* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download ch_14_and_15_Power_point
Georgia in the American Civil War wikipedia , lookup
Lost Cause of the Confederacy wikipedia , lookup
Tennessee in the American Civil War wikipedia , lookup
Commemoration of the American Civil War on postage stamps wikipedia , lookup
Virginia in the American Civil War wikipedia , lookup
Alabama in the American Civil War wikipedia , lookup
Military history of African Americans in the American Civil War wikipedia , lookup
South Carolina in the American Civil War wikipedia , lookup
Opposition to the American Civil War wikipedia , lookup
Border states (American Civil War) wikipedia , lookup
Mississippi in the American Civil War wikipedia , lookup
Hampton Roads Conference wikipedia , lookup
Union (American Civil War) wikipedia , lookup
United Kingdom and the American Civil War wikipedia , lookup
Origins of the American Civil War wikipedia , lookup
United States presidential election, 1860 wikipedia , lookup
AN AGE OF EXPANSIONISM Manifest Destiny The Doctrine of Manifest Destiny  "Manifest destiny" first used in 1845 God wants the U.S., His chosen nation, to become stronger  U.S. divinely ordained to encompass Mexico and Canada  Americans make new territories free and democratic  growing American population needs land   Limits to American expansion undefined Movement to the Far West  American settlement reaches Pacific in 1830s and 1840s  Settlement encroaches on lands claimed by Mexico and England Territorial Expansion by the Mid-Nineteenth Century The Texas Revolution  1820s--Americans move into Texas  "Anglos" never fully accept Mexican rule  1829--Mexico tries abolishing slavery  1835--armed rebellion breaks out The Republic of Texas  March, 1836--Texans declare independence  April, 1836--Santa Anna defeated at San Jacinto  May, 1836--Santa Anna’s treaty recognizes Texas' claim to territory (Mexico repudiates)  Texas offers free land grants to U.S. settlers  Annexation to U.S. refused by Jackson Texas Revolution Western Trails Tyler and Texas  1841--John Tyler assumes presidency     after William Henry Harrison’s death Tyler breaks with Whigs 1844--Tyler negotiates annexation with Texas for re-election campaign issue Senate refuses to ratify Tyler loses Whig nomination to Henry Clay The Triumph of Polk and Annexation  Democrats nominate James K. Polk  Polk runs on expansionist platform   annexation of Texas for Southern vote U.S. jurisdiction of Oregon for Northern vote  Polk wins, so Congress interprets his election as mandate for expansion  Texas annexed before Polk inaugurated Mexican War  Polk wanted to buy California, but tensions prevented this  California: gateway to Pacific  Mexico’s still upset over Texas annexation  Boundary dispute: Original boundary: Nueces River; Texans claimed Rio Grande  Polk honored boundary at Rio Grande  Mexicans wanted all of Texas back The Mexican-American War Mexican War  Polk sent John Slidell to buy California for     $25 mil Mexico refused Polk ordered Gen Zachary Taylor to march from Nueces R. to Rio Grande and ordered naval forces to get ready Mexican troops crossed the Rio Grande and attacked Am. Troops Polk sent message to Congress War! War with Mexico  May 13, 1846--War on Mexico declared  General Zachary Taylor wins campaign in northern Mexico  Colonel Stephen Kearney captured New Mexico and joined John C. Frémont in taking California by early 1847  September, 1847--General Winfield Scott occupies Mexico City Mexican War opponents  Some Whigs opposed war  Thought US did not have a right to Texas beyond Nueces River  Some threatened to cut off supplies and money  Feared this was a slavery conspiracy  E.g. Ralph Waldo Emerson: “Mexico will poison us”  Questioned if blood was spilled on Am. Territory: i.e. Lincoln’s Spot Resolutions Settlement of the MexicanAmerican War  February, 1848--Treaty of Guadalupe     Hidalgo Rio Grande becomes southern border California ceded to U.S. and NM, AZ, UT, NV Latin America started viewing US as “Colossus of the North” US forces gained war experience: prep for CW Most important effect:  Mexican War stirred up the slavery issue in Congress led to CW  Would the new territory be open to slavery?  How to decide?  