Download Smirnov_PSTP2015

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Quantum tunnelling wikipedia , lookup

DESY wikipedia , lookup

Quantum vacuum thruster wikipedia , lookup

Angular momentum operator wikipedia , lookup

Renormalization group wikipedia , lookup

Renormalization wikipedia , lookup

Nuclear structure wikipedia , lookup

Large Hadron Collider wikipedia , lookup

Double-slit experiment wikipedia , lookup

Elementary particle wikipedia , lookup

Eigenstate thermalization hypothesis wikipedia , lookup

Cross section (physics) wikipedia , lookup

Antiproton Decelerator wikipedia , lookup

Weakly-interacting massive particles wikipedia , lookup

Relativistic quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup

Photon polarization wikipedia , lookup

Super-Kamiokande wikipedia , lookup

ALICE experiment wikipedia , lookup

Future Circular Collider wikipedia , lookup

Monte Carlo methods for electron transport wikipedia , lookup

Theoretical and experimental justification for the Schrödinger equation wikipedia , lookup

Electron scattering wikipedia , lookup

ATLAS experiment wikipedia , lookup

Compact Muon Solenoid wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
On the feasibility of using an
extracted polarized antiproton
beam of the HESR with a solid
polarized target
(continue)
Presenters Yu. A. Plis, A.V. Smirnov
PSTP2015, Bohum, Germany
Urban model of beam energy loss
n3
I
E  n1 I1  n2 I 2  
i 1 1  g i
Emax
g
Emax  I
n1, n2 – number of excitation events
to different atomic energy levels
n3
– number of ionization events

– uniform random number
N
P/P0
Eloss
P/P
WASA@COSY experiment
(momentum on time – no barriers)
Burrier
buckets reflect
particles and
keep inside
barriers while
momentum
spread less
than barrier
height
Example of moving
barrier buckets
TRE
V0
V
t
TGAP
 p/p
TR
F
s-s0
Burrier buckets compensate
the effect of beam energy loss
N
no barriers:
P/P0
P/P1
fast negative energy loss
P/P
Eloss
N
P/P1
P/P0
P/P
barrier buckets
momentum spread growths
due to scattering process
which is much slower than
energy loss
Simulation of particle interaction with
pellets using BEATCOOL code
http://betacool.jinr.ru
Pellet flux
For each particle
s
Find number of interaction events:
1) Integration over betatron oscillation
2) Integration over pellet flux
3) Number of turns per integration step
A few interactions of each particle per
integration step (about 0.1 - 1 sec)
with realistic interaction models
(Urban + plural scattering)
x
Ion beam profile
Particle probability distribution
over betatron oscillation
Designed parameters for PANDA
(high-luminosity mode)
Momentum, GeV/c
RMS momentum spread
Transverse emittance (RMS normalized)
9
1·10-4
0,4
Average luminosity, cm-2 s-1
2·1032
Detector limit, cm-2 s-1
3·1032
Effective target density, cm-2
4·1015
Pellet velocity, m/s
Pellet flux radius, mm
60
1,25
Pellet size (diameter), µm
28
Distance between pellets, mm
5
6
Effective luminosity simulation for
different variants of detector limit
Average luminosity
Detector limit
Detector can not
count more than limit
y
Microstructure of luminosity on time
Average luminosity
Full overload of
detector
y
Effective luminosity
x
7
Luminosity on time
Conclusion
• BETACOOL simulations show that the pellet
size should be much less than 28 µm which
was accepted by PANDA community
• Algorithms in BETACOOL code were especially
elaborated for PANDA experiment and can be
effectively used for the optimization of the
beam extraction with the scattering on the
different types of internal targets