Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Factors That Affect Human Population Size • • Crude birth rate: the number of live birth per 1,000 individuals in one year. • Crude death rate: the number of deaths per 1,000 individuals in one year. • The annual rate of population change in percentage is: CBR – CDR % change in population = 1,000 x 100%= • 14-8 %= 1000 • • • World 2005=1.21% Europe 2005= -.7% Developing = 1.8% X100% = .6% In USA, this number does not include immigration US and world population growth rate • • • • U.S. population growth rate in 1965 was 2%, now in 2009 it is .9% (including migration) The U.S. is the third most populous country in the world. 306 million World population 6.8 billion Doubling time = rule of 70 : 70 divided by the population growth rate equals the doubling time in years _70_ .97 = 72 years In the world there are 2.5 babies born for every one heart beat Average crude birth rate Average crude death rate World 22 9 All developed countries 11 10 All developing countries 25 9 Developing countries (w/o China) 29 9 Fig. 11.2a, p. 239 Africa 38 14 Latin America 24 6 Asia 22 8 Oceania 18 7 United States 15 9 North America 14 9 Europe 10 11 Fig. 11.2b, p. 239 Population Growth Rate Annual world population growth <1% 1-1.9% 2-2.9% 3+% Data not available Fig. 11.3, p. 240 % population growth rate - worldwide Growth rate (percent) 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 Year Fig. 11.4, p. 240 China 1.26 billion 1.4 billion India 1 billion 1.4 billion USA Indonesia Brazil 276 million 338 million 212 million 273 million 170 million 221 million Pakistan Russia Bangladesh Japan 151 million 227 million 145 million 137 million 128 million 177 million 127 million 121 million Nigeria 123 million 205 million Fig. 11.5, p. 241 2000 2025 Asia 3.7 billion 4.7 billion Europe 728 million 714 million Africa 800 million 1.3 billion Latin America 518 million 703 million North America 306 million 374 million Oceania 31 million 39 million 2000 2025 Fig. 11.6, p. 241 Measuring Global Fertility Rate • Replacement fertility rate: the number of children a couple must bear to replace themselves • 2.1 for developed countries • 2.5 for developing countries • Even after lowering fertility rates to replacement level, it will take 50 – 60 years for the population to stabilize Total fertility rate (TFR): an estimate of the number of children a women will have during her child bearing years. • Worldwide TFR = in 2009 2.6 • 1.7 in developed countries, 3.85 in developing countries, can be a high as 6 in some countries like Africa. • Europe TFR = 1.5 At a TFR of 2.9 • USA TFR = 2.1 with no limits to • Hispanic= 2.9 population • Asian = 1.9 growth, in 150 • Black = 2.2 years there will • White = 1.8 be 296 billion people on this World 5 children per women 2.9 Developed countries 2.5 1.5 Developing countries 6.5 3.2 Africa 6.6 5.3 Latin America 5.9 2.8 Asia 5.9 2.8 Oceania 3.8 2.4 North America 3.5 2.0 Europe 2.6 1.4 Fig. 11.7, p. 241 1950 2000 Births per woman <2 4-4.9 2-2.9 5+ 3-3.9 Data not available Fig. 11.8, p. 242 Population Estimates for 2050 12 11 Population (billion) 10 9 8 High High 10.7 Medium Low Medium 8.9 7 6 Low 7.3 5 4 3 2 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 Year 2050 Fig. 11.9, p. 242 . Fertility In The U.S. • • • • • 306+ million people in the U.S. Peak TFR was 3.7 in 1957 during the baby boom In 2009 growth rate was .97 %, 56% of this was babies being born and 44% was immigration. In 2000 there were 7.1 million babies born, 900,000 legal immigrants, 300,000 illegal immigrants By 2050 the U.S. population is expected to reach 439,000 . Fertility In The U.S. • The 4 main reasons for such high growth in the U.S. 1. Large numbers of women Teen Pregnancy 15-19 from the baby boom are Total stillper in1000 childbearing years. births There has been World = a 50large increase in potential mothers in recent years, USA = 53 although TFR LDC =has 112 remained stable. MDC =24 2. High # of unmarried women bearing children Europe = 5.8 = 3.5 ethnic groups 3. High TFR inJapan certain 4. High levels of immigration California Fertility 1. most populous state in the nation 2. 