* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download File
Plato's Problem wikipedia , lookup
Rationalism wikipedia , lookup
Problem of universals wikipedia , lookup
Transactionalism wikipedia , lookup
Direct and indirect realism wikipedia , lookup
Aesthetic Realism wikipedia , lookup
Neuroesthetics wikipedia , lookup
History of aesthetics before the 20th century wikipedia , lookup
Pastoral 1 (AO4) What do you understand by “pastoral”? What is “the pastoral”? Why is Saunders's book called Pastoralia? Some definitions: Terry Gifford (1999) offers several permutations of “the” pastoral tradition: The pastoral is any poem (particular the classical eclogue) that deals with shepherds and rural life; it tends to idealize both. Pastoral texts are those in which the countryside features in a significant way; often it is privileged over & opposed to the city and city life. An extension of more traditional pastoral texts might be “eco-texts” (such as those by Ursula Le Guin); often overlaps with some forms of fantasy and/or science fiction. “Pastoral” sometimes a pejorative adjective describing romanticized, naive, patronizing idealizations of the countryside and country life. “The pastoral” might also be thought of as “the literature of landscape” (Stephen Siddall [2009] calls his book on pastoral literature Literature and Landscape) Introduction to Aesthetics and Aesthetic Theory Edmund Burke (1729-1797) Burke’s distinction of the beautiful and the sublime (1757): “By beauty I mean that quality or those qualities in bodies, by which they cause love, or some passion similar to it.” “Whatever is fitted in any sort to excite the ideas of pain and danger, that is to say, whatever is in any sort terrible, or is conversant about terrible objects, or operates in a manner analogous to terror, is a source of the sublime; that is, it is productive of the strongest emotion which the mind is capable of feeling.” The sublime and the beautiful “are indeed ideas of a very different nature, one [the sublime] being founded on pain, the other [the beautiful] on pleasure” Beautiful? Sublime? The sublime and the beautiful are both aspects of aesthetic experience – two faces of the same aesthetic coin. Introduction to Aesthetics and Aesthetic Theory Kant (1724-1804) Kant’s was arguably the first major contribution to aesthetic theory and philosophy. He was influenced in part by Burke’s distinction of the beautiful and the sublime. Beauty is a problem for Kant: it is an immediate experience “in” us, and yet we perceive beauty “in” things; therefore, we act as if “x is beautiful” is universally true. Beauty appears to be in other things, and yet it is justified by our own immediate experiences – so what guarantees that something really is beautiful? Pure aesthetic pleasure should be free from concepts; e.g., the experience of a “something” greater than oneself when looking out over, say, the Grand Canyon is not a representation of any thing or concept, whereas as photograph of me is. Introduction to Aesthetics and Aesthetic Theory Kant (cont.) Pure aesthetic experience should allow the “free play” of the imagination – it should allow us to make links and leaps, without the need of concepts, and without being “for” anything else. Aesthetic contemplation should lead us to a point of disinterested reflection – not uninterested; “disinterested” means free from concerns to do with my, or anyone’s, advantage; disinterested here means contemplating the aesthetic object for its own sake. Pure aesthetic experience indicates a harmony between us (our rational faculties) and the world/aesthetic objects. Aesthetic experience should give us a sense of a “beyond” that we can neither know nor explain, but of which we have glimpses and are given clues. In this sense, aesthetic experience is moral, for it makes us realize we are part of a grander design than ourselves, one we can never truly understand. It is also linked to morality because in aesthetic experience, as in our dealings with others, we learn to view things as ends in themselves, not means to other ends. Not “the” pastoral at all... Might be better, with so many definitions on offer, to think not of “the pastoral,” but of “pastorals” or “pastoralism.” Why study the pastoral? Two views: 1) We “map” our broader views and beliefs onto our surroundings: we might “see the world in a grain of sand | And heaven in a wild flower” (William Blake); we might see the oppression of the working classes “written” into the uniformity of industrial landscapes 2) Marx - “life is not determined by consciousness but consciousness by life.” Our aesthetics lives, at their most basic, have their foundations in the fact that we cannot help but respond to our environment. Other philosophers, like George Santayana and John Dewey, were not Marxists, but held similar views about aesthetic life being rooted in experience. If “pastoral” is the literature of landscape, in the broadest sense of “landscape,” then it might also be the literature that attempts to chart our aesthetic lives. Pastoral & the Romantic Imagination The beautiful and the sublime. The free play of the imagination. Imagination as the essence of “man,” in an increasingly secular world. What do the title and image suggest? How do you think this text will relate to the idea of a pastoral tradition? Songs of Innocence and of Experience Shewing the Two Contrary States of the Human Soul Introduction (Experience) & Earth’s Answer The Ecchoing Green [from Innocence] The Sun does arise, And make happy the skies. The merry bells ring, To welcome the Spring, The sky-lark and thrush, The birds of the bush, Sing louder around, To the bells chearful sound, While our sports shall be seen On the Ecchoing Green. Old John with white hair Does laugh away care, Sitting under the oak, Among the old folk. They laugh at our play, And soon they all say, Such, such were the joys, When we all, girls & boys, In our youth time were seen, On the Ecchoing Green. Till the little ones weary No more can be merry The sun does descend, And our sports have an end: Round the laps of their mothers, Many sisters and brothers, Like birds in their nest, Are ready for rest: And sport no more seen, On the darkening Green. The Pastoral: Critical Approaches Terry Gifford (1999) offers several permutations of “the” pastoral tradition: The pastoral is any poem (particular the classical eclogue) that deals with shepherds and rural life; it tends to idealize both. Pastoral texts are those in which the countryside features in a significant way; often it is privileged over & opposed to the city and city life. An extension of more traditional pastoral texts might be “eco-texts” (such as those by Ursula Le Guin); often overlaps with some forms of fantasy and/or science fiction. “Pastoral” sometimes a pejorative adjective describing romanticized, naive, patronizing idealizations of the countryside and country life. Vocab • Texts/speeches etc. that exhort us to change our way of life for another, more preferable way can be called protreptic. We can also speak of acts or instances of protrepsis. • Texts/speeches etc. that exhort us to continue with/in a particular way of life are called paraenetic. We can also speak of acts or instances of paraenesis. • Gifford also outlines a tradition of anti-pastoral writing. This is a tradition in which the faith in the good and promise, of the Edenic character of nature has been broken. • Anti-pastoral writing involves a “corrective” attitude rather than a simply celebratory attitude