Abolitionists saw Mexican conflict as conspiracy of the “slaveocracy” and cited the Ostend Manifesto and Oregon settlement as further examples Northwest Boundary Dispute Polk and the Oregon Question  1846--Polk notifies Great Britain that the U.S. no longer accepts joint occupation  England prepares for war, proposes division of the area  Senate approves division of Oregon along 49o north latitude, Treaty of 1846 The Problem of Slavery in the Mexican Cession  Congressional power over slavery includes   setting conditions to make territories states forbidding slavery in new states  Mexican Cession of 1848 puts status of slavery in new territory into question Wilmot Proviso  Slavery should never exist in any of the territories gained from Mexico  Twice passed House, but not Senate  Southerners resented Northern attempts to prevent expansion of slavery The Election of 1848  Whig: Zachary Taylor  Takes no position  But owns slaves in LA  Democratic: Lewis Cass  proposes popular sovereignty supported by many antislavery forces  Free-Soil party: Martin Van Buren  Coalition of N. anti-slavery Whigs, Liberty party, and Dems who distrust Taylor  Supports Wilmot Proviso  Federal internal improvements and free govt homesteads to settlers  Foreshadows beginning of the Republican party  Taylor wins election with less than 50%  Taylor Takes Charge  Taylor proposes admitting California and New Mexico as states immediately  Gold in Cali: most settlers aiming to strike it rich, but didn’t  San Fran: main center of pop. And business  Cali drafted constitution in 1849 that excluded slavery  South reacts angrily   not enough time for planters to settle immediate admission would result in ban of slavery Sectional Balance in 1850  South     Presidency majority in cabinet majority in Supreme Court equal number of states in Senate  Worried that  CA would tip balance  set free state precedent in Southwest  Pave road for NM and UT to be free states also  Angered by  N. demand for abolition in DC  Underground RR and Runaway slaves  Personal Liberty Laws Compromise of 1850  Henry Clay’s compromise package     California admitted as a free state slave trade prohibited in District of Columbia strong fugitive slave law popular sovereignty in the rest of the Mexican cession Result  N got a better deal  CA=advantage in Senate  Popular sovereignty in NM and UT would probably choose non-slave  Stopped slave trade in DCstep toward emancipation  Fugitive slave law was the most fractional issue  Slaves could not testify on own behalf  Hefty fines and jail times for those who helped runaways  More N states passed Personal Liberty Laws The Compromise of 1850 Political Upheaval, 1852-1856  Doom for the Whigs  Whigs were spilt between antislavery northerners and southerners who supported slavery  Both leaders of the party Henry Clay and Daniel Webster die  Nominated war hero Winfield Scott in the Election of 1852  Scott a terrible candidate allied himself with the antislavery northern segment of the party and lost to Democrat Franklin Pierce The Kansas-Nebraska Act Raises a Storm  1854--Stephen Douglas introduces Kansas-Nebraska bill   apply popular sovereignty to Kansas, Nebraska repeal Missouri Compromise line  Act passes on sectional vote  Northerners outraged The Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 The Kansas-Nebraska Act Raises a Storm  Whig indecision causes party to     disintegrate Mass defection among Northern Democrats “Anti-Nebraska” candidates sweep North in 1854 congressional elections Democrats become sole Southern party President Pierce’s effort to acquire Cuba provokes antislavery firestorm: Ostend Manifesto Kansas and the Rise of the Republicans  Republican party:  Former Whigs, Know-Nothings, Free-Soilers, Some Northern Democrats, Liberty Party, Know-Nothings, Opponents of KNA  Appeals to Northern sectional sympathies  Defends West for white, small farmers  Lincoln is candidate  Not allowed south of Mason-Dixon Line Conflict Heats Up  KNA suggested that KS would be free and Neb would be slave  “Bleeding Kansas”  Struggle among abolitionists, proslavery forces for control of Kansas territory   N: Sent NE Emigrant Aid Company S: Pro-slavery “border ruffians” from MO poured into KS to vote repeatedly and stop abolitionists  Pro-slavery group set up a government at Shawnee Mission  Free-soilers set up a competing government in Topeka “Bleeding Kansas” Conflict Heats Up  Caning of Charles Sumner  Leading abolitionist Senator from Mass.  Made speech about Bleeding Kansas  SC senator Preston Brooks attacked Sumner and beat him over the head with his cane!  This issue symbolized the irreconcilability of the N/S disagreements Congressional Election of 1854 Sectional Division in the Election of 1856  Republican John C. Frémont seeks votes only in free states  Know-Nothing Millard Fillmore champions sectional compromise  Democrat James Buchanan defends the Compromise of 1850, carries election  Republicans make clear gains in North The House Divided, 1857-1860  Sectional quarrel becomes virtually irreconcilable under Buchanan  Growing sense of deep cultural differences, opposing interests between North and South Lecompton Constitution (1857)  Main issue: Kansas constitution and statehood  Southerners devised this tricky doc:  PPL not allowed to vote for or against the constitution as a whole  Had to vote for the constitution with or without slavery  If ppl voted no on slavery, the rights of slaveholders already in KS would still be protected