* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Paired with Lecture
Liquid–liquid extraction wikipedia , lookup
Chemical equilibrium wikipedia , lookup
Molecular Hamiltonian wikipedia , lookup
Thermomechanical analysis wikipedia , lookup
Shape-memory alloy wikipedia , lookup
Nuclear fusion wikipedia , lookup
Physical organic chemistry wikipedia , lookup
Chemical thermodynamics wikipedia , lookup
Nuclear binding energy wikipedia , lookup
Marcus theory wikipedia , lookup
Phase transition wikipedia , lookup
Equilibrium chemistry wikipedia , lookup
George S. Hammond wikipedia , lookup
Rate equation wikipedia , lookup
Colloidal crystal wikipedia , lookup
Rutherford backscattering spectrometry wikipedia , lookup
Basal metabolic rate wikipedia , lookup
Atomic nucleus wikipedia , lookup
Spinodal decomposition wikipedia , lookup
Bioorthogonal chemistry wikipedia , lookup
Hypoeutectoid Steel T(°C) 1600 d g g g g g +L g 1200 (austenite) g g g g 1000 g a g g 800 a w a =s/(r +s) 600 w g =(1- wa ) a 727°C r s RS 400 0 (Fe) pearlite a + Fe3C 1 C0 w pearlite = w g w a =S/(R+S) w Fe3 =(1-w a ) C L+Fe3C g + Fe3C 0.76 ag a 1148°C pearlite 2 3 4 5 6 Fe3C (cementite) L 1400 6.7 Co , wt% C 100 mm proeutectoid ferrite Proeuctectoid Ferrite – Pearlite 0.38 wt% C: Plain Carbon – Medium Carbon Steel Hypereutectoid Steel T(°C) 1600 d Fe3C g g g +L g 1200 (austenite) g g 1000 g g g g r 800 w Fe3C =r/(r +s) w g =(1-w Fe3C ) a R 600 400 0 (Fe) pearlite 1148°C L+Fe3C g +Fe3C 0.76 g g g g s S 1 Co w pearlite = w g w a =S/(R+S) w Fe3C =(1-w a ) a +Fe3C 2 3 4 5 6 Fe3C (cementite) L 1400 6.7 Co , wt%C 60 mm pearlite proeutectoid Fe3C Adapted from Fig. 9.33,Callister 7e. Proeutectoid Cementite - Pearlite 1.4 wt% C: Plain Carbon – High Carbon Steel Phase Transformations • We just studied Phase Diagrams which are thermodynamic maps which tell us the equilibrium phases present at any specific combination of temperature, pressure, and composition • These phase diagrams are based on the concept of Gibbs Free Energy, DG, which we have briefly introduced before: DG is the thermodynamic driving force for a reaction If DG is negative then there is a probability that a reaction will occur. The more negative DG becomes, the more driving force there is for the reaction Thermodynamics tells us the probability of a reaction but not the rate – the rate of a reaction is determined by Kinetics Now we are going to shift perspectives and discuss the details of how we transform from one phase to another Phase Transformations Phase transformations involve some form of change in the microstructure Let’s categorize with 3 types: 1. Simple diffusion-dependent transformations in which there is no change in the number or composition of the phases present Examples: Solidification of a pure metal Allotropic transformations Recrystallization and Grain Growth 2. Diffusion-dependent transformations in which there is a change in the phase compositions and or number of phases present Examples: Eutectoid reaction Peritectic reaction 3. Diffusion-less transformations, in which a metastable phase is produced Examples: Martensitic and Bainitic transformations Nucleation During Phase transformation – new phase formed with different physical/ chemical characteristics than the parent phase Diffusion based Phase Transformations do not occur instantaneously – nucleated – nuclei (seeds) act as template to grow crystals – for nucleus to form, rate of addition of atoms to nucleus must be faster than rate of loss – once nucleated, grow until reach equilibrium Driving force to nucleate increases as we increase DT – supercooling (eutectic, eutectoid reactions) Small supercooling few nuclei - large crystals Large supercooling rapid nucleation - many nuclei, small crystals Solidification: Nucleation Processes • Homogeneous nucleation – nuclei form in the bulk of liquid metal – requires supercooling (typically 80-300°C max) • Heterogeneous nucleation – much easier since stable “nucleus” is already present • Could be wall of mold or impurities in the liquid phase – allows solidification with only 0.1-10ºC supercooling Consider Solidification First Let’s assume spherical nuclei Why? Sphere has the smallest surface area/ surface energy for a given volume Let’s Determine the