* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download M. Koch
Schiehallion experiment wikipedia , lookup
Tidal acceleration wikipedia , lookup
Seismic communication wikipedia , lookup
History of geomagnetism wikipedia , lookup
Surface wave inversion wikipedia , lookup
History of geodesy wikipedia , lookup
Mantle plume wikipedia , lookup
Magnetotellurics wikipedia , lookup
Earthquake engineering wikipedia , lookup
Reflection seismology wikipedia , lookup
Seismometer wikipedia , lookup
The seismic Travel Time Problem as applied to Tomography of the Earth I. History and Developments in the Solution of the forward and inverse Problem Dr. M. Koch Department of Geotechnology University of Kassel Lecture 1 / 41st INSC (2016) M. Koch: The seismic travel time problem as applied to tomography of the Earth 28.07. 2016 Table of contents 1. Introduction 1.1. What is the seismic travel time problem and tomography? 1.2. Pioneering work and history 1.2.1. X-ray computed tomography 1.2.2. Local studies of the crust and upper mantle 1.2.3. Regional and global tomography 1.3. Recent trends: ambient noise and finite frequency tomography 2. Representation of structure 2.1 General approaches 2.2. Comparison of block/ smoothed parameterizations 3. The data prediction (forward) problem 3.1. Ray-based methods /shooting / bending 3.2. Grid-based methods / Eikonal/ shortest path ray tracing M. Koch: The seismic travel time problem as applied to tomography of the Earth 28.07. 2016 2 Table of contents 4. Solving the inverse problem 4.1. Nonlinear optimization formulation 4.2. The linear inverse problem 4.3. Analysis of solution robustness 5. Tomography as a tool to understand Earth’s geodynamics 5.1. Overview of the geodynamics of the Earth 5.2 How to relate seismic structure to geodynamics? 5.3. Tomography in geodynamically active regions 6. Future developments 7. References M. Koch: The seismic travel time problem as applied to tomography of the Earth 28.07. 2016 3 1. Introduction 1.1. What is the seismic travel time problem and tomography? Seismic tomography is the 3D- extension of the classical seismic travel time problem technique for imaging the 3D- velocity structure v(x,y,z) of the Earth from travel times T of seismic waves (P-, S-, and Surface waves) produced by earthquakes or explosions: 𝑇= => 1 𝑣 𝑥,𝑦,𝑧 𝑑𝑠 d = g(m) v(x,y,z) = F-1 (T) m = g-1(m) (forward problem) (inverse problem) a) Classical seismic travel time problem Determination of v(r) by the Wiechert- Herglotz -method / tau-p method => velocity model of the earth M. Koch: The seismic travel time problem as applied to tomography of the Earth 28.07. 2016 4 1. Introduction 1.1. What is the seismic travel time problem and tomography? b) Seismic tomography b1) (Teleseismic) sources (hypocenters) known: Determination of structure (Aki-Christofferson-Husebye (ACH) method): Aki, K., A. Christoffersson, and E. S. Husebye (1977). Determination of the three-dimensional seismic structure of the lithosphere, J. Geophys. Res., 82, 277-296 b2) (Local) sources unknown: Simultaneous Inversion for Structure and Hypocenters (SSH- Method) (Focus of author’s research) Aki K and Lee WHK (1976) Determination of three-dimensional velocity anomalies under a seismic array using first P-arrival times from local earthquakes, 1, a homogeneous initial model. J. Geophys. Res., 81: 4381–4399 Koch, M., (1985) Nonlinear inversion of local seismic travel times for the simultaneous determination of the 3D-velocity structure and hypocenters - application to the seismic zone Vrancea, J. Geophys., 56, 160 – 173. M. Koch: The seismic travel time problem as applied to tomography of the Earth 28.07. 2016 5 1. Introduction 1.2. Pioneering work and history 1.2.1. X-ray computed tomography 2D- X-ray Computed Tomography (CT) developed in the 1970’s is at origin of seismic tomography Mathematics based originally on the Radon Transform (1917) (Koch, 1977) Computationally nowadays CT done with Algebraic Reconstruction Technique (ART) (similar to the ACH-method) M. Koch: The seismic travel time problem as applied to tomography of the Earth 28.07. 