* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download PDF
Electrocardiography wikipedia , lookup
Heart failure wikipedia , lookup
Remote ischemic conditioning wikipedia , lookup
Coronary artery disease wikipedia , lookup
Cardiac surgery wikipedia , lookup
Cardiac contractility modulation wikipedia , lookup
Echocardiography wikipedia , lookup
Myocardial infarction wikipedia , lookup
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy wikipedia , lookup
Dextro-Transposition of the great arteries wikipedia , lookup
Management of acute coronary syndrome wikipedia , lookup
Ventricular fibrillation wikipedia , lookup
Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia wikipedia , lookup
Cardiovascular Research 43 (1999) 58–66 www.elsevier.com / locate / cardiores www.elsevier.nl / locate / cardiores Assessment of the functional status of heart failure in non ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy: an echo-dobutamine study Ioannis A. Paraskevaidis*, Dimitrios P. Tsiapras, Stamatis Adamopoulos, Dimitrios Th. Kremastinos 2 nd Department of Cardiology, Onassis Cardiac Surgery Center, 356 Sygrou Avenue, GR-17674 Athens, Greece Received 16 September 1998; accepted 1 December 1998 Abstract Background: The functional status of heart failure (HF) is conventionally evaluated by peak exercise oxygen consumption (VO 2 max). Dobutamine echocardiography can be used to evaluate myocardial reserve. The aim of this study was to estimate the functional status of chronic HF in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy, by investigating the changes in echo-variables, as assessed by echo-dobutamine, in relation with VO 2 max. Methods and results: A low infusion rate echo-dobutamine test (10 mg / kg / min) was performed in 30 patients with dilated cardiomyopathy and 1 h later VO 2 max was measured. VO 2 max (ranging from 7.6 to 23 ml / kg / min, mean 14.0660.64 ml / kg / min) was correlated with the changes (values obtained after inotropic stimulation minus those obtained at baseline) in left ventricular end-systolic diameter (r:0.80, p:0.001), in left ventricular end-systolic posterior wall thickness (r:0.73, p:0.001) and in left ventricular heart-rate corrected mean velocity of circumferential fiber shortening (Vcfc) / end-systolic meridional wall stress ratio (r:0.64, p:0.0001). A negative correlation was found between VO 2 max and the changes in end-systolic meridional wall stress (r: 20.76, p:0.001). After dobutamine infusion Vcfc / systolic meridional wall stress ratio increased in patients with VO 2 max .14 ml / kg / min but decreased in patients with VO 2 max ,14 ml / kg / min (0.000160.0001 vs 20.000260.0003 circ3cm 2 / g3s, p:0.0001). End-systolic meridional wall stress was decreased in patients with VO 2 max .14 ml / kg / min but increased in patients with VO 2 max ,14 ml / kg / min (2126.97634.24 vs 205.77656.71 g / cm 2 , p:0.0001). Conclusion: The changes in echo-variables assessed by echo-dobutamine are well correlated with VO 2 max and seem to be accurate for evaluating the functional status of chronic HF in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy. 1999 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved. Keywords: Cardiomyopathy; Contractile function; Heart failure; Inotropic agents; Transplantation 1. Introduction Despite continuing advances in the diagnosis and therapy of heart failure (HF) the mortality of this syndrome remains high [1]. Although various parameters have been used to assess the severity of congestive HF [2,3], they have several potential limitations [4]. Recent American Heart Association consensus reports have recommended that peak exercise oxygen consumption (VO 2 max) can be used to evaluate objectively the functional *Corresponding author. Tel.: 130-1-9406-184 or 130-1-9393-372; fax: 130-1-9393-373 or 130-1-9393-331. E-mail address: [email protected] (I.A. Paraskevaidis) status of HF [5]. Specifically, it has been suggested that, in spite of similar left ventricular ejection fraction, patients with VO 2 max more than 14 ml / kg / min have a far better prognosis than those with VO 2 max less than 14 ml / kg / min [6]. However, several groups have found no statistical difference in survival between patients with VO 2 max levels in the range of 10 to 14 ml / kg / min and those with levels in the range of 14 to 18 ml / kg / min [7]. Although, several echocardiographic indexes have been proposed as prognostic indicators in chronic HF [8,9]; these indexes represent the functional status of the heart at rest. In patients with HF, both the response of