equations that define behavior Homogeneous Nucleation & Energy Effects Surface Free Energy- destabilizes the nuclei (it takes energy to make Surface area of sphere an interface) DGS 4r 2g g = surface tension DGT = Total Free Energy = DGS + DGV Volume (Bulk) Free Energy – stabilizes the nuclei (releases energy) embryo nucleus DGV DG 4 3 r DG 3 volume free energy unit volume DGn = free energy difference between the parent and daughter phase r* = critical nucleus: nuclei < r* shrink; nuclei>r* grow (to reduce energy) Solidification 2 gTm r* DH S DT r* = critical radius g = surface free energy Tm = melting temperature DHS = latent heat of solidification DT = Tm - T = supercooling Note: DHS = strong function of DT g r* = weak function of DT decreases as DT increases For typical DT r* ca. 100Å T1 > T2 Other Effects of Temperature Number of stable nuclei follows Arrhenius behavior (like vacancy densities) Clustering of atoms by short range diffusion – Diffusivity has Arrhenius behavior Maximum Nucleation Rate occurs at intercept of two curves Heterogenous Nucleation Young’s Law: g ml g sm g sl cos (g ml g sm ) cos g sl Heterogeneous Nucleation DGhet Vs DGv Aslg sl Asmg sm Asmg ml 4 3 DGhet r DGv 4 r 2g sl S ( ) 3 (1 cos ) 2 S ( ) (2 cos ) 4 2g sl DG v 1 6g 3 sl DG* 3DG 2 v r* Note: DG*het = DGhom S() S( ) Heterogeneous vs Homogenous DG*het = DGhom S() Lower activation energy barrier Less undercooling required Faster transformation rate Nucleation vs Growth Rates • Growth is determined by long range diffusion • Arrhenius activation energy behavior Overall transformation is equal to the product of Ġ and Ń Rate = 1/time Kinetics of Phase Transformation • Discussed Thermodynamic driving forces in detail • Kinetics – measures the approach to equilibrium vs. time – Hold temperature constant & measure conversion vs. time Fraction transformed, y Rate of Phase Transformation All out of material - done Fixed T maximum rate reached – now amount unconverted decreases so rate slows 0.5 t0.5 rate increases as surface area increases & nuclei grow log t Avrami rate equation => y = 1- exp (-ktn) fraction transformed – k & n fit for specific sample By convention r = 1 / t0.5 time Rate of Phase Transformations 135C 119C 1 10 113C 102C 88C 102 43C 104 • In general, rate increases as T r = 1/t0.5 = A e -Q/RT – – – – R = gas constant T = temperature (K) A = pre-exponential factor Q = activation energy Arrhenius expression • r often small: equilibrium not possible! Eutectoid Transformation Rate • Growth of pearlite from austenite: Adapted from Fig. 9.15, Callister 7e. a a g a a a a • Transformation rate increases with DT. g cementite (Fe3C) Ferrite (a) a g a pearlite growth direction a 100 y (% pearlite) Austenite (g) grain boundary Diffusive flow of C needed 600°C (DT larger) 50 650°C 675°C (DT smaller) 0 Course pearlite formed at higher T - softer Fine pearlite formed at low T - harder g Nucleation and Growth Reaction rate is a result of nucleation and growth of crystals. 100 % Pearlite Nucleation rate increases with DT Growth regime 50 Nucleation Growth rate increases with T regime t 0.5 0 log (time) • Examples: g pearlite colony T just below TE Nucleation rate low Growth rate high g T moderately below TE Nucleation rate med . Growth rate med. g T way below TE Nucleation rate high Growth rate low Consider Eutectoid Transformation … g a + Fe3C Eutectoid transformation (Fe-C): 0.76 wt% C 6.7 wt% C 0.022 wt% C 1600 d L 1400 g +L g 1200 (austenite) 1000 L+Fe3C g +Fe3C Eutectoid: Equil. Cooling: Ttransf. = 727ºC 800 727°C 400 0 (Fe) DT a +Fe3C Undercooling by DTtransf. < 727C 0.76 600 0.022 a ferrite 1148°C 1 2 3 4 5 6 Fe3C (cementite) T(°C) 6.7 Co , wt%C Isothermal Transformation Diagrams y, % transformed • Fe-C system, Co = 0.76 wt% C • Transformation at T = 675°C. 100 T = 675°C 50 0 10 2 1 T(°C) Austenite (stable) 10 4 time (s) TE (727C) 700 Austenite (unstable) 600 Pearlite isothermal transformation at 675°C 500 400 1 10 10 2 10 3 10 4 10 5 time (s) Effect of Cooling History in Fe-C System • Eutectoid composition, Co = 0.76 wt% C • Begin at T > 727°C • Rapidly cool to 625°C and hold isothermally. T(°C) Austenite (stable) 700 Austenite (unstable) 600 g g 500 TE (727C) Pearlite g g g g 400 1 10 10 2 10 3 time (s) 10 4 10 5