2016 6 1. Introduction 1.2. Pioneering work and history 1.2.2. Local studies of the crust and upper mantle Tomography using local earthquakes (SSH) Aki K and Lee WHK (1976) Determination of three-dimensional velocity anomalies under a seismic array using first P-arrival times from local earthquakes, 1, a homogeneous initial model. J. Geophys. Res., 81: 4381–4399 Eberhart-Phillips, D., 1986. Three-dimensional velocity structure in northern California coast ranges from inversion of local earthquake arrival times. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 76, 1025–1052. Hirahara, K., 1988. Detection of three-dimensional velocity anisotropy. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 51, 71–85 References by the author M. Koch Teleseismic tomography Aki, K., A. Christoffersson, and E. S. Husebye (1977). Determination of the three-dimensional seismic structure of the lithosphere, J. Geophys. Res., 82, 277-296 Koch, M., (1985) Nonlinear inversion of local seismic travel times for the simultaneous determination of the 3Dvelocity structure and hypocenters - application to the seismic zone Vrancea, J. Geophys., 56, 160 – 173. => extension of the linear ACH- and SSH – method to a nonlinear iterative gradient optimization procedure with exact (shooting) ray-tracing References by the author M. Koch Nowadays non-linear inversion state of the art. M. Koch: The seismic travel time problem as applied to tomography of the Earth 28.07. 2016 7 1. Introduction 1.2. Pioneering work and history 1.2.2. Local studies of the crust and upper mantle Cross-bore hole tomography, for small-scale studies using Backprojection (ART) techniques of first arrivals initiated by McMechan, G.A., 1983. Seismic tomography in boreholes. Geophys. J. Royal Astr. Soc., 74, 601–612. Bregman, N.D., Bailey, R.C., Chapmans, C.H., 1989. Crosshole seismic tomography. Geophysics 54, 200–215. Reflection tomography, using artificial sources, to constrain both velocity and interface depth by Bishop, T.P., Bube, K.P., Cutler, R.T., Langan, R.T., Love, P.L., Resnick, J.R., Shuey, R.T.,Spindler, D.A., Wyld, H.W., 1985. Tomographic determination of velocity and depth in laterally varying media. Geophysics 50, 903–923 Wide-angle (refraction and wide-angle reflection) tomography on the regional scale by Kanasewich, E.R., Chiu, S.K.L., 1985. Least-squares inversion of spatial seismic refraction data. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 75, 865–880. Bleibinhaus, F., Gebrande, H., 2006. Crustal structure of the Eastern Alps along the TRANSALP profile from wide-angle seismic tomography. Tectonophysics 414, 51–69. M. Koch: The seismic travel time problem as applied to tomography of the Earth 28.07. 2016 8 1. Introduction 1.2. Pioneering work and history 1.2.3. Regional and global tomography In these applications use of permanent global seismic networks (GSN). Dziewonski, A.M., Hager, B.H., O’Connell, R.J., 1977. Large-scale heterogeneities in the lower mantle. J. Geophys. Res. 82, 239–255 => Used 700,000 P wave residuals from ISC bulletins to imagine lateral structure of the Earth’s mantle. Use of PcP- and PKP- phases by Karason, H., van der Hilst, R.D., 2001. Improving global tomography models of P-wavespeed. I. Incorporation of differential travel times for refracted and diffracted core phases (PKP, Pdiff). J. Geophys. Res. 106, 6569–6587. S-Phases and mostly spherical harmonical, but also irregular cell representation of heterogeneities, allowing determination of Vp/Vs- ratios. Su, W.-J., Dziewonski, A.M., 1997. Simultaneous inversion for 3-D variations in shear and bulk velocity in the mantle. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 100, 135–156 Use of surface waves allowing for good resolution by the oceanic lithosphere Shapiro, N.M., Campillo, M., Stehly, L., Ritzwoller, M.H., 2005. High-resolution surface wave tomography from ambient seismic noise. Science 307, 1615–1618 M. Koch: The seismic travel time problem as applied to tomography of the Earth 28.07. 2016 9 1. Introduction 1.2. Pioneering work and history 1.2.3. Regional and global tomography Use of normal modes (free oscillations) allow for resolution of deep structures, but at large scales Resovsky, J.S., Ritzwoller, M.H., 1999. A degree 8 mantle shear velocity model from normal mode observations below 3 mHz. J. Geophys. Res. 104, 9931014 Anisotropy of the mantle is becoming a focus of tomography either - by direct inversion of the P-wave anisotropy tensor Tanimoto, T., Anderson, D.L., 1985. Lateral heterogeneity and azimuthal anisotropy of the upper mantle—Love and Rayleigh waves 100–250 sec. J. Geophys. Res. 90, 1842–1858 References by the author M. Koch - by shear wave splitting Zhang, H., Liu, Y., Thurber, C., Roecker, S., 2007. Three-dimensional shear-wave splitting tomography in the Parkfield, California, region. Geophys. Res. Lett. 34, doi:10.1029/2007GL031951 M. Koch: The seismic travel time problem as applied to tomography of the Earth 28.07. 2016 10 1. Introduction 1.3. Recent trends: ambient noise and finite frequency tomography Approaches that go beyond classical travel-time analysis: Use of cross-correlations of ambient noise and the Coda of small-scale scattering Shapiro, N.M., Campillo, M., 2004. Emergence of broadband Rayleigh waves from correlations of the ambient seismic noise. Geophys. Res. Lett. 31, doi:10.1029/2004GL019491. To overcome the limitations of geometrical resolution by the finite wavelength of body waves (high frequency approximation of seismic ray- theory) use of first-order perturbation theory (Born theory) to account for scattering has been proposed Snieder, R., 1988a. Large-scale waveform inversions of surface waves for lateral heterogeneity. 1. Theory and numerical examples. J. Geophys. Res. 93, 12055–12065, 2. Application to surface waves in Europe and the Mediterranean. J. Geophys. Res. 93, 12067–12080 Understanding the sensitivity kernels of the ray-inversion (banana-doughnuts) allowed for better localization of mantle plumes Marquering, H., Dahlen, F.A., Nolet, G., 1999. Three-dimensional sensitivity kernels for finite-frequency travel times: the banana–doughnut paradox. Geophys. J. Int. 137, 805–815. Finite frequency tomography, using phase information, improves resolution of ray-based tomography Hung, S.H., Shen, Y., Chiao, L.Y., 2004. Imaging seismic velocity structure beneath the Iceland hotspot: a finite frequency approach. J. Geophys. Res. 109, B08305 M. Koch: The seismic travel time problem as applied to tomography of the Earth 28.07. 2016 11 Table of Contents 1. Introduction 1.1. What is the seismic travel time problem and tomography? 1.2. Pioneering work and history 1.2.1. X-ray computed tomography 1.2.1. Local studies of the crust and upper mantle 1.2.3. Regional and global tomography 1.3. Recent trends: ambient noise and finite frequency tomography 2. Representation of structure 2.1 General approaches 2.2. Comparison of block/ smoothed parameterizations 3. The data prediction (forward) problem 3.1. Ray-based methods /shooting / bending 3.2. Grid-based methods / Eikonal/ shortest path ray tracing M. Koch: The seismic travel time problem as applied to tomography of the Earth 28.07. 