* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Quarterly commentary - Principal Global Investors
Private equity secondary market wikipedia , lookup
Investment management wikipedia , lookup
Land banking wikipedia , lookup
Financial economics wikipedia , lookup
Stock selection criterion wikipedia , lookup
Financialization wikipedia , lookup
Credit rating agencies and the subprime crisis wikipedia , lookup
Investment fund wikipedia , lookup
Stock trader wikipedia , lookup
Securitization wikipedia , lookup
Amman Stock Exchange wikipedia , lookup
Real Estate Quarterly commentary Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securities (CMBS) 2017 first quarter Market review After trailing the rest of the broader fixed income markets for much of the fourth quarter, CMBS was finally able to get out in front of the pack and post solid outperformance. With supply relatively constrained on the new issuance and secondary fronts, the amount of cash looking to get put to work overwhelmed the amount of available supply, leading to tighter spreads across the entire capital stack. Additionally, we saw the credit curve flatten since the solid pool level underwriting metrics on the new issue deals during the quarter allowed accounts to roll down the credit curve. At this point, CMBS feels like it has done a decent job of catching up to the broader markets in terms of spreads. There are still pockets of value, and security selection can still drive some positive performance. However, it will be tough for CMBS to continue to rally much from here, given all of the macro uncertainty surrounding future growth and the increasing geo-political concerns. Strategy review Technicals First quarter saw 10 new conduit deals come to market for a total of $9.4 billion, which is down roughly 24% from the average first quarter issuance of the prior four years. That level of supply was easily absorbed since a number of investors received fresh 2017 allocations which they immediately looked to begin investing. Meanwhile, this strong demand was met with limited supply. Dealer balance sheets also remained light throughout most of the quarter because investors turned to the secondary market since the new issue market wasn’t able to meet demand. We did start to see that dynamic reverse as some investors sold AAAs heading into the end of the quarter. That left dealers with a pretty decent overhand of 8 to10-year AAA paper, which led spreads wider in conjunction with lower treasury yields. We are not expecting a material uptick in supply in April, but the outlook for May and June is for more robust new issuance. Overall, our estimate for 2017 private issuance (including conduit and SASB) remains in the $55-$65 B range, but another quarter similar to the first could cause that number to come down. Quarterly commentary | Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securities 1 Fundamentals (continued) While commercial real estate fundamentals still remain on decent footing, we have seen some indications that real estate cycle is slowly maturing. There has been a significant drop in transaction volume and the rhetoric on equity valuations there failed to garner much interest, and the fact that there was a greater supply of AAAs verses the rest of the stack. Finally, IO spreads were also tighter for the quarter since a few accounts looked to roll their legacy pay-downs into that segment of the market. has shifted to a much more cautious tone. However, supply/ demand technicals remain in a decent spot and we continue to see positive income growth at the property level. There is a feeling that the commercial real estate market has shifted from a pro-equity environment to one that more strongly favors commercial real estate debt instruments from a risk/ return perspective. In terms of the CMBS metrics that we track to gauge fundamentals, the maturity pay-off rate remained within expectations, the delinquency rate is slowly leaking higher but remains manageable, and ratings remain very stable. Delinquencies currently stand at 5.1% for the overall conduit universe (with legacy at 20.4% and 2.0 CMBS at 0.2%), according to Wells Fargo. The pay-off rate for loans that matured in 2016 remained an impressive 90% per Wells Fargo. We expect that metric to dip as we move into the second quarter of 2017, based on the more aggressive underwriting of that subset of 2007 loans relative to the metrics from the 2006 and early 2007 vintages. Outlook & strategy New issue underwriting metrics continue to look relatively conservative as the pool level leverage and coverage ratios continue to move lower and higher, respectively. Combine that with a continued balance in the commercial real estate supply/ demand landscape, and the fundamental story remains intact. Legacy CMBS pay-downs continue to come in relatively strong, which has kept money flowing into accounts as their legacy positions pay down. Finally, the CMBS market’s ability to successfully navigate the regulatory requirements on the risk retention front has shown that the market can still find ways to adapt to changing circumstances. Thus far, the market has seen a number of vertical, horizontal, and L-shaped risk retention deals successfully come to market. The retail property type continues to garner a significant amount of attention and headlines because the exposure to Spreads/pricing struggling retailers and continued store closures is weighing CMBS spreads ripped tighter to begin the year and didn’t look around the traditional enclosed mall format. As time goes back until quarter-end when the market cooled off. The positive by, the market is starting to shift away from the “all malls are technical landscape not only brought overall spread tightening, it bad” mentality, to a more balanced approach of trying to pick also led to a significant flattening of the credit curve. One dynamic winners and losers within that space. However, the media that has persisted from the second half of last year is the sizable headlines continue to gravitate towards the former mentality vs. tiering that has