cardiac Time for primary review 26 days. 0008-6363 / 99 / $ – see front matter 1999 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved. PII: S0008-6363( 98 )00345-9 I. A. Paraskevaidis et al. / Cardiovascular Research 43 (1999) 58 – 66 output to exercise and VO 2 max provide valuable independent prognostic information regarding the functional status of the failing heart [10], indicating that the ability of the failing heart to maintain an adequate cardiac output depends on its functional reserve. Dobutamine stress echocardiography is receiving increasing attention in relation to patients with coronary artery disease [11]. Moreover, by its well known direct positive inotropic action, it is known to increase cardiac performance in patients with HF [12]. In this regard, it has been suggested that dobutamine can be used in order to evaluate myocardial reserve, which is a better descriptor of the functional status of the heart than rest indexes or indexes based on volumetric measurements [13]. This has been confirmed in several subgroups of patients with chronic heart failure due to coronary artery disease [14], left ventricular hypertrophy [15], dilated cardiomyopathy [16], or after cardiac transplantation [17]. The aim of this study was to estimate the functional status of chronic HF in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy, by investigating the changes in echo-variables, assessed by echo-dobutamine, in relation with VO 2 max. 2. Methods 2.1. Study patients Thirty one consecutive patients with documented dilated cardiomyopathy were studied. Thirty patients (97%) 21 men and 9 women, mean age 55610 years, with good quality M-mode and 2-dimensional echocardiography were recruited for analysis. The cause of dilated cardiomyopathy was idiopathic in 25 patients while an evidence of myocarditis based on clinical, ECG and echocardiographic findings, was reported in five patients. Nine patients were in New York Heart Association functional class II, thirteen were in class III, and eight were in class III–IV. Diagnosis of dilated cardiomyopathy was based on the echocardiographic findings of a dilated left ventricle (left ventricular end-diastolic diameter .60 mm) with severely affected systolic function; fractional shortening ,20% and ejection fraction below 35%. In no case was a significant regional wall motion abnormality recorded by two-dimensional echocardiography. Coronary angiography performed in all patients revealed no coronary artery disease. All patients were in sinus rhythm and were under digoxin, angiotensinconverting enzyme inhibitors and diuretic drugs in adequate doses. Patients with rhythm disturbances, ischemic cardiomyopathy, more than mild valvular heart disease, or regional wall motion abnormalities were excluded. Transthoracic echocardiography was performed and the echocardiographic variables were measured at baseline and after dobutamine infusion. One hour later VO 2 max was calculated. All patients gave informed consent. 59 2.2. Echocardiography Measurements and tracings were carried out according to the principle of the leading edge, in accordance with the recommendations of the American Society of Echocardiography [18]. Left ventricular dimensions and wall thickness were measured from parasternal targeted M-mode echocardiographic recordings. Care was taken to record the largest and smallest left ventricular dimensions present between the tips of the mitral valve leaflets and the superior aspect of the papillary muscles. End-diastolic diameter was taken at the Q wave of the electrocardiogram. End-systolic dimension was determined to be the shortest distance between walls rather than at the time of peak downward septal motion [19]. Using a HewlettPackard (Sonos 1000 or 2500) ultrasound device the following echocardiographic variables were measured at baseline and after the end of 10 mg / kg / min of dobutamine infusion: (1) Left ventricular end-diastolic (LVEDD) and end-systolic diameter (LVESD) and the derived fractional shortening, FS5[(LVEDD2LVESD) / LVEDD]3100; (2) maximal ventricular septum and posterior wall thickness (PWTH) in systole(s); (3) end-systolic meridional wall stress, calculated using the formula: systolic blood pressure 3 LVESD 3 1.35 / 4 3 PWTHs 3 (1 1 PWTHs) / LVESD [20] (systolic blood pressure was represented by brachial artery systolic pressure and was measured every minute with a cuff sphygmomanometer); Although the above variables are easily calculated by echocardiography, care must be taken to make accurate calculations. (4) left ventricular heart-rate corrected