fusion suicide gene yCDglyTK inhibits gastric carcinoma growth. Exp Mol Pathol 2011; 91(3): 745–752. doi: 10.1016/j.yex mp.2011.07.007. Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2013. CA Cancer J Clin 2013; 63(1): 11–30. doi: 10.3322/caac. 21166. Ginn SL, Alexander IE, Edelstein ML, Abedi MR, Wixon J. Gene therapy clinical trials worldwide to 2012 – An 72. 73. 74. 75. 76. 77. 78. 79. 80. 81. 82. 83. update. J Gene Med 2013; 15(2): 65–77. doi: 10.1002/jg m.2698. Song C, Xiang J, Tang J, Hirst DG, Zhou J, et al. Thymidine kinase gene modified bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells as vehicles for antitumor therapy. Hum Gene Ther 2011; 22(4): 439–449. doi: 10.1089/hum.2010.116. Cottin S, Gould PV, Cantin L, Caruso M. Gap junctions in human glioblastomas: Implications for suicide gene therapy. Cancer Gene Ther 2011; 18(9): 674–681. doi: 10.1038/cgt.2011.38. Schepelmann S, Springer CJ. Viral vectors for gene-directed enzyme prodrug therapy. Curr Gene Ther 2006; 6(6): 647–670. doi: 10.2174/156652306779010679 #sthash.e2TpnFiB.dpuf. Spring H, Schüler T, Arnold B, Hämmerling GJ, Ganss R. Chemokines direct endothelial progenitors into tumor neovessels. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005; 102(50): 18111–18116. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0507158102. Stappenbeck TS, Miyoshi H. The role of stromal stem cells in tissue regeneration and wound repair. Science 2009; 324(5935): 1666–1669. doi: 10.1126/science.11726 87. Qiu Y, Peng GL, Liu QC, Li FL, Zou XS, et al. Selective killing of lung cancer cells using carcinoembryonic antigen promoter and double suicide genes, thymidine kinase and cytosine deaminase (pCEA-TK/CD). Cancer Lett 2012; 316(1): 31–38. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2011.10.015. Tanaka M, Inase N, Miyake S, Yoshizawa Y. Neuron specific enolase promoter for suicide gene therapy in small cell lung carcinoma. Anticancer Res 2001; 21(1A): 291–294. Michaelsen SR, Christensen CL, Sehested M, Cramer F, Poulsen TT, et al. Single agent- and combination treatment with two targeted suicide gene therapy systems is effective in chemoresistant small cell lung cancer cells. J Gene Med 2012; 14(7): 445–458. doi: 10.1002/jgm.2630. Frängsmyr L, Baranov V, Hammarström S. Four carcinoembryonic antigen subfamily members, CEA, NCA, BGP and CGM2, selectively expressed in the normal human colonic epithelium, are integral components of the fuzzy coat. Tumour Biol 1999; 20(5): 277–292. doi: 10.11 59/000030075. Wang ZX, Bian HB, Yang JS, De W, Ji XH. Adenovirus-mediated suicide gene therapy under the control of Cox-2 promoter for colorectal cancer. Cancer Biol Ther 2009; 8(15): 1480–1488. doi: 10.4161/cbt.8.15.8940. Dubrovska A, Elliott J, Salamone RJ, Telegeev GD, Stakhovsky AE, et al. CXCR4 expression in prostate cancer progenitor cells. PLoS ONE 2012; 7(2): 31226. doi: 10.1 371/journal.pone.0031226. Alptekin D, Izmirli M, Bayazit Y, Luleyap HU, Yilmaz MB, et al. Evaluation of the effects of androgen receptor gene trinucleotide repeats and prostate-specific antigen 11 doi: 10.18282/amor.v2.i3.103 (online first, page number not for citation purpose) The war against cancer: Suicide gene therapy 84. 85. gene polymorphisms on prostate cancer. Genet Mol Res 2012; 11(2): 1424–1432. doi: 10.4238/2012.May.18.1. Ahn M, Lee SJ, Li X, Jiménez JA, Zhang YP, et al. Enhanced combined tumor-specific oncolysis and suicide gene therapy for prostate cancer using M6 promoter. Cancer Gene Ther 2009; 16(1): 73–82. doi: 10.1038/cgt.2 008.59. Liu J, Cristea MC, Frankel P, Neuhausen SL, Steele L, et al. Clinical characteristics and outcomes of BRCA-as- 86. 87. sociated ovarian cancer: Genotype and survival. Cancer Genet 2012; 205(1–2): 34–41. doi: 10.1016/j.cancerge n.2012.01.008. Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin 2012; 62(1): 10–29. doi: 10.3322/caac. 20138. Robinson BW, Musk AW, Lake RA. Malignant mesothelioma. Lancet 2005; 366(9483): 397–408. doi: 10.1016/S 0140-6736(05)67025-0. 12 (online first, page number not for citation purpose) doi: 10.18282/amor.v2.i3.103