created a wide dispersion of pricing, even on the latter. In addition to the retail headwind, there are growing bonds with the same rating and vintage buckets. With the credit concerns surrounding the overall health of the macro economy curve flattening, the lower rated A-/BBB- segments of the market and a rising belief that the implementation of the much outperformed during the first quarter. The AS/AA parts of the anticipated pro-growth agenda may be severely hampered. If capital stack also posted strong quarters since they remain the you throw in a fragile geo-political landscape and an impending focus for a number of insurance companies. The top of the capital debt ceiling debate, the near-term outlook seems to be skewed stack was the weakest performer because the absolute yield levels to the downside. heavily on that sector. The main focus continues to center Quarterly commentary | Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securities 2 Unless otherwise noted, the information in this document has been derived from sources believed to be accurate as of April 2017. Information derived from sources other than Principal Global Investors or its affiliates is believed to be reliable; however, we do not independently verify or guarantee its accuracy or validity. Past performance is not necessarily indicative or a guarantee of future performance and should not be relied upon to make an investment decision. The information in this document contains general information only on investment matters. It does not take account of any investor’s investment objectives, particular needs or financial situation and should not be construed as specific investment advice, an opinion or recommendation or be relied on in any way as a guarantee, promise, forecast or prediction of future events regarding a particular investment or the markets in general. All expressions of opinion and predictions in this document are subject to change without notice. Any reference to a specific investment or security does not constitute a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold such investment or security, nor an indication that Principal Global Investors or its affiliates has recommended a specific security for any client account. Principal Financial Group, Inc., Its affiliates, and its officers, directors, employees, agents, disclaim any express or implied warranty of reliability or accuracy (including by reason of negligence) arising out of any for error or omission in this document or in the information or data provided in this document. Any representations, example, or data not specifically attributed to a third party herein, has been calculated by, and can be attributed to Principal Global Investors. Principal Global Investors disclaims any and all express or implied warranties of reliability or accuracy arising out of any for error or omission attributable to any third party representation, example, or data provided herein. All figures shown in this document are in U.S. dollars unless otherwise noted. Indices are unmanaged and do not take into account fees, expenses and transaction costs and it is not possible to invest directly in an index. This document is issued in: •The United States by Principal Global Investors, LLC, which is regulated by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. •Europe by Principal Global Investors (Europe) Limited, Level 1, 1 Wood Street, London EC2V 7JB, registered in England, No. 03819986, which has approved its contents, and which is authorized and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. •Singapore by Principal Global Investors (Singapore) Limited (ACRA Reg. No. 199603735H), which is regulated by the Monetary Authority of Singapore and is directed exclusively at institutional investors as defined by the Securities and Futures Act (Chapter 289). •Hong Kong by Principal Global Investors (Hong Kong) Limited, which is regulated by the Securities and Futures Commission and is directed exclusively at professional investors as defined by the Securities and Futures Ordinance. •Australia by Principal Global Investors (Australia) Limited (ABN 45 102 488 068, AFS License No. 225385), which is regulated by the Australian Securities and Investment Commission and is only directed at wholesale investors (as defined in sections 761G and 761GA of the Corporations Act). •This document is issued by Principal Global Investors LLC, a branch registered in the Dubai International Financial Centre and authorized by the Dubai Financial Services Authority as a representative office and is delivered on an individual basis to the recipient and should not be passed on or otherwise distributed by the recipient to any other person or organization. This document is intended for sophisticated institutional and professional investors only. In Europe, this document is directly exclusively at Professional Clients and Eligible Counterparties and should not be relied upon by Retail Clients (all as defined by MiFID). In connection with its management of client portfolios, Principal Global Investors (Europe) Limited may delegate management authority to affiliates that are not authorised and regulated within Europe. In any such case, the client may not benefit from all protections offered by rules and regulations enacted under MiFID.This material is not intended for distribution to, or use by any person or entity in any jurisdiction or country where such distribution or use would be contrary to local law or regulation. This material is not intended for distribution to, or use by any person or entity in any jurisdiction or country where such distribution or use would be contrary to local law or regulation. © 2017 Principal Financial Services, Inc. Principal, Principal and the symbol design and Principal Financial Group are trademarks and service marks of Principal Financial Services, Inc., a member of the Principal Financial Group. Principal Global Investors is the asset management arm of the Principal Financial Group. Quarterly commentary | Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securities 3