mean velocity of circumferential fiber shortening (Vcfc), calculated as follows: Vcfc5(%FS / LVET)3RR [20]. (LVET represents left ventricular ejection time in milliseconds from the opening to the closing clicks of the aortic valve flow velocity envelope by continuous-wave Doppler imaging); (5) Vcfc / systolic meridional wall stress ratio; (6) cardiac output, calculated as the product of stroke volume3heart rate (stroke volume, was calculated according to the formula: p / 43(aortic diameter)2 3aortic velocity–time integral. Aortic diameter was measured in a two-dimensional parasternal long axis view, just below the aortic orifice, from the inner echo at rest only, because the aortic valve is thought to remain constant during exercise or dobutamine infusion [21]. Aortic velocities were measured by continuous Doppler in an apical five chamber view; (7) from 2D echocardiography and using the modified Simpson’s rule technique, end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes were calculated and ejection fraction was derived [(end diastolic-end systolic volume) / end diastolic volume]3100. Vcfc / end systolic meridional wall stress ratio was also measured as an index of myocardial contractile reserve. The latter index is a preload and heart rate-independent index of contractility that incorporates afterload [15]. The changes in the above echocardiographic variables after dobutamine infusion were also calculated. Changes repre- 60 I. A. Paraskevaidis et al. / Cardiovascular Research 43 (1999) 58 – 66 sent the values obtained after inotropic stimulation minus those obtained at baseline. All measurements were made at a speed paper of 100 mm / s and represent the average of the measurements of five consecutive beats. In all cases echocardiograms were analyzed by two independent expert observers. In cases of discrepancy the average was calculated and the mean value was reported. 2.3. Dobutamine infusion Dobutamine was infused intravenously in two steps after establishment of a stable hemodynamic state (heart rate, blood pressure). The duration of each step was 5 min and the maximal end dose of dobutamine infused was 10 mg / kg / min [22]. At each step dobutamine infusion was increased by 5 mg / kg / min, reaching 10 mg / kg / min at the second step. Every minute during the protocol, systolic, diastolic and hence mean arterial blood pressure (Siemens, Sirecust 888 device), heart rate and a 12-lead electrocardiogram were recorded. 2.4. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing Exercise testing with respiratory gas exchange measurements was performed while patients exercised on a treadmill according to the Dargie protocol [23]. Oxygen consumption, carbon dioxide production and respiratory exchange ratio were measured continuously during exercise using the Medgraphics CPX / MAX automated gas exchange measuring system, which provides the above gas exchange data for each individual breath (which can then be averaged over a 5 s interval). Blood pressure was measured with a mercury sphygmomanometer and the electrocardiogram was monitored continuously with a computer-assisted system (Marquette Electronics Inc.). Patients were familiar with exercise testing and they were encouraged to exercise until symptoms forced them to stop. All patients terminated the test because of dyspnea or fatigue, and in all patients the gas exchange anaerobic threshold (the point at which carbon dioxide production increased disproportionately in relation to oxygen consumption) and a respiratory exchange ratio .1.0 were reached. Peak oxygen consumption (ml / min / kg) at peak exercise was calculated as the mean of values during the last minute of exercise. 2.5. Statistical analysis All values are expressed as mean6standard error. An unpaired two-tailed t-test was used to compare values between groups; a paired two-tailed t-test was used to compare the differences between values in the same group before and after inotropic stimulation. Linear regression analysis was employed for the assessment of the correlation between VO 2 max and the echocardiographic measurements. To assess reproducibility (inter-and intra-ob- server variability) root mean square differences between duplicate determinations was performed. A p value ,0.05 was considered statistically significant. 3. Results No major side effects were reported during dobutamine infusion. The VO 2 max measured in all patients ranged from 7.6 to 23 ml / kg / min (mean 14.0660.64 ml / kg / min). 