Download It Takes a Region: Ecosystem-Based Management in the Gulf of Maine

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Marine life wikipedia , lookup

Marine art wikipedia , lookup

Blue carbon wikipedia , lookup

Raised beach wikipedia , lookup

Indian Ocean wikipedia , lookup

Ocean acidification wikipedia , lookup

Physical oceanography wikipedia , lookup

Marine debris wikipedia , lookup

History of research ships wikipedia , lookup

Global Energy and Water Cycle Experiment wikipedia , lookup

The Marine Mammal Center wikipedia , lookup

Marine pollution wikipedia , lookup

Marine biology wikipedia , lookup

Marine habitats wikipedia , lookup

Effects of global warming on oceans wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
It Takes a Region: Ecosystem-Based Management in the Gulf of Maine
Andrea Cohen, MIT Sea Grant
People like borders and fences. We like lines of demarcation. But the natural world has its
own idea of boundaries: they’re fluid, they shift. Or as Ronald O'Dor, a professor of biology
at Dalhousie University in Halifax puts it: “Fish don’t carry passports.” Nowhere is that
more apparent than in the Gulf of Maine, whose fisheries, diverse habitats and cultural
resources are key to both the U.S. states and Canadian provinces that call its shores home.
To better manage those critical resources in an integrated, ecosystem-based manner,
the Northeast Sea Grant Programs established the Gulf of Maine (GOM) Regional Ocean
Science Initiative (ROSI). One of several regional initiatives funded by NOAA, the project is
guided by a council of U.S. and Canadian members collaborating with coastal managers,
agencies, non-government organizations, governors’ committees, and stakeholders to
identify key areas of concern and the research and monitoring needed to address them.
Michele Dionne, research director for Maine’s Wells National Estuarine Research Reserve,
points out the need for such an initiative: “Many of the pressing questions regarding the
ecological consequences of human alterations of coastal watersheds, landscapes, seascapes,
habitats and fisheries can only be answered at [the Gulf-wide] scale,” she says.
The GOM ROSI’s report, The Gulf of Maine Strategic Regional Ocean Science Plan, identifies
several themes as critical to stakeholders: how the oceans respond to climate change, human
health, and human activities, as well as coastal resiliency and management and governance.
Judith Pederson, advisory leader and regional project coordinator for MIT Sea Grant
(MITSG) and editor of the report, notes that the document will evolve to meet new concerns
and priorities. She stresses that while many of the stakeholder critical themes are also global
issues, the GOM ROSI is committed to seeking regional solutions that will benefit the Gulf of
Maine in the next 5-10 years.
The report emphasizes that stakeholders are concerned about how climate shifts will affect
marine plants and animals; how higher ocean temperatures may increase harmful algal
blooms, expand the range of non-indigenous species, and foster new diseases; and how
uncertainty with climate change models complicates the management of ocean resources,
particularly locally and regionally. Fisheries will be affected by higher temperatures, habitat
loss, pollution, and ocean acidification (especially for shellfish).
Socioeconomic studies, studies of cumulative human effects on the Gulf of Maine, and the
integration of physical, chemical, geological, and biological oceanographic information will
help to provide tools for managers.
But all the interconnected effects need to be understood.
Emphasizing an ecosystem-based approach, the GOM ROSI team has identified marine and
coastal data as critical to helping management address citizens’ concerns. Regional research,
monitoring, and data collection are essential for understanding cumulative impacts of
1
human-based and natural stresses on ecosystems. That information, along with
socioeconomic data, can help resolve conflicts over ocean and coastal resources.
Coastal resiliency–an area’s ability to recover from storms and extreme weather changes–is
another key factor. Projected sea level rise generates concerns about flooding in coastal areas,
damage to homes and infrastructure, and the reduction of wetlands and shorelines.
Communities also lack management plans for extreme scenarios, such as hurricanes on the
scale of Katrina, and there is insufficient data to predict the potential costs of coastal hazards.
To mitigate risk, researchers must understand the myriad components (social, economic,
biological, geographic) of coastal communities and ecosystems most vulnerable to damage.
Mapping of the coast and sea floor is also needed to identify sensitive habitats and areas of
cultural or historic significance.
As the report emphasizes, providing policy makers with the best available science will help
them balance development and economic growth with environmental protection However,
the effects of their decisions are often not monitored. Stakeholders polled in the Gulf of
Maine advocate that regulations enacted to promote healthy coastal and marine ecosystems
be monitored, and that more socioeconomic and scientific data be gathered and disseminated
in a timely fashion. The initiative also concludes that managers must ask the right questions:
How should science and policy be integrated? What tools do policy makers and managers
need to do their jobs and to evaluate the impacts of human activities? How can they best
adapt their plans in a setting of climate change?
The Northeast Sea Grant Programs already have several regional projects underway. In
collaboration with the National Marine Fisheries Service and the U.S. Geological Survey,
MITSG is studying how the marine invasive Didemnum vexillum, a colonial sea squirt, is
affecting fisheries. These animals form large colonies that prevent organisms such as mussels
and young scallops from settling on the seafloor. Using autonomous underwater vehicles
equipped with cameras and sensors, MITSG has been able to document the colonies, which
now cover 50% or more of the seafloor in an area of about 200 square kilometers on Georges
Bank. Researchers are also developing models of how Didemnum spreads, which will help
managers and industry assess risk.
In another regional project, MITSG and Connecticut Sea Grant are funding research to better
understand the causes of sudden wetland dieback on Cape Cod. Wetlands play a critical role
as a habitat for marine plants and animals and as a filter for pollutants, and identifying the
causes of such diebacks will help in remediation and restoration efforts.
Also regional in scope is an ongoing community project to map marine invasive data in real
time. Led by MITSG’s Pederson, that effort includes a database that the GOM ROSI can
integrate with oceanographic and geological data.
In the bigger picture, Dalhousie’s O’Dor points out that the GOM ROSI “makes it easier for
us to work with all the different agencies in different states” and that the project has sparked
Dalhousie and Fisheries and Oceans Canada to consider implementing a Sea Grant-like
2
program in Canada. “We’re trying to make sure that the same philosophy transfers,” he says.
Pederson adds that the GOM ROSI will help bring U.S. and Canadian researchers together
“to tackle regional problems in a coordinated and collaborative manner.”
For more information, or to download the Gulf of Maine Regional Ocean Science Plan, see
http://seagrant.mit.edu/rosi/
3