Download Symposium Poster - uospur

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Bacterial cell structure wikipedia , lookup

Human microbiota wikipedia , lookup

Lac operon wikipedia , lookup

Bacterial morphological plasticity wikipedia , lookup

Gene nomenclature wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Designing a switch to conditionally control gene
expression in bacteria
Reina Betancourt1,2, Travis Wiles3 and Karen Guillemin3 1. Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Ga 30332 2. Georgia State University, Atlanta, Ga 30303 3. University of Oregon, Eugene Or 97401
Abstract
Optimizing Repression
Engineering Scheme
It has been recognized that coordinated expression of genes allows bacterial
pathogens to develop and quickly respond to and survive host immune responses1.
Of particular interest would be elucidating the mechanisms by which the complex
bacterial communities that comprise host associated microbiota develop in the face
of volatile fluctuations in environmental conditions.
1. Starting Vector
Constitutive expression of dTomato (dTom) yields red only bacteria.
In order to obtain a mutation free, functionally correct pRB2 construct, tetR expression
was dampened by changing the base sequence at its ribosome binding site (RBS). This
change in base pairs works at a translational level by modulating ribosomal affinity to
tetR’s ribosome binding site.
Ribosome Binding Site Sequence Logo for
tetR in E. coli
Question: How do gene expression patterns control the development of microbiota?
Hypothesis: Bacterial members of the normal zebrafish gut microbiota require
coordinated gene expression for community development and function within the
host.
2. Insert
Specifically we wanted to observe how expression patterns for genes that control
motility and chemotaxis influenced bacterial behaviors of swimming and biofilm
formation. We wanted to vary gene expression as bacteria progressed through the
three major growth phases. To this end we set out to engineer a genetic device that
would allow us to conditionally control and track gene expression.
RBS
The AvrII and SacI restriction sites were used to insert a tet-inducible
element containing sfGFP. At this stage bacteria express both red
and green protein.
3. Repression
Inspiration
The NotI and SalI restriction sites were used to insert the tetR gene.
The PLtetO promoter is repressed which results in red only bacteria
unless induced with aTc to yield bacteria that are both red and green.
Naturally occurring tetR
used in pRB2
TTAGGAATTAATGATGTCTAGATTAGAT
tetR library with randomized
RBS. N=A/G/C/T, R=A/G,
D=A/G/T
TNDRRDNATTACATCATGTCTAGATTAG
Functional clone (pRB3).
3. Repression (pRB3)
4. Gene of Interest
The multiple cloning site allows for genes of interest to be inserted
into to the construct. The gene can then be conditionally expressed
and tracked in vivo.
TCTAGGTATTACATCATGTCTAGATTAG
sfGFP
dTom
Merged
A single colony grown with
stage 3 plasmid.
The pRB3 construct demonstrated noticeably higher expression of the dTom gene.
Construction of the Switch
1. Starting Vector (pTW92)
The naturally occurring tet repressor system negatively controls tetracycline (tc)
resistance.
In the presence of tc the constitutively produced TetR protein is inhibited and detaches
from its cognate DNA sequence allowing the expression of tetA which codes for a tc
antiporter (efflux pump)2.
Design
sfGFP
dTom
sfGFP
Merged
A single colony grown
with the starting vector
2. Insert (pRB1)
sfGFP
dTom
Merged
Merged
In a functional test, pRB3
showed visible induction of
GFP with the addition of aTc.
Result: Successful construction of an aTc inducible switch using modified synthetic
transcriptional elements and translationally optimized modulation of gene expression.
A single colony grown
with stage 2 plasmid.
3. Repression (pRB2)
dTom
Future Directions
sfGFP
dTom
Merged
A single colony grown
with stage 3 plasmid.
sfGFP
dTom (4X)
Merged
Same as above with
dTom image at 4X the
intensity.
4. Gene of Interest
The next step will be inserting genes of interest into the synthetic construct, pRB3,
transforming it into natural isolates of the zebrafish microbiota and observing the effects
of gene expression on bacterial behavior. The switch could potentially be a key tool in
future experiments centered around the identification and characterization of genetically
encoded behaviors.
References
The pRB2 construct was sequenced confirmed, but demonstrated very dim expression of
dTom.
Our design uses an analog of tc, aTc, a similarly powerful inducer molecule without
antibiotic properties.
The construct will allow for the tracking of gene expression using co-transcribed genes
that code for fluorescent proteins.
The backbone of the vector codes for ampicillin resistance, which allows for selective
growth of bacteria containing the plasmid.
In a functional test, aTc was added to
a small disc of Whatman filter paper
that was placed on a plate of E. coli
containing the pRB2 construct and no
induction of sfGFP was observed.
sfGFP
dTom
Merged
The only clones that were functionally correct were those that had a mutated tetR gene.
Conclusion: Over expression of TetR from the strong Ptac promoter might result in
inappropriately high levels of TetR, thus explaining lack of induction and off target
repression of dTom.
1. Miller, J. F., Mekalanos, J. J., & Falkow, S. (1989). Coordinate regulation and sensory transduction in the
control of bacterial virulence. Science, 243(4893), 916.
2. Bertram R, Hillen W. The application of Tet repressor in prokaryotic gene regulation and expression.
Microbial Biotechnology. 2008;1:2–16.
Acknowledgements
Thank you to everyone in the Guillemin lab, my mentor Travis Wiles. Peter O’Day, Marilyn Drennan, all of the
SPUR interns, and everyone else involved in SPUR. Thank you to the National Science foundation Research
Experience for Undergraduates Site Program in Molecular Biosciences at the University of Oregon (NSF
DBI/BIO 1460735) and the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (Grant
#1R01DK101314) for funding this project.