3.1. Echocardiographic measurements The echocardiographic measurements of the whole study group at baseline and after dobutamine infusion are shown in Table 1. The changes in the echocardiographic variables are also reported in Table 1. After dobutamine infusion statistically significant increases in fractional shortening ( p:0.004) and ejection fraction ( p:0.005) were observed. Systolic blood pressure increased at borderline significance ( p:0.06), while mean blood pressure significantly decreased ( p:0.000). Heart rate, stroke volume and consequently cardiac output significantly increased ( p:0.02, p:0.0000 and p:0.0000, respectively). Vcfc and Vcfc / endsystolic meridional wall stress significantly increased ( p:0.001 and p:0.04, respectively). The other echocardiographic variables did not change significantly after inotropic stimulation. The correlation between VO 2 max and the changes in echocardiographic variables are shown in Table 2. 3.2. Response of echocardiographic variables to dobutamine in patients with high vs those with low VO2 max The study population was further divided in two groups; Group I (17 patients), comprised patients with VO 2 max more than 14 ml / kg / min (mean 16.3660.66 ml / kg / min) and group II (13 patients) patients with VO 2 max less than 14 ml / kg / min (mean 11.160.49 ml / kg / min). The values of the echocardiographic variables before and after inotropic stimulation with dobutamine are shown in Tables 3 and 4. In Table 5 are shown the significant changes of the echocardiographic variables; in group I posterior wall systolic thickness increased, whereas in group II it decreased ( p:0.0001). End systolic diameter end-systolic meridional wall stress and end-diastolic diameter decreased in group I but increased in group II ( p:0.001), ( p:0.0001), ( p:0.003), respectively. Shortening and ejection fraction increased more in group I than in group II ( p:0.02 for both). Vcfc increased in group I but was unchanged in group II ( p:0.02). Vcfc / end-systolic meridional wall stress increased in group I but decreased in group II ( p:0.0001). After dobutamine infusion the changes in the other echocardiographic variables were not statistically different between the groups. I. A. Paraskevaidis et al. / Cardiovascular Research 43 (1999) 58 – 66 61 Table 1 Echocardiographic and other measurements before and after dobutamine infusion in the whole study group (n: 30) IVSs (cm) PWTHs (cm) EDD (cm) ESD (cm) FS (%) 2-D EF (%) SV (ml) CO (l / min) SWS (g / cm 2 ) Vcfc (circ / s) Vcfc / SWS (circ*cm 2 / g*s) SBP (mm Hg) MBP (mm Hg) HR (beats / min) Before After Change p value 0.9660.03 1.2360.05 7.2260.14 6.2760.13 13.1160.47 23.0161.25 39.7861.66 3.5560.06 577.58649.56 0.4360.01 0.000960.0000 109.761.4 76.1360.89 92.4362.90 0.9960.03 1.2560.06 7.2460.16 6.1460.15 15.1460.51 28.0561.42 47.3162.28 4.3860.09 594.8658.83 0.4960.02 0.00160.0001 112.2761.36 68.4310.94 96.163.0 0.0360.03 0.00960.04 0.01760.07 20.1360.07 2.0360.64 5.0461.68 7.5461.22 0.8360.08 17.22643.37 0.0660.02 0.000260.0001 2.5361.30 2 7.760.70 3.6761.44 NS NS NS NS 0.004 0.005 0.0000 0.0000 NS 0.001 0.04 NS(0.06)* 0.0000 0.02 * Borderline statistical significance. Change represents the values obtained after inotropic stimulation minus those obtained at baseline. CO, cardiac output; EDD, end-diastolic diameter; 2D EF, ejection fraction measured by 2-dimensional echocardiography; ESD, end-systolic diameter; FS, fractional shortening; HR, heart rate; IVSs, ventricular septum thickness in systole; PWTHs, left posterior wall thickness in systole; MBP, mean blood pressure; SBP, systolic blood pressure; SV, stroke volume; SWS, end-systolic meridional wall stress; Vcfc, left ventricular heart-rate corrected mean velocity of circumferential fiber shortening. Table 2 Correlation between VO 2 max and the changes in echocardiographic variables Variable Cor. coef. p value Intercept Slope Std. err. LPWT ESD SWS EDD Vcfc Vcfc / SWS 0.73 20.80 20.76 20.72 0.37 0.64 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.04 0.0001 13.97 (13.05–14.88) 13.16 (12.32–14) 14.26 (13.38–15.13) 14.18 (13.23–15.11) 13.43 (12.03–14.82) 12.03 (10.92–13.13) 11.26 26.9 20.01 26.46 10.8 5414.50 2.43 2.13 2.33 2.5 3.33 2.77 Cor. coef.: correlation coefficient, Std. err.: standard error. The other abbreviations as in Table 1. Values in parenthesis represent the lower and upper 95% confidence limit. Plotting the variables VO 2 max vs. the changes in Vcfc / end-systolic meridional wall stress ratio (Fig. 1), VO 2 max vs the changes in left ventricular end systolic diameter, (Fig. 2), and VO 2 max vs the changes in left ventricular posterior wall thickness (Fig. 3), on