Lecompton Constitution  In KS:  Freesoilers boycotted polls  Slaveryites approved the constitution with slavery  In Fed:  President Buchanan supported the LC  Senator Douglass fought against it and the House defeated it  COMPROMISE: Entire constitution had to be resubmitted to popular vote in KS, but pro-slavery rejected compromise  RESULT: Free-soilers win, but KS didn’t become state until 1861 (after CW started) The Dred Scott Case  Dred Scott v. Sanford (1857): Supreme Court can decide on slavery in the territories  Major arguments Scott has no right to sue because neither he nor any other black, slave or free, a citizen  Congress has no authority to prohibit slavery in territories, Missouri Compromise unconstitutional  Result:   All blacks (N+S) no longer citizens  Slaves could be taken anywhere  Missouri Compromise=unconstitutional Dred Scott Case  Impact:  N was outraged  Strengthened Republican party in N  Further split Democratic party along regional lines  Southerners claimed that N’s refusal to honor decision was grounds for disunion. Financial Crash of 1857  Over 5,000 northern businesses failed  Unemployment in urban areas became widespread  North including grain growers were hit the hardest  Cotton was still doing well – increased southern confidence in their crop “A house divided against itself cannot stand…” - Abraham Lincoln Lincoln (R) v. Douglas (D) for Senate, Illinois  Lincoln: All attempts to compromise the slavery issue had failed (see previous quotation).  Douglas: No reason why U.S. can’t remain half slave and half free indefinitely  The Lincoln-Douglas debates over slavery – two great orators  Lincoln lost to Douglas, but launched his career and the new party John Brown – Harper’s Ferry  Returned from Canada in 1859, determined to end slavery forever  Planned to seize federal arsenal at Harper’s Ferry, Virginia  Use weapons to arm slaves and lead them in glorious rebellion to destroy slavery     Brown and his men did capture arsenal Soon all were killed or captured by soldiers Brown was convicted of treason and hanged Some Northerners saw Brown as a lunatic, some saw him as a hero  South feared massive slave uprising Election of 1860  Nation desperately divided  Republicans chose Lincoln  Democrats split:  Initially nominated Douglas  South chose own candidate – John C. Breckinridge of Kentucky  John Bell of Tennessee – Constitution Union Party The Election of 1860: Republicans  Abraham Lincoln nominated   home state of Illinois crucial to election seen as moderate  Platform to widen party’s appeal    high tariffs for industry free homesteads for small farmers government aid for internal improvements  Lincoln wins by carrying North Lincoln’s Appealed to every nonsouthern Group  Free-soilers – promised the non-extension of slavery  Manufacturers – Higher protective tariff  Immigrants – No abridgement of their rights  Western pioneers – internal improvements – railroad and free homesteads  Lincoln was not a radical abolitionist but a moderate The Election of 1860: Constitutional Union Party  Candidate John Bell  Promises compromise between North and South The Election of 1860:  Democrats Divide while Republican Unite  Northern Democrat Stephen Douglas  Southern Democrat John Breckenridge  Republicans nominate political outsider Abraham Lincoln  Born in Kentucky Log Cabin  Mainly Self educated lawyer  Whig Congressman who opposed the Mexican War Election of 1860  Lincoln easily won – opposition divided  Only won 40% of popular vote  Absolutely no support in the South  South felt certain that it had become a minority section  Could no longer shape national policies and events  Believed Congress would eventually try to abolish slavery  South would be ruined  Senate formed Compromise Committee Compromise ?  It is the end of 1860. Lincoln has just been elected president. The slave states are talking about secession. Your job is to find some compromise on slavery that will prevent civil war. Procedure  Step 1: Meet with your regional group and EXPLAIN your position in writing on the following issues:  Compromise of 1850  Fugitive Slave Law  Ostend Manifesto  Kansas Nebraska Act  “Bleeding Kansas”  Caning of Charles Sumner  Dred Scott v. Sanford  Lincoln-Douglas Debates  John Brown’s Raid  Election of Lincoln  Secession Procedure  Step 2: Meet with your opponent  Explain your position on each issue  Work out a compromise that addresses these key questions:  What should be done about slavery where it exists?  What should be done about slavery in the territories?  What should be done about fugitive slaves?  How should the federal government balance between protecting individual personal liberty and property rights?  How should the federal government balance the North and South’s desires to preserve and spread their economic system and their way of life?  