34 million people, expected to rise to 39 million by 2020 3. Since 1985 the CA TFR rose from 1.9 to 2.5 because immigrants have high fertility. • Increases in population size has caused wetland destruction, air pollution, more endangered species than any other continental state except for Texas. TFR in the US 4.0 Births per woman 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.1 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 Year Fig. 11.10, p. 243 Births per thousand population 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 0 1910 World War II Demographic transition 1920 Depression 1930 1940 Baby boom 1950 1960 Baby bust 1970 Echo baby boom 1980 1990 2000 2010 Year Fig. 11.11, p. 243 Highly Effective Extremely Effective Total abstinence Sterilization Hormonal implant (Norplant) 100% 99.6% 98% IUD with slow-release hormones 98% IUD plus spermicide 98% Vaginal pouch (“female condom”) 97% IUD Condom (good brand) plus spermicide Oral contraceptive 95% 95% 93% Fig. 11.12a, p. 244 Effective Moderately Effective Cervical cap 89% Condom (good brand) Spermicide (creams, jellies, suppositories) 75% Rhythm method (daily temperature readings) 74% 84% Withdrawl 74% Rhythm method (Billings, Sympto-Thermal) 84% Condom (cheap brand) Vaginal sponge impregnated with spermicide 83% 86% Diaphragm plus spermicide Spermicide (foam) 70% 82% Unreliable Douche Chance (no method) 40% 10% Fig. 11.12b, p. 244 Developed Countries Rate per 1,000 people 50 40 Rate of natural increase 30 Crude birth rate 20 Crude death rate 10 Rate of natural increase = crude birth rate = crude death rate 0 1775 1800 1850 1900 Year 1950 2000 2050 Fig. 11.13a, p. 245 Developing Countries 50 Rate per 1,000 people Crude birth rate 40 Rate of natural increase 30 Crude death rate 20 10 0 1775 1800 1850 1900 Year 1950 2000 2050 Fig. 11.13b, p. 245 Factors that Influence Birth and Fertility Rates • Average level of education and affluence (high education=low TFR) • Importance of children as part of the labor force • Urbanization (urbanization=lower fertility rates) • Cost of raising and educating children • Educational and employment opportunities for women • Infant mortality rate (high infant mortality rate=high TFR) • Average age at marriage (younger=more kids) • Availability of pension plans (pension plan=less kids) • Availability of legal abortions • Availability of birth control • Religious beliefs, traditions, norms • Economic rewards and penalties for bearing children (Like China) Factors that Influence Death Rates • The rise in world population in the last 100 Mortality years is not aInfant result of huge increases in CBR, Deaths per 1000 but is due to decreases in CDR birthsfood supplies, medicine, • This is due to Live better betterLife sanitation, Expectancy USA =and 6.9 safer water World = 66.5 • The two most useful indicators of overall Europe = 4.5 USA Male ==75.2, health of=a77.9, population: World 57 Female = 80.6 • Life expectancy: Europe, 79 U.S., Average 76 LDC = 97 developed, 52 developing MDC = rates: 7.7 • infant mortality # of babies out of every 1,000 born that die before the age of one (this is the single most important factor to measure a society’s overall quality of life) Infant deaths per 1,000 live births <10 10-35 36-70 71-100 100+ Data not available Fig. 11.14, p. 246 Deaths under age 1 per 1,000 live births 110 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 Years Fig. 11.15, p. 246 Migration • Voluntary – provides migrant labor • Involuntary – 25 million environmental refugees • Only 1% of annual population growth in developing countries is absorbed by developed countries • Immigration in the U.S. • 11-12 million illegal immigrants in the U.S. • 35 million legal • 75%, 90% if illegal immigrants are counted, of them are in California, Illinois, New York, New Jersey, Texas, and Florida • The U.S. wants to slow legal and illegal immigration to slow population growth Number of legal immigrants (thousands) 2,000 1,800 1,600 1,400 1907 1,200 1,000 1914 New laws restrict immigration 800 600 400 Great Depression 200 0 1820 1840 1860 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2010 Year Fig. 11.23, p. 250 Pros • Often take jobs natives won’t do • They increase the supply of available goods • They boost economy by buying goods • They pay taxes Cons • Work for lower wages and take jobs from Natives • States bear the costs and the federal government collects all the taxes • Laws to catch illegal immigrants do not work Population Age Structure • Age structure