a scatter- plot shows the linear relationship and in addition we can make the following observations. Firstly, the trend line (linear regression model) of the above variables cuts the x axis at the value 12, 13, or 14 ml / kg / min for VO 2 max respectively indicating that we may expect an improve- Table 3 Echocardiographic variables before dobutamine infusion in the patients with VO 2 max .14 ml / kg / min (Group I, n:17), and in the patients with VO 2 max ,14 ml / kg / min (Group II, n:13) IVSs (cm) PWTHs (cm) EDD (cm) ESD (cm) FS (%) 2-D EF (%) SV (ml) CO (l / min) SWS (g / cm 2 ) Vcfc (circ / s) Vcfc / SWS (circ*cm 2 / g*s) SBP (mm Hg) MBP (mm Hg) HR (beats / min) Abbreviations as in Table 1. Group I Group II p value 0.9960.05 1.2260.06 7.1760.13 6.2360.12 13.1560.60 23.4361.54 42.462.59 3.6460.07 602.56680.55 0.4460.02 0.000960.0001 110.7661.61 75.9460.96 89.8864.65 0.9260.04 1.2560.07 7.2860.28 6.3360.26 13.0660.78 22.4762.14 36.3661.39 3.4560.08 544.92647.22 0.4210.03 0.000960.0001 108.3862.47 76.3861.67 95.7762.78 NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS 62 I. A. Paraskevaidis et al. / Cardiovascular Research 43 (1999) 58 – 66 Table 4 Echocardiographic variables after dobutamine infusion in the patients with VO 2 max .14 ml / kg / min (group I, n:17), and in the patients with VO 2 max ,14 ml / kg / min (group II, n:13). IVSs (cm) PWTHs (cm) EDD (cm) ESD (cm) FS (%) 2-D EF (%) SV (ml) CO (l / min) SWS (g / cm 2 ) Vcfc (circ / s) Vcfc / SWS (circ*cm 2 / g*s) SBP (mm Hg) MBP (mm Hg) HR (beats / min) Group I Group II p value 1.0460.04 1.3760.07 7.0160.16 5.8660.15 16.4860.54 31.8661.31 50.6163.58 4.5260.09 475.6677.13 0.5460.02 0.001560.0000 113.7661.98 69.3561.30 94.5365.03 0.9360.05 1.160.08 7.5260.30 6.5160.26 13.460.7 23.0662.14 43.0061.99 4.260.14 750.7673.19 0.4260.02 0.000760.0001 110.3161.70 67.2361.33 98.1562.35 NS 0.02 NS 0.03 0.001 0.001 NS NS 0.02 0.001 0.001 NS NS NS Abbreviations as in Table 1 Table 5 Statistically significant changes in echocardiographic variables in the patients with VO 2 max .14 ml / kg / min (group I, n: 17), and in the patients with VO 2 max ,14 ml / kg / min (group II, n:13) PWTHs (cm) EDD (cm) ESD (cm) FS (%) 2-D EF (%) SWS (g / cm 2 ) Vcfc (circ / s) Vcfc / SWS (circ*cm 2 / g*s) Group I Group II p value 0.1460.04 20.1660.07 20.3760.07 3.3260.59 8.4361.53 2126.97634.24 0.1060.02 0.000660.0001 20.1660.05 0.2560.11 0.1860.09 0.3461.13 0.5962.96 205.77656.71 0.000860.04 20.000260.0001 0.0001 0.003 0.0001 0.02 0.02 0.0001 0.02 0.0001 Change represents the values obtained after inotropic stimulation minus those obtained at baseline. Abbreviations as in Table 1. Fig. 1. Linear regression analysis between VO 2 max and the changes in left ventricular heart-rate corrected mean velocity of circumferential fiber shortening / end-systolic meridional wall stress ratio (Vcf / SWS). Note that the trend line cuts the x axis at the value of 12 ml / kg / min for VO 2 max. I. A. Paraskevaidis et al. / Cardiovascular Research 43 (1999) 58 – 66 63 Fig. 2. Linear regression analysis between VO 2 max and the changes in left ventricular end-systolic diameter (ESD). Note that the trend line cuts the x axis at the value of 13 ml / kg / min for VO 2 max. ment in myocardial reserve even for values of VO 2 max less than 14 ml / kg / min. Secondly, changes in echodobutamine variables that correspond to the range of 10– 14 ml / kg / min of VO 2 max, fall very near to the zero line and some of them are even positive or negative, expressing an improvement in myocardial reserve. 3.4. Intra- and inter-observer variability 3.3. Ten month follow-up 4. Discussion During the ten month follow-up, two patients from group II died (6.6% of the whole study group) and two patients underwent heart transplantation. All patients from group I remained alive and none required heart transplantation. The results of this study showed that in patients with non ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy left ventricular systolic performance indexes, contractility status and stroke volume were increased after inotropic stimulation. A correlation between VO 2 max and the changes in Intra- and inter-observer variability of the echocardiographic measurements at baseline and after dobutamine infusion are given in Table 6. Fig. 3. Linear regression analysis between VO 2 max and the changes in left ventricular posterior wall thickness in systole (LPWT). Note that the trend line cuts the x axis at the value of 14 ml / kg / min for VO 2 max. I. A. Paraskevaidis et al. / Cardiovascular Research 43 (1999) 58 – 66 64 