What should the federal government do if a state decides to secede? Procedure  Step 3: Reflection:  Are you satisfied that your compromise effectively addresses all of the issues and will keep the country unified? Explain your answer. P3  North Group 1       Kenny Sheena Jessica Kelvin Anna Jon T      Pawel Carolyn Brianna Peter Ronnie  North Group 2  South Group 1       Geri Jean Luc Jordan Mimiko Natalie Prashansa      Doug Frank Khayla Jon P Andrew  South Group 2 P7  North      Marissa Alison Alex Steve Brian  South      Chris D Chris G Martha Chris Y Nick P9  North Group 1      Anthony Chloe Robert D Kristina Jon R, Ewelina  North Group 2      Je’Naya Kristin Nick Colleen Robert T  South Group 1      Yong Jamie Valeri Monica Gary  South Group 2      Alex Katie Angela Vinnie Steve Confederate States of America  SC voted to secede from the union after AL’s election  Most other southern states followed within a few months  Chose Jefferson Davis as president of provisional gov’t located in Richmond, VA  “Border States” were sympathetic to the S but did not vote to secede:  Delaware, Kentucky, Maryland, Missouri, West Virginia What provoked the South to secede?       Shift of the balance of power Triumph of Lincoln and Republican Party Abolition agitation Felt departure would be unopposed Thought the Cotton Economy was strong Preserve rights of “Self Determination”  South felt similar to the American Revolutionaries Why should the North fight to keep the South?      North and South were geographically bound National Debt…Who would pay it? Jointly held Federal territories Fugitive slave issue would not go away US would be weakened and Europe would threaten Crittenden Amendments  Last effort to compromise  Designed to appease the South  Slavery prohibited N of 36-30  BUT would be protected in all areas south of that line (even in any new territories)  Popular sovereignty for all future states  Lincoln rejected it  All hope of compromise was gone Bombardment of Fort Sumter  December 20, 1860: Lincoln said he would not compromise over extension of slavery  April 12: South Carolinians opened fire on federal fort in Charleston Harbor  Thus the Civil War began.  Lincoln defines the war as effort to preserve Union Crucial border states – Missouri, Kentucky, Maryland and Delaware  Lincoln used illegal tactics to control these slave states and force to remain with the union  Martial law was declared in Maryland to suppress confederate support  Supervised voting insured that only proUnion politicians were elected in these states  Repealed ban on habeas corpus South seemed to have great advantages  Confederacy could win a defensive war  North had to invade and drag South back  South had most talented officers  Lee, Jackson  Southern men were bred to fight  South seized federal forts and weapons Southern Problems  North cut rail and ship supply lines with a blockade  Lack of diversity of southern economy  North controlled the sea  North had larger army and population with a steady flow of immigrants  Weak central government of the south had problems running the war  People opposed high taxes to fund war  Confederate money was not valuable South could have won if….  Border state seceded  Northern against war demanded armistice  Britain or France broke blockade Northern Initial Strategy  Lincoln adopts two-front strategy  End the War quickly  deploy navy to blockade Southern ports  capture Confederate capital, Richmond, Va.  Capture Mississisippi River 1st Battle of Bull Run 1st major battle of war  30,000 poorly trained Union soldiers attack a smaller confederate force at Monassas Junction Virginia  They Union troops were stopped there by Confederate general Thomas “Stonewall” Jackson  Union was humiliated and forced to retreat to Washington  Lincoln place General George McClellan in command General McClellan (Union General)  Consistently felt he was outnumbered  Pro-slavery Democrat favored pushing the south into a bloodless defeat  Overcautious and slow  Critical of Lincoln’s leadership Robert E. Lee (Confederate General)  Lee was everything McClellan was not  Lincoln initially asked him to run Union army  He was Bold and willing to accept casualties Political Leadership: Northern Success and Southern Failure  Lincoln expands wartime powers    declares martial law imprisons 10,000 "subversives" without trial briefly closed down a few newspapers  Jefferson Davis    concerned mainly with military duties neglects civilian morale, economy lacks influence with state governments The Diplomatic Struggle  England   belligerent rights extended to Confederacy conditions recognition of independence on proof that South can win independence  France--Confederacy not recognized unless England does so first  "King Cotton" has little influence on foreign policy of other nations Battle of Antietam Sept 1862  McClellan stopped Lee’s advance in one of the bloodiest