diagram: shows the proportion of the population at each age level • prereproductive: 0-14 • reproductive: 15-44 • post-reproductive: 45+ • The percentage of the population at each age level • # of women of reproductive age (50% of world’s women) • # of women under the age of 15 (29% of world, 42% of Africa, 32% developing, 17% developed) • The more women under age of 15 the more momentum for growth • Youthful age structures lead to high unemployment rates Male Female Male Rapid Growth Guatemala Nigeria Saudi Arabia Ages 0-14 Female Slow Growth United States Australia Canada Ages 15-44 Ages 45-85+ Fig. 11.16a, p. 247 Male Female Male Zero Growth Spain Austria Greece Ages 0-14 Female Negative Growth Germany Bulgaria Sweden Ages 15-44 Ages 45-85+ Fig. 11.16b, p. 247 Declining Population • If the decline is slow a country can manage • If decline is rapid, there is a larger number of older people putting strains on medical, social security, and public services, with less young people to pay for it. • Also less young people mean smaller military. AIDS Tragedy • Between 2000 and 2005 aids will kill 278 million people (almost the size of the US) • Kills young adults which support the young and the old. In some African countries as many as 39% of the population is affected. • Analysts call for financial assistance and education to slow this down. Should we intervene? 85+ 80-85 Male 75-79 Female 70-74 65-69 60-64 55-59 50-54 45-49 40-44 35-39 30-34 25-29 20-24 15-19 10-14 5-9 0-4 300 200 100 0 100 200 300 Population (millions) Fig. 11.17a, p. 247 85+ 80-85 Male 75-79 Female 70-74 65-69 60-64 55-59 50-54 45-49 40-44 35-39 30-34 25-29 20-24 15-19 10-14 5-9 0-4 300 200 100 0 100 200 300 Population (millions) Fig. 11.17b, p. 247 United States (highly developed) Population (2000) 276 million 170 million 123 million Brazil (moderately developed) Nigeria (less developed) Population projected (2025) Infant mortality rate 338 million 221 million 205 million 7 38 77 Life expectancy 77 years 68 years 52 years Fertility rate (TFR) 2.1 2.4 6.0 %Population under age 15 % Population over age 65 Per capita GNP (1998) 21% 30% 44% 13% 5% 3% $29,240 $4,630 $300 Fig. 11.18, p. 248 Age structure can be used to predict population changes. • For example: baby boomers create changes in population dynamics as they move through the age structure. They create competition for jobs, dominate demands for goods and services and have political control. As they age their needs become a burden to the baby bust generation (genration x). Echo-boom generation 19772000 largest generation ever Age Age Females Males 1955 4 12 16 20 8 8 20 16 12 Females 4 1985 4 Millions Males 24 12 16 20 8 8 16 20 12 24 4 Millions Fig. 11.19a, p. 248 Age Age Females Males 4 1955 8 8 4 12 16 20 Millions 24 16 20 12 Females Males 20 4 2035 24 12 16 20 8 8 16 20 12 20 4 Millions Fig. 11.19b, p. 248 Reducing Births PROS • better than raising death rate • we already fail to provide basic necessities for one-fifth of the world • over pop. Is the main reason for environmental degradation and resource over consumption • technology is the key to economic power, not more people • freedom to reproduce should only apply if it does not reduce the quality of other peoples lives CONS *people live longer *some people believe that the world can support millions more *people are our most valuable resource Births and Economic Development 1. demographic transition = hypothesis of population change. As countries become more industrialized, first their death rates, then birth rates decline. This is done in 4 stages. a. preindustrial stage - harsh living conditions contribute to high birth rate & death rate (little population growth) b. transitional stage - industrialization begins, food production rises, health care improves, death rates drop, births remain high, and population grows. c. industrial stage - industrialization is widespread, birth rate drops & approaches death rate (due to birth control) decline in infant mortality, increased job opportunities for women, high cost of raising children. d. postindustrial stage - birth rates decline further = ZPG until the population growth rate decreases, shift to a sustainable form of economic development. (Most Western European countries are in this stage = 12% of the world’s population. 