Table 6 Intra observer and inter observer variability Baseline Intra observer variability ESD (cm) EDD (cm) IVSs (cm) PWTHs (cm) Inter observer variability ESD (cm) EDD (cm) IVSs (cm) PWTHs (cm) After Dobutamine RMSD Mean RMSD Mean 0.10 0.13 0.04 0.05 6.27 (6.06–6.47) 7.22 (6.95–7.48) 0.96 (0.87–1.04) 1.23 (1.1–1.33) 0.11 0.16 0.03 0.05 6.14 (5.9–6.37) 7.24 (6.91–7.56) 0.99 (0.91–1.06) 1.25 (1.13–1.36) 0.16 0.17 0.05 0.07 6.27 (5.94–6.59) 7.22 (6.86–7.57) 0.96 (0.84–1.07) 1.23 (1.07–1.38) 0.18 0.23 0.05 0.08 6.14 (5.76–6.5) 7.24 (6.77–7.70) 0.99 (0.87–1.10) 1.25 (1.08–1.41) RMSD: root mean square differences, the other abbreviations as in Table 1. Values in parenthesis represent lower and upper 95% confidence limit. echocardiographic variables assessed by echo dobutamine was also detected. 4.1. Echocardiographic changes during dobutamine infusion. Possible explanations Similarly to previous reports [14,24] we observed, that after low dose dobutamine infusion cardiac contractility, stroke volume, heart rate and consequently cardiac output were increased. Although, the changes in systolic posterior wall thickness and in left ventricular end systolic diameter probably represent the simple easy way, to measure the functional status of heart failure, Vcfc / end-systolic meridional wall stress ratio represents another index which incorporates afterload. Since left ventricular afterload increased after dobutamine infusion it seems that augmenting myocardial contractility (Vcfc and in Vcfc / end-systolic meridional wall stress ratio) in these patients did not result in a decrease in left ventricular internal load [16]. Vcfc incorporates heart rate which might have variable effect on force–frequency relationship in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy. However, in our series, heart rate did not vary significantly between groups before and after inotropic stimulation, indicating that in low dose dobutamine administration heart rate does not significantly influence the contractile status of the failing heart [14,16]. Wall stress reflects the combined effects of instantaneous peripheral loading conditions and factors internal to the heart [25]. The ability of the ventricle to unload itself is crucial to the maintenance of normal myocardial mechanics since it is the wall stress that determines the overall extent and mean velocity of fiber shortening [26]. In this study the response of systolic meridional wall stress to inotropic stimulation was different between the groups, indicating that the myopathic left ventricle might have an abnormal distribution of fiber shortening [16]. This different response of the left ventricle to inotropic stimulation seems to represent a different stage of the same disease process [16]. The results of this study also showed that after dobutamine infusion there is a correlation between peak exercise VO 2 and the changes in left posterior wall systolic thickness, end systolic diameter, end-systolic meridional wall stress, end diastolic diameter. Previous reports have demonstrated that, in patients with severely affected left ventricular systolic function, end-systolic and end-diastolic volumes (and, consequently, in patients without wall motion abnormalities, end-systolic and end-diastolic diameter) are prognostic indexes [27]. The prognostic value of posterior wall thickness in dilated cardiomyopathy has also been reported [9]. Myocardial contractile reserve represents the common denominator of both Vcfc / end-systolic meridional wall stress ratio and VO 2 max and may, therefore, explain the correlation between these two parameters in patients with heart failure. However, apart from central, peripheral factors may also contribute substantially to lower VO 2 max seen in chronic heart failure. In this respect these two indexes may measure different aspects of heart failure, although both of them reflect functional status of heart failure. Although VO 2 max ,14 ml / kg / min has been used as an objective index of the functional status of the heart, it has been shown to improve with vasodilator and exercise therapy in patients with HF [28,29]. Accordingly, the results of this study showed that the cut-off point of VO 2 max may not be 14 ml / kg / min (indeed it may be lower, depending on other factors). This may indicate an improvement not only in functional capacity but also in prognosis. 