2016 12 2. Representation of structure 2.1 General approaches Structural representation dependent on resolution purpose of the model, whether model contains horizontal (Moho) or vertical (faults) boundaries, and of the data (station) coverage. Parametrization possible with a) blocks (no a priori smoothing) (ACH-method, SSH- method of the author, see References by the author M. Koch ) smoothing may occur a posteriori during the regularization (damping) of the solution, in account of the Backus-Gilbert resolution-covariance trade-off Backus, G.E., Gilbert, J.F., 1968. The resolving power of gross earth data. Geophys. J. Royal Astr. Soc. 16, 169–205 b) with interpolation and/or B-Spline smoothing Thurber, C.H., 1983. Earthquake locations and three-dimensional crustal structure in the Coyote Lake area, central California. J. Geophys. Res. 88, 8226–8236. Thomson, C.J., Gubbins, D., 1982. Three-dimensional lithospheric modelling at NORSAR: linearity of the method and amplitude variations from the anomalies. Geophys. J. Royal Astr. Soc. 71, 1–36 c) adaptive irregular Delauney tetrahedra meshes Sambridge, M., Gudmundsson, O., 1998. Tomographic systems of equations with irregular cells. J . Geophys. Res. 103, 773–781. M. Koch: The seismic travel time problem as applied to tomography of the Earth 28.07. 2016 13 2. Representation of structure 2.2 Comparison of block/ smoothed parameterizations Synthetic reconstruction test with direct block parametrization (a) and with B-Spline smoothing (b). (Rawlinson et al., 2010) M. Koch: The seismic travel time problem as applied to tomography of the Earth 28.07. 2016 14 Table of Contents 1. Introduction 1.1. What is the seismic travel time problem and tomography? 1.2. Pioneering work and history 1.2.1. X-ray computed tomography 1.2.1. Local studies of the crust and upper mantle 1.2.2. Regional and global tomography 1.3. Recent trends: ambient noise and finite frequency tomography 2. Representation of structure 2.1 General approaches 2.2. Comparison of block/ smoothed parameterizations 3. The data prediction (forward) problem 3.1. Ray-based methods /shooting / bending 3.2. Grid-based methods / Eikonal/ shortest path ray tracing M. Koch: The seismic travel time problem as applied to tomography of the Earth 28.07. 2016 15 3. The data prediction (forward) problem 3.1. Ray-based methods /shooting / bending Seismic ray tracing involves the computation of 𝑇= 1 𝑣 𝑥,𝑦,𝑧 𝑑𝑠 From the elastic wave-equation under the high-frequency approximation results the Eikonal equation |∇T|= s with, s=1/v, the slowness) or for the characteristics, the trajectory r(l), the kinematic ray equation Cerveny, V., 2001. Seismic Ray Theory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge M. Koch: The seismic travel time problem as applied to tomography of the Earth 28.07. 2016 16 3. The data prediction (forward) problem 3.1. Ray-based methods /shooting / bending Solution of ray-equation by a) shooting method (initial value problem) (iterative application of Snell’s law) Thurber, C.H., Ellsworth, W.L., 1980. Rapid solution of ray tracing problems in heterogeneous media. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 70, 1137–1148 References by the author M. Koch b) bending method (boundary value problem, to be solved iteratively) Julian, B.R., Gubbins, D., 1977. Three-dimensional seismic ray tracing. J. Geophys. 43, 95–113 Comparison of shooting- (top) and bending methods (bottom) (Rawlinson et al., 2010) M. Koch: The seismic travel time problem as applied to tomography of the Earth 28.07. 2016 17 3. The data prediction (forward) problem 3.2. Grid-based methods / Eikonal/ shortest path ray tracing Grid-based methods a) Eikonal –equation b) Shortest path ray tracing (using Fermat’s principles) compute the global travel-time field on a defined a grid of points, not only for one pair of source-receiver, as previously. Advantage: Highly efficient and stable for very heterogeneous media Disadvantage: Computationally demanding (CPU-time scales with n3 of grid size) Vidale, J.E., 1988. Finite-difference calculations of traveltimes. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 78, 2062–2076 M. Koch: The seismic travel time problem as applied to tomography of the Earth 28.07. 2016 18 Table of contents 4. Solving the inverse problem 4.1. Nonlinear optimization formulation 4.2. The linear inverse problem 4.3. Analysis of solution robustness 5. Tomography as a tool to understand Earth’s geodynamics 5.1. Overview of the geodynamics of the Earth 5.2 How to relate seismic structure to geodynamics? 