days of the war  Antietam was a draw militarily  Impact  South never got closer to D.C  British and French may have joined south had they won  Provided Lincoln a victory to launch his Emancipation Proclamation Sept 23, 1862 Emancipation Proclamation  Made Union cause a morale one  Border states did not free slaves  Foreshadowed doom of slavery  Northern opposition to the war rises  Desertions in Union army increased sharply  Northern Democrats had gains in Congress Emancipation (2)  Improved relations with France and England  Blacks began to enlist in the Union army  180,000 black soldiers 10% of army  22 Congressional medals of honor  Routinely massacred when captured  54th Massachusetts Infantry – 1st to see combat Lincoln replace McClellan with General Burnside  Burnside tries again to take Richmond and won the Battle of Fredericksburg only a couple of miles from Richmond  He was forced to retreat by Lee after trying to charge into the heights west of the town  Burnside would be replaced by General Joe Hooker  War in the East had become a stalemate Union Strategy Shifts “Total War”  Anaconda Plan  Slowly suffocate south with a naval blockade  Liberate the slaves to undermine Southern economy  Cut Confederacy in half by seizing control of Mississippi River  Chop South into pieces by sending troops threw Georgia and on to the Carolinas  Decapitate the Confederacy by taking Richmond The Tide Turns 1863  Southern Problems  Confederate economy had collapsed  Diplomacy with France and Britain was a failure  Masters were loosing control of their slaves Tide Turns 1863 (2)  North failed to capitalize  Morale problems resulting from Emancipation  Enrollment Act – Draft of eligible whites  Rich could pay their way out  Provoked a violent response  Draft riots in NYC  Copperheads – promoted end to the war  Feared power of government  Opposition to the Emancipation Battle of Gettysburg  North had tactical advantage having taken a strong defensive position on Cemetery Ridge and Culp’s Hill  July 2 a series of Confederate attacks failed to penetrate the Union lines  July 3 Lee chose to send one final desperate assault lead by General Pickett – More bold than wise  “Pickett’s Charge” was disastrous only a few soldiers survived  Lee was forced to retreat  Meade failed to follow Lee and allowed him to escape – could have ended it right there Battle of Vicksburg (Same day)  Grant took control of a vital fort on Mississippi river Impact of Gettysburg and Vicksburg  Opened Mississippi river to North which allowed for trading to Ohio River Valley  Invasion of south would now begin  Divided South in half  Lee would never advance his army north again  Britain and France would not recognize Confederacy  Any hope for a Southern victory ended on July 4, 1863 at Vicksburg and Gettysburg Last Stages of the Conflict  March 9, 1864--Grant made supreme commander of Union armies  Union invades the South on all fronts  William Sherman marches through Georgia and takes Atlanta  1865  Lee surrenders  Lincoln assassinated  Confederacy ends Effects of the War  618,000 troops dead  Bereft women seek non-domestic roles  Four million African Americans free, not equal  Industrial workers face wartime inflation Effects of the War (2)  Federal government predominant over states  Federal government takes activist role in the economy  higher tariffs, free land, national banking system
 
									 
									 
									 
									 
									 
									 
									 
									 
									 
									 
									 
									 
									 
									 
									 
									 
									 
									 
									 
									 
									 
									 
									 
									 
									 
									 
									 
									 
									 
									 
									 
									 
									 
									 
									 
									 
									 
									 
									 
									 
									 
									 
									 
									 
									 
									 
									 
									 
									 
									 
									 
									 
									 
									 
									 
									 
									 
									 
									 
									 
									 
									 
									 
									 
									 
									 
									 
									 
									 
									 
									 
									 
									 
									 
									 
									 
									 
									 
									 
									 
									 
									 
									 
									 
									 
									 
									 
									 
									 
									 
									 
									 
									 
									 
									 
									 
									 
                                             
                                             
                                             
                                             
                                             
                                             
                                             
                                             
                                            