4.2. Study limitations (1) The heterogeneous contractile responses to dobutamine observed in this study among patients with chronic HF have been reported previously [16] and may reflect differences in b1-adrenoreceptor density, which was not investigated in this study. Although the response to dobutamine may underestimate the contractile reserve of the failing myocardium, the magnitude of the drug’s effect appears to decline as left ventricular function deteriorates; the latter is accompanied by a reduction in b-adreno- I. A. Paraskevaidis et al. / Cardiovascular Research 43 (1999) 58 – 66 receptor density [30]. (2) Brachial arterial pressure was used to calculate peak systolic blood pressure. Although numerous validation studies have been performed [31], we recognize that brachial arterial pressure is only an estimate of left ventricular ejection pressure and not a direct measurement. Additionally, there is a lack of synchrony of estimates of ventricular pressure (which occurred at early or mid ejection) and those of cavity dimensions and wall thickness which occurred at end-ejection). However, since the main interest of this study was to estimate wall stress before and after inotropic stimulation, we assumed that the method used in this study for the measurement of peak systolic blood pressure had little influence on the final result. Although the peak (as opposed to end-systolic) pressure was used in this study, previous reports have shown that this substitution is reasonable [32]. (3) Although, the most satisfactory estimates of stroke volume are made using pulsed Doppler aortic velocities were measured by continuous Doppler in an apical five chamber view since the main interest of this study was the changes in velocity time integral which occurred after inotropic stimulation and not the absolute values. 4.3. Clinical implications The results of this study showed that echo-dobutamine indices could provide clinical and prognostic information complementary to the VO 2 max value for a given patient, since the numerical approach does not necessarily shed light on pathophysiology and prognosis. Furthermore, patients should be reevaluated after 6 months, since they sometimes improve their functional capacity. There is growing evidence that VO 2 max is influenced by non cardiac factors, [33,34]. In this respect dobutamine echocardiography might be an alternative tool in the detection of the functional status of the heart, especially in those patients with VO 2 max levels between 10 and 14 ml / kg / min. 5. Conclusion The changes in echocardiographic variables assessed by echo-dobutamine are well correlated with VO 2 max and seem to be an accurate index for evaluating the functional status of chronic HF in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy. Acknowledgements We thank George Tentis, PhD for assistance with statistical analysis and Eleni Binou for her secretarial assistance. 65 References [1] Kannel W, Belanger AJ. Epidemiology of HF. Am Heart J 1991;121:951–957. [2] Parameshwar J, Keegan J, Sparrow J, Sutton GC, Poole Wilson PhA. Predictors of prognosis in severe chronic HF. Am Heart J 1992;123:421–426. [3] Franciosa JA. Why patients with HF die; hemodynamic and functional determinants of survival. Circulation 1987;75(Suppl IV):IV20–IV27. [4] Chakko S, Gheorgiade M. Estimating severity of chronic HF. A clinical challenge for the 1900s. Am Heart J 1992;124:260–264. [5] Costanzo MR, Augustine S, Bourge R, et al. Selection and treatment of candidates for heart transplantation: a statement for health professionals from the Committee on HF and Cardiac Transplantation of the Council on Clinical Cardiology American Heart Association. Circulation 1995;92:3593–3612. [6] Roul G, Moulichon ME, Bareiss P et al. Exercise peak VO 2 determination in chronic HF: Is it still of value. Eur Heart J 1994;15:495–502. [7] Mancini DM, Eisen H, Kussmaul W et al. Value of peak exercise oxygen consumption for optimal timing of cardiac transplantation in ambulatory patients with HF. Circulation 1991;83:778–786. [8] Wong M, Johnson G, Shabetai R et al. Echocardiographic variables as prognostic indicators and therapeutic monitors in chronic congestive HF. Veterans affairs cooperative studies V-HeFT 1 and II. Circulation 1993;87(suppl VI):VI65–VI70. [9] Carvalho JS, Silva MC, Shinebourne EA, Redington AN. Prognostic value of posterior wall thickness in childhood dilated cardiomyopathy and myocarditis. Eur Heart J 1996;17:1233–1238. [10] Weber KT, Kinasewitz GT, Lanicki JS, Fishman AP. Oxygen utilization and ventilation during exercise in patients with chronic cardiac failure. Circulation 1982;65:1213–1223. [11] Picano E, Mathias Jr. W, Pringitore A, Bigi R, Previtali M. Safety and tolerability of dobutamine–atropine stress