Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Monte Carlo methods for electron transport wikipedia , lookup
Quantum electrodynamics wikipedia , lookup
Introduction to quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup
ATLAS experiment wikipedia , lookup
Elementary particle wikipedia , lookup
Theoretical and experimental justification for the Schrödinger equation wikipedia , lookup
Photoelectric effect wikipedia , lookup
PIXEL Slow Simulation Xin Li 3/16/2008 CMOS Active Pixel Sensor (APS) Epitaxy is a kind of interface between a thin film and a substrate. The term epitaxy (Greek; epi "above" and taxis "in ordered manner") describes an ordered crystalline growth on a monocrystalline substrate. Can use the standard Integrate Circuit production process for the production. Rely on charge diffusion instead of drifting. Simulation Process Input from GEANT3 PIXEL Geometry PIXEL response simulation Reference: “Modeling, Design, and Analysis of Monolithic Charged particle Image Sensors” by Shengdong Li, Univ. of California, Irvine Thank Howard Matis for birdging the communications with Shengdong Li Output Input for the Simulator • Track directions and inject locations at PIXEL • Number of ionized pairs – For the charged particles: The number of ionized electrons/hole pairs. There are two options: • Energy deposition in the detector volume from Geant. – StMcTrack->dE(). • H. Matis: for thin layer of material better use the Bichsel distribution, as – H. Bichsel, "Straggling in Thin Silicon Detectors," Review in Modern Physics, vol. 60, pp. 663, 1988 Will use the Bichsel distribution as input since it’s tested with the experiment. – For neutral particles including photons (see next slides) PIXEL Response Simulation • For charged track – the ionized electron/hole pairs originate randomly along the track. – Number of ionized electrons is E/3.6eV where E is the energy deposition from the Bichsel distribution. • For high energy photons and neutral particles – No good reference to our knowledge. – possible way to deal with it: • For high energy photons (E>1MeV) where pair production and Compton scattering dominant: – Use Bischsel distribution if we know the pair production vertex or the Compton scattering origin for high energy photons and the electron tracks direction (need to check it). – For low energy gamma-rays below 1MeV where p.e. effect dominant, » use the energy deposition from GEANT. » 1MeV may be below the lower threshold of GEANT tracking. And may have negligible effect. Need to check it. – Neglect contribution from other neutral particles since they are rare. PIXEL Response simulation - Boundary conditions p Well N Well p Well p Well p-epi layer p+ substrate when the p-epi electron hit p-epi/p+ substrate, because p+ substracte is more heavily doped, interface is recognized as a boundary with total reflection for electrons in the epitaxial silicon. when the p+ substrate electron hit p-epi/p+ substrate interface, the interface is totally transparent. • When the electron fall into the depletion region between N-Well and P-Well or the N-well region, it will be fully collected into the readout electronics. •Electrons in the p-well region will be neglected. •When electron hits the p-epi and pwell interface, the p-well/p-epi interface can be recognized as a boundary with total reflection for electrons in the epitaxial silicon because pWell are more heavily doped and electric field in the depletion region will reflect the electron away. • When electrons hit the n-well/p-epi depletion region, has very little chance to be reflected but pass through. Consequently, the n-well/p-epi interface can be recognized as a boundary with total absorption. PIXEL geometry questions p Well N Well p Well • What’s the gap between pWell and nWell? •Are they fully depleted? p- epi layer •If the gap is zero, what are the depletion thickness? •What’s the thickness of pepi layer? p+ substrate •What’s the substrate thichness? •What’s the size of the pwell and n-well? •What’s the shape? Is the cubic shape reasonable approximation? Question on interface between pixels p Well N Well p- epi layer p+ substrate p Well p Well N Well p Well p- epi layer p+ substrate Will the boundary be total transparent to the electrons going across the pixel boundaries? Simulation Diagram Total integration time is 200us. If there’re still electron diffusion after this time. We will keep it and add it to the simulation for the next track hit the same pixel. This might have an impact for pileup. But according to Shengdong’s thesis, this effect is very small. Output – PIXEL hits collection • Output of each event is a collection of hits – Each hits corresponds to an object of fired pixel • Each pixel object contains – PIXEL ID – Number of electrons – First 3 or more geant tracks information contribute most to the signal. • Injecting location and direction of each track • Contribution to the fraction of signal from each track. – Fraction of signal from p-epi layer for each track – Fraction of signal from p-substrate for each track – Fraction of signal from p-epi layer for all signals – Fraction of signal from the p-substrate for all signals – Fraction of signal from previous 200us cycle. • Pileup effect? Summary • Geometry: Detailed sizes of different layers, depletion region and boundaries. • Input: Deposition energy, incident angle and inject location • PIXEL response simulation: How do ionized electron/hole pairs originate from charged and neutral particles? Recombination Action when crossing boundaries • Output: Collection of HITS.