* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download A Thought for Food
IPCC Fourth Assessment Report wikipedia , lookup
Scientific opinion on climate change wikipedia , lookup
Climate change feedback wikipedia , lookup
Effects of global warming on humans wikipedia , lookup
Climate change, industry and society wikipedia , lookup
Global Energy and Water Cycle Experiment wikipedia , lookup
Physical impacts of climate change wikipedia , lookup
Effects of global warming on Australia wikipedia , lookup
Years of Living Dangerously wikipedia , lookup
Public opinion on global warming wikipedia , lookup
Surveys of scientists' views on climate change wikipedia , lookup
A Thought for Food: Conservation of Charismatic Megafauna in the Arctic Rachael Lorna Johnstone, University of Akureyri and University of Greenland [email protected] Photo: National Geographic Photo: Paul Nicklen / National Geographic Photo: National Marine Mammal Labaoratory Photo: Firstpeople.us Food for Thought? Photo: National Geographic Conservation (stewardship; ustainable use; sustainable Photo: National Marine Mammal Labaoratory Photo: National Geographic development; Intergenerational equity) Protection (no-take approach; rejection of stewardship; “sentimental” reasons) Photo: National Geographic The right to food Photo: John Tyman right to adequate food (article 11 ICESCR): that must be free from adverse substances, and acceptable within a given culture (UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, General Comment No 12, para 8). UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, General Comment #12 The right to adequate food shall therefore not be interpreted in a narrow or restrictive sense which equates it with a minimum package of calories, proteins and other specific nutrients (para 6). Food should be culturally acceptable, taking: into account, as far as possible, perceived non-nutrientbased values attached to food and food consumption (para 11). Classifications (IUCN) Extinct 1. Extinct (Caribbean Monk Seal; Canarian oystercatcher) 2. Extinct in the Wild (Black soft shell turtle; Hawaiian Crow) Threatened 3. Critically Endangered (Southern bluefin tuna) 4. Endangered (fin & blue whales; Atlantic bluefin tuna) 5. Vulnerable (polar bear, walrus) Non-Threatened 6. Near Threatened (narwhal & beluga) 7. Least Concern (minke, bowhead, humpback, grey, harp seal) Photo: firstpeople.us Photo: firstpeople.us IUCN Polar Bear (vulnerable) Loss of Arctic sea ice due to climate change is the most serious threat to Polar Bears throughout their circumpolar range… Our analyses highlight the potential for large reductions in the global Polar Bear population if sea-ice loss continues, which is forecast by climate models and other studies. (IUCN Red List 2016) IUCN Polar Bear (vulnerable) For the two subpopulations (Southern Beaufort Sea, Western Hudson Bay) that are known to have been impacted by climate change and where a long time series of abundance exist, harvest represents an additive impact. Illegal take of polar bears in Russia, combined with legal subsistence harvest in the U.S., may exceed sustainable limits for the Chukchi subpopulation. (IUCN Red List 2016) Polar Bear Populations (WWF 2014) CITES Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora 1973 Appendix I – “species threatened with extinction” Appendix II - “species not necessarily threatened with extinction, but in which trade must be controlled in order to avoid utilization incompatible with their survival” Appendix III – species protected under some States’ domestic laws Polar Bear Hunting Tours IUCN Polar Bear Specialist Group The primary global threat to polar bears is loss of sea ice habitat due to anthropogenic climate change — not international trade. Habitat loss and the resulting population declines can only be mitigated through global reduction in emissions of GHGs. … international trade does not currently appear to be a significant threat to the global polar bear population, and the global harvest is currently managed to avoid negative effects on persistence. (PBSG statement on proposed transfer of polar bear to CITES Appendix I) Narwhal Distribution Baffin Bay: >90,000 Northern Hudson Bay: c 12,500 East Greenland: c 6,400 (TRAFFIC/WWF Report 2015) DFO estimate for Baffin Bay 2013: > 140,000 Narwhal quotas in Canada DFO: Department of Fisheries and Oceans recommendation for TAH Hunters submit evidence based on indigenous knowledge and practice NWMB: Nunavut Wildlife Management Report makes recommendation for TAH Federal Minister accepts or rejects NWMB TAH recommendaiton Photo: Paul Nicklen / National Geographic Narwhal quotas in Canada DFO: Map of the six Canadian narwhal summer aggregations as well as two aggregations in Greenland recognized as part of the Baffin Bay population by the CanadaGreenland Joint Commission on Conservation and Management of Narwhal and Beluga (source: NAMMCO/SC/21JCNB/SWG/14-05). Narwhal quotas in Canada 2013 Aerial Survey Results: Baffin Bay Narwhal Stocks – new TAH advice Narwhal Stock (Management Unit) Current TAH New TAH Advice Somerset Island (SI) Admiralty Inlet (AI) Eclipse Sound (ES) East Baffin Island (EBI) Unassigned (Jones Sound) * Unassigned (Smith Sound) * TOTAL 532 233 236 122 50 1173 658 389 134 206 76 77 1540 * TAH of 50 approved for Jones Sound & Smith Sound together DFO 2013 narwhal survey in Baffin Bay • Survey conducted in August 2013; but narwhal summer in area from May through October. • “Human error” of spotters. • The conditions were foggy for part of the survey period. • Narwhals changing route in response to extraneous factors (noise, orca, even the spotter plane). • DFO considers only Western method and ignores indigenous knowledge. • Inuit believe that Admiralty Inlet and Eclipse Sound whales are the same sub-population (hence no decrease). Inuit Polar Bear and Narwhal Products (c) Tim Melling (c) Fur Canada Thank you! [email protected] Photo: firstpeople.us