2. Some developing countries may have difficulty making the demographic transition because they lack capital and resources to move to stage 3 or 4. Stage 1 Preindustrial Stage 2 Transitional Stage 3 Industrial Stage 4 Postindustrial High 70 Relative population size Birth rate and death rate (number per 1,000 per year) 80 60 Birth rate 50 40 30 Death rate 20 10 Total population 0 Low growth rate Increasing Growth growth rate Very high growth rate Decreasing growth rate Low Low growth rate Zero growth rate Negative growth rate Time Fig. 11.26, p. 255 Family Planning & Birth Reduction = provides educational and clinical services to help couples choose how many and when to have children. a. Family planning is responsible for a 40% drop in fertility rates in developing countries. b. helps to reduce the need for social services. c. may reduce legal and illegal abortions. d. coupled with prenatal care & health services, family planning can reduce the risk of childbearing. e. reduces the birth and fertility rates in populous countries such as China, Indonesia, Brazil, & Bangladesh. 1. there has been a 6-fold increase in the use of contraceptives in the last 2 decades for married women. 2. couples see fewer benefits of large families due to lack of available land, unstable farming conditions, extensive flooding & government supplied mass media messages. (U.S. has 1/5 of the abortions -242,000/yr) Economic rewards & penalties for reduced births 1. payments for using contraceptives or sterilization (either to women or their doctors). 2. penalize couples for more than 1 or 2 children (raise their taxes, charge other fees, or eliminate income tax deductions for third child, loss of health care benefits, food allotment, job options. Empowering Women 1. women with an education & a job outside the home have fewer children. 2. women work 2/3’s of all hours worked and receive 1/10 of the world’s income & own less than 2% of the world’s property. 3. In most developing countries, women don’t have the legal rights to own land or borrow $. 4. women make up 70% of the world’s poor & 2/3’s are illiterate. Reducing population growth • Help countries develop and implement national population policies UNPFA • Provide universal access to family planning • Reduce poverty • Provide better healthcare and nutritious food supplements • Provide universal education with emphasis on girls • Improve the status of women • Nutritious school lunch programs • Increase the involvement of men in child rearing and family planning • Sharply reduce unsustainable patterns of production and consumption 4:45 A.M. Wake, wash, and eat 5:00 A.M.5:30 A.M. Walk to fields 5:30 P.M.3:00 P.M. Work in fields 3:00 P.M.4:00 P.M. Collect firewood 4:00 P.M.5:30 P.M. Pound and grind corn 5:30 P.M.6:30 P.M. Collect water 6:30 P.M.8:30 P.M. Cook for family and eat 8:30 P.M.9:30 P.M. Wash dishes and children 9:30 P.M. Go to bed Fig. 11.28, p. 256 Number of workers supporting each Social Security beneficiary 40 1945 41.9 workers 30 20 1950 16.5 10 2075 1.9 0 1945 2000 2050 2075 Fig. 11.20, p. 249 40 Age Distribution (%) 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 1950 1970 1990 2010 2030 2050 2070 2090 2110 2130 2150 Year Fig. 11.22, p. 249 Under age 15 Age 60 or over Age 80 or over State of the World 1900 2000 2100 Year Industrial output Food Resources Population Pollution Fig. 11.24a, p. 251 Material Standard of Living 1900 2000 2100 Year Consumer goods per person Services per person Food per person Life expectancy Fig. 11.24b, p. 251 State of the World 1900 2000 2100 Year Industrial output Food Resources Population Pollution Fig. 11.25a, p. 254 Material Standard of Living 1900 2000 Year 2100 Consumer goods per person Services per person Food per person Life expectancy Fig. 11.25b, p. 254 Male sterilization 5% Condom 5% Pill 8% No method 43 % Other methods 10% IUD 12% Female sterilization 17% Fig. 11.27, p. 255 India China Percentage of world population 16% 21% Population (2000) 1 billion 1.3 billion Population (2025) (estimated) 1.4 billion 1.4 billion Illiteracy (%of adults) 47% 17% Population under age 15(%) 36% 25% Population growth rate (%) Total fertility rate 1.8% 0.9% 3.3 children per woman (down from 5.3 in 1970) 1.8 children per woman (down from 5.7 in 1972) Infant mortality rate 72 31 Life expectancy GNP per capita (1998) 61 years 71 years Fig. 11.29, p. 257 $440 $750