5.3. Tomography in geodynamically active regions 6. Future developments 7. References M. Koch: The seismic travel time problem as applied to tomography of the Earth 28.07. 2016 19 4. Solving the inverse problem 4.1. Nonlinear optimization formulation The (nonlinear) seismic forward (travel time) relationship between model m and data d d = g(m) is formulated as a nonlinear least-squares optimization problem for the objective function ||d - g(m) ||2 -> minimum Solution methods are Iterative inversion procedure, adapted from Liu, Q. and Y.J. Gu (2012), Seismic imaging: From classical to adjoint tomography, provide only a local minimum, i.e. depend on an accurate initial models, but Tectonophysics, 566-567, 31–66 provide robust measures of model uncertainty, at least within the linear sub-framework (see Koch, Lecture 2) 1) non-linear (iterative) gradient techniques (most common), (Newton, Gauss-Newton, Levenberg-Marquardt) 2) fully nonlinear methods, i.e. Monte Carlo (MC) methods, i.e. simulated annealing and genetic algorithms, are recent, allow a global search of the “true” minimum, but very time consuming. Sambridge, M., Mosegaard, K., 2001. Monte Carlo methods in geophysical inverse problems. Rev. Geophys. 40, M. Koch: The seismic travel time problem as applied to tomography of the Earth 28.07. 2016 20 4. Solving the inverse problem 4.1. Nonlinear optimization solution Non-linear (iterative) gradient technique (Gauss-Newton / Levenberg-Marquardt) For the model update Δm (from a starting solution mo) in step n+1 Δmn+1 = (GTG + Cm−1) * GTCd−1(d – g(mn)) with G = 𝝏g/𝝏mn, the Fréchet (Jacobian) matrix, computed either analytically, but mostly numerically Cm , the covariance matrix of the model, related to the a priori uncertainty of the model Cd, the covariance matrix of the data, related to the a priori uncertainty of the data The equation above is also “the one-step” of the so-called damped least squares solution, or ridge regression of the linear inverse problem (see Koch, Lecture 2). Iterative procedure is stopped, whenever || Δmn+1 ||2 < εm or || d-g(mn)||2 = || r ||2 < εd No guarantee to reach the local minimum, let alone the global one. M. Koch: The seismic travel time problem as applied to tomography of the Earth 28.07. 2016 21 4. Solving the inverse problem 4.2. The linear inverse problem One-step Gauss-Newton / Levenberg-Marquardt method => Δm = (GTG + kI) * GTCd−1(d – Gm0) with k , the damping- or ridge parameter, to stabilize (regularize) the ill-posed (unstable) inverse solution (see Koch, Lecture 2). The proper choice of k ~ trace(Cm-1 ) is one of the most intriguing issues of ill-posed inverse problems Koch, M., 1992. The optimal regularization of the linear seismic inverse problem, In: Geophysical Inversion, Bednar, J.B., L. Lines, R.H. Stolt and A.B. Weglein (eds.), Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (SIAM), Philadelphia, PY, pp. 170 – 234. M. Koch: The seismic travel time problem as applied to tomography of the Earth 28.07. 2016 22 4. Solving the inverse problem 4.3. Analysis of solution robustness (error-resolution analysis) This is one of the most intriguing issues in inverse theory (e.g. Koch, Lectures 2 and 3). Frequently overlooked, when dealing with non-linear inversion, as no exact theory exists Koch, M., 1992, Optimal models in seismic inversion of local travel times: unifying the different viewpoints within both the linear and nonlinear inversion approaches, 19th International Conference on Mathematical Geophysics, Taxco, Mexico, June 21 - 26, 1992. Two common techniques are - synthetic resolution checkerboard test (simple procedure, but works also for nonlinear inversion) - covariance- resolution - “trade-off” analysis (Backus-Gilbert-methodology) Backus, G.E., Gilbert, J.F., 1968. The resolving power of gross earth data. Geophys. J. Royal Astr. Soc. 16, 169–205. (only verified within the framework of linear theory) (see Lecture 2) M. Koch: The seismic travel time problem as applied to tomography of the Earth 28.07. 