echocardiography: a prospective, multicenter study. Lancet 1994;344:1190–1191. [12] Sonnenblick EH, Frishman WH, Le Jemtel TH. Dobutamine: A new synthetic cardioactive sympathetic amine. N Engl J Med 1986;314:349–358. [13] Marmor A, Jain D, Zaret B. Beyond ejection fraction. J Nucl Cardiol 1994;1:477–486. [14] Marmor A, Raphael Th, Mamor M, Blondheim D. Evaluation of contractile reserve by dobutamine echocardiography: noninvasive estimation of the severity of HF. Am Heart J 1996;132:1195–1201. [15] Fontanet HL, Perez JE, Davila-Roman VG. Diminished contractile reserve in patients with left ventricular hypertrophy and increased end-systolic stress during dobutamine stress echocardiography. Am J Cardiol 1996;78:1029–1035. [16] Borow KM, Lang RM, Neuman A, Carroll JD, Rajfer SI. Physiologic mechanisms governing hemodynamic response to positive inotropic therapy in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy. Circulation 1988;77:625–637. [17] Borow KM, Neuman A, Arensman FW, Yacoub MB. Left ventricular contractility and contractile reserve in humans after cardiac transplantation. Circulation 1985;71:866–872. [18] Shiller NB, Shah PM, Crawford M et al. Recommendations for quantification of the left ventricle by two-dimensional echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1989;2:358–367. [19] Shah PM, DeMaria A, Kisslo J, Weyman A. Recommendations regarding quantitation in M-mode echocardiography: results of a survey of echocardiographic measurement. Circulation 1978;58:1072–1083. [20] Colan SD, Borow KM, Neumann A. Left ventricular end-systolic wall stress-velocity of fiber shortening relation: a load independent index of myocardial contractility. J Am Coll Cardiol 1984;4:715– 724. [21] Dahan M, Aubry N, Baleynaud S et al. Influence of preload reserve 66 [22] [23] [24] [25] [26] [27] [28] I. A. Paraskevaidis et al. / Cardiovascular Research 43 (1999) 58 – 66 on stroke volume response to exercise in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction: a Doppler echocardiographic study. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995;25:680–686. Weissman NJ, Nidorf SM, Guerrero LJ, Weyman AE, Picard MH. Optimal stage duration in dobutamine stress echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995;25:605–609. Riley M, Northridge DB, Henderson E et al. The use of an exponential protocol for bicycle and treadmill exercise testing in patients with chronic cardiac failure. Eur Heart J 1992;13:1363– 1367. Binkley PF, van Fossen DB, Nunziata E, Unverferth DV, Leier CV. Influence of positive inotropic therapy on pulsatile hydraulic load and ventricular–vascular coupling in congestive HF. J Am Coll Cardiol 1990;15:1127–1135. Gould KL, Lipscomb K, Hamilton GW, Kennedy JW. Relation of left ventricular shape, function,and wall stress in man. Am J Cardiol 1974;34:627–634. Weber KT, Janiski JS. The dynamics of ventricular contraction: force, length, and shortening. Fed Proc 1980;39:188–195. Diaz RA, Obasohan A, Oakley CM. Prediction of outcome in dilated cardiomyopathy. Br Heart J 1987;58:393–399. Coats AJS, Adamopoulos S, Radaelli A et al. Controlled trial of physical training in chronic HF: Exercise performance, hemodynamics, ventilation and autonomic function. Circulation 1992;85:2119–2131. [29] Stevenson LW, Steimle AE, Fonarow G et al. Improvement in exercise capacity of candidates awaiting heart transplantation. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995;25:163–170. [30] Bristow MR, Ginsberg R, Umans V et al. Beta1 and beta 2 adrenergic receptor subpopulations in non-failing and failing human ventricular myocardium: coupling of both receptor subtypes to muscle contraction and selective beta 1 receptor down-regulation in HF. Circ Res 1986;59:297–309. [31] Borow KM, Green LH, Grossman W, Braunwald E. Left ventricular end-systolic stress-shortening and stress-length relation in humans: normal values and sensitivity to inotropic state. Am J Cardiol 1982;50:1301–1308. [32] Davila-Roman VG, Creswell LL, Rosenbloom M, Perez JE. Myocardial contractile state in dogs with chronic mitral regurgitation: echocardiographic approach to the peak systolic pressure / endsystolic area relationship. Am Heart J 1993;126:155–160. [33] Wilson JR, Rayos G, Yeoh TK, Gothard P. Dissociation between peak exercise oxygen consumption and hemodynamic dysfunction in potential heart transplant candidates. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995;26:429–435. [34] Becklake MR, Frank H, Dagenais GR, Ostiguy GL, Guzman CA. Influence of age and sex on exercise cardiac output. J Appl Physiol 1965;20:938–947.