2016 23 4. Solving the inverse problem 4.4. Analysis of solution robustness (error – resolution analysis) Synthetic test example (Rawlinson et al., 2010) Input model (a) and final (nonlinear inversion) model (d) Resolution checkerboard test (a) and covariance and error estimates (b) for model left M. Koch: The seismic travel time problem as applied to tomography of the Earth 28.07. 2016 24 Table of contents 4. Solving the inverse problem 4.1. Nonlinear optimization formulation 4.2. The linear inverse problem 4.3. Analysis of solution robustness 5. Tomography as a tool to understand Earth’s geodynamics 5.1. Overview of the geodynamics of the Earth 5.2 How to relate seismic structure to geodynamics? 5.3. Tomography in geodynamically active regions 6. Future developments 7. References M. Koch: The seismic travel time problem as applied to tomography of the Earth 28.07. 2016 25 5. Tomography as a tool to understand Earth’s geodynamics 5.1. Overview of the geodynamics of the Earth Geodynamical processes in the Earth mainly driven by density differences due to - mineral composition differences (layering of the earth) - thermally driven flow (mantle convection => plate tectonics) (mantle plumes => hot spots, rift zones, volcanism) M. Koch: The seismic travel time problem as applied to tomography of the Earth 28.07. 2016 26 5. Tomography as a tool to understand Earth’s geodynamics 5.2. How to relate seismic structure to geodynamics? Seismic velocities ; depend on (decreasing order?) - temperature T, composition (ρ), presence of partial melt, anisotropy. Based on Goes, S., Govers, R., Vacher, P., 2000. Shallow mantle temperatures under Europe from P and S wave tomography. J. Geophys. Res. 105, 11153–11169. a) when mantle is below the solidus, temperature T is dominant factor, with a decrease of 0.5–2% in P- and 0.7–4.5% in S-velocity per 100 oC - T-change b) compositional variations <1% c) above the solidus, effect of partial melt is significant, but difficult to quantify d) in lower mantle effects of temperature smaller (0.3-0.4%), depending on Fe/(Mg+ Fe)- ratio, with a -0.5 % change 200 oC temperature change M. Koch: The seismic travel time problem as applied to tomography of the Earth 28.07. 2016 27 5. Tomography as a tool to understand Earth’s geodynamics 5.3. Tomography in geodynamically active regions The LLNL-G3Dv3 Model (Simmons et al., 2012) Note subduction and spreading zones and small-scale anomalies in the lower mantle M. Koch: The seismic travel time problem as applied to tomography of the Earth 28.07. 2016 28 5. Tomography as a tool to understand Earth’s geodynamics 5.3. Tomography in geodynamically active regions Surface wave- and S-wave- inversions combined Comparison of three global shear velocity models at 150 km depth (adapted from: Kustowski, B., Ekstrom, G., Dziewonski, A.M., 2008. Anisotropic shear-wave velocity structure of the Earths mantle: a global model. J. Geophys. Res. 113, B06306) M. Koch: The seismic travel time problem as applied to tomography of the Earth 28.07. 2016 29 5. Tomography as a tool to understand Earth’s geodynamics 5.3. Tomography in geodynamically active regions Subducting slab environments P- and S- wave tomographic models under the Japanese Island arc system. (adapted from: Widiyantoro, S., Gorbatov, A., Kennett, B.L.N., Fukao, Y., 2000. Improving global shear wave traveltime tomography using three-dimensional ray tracing and iterative inversion. Geophys. J. Int. 141, 747–758) M. Koch: The seismic travel time problem as applied to tomography of the Earth 28.07. 2016 30 5. Tomography as a tool to understand Earth’s geodynamics 5.3. Tomography in geodynamically active regions Mantle plume environments P-wave tomographic “plume” images under “thermally hot” (hotspots, spreading and rift) zones. adapted from Zhao, D., 2004. Global tomographic images of mantle plumes and subducting slabs: insight into deep Earth dynamics. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 146, 3–34 M. Koch: The seismic travel time problem as applied to tomography of the Earth 28.07. 2016 31 5. Tomography as a tool to understand Earth’s geodynamics 5.3. Tomography in geodynamically active regions Yellowstone hot spot Upper P-wave mantle structure at a depth of 150 km across the US (white line delineates the western region of high resolution) (Source: earth scope) Waite, G. P., R. B. Smith, and R. M. Allen (2006), VP and VS - structure of the Yellowstone hot spot from teleseismic tomography: Evidence for an upper mantle plume, J. Geophys. Res., 111, B04303, Husen, S. , R. B. Smith and G. P. Waite (2004). Evidence for gas and magmatic sources beneath the Yellowstone volcanic feld from seismic tomographic imaging. J. Volcanology and Geothermal Res., 131, 397-410 M. Koch: The seismic travel time problem as applied to tomography of the Earth 28.07. 2016 32 Table of contents 4. Solving the inverse problem 4.1. Nonlinear optimization formulation 4.2. The linear inverse problem 4.3. Analysis of solution robustness 5. Tomography as a tool to understand Earth’s geodynamics 5.1. Overview of the geodynamics of the Earth 5.2 How to relate seismic structure to geodynamics? 5.3. Tomography in geodynamically active regions 6. Conclusions and outlook 7. References M. Koch: The seismic travel time problem as applied to tomography of the Earth 28.07. 2016 33 6. Conclusions and outlook - Seismic tomography has experienced rapid advances on many fronts, since its inception in the 1970s, including improved techniques for solving the forward (ray-tracing) and inverse problems. - More efficient techniques of geometric ray tracing, to solve the two point (source–receiver path) problem, such as grid-based methods, i.e. eikonal solvers and shortest-path ray tracing, as well as multi-arrival schemes are coming to the fore. - The recently emerging ambient noise tomography, is having a significant impact, as ambient noise information is independent of and complimentary to information from deterministic sources - Finite difference and even full waveform tomography is beginning to emerge as a powerful tool for imaging the earth, as the computing power continues to increase (following Moore’s law) - At regional and global scales, one major main impediments to improve the resolution of tomographic models is a lack of good data coverage, especially across ocean basins. - The steps from relating seismic tomographic properties to physical (thermal) and chemical properties of the earth’s rock material for geodynamical inferences need further research - Quote (Nolet et al., 2007): “By all signs, seismic tomography is entering a Golden Age”. ?????? Further details in lectures 3 and 4 of the lecture series. M. Koch: The seismic travel time problem as applied to tomography of the Earth 28.07. 2016 34 7. References General references (personal likings) Iyer, H. and Hirahara, K., 1993. Seismic Tomography: Theory and Practice. Chapman & Hall, London, UK. Nolet, G. (Ed), 1987. Seismic Tomography: With Applications in Global Seismology and Exploration Geophysics. D. Reidel, Dordrecht, The Netherlands. Nolet, G., Allen, T. and Zhao, D., 2007. Mantle plume tomography, Chemical Geology, 241, 248–263. Nolet, G., 2008. A Breviary of Seismic Tomography: Imaging the Interior of the Earth and the Sun. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. Rawlinson, N., Pozgay, S. and Fishwick, S. 2010. Seismic tomography: A window into deep Earth. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 178, (3–4), 101–135. Tarantola, A., 1987. Inverse Problem Theory. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. References of the author (M. Koch) Publications, Projects and Presentations of Research >> Curriculum Vitae, Prof. Dr. M. Koch M. Koch: The seismic travel time problem as applied to tomography of the Earth 28.07. 2016 35