* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Quantum Mechanics and General Relativity
Supersymmetry wikipedia , lookup
Photon polarization wikipedia , lookup
Matrix mechanics wikipedia , lookup
Mathematical formulation of the Standard Model wikipedia , lookup
Theoretical and experimental justification for the Schrödinger equation wikipedia , lookup
Quantum fiction wikipedia , lookup
Renormalization group wikipedia , lookup
Quantum electrodynamics wikipedia , lookup
Path integral formulation wikipedia , lookup
Quantum potential wikipedia , lookup
Relativistic quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup
Symmetry in quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup
Quantum entanglement wikipedia , lookup
Bell's theorem wikipedia , lookup
Topological quantum field theory wikipedia , lookup
Quantum field theory wikipedia , lookup
Quantum tunnelling wikipedia , lookup
Scale relativity wikipedia , lookup
Renormalization wikipedia , lookup
Quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup
Introduction to quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup
Scalar field theory wikipedia , lookup
Quantum vacuum thruster wikipedia , lookup
Quantum state wikipedia , lookup
Uncertainty principle wikipedia , lookup
Quantum chaos wikipedia , lookup
Event symmetry wikipedia , lookup
Relational approach to quantum physics wikipedia , lookup
Old quantum theory wikipedia , lookup
EPR paradox wikipedia , lookup
Interpretations of quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup
Quantum logic wikipedia , lookup
Canonical quantization wikipedia , lookup
Canonical quantum gravity wikipedia , lookup
Quantum gravity wikipedia , lookup
Theory of everything wikipedia , lookup
Quantum Mechanics and General Relativity – Incompatible Giants These two theories together encompass the explanation for almost the entire of our reality. The usual domain of quantum mechanics is that which deals with the smallest structures in the universe, for example electrons, quarks, muons and other elementary particles. From this spring such applications as nuclear physics and solid state electronics. General Relativity on the other hand describes particularly the force of gravity and thus is usually applied to the largest and most massive structures and objects in the universe such as stars, black holes, galaxies and even in some instances the universe itself. Thus, when analysing physical situations, a theoretical understanding can be achieved by applying either Quantum Mechanics OR General Relativity, but not both. Here comes the problem – if both of these theories were mutually compatible, then either would be capable of describing either situation. Furthermore, there exist some extreme circumstances where both fundamental theories are needed to achieve a proper theoretical understanding. For example, where the extremely small distance scales (of the order of Planck’s constant, 10-33 m, the “Planck Length”) as well as enormous mass scales are required to describe phenomena such as space-time singularities (the centre of a black hole). In instances such as these, the results which are achieved by the combining of the two theories are nonsensical, and treatment by one theory alone yields results that are nonconcurrent with data. Of the four known interactions in nature, (Electromagnetism, Strong and Weak Nuclear Forces, and Gravity) the ideal has been to create theories that unify these forces in both the Quantum Mechanics and the Special Theory of Relativity (i.e time and mass dilation, length contraction). This ideal is yet unachieved as no theory as yet can encompass quantum theory AND the interactions due to gravity. There are many speculatory reasons as to this incompatibility, which we will now explore. Returning to the nonsensical answers that result from the application of both theories to a situation, this can be attributed to the equations used for particle interactions. The coherency and relevance of the answer is flawed when the minute distance scales of Planck Length are used, and thus a nonsensical answer is derived. (Similar to how a quadratic equation, used to solve for the length of polygon side, can yield both a positive and negative answer – the negative is discarded as nonsensical) A further issue is that these theories assume the existence of distinct forces and carriers of these forces, for example electric force and electrons. Einstein had been trying to his last days to find “unified” theory, one in which all forces were emergent from a single force, much the way in which electric and magnetic forces used to be thought of as distinct forces but we now know are aspects of a singular electromagnetic force. In much the same way, if the four distinct forces we know today could be thought of as aspects of a single unified force, then perhaps without “different” forces and “different” carriers unification could be achieved. On gravity, perhaps a reason for the difficulty in incorporating it into the all-encompassing theory is that it is different from the other physical forces. The classical description of the other three fundamental forces involves fields (either electric or magnetic or electromagnetic) propagating in space-time. However the classical description of gravity relates gravitational force to the curvature of space-time itself. That is, the geometry of space-time, rather than a field. In other words, rather than space-time being the “place” where the field interaction take place, it is actually itself a dynamic field. Other theories have perhaps failed because they attempt to simplify Einstein’s equations of General Relativity to a linearized form, and then apply the standard Quantum mechanics to the resultant information. However what was discovered was that General Relativity is “perturbatively non-renormalizable” which means that the strong linearities are intrinsic to the theory and to assume otherwise is self-contradictory. This is not really surprising because to linearize General Relativity would destroy the most interesting and characteristic features of the theory, such as Black Holes. Another issue which some parties speculate is that due to the probabilistic nature of Quantum Mechanics, and its dealings with infinite energies outside the barrier of a potential-well, according to relativity this should create infinite gravity everywhere as well, which is an obvious paradox. Another way of stating the geometrical interpretation of General Relativity is that this is not fundamental but emergent. This “background-independence” is necessary for GR, but Quantum Mechanics needs to be generalized to accommodate this. (The attempt is called Loop Quantum Gravity) Yet another fundamental difference between the two theories is that for General Relativity, space and time are dimension that extend continuously from zero to infinity. Reality is strictly causal, which makes any connection between observer and observed superfluous. However, according to Quantum Mechanics, not only is energy quantised, but the granularity of space-time itself cannot be divided below the Planck length. Reality here is the superposition of the probable outcomes of all states, where the observer is the cause of the observed outcome and the collapse of all other possibilities. Furthermore matter does not distort space-time the way General Relativity predicts (i.e the way that the apparent position of a star behind a large heavenly body differs from its actual position, due to the bending of space-time by the gravity of the mass.) One of the most well-known clashes between General Relativity and Quantum Mechanics is the phenomenon of quantum tunnelling, which defies the classical predictions of GR, but is perfectly allowed in QM, and without it nuclear fusion and sunshine would never happen. Furthermore Quantum entanglement, which implies faster-than-light information transfer, defies the GR and classical assumption of the absolute barrier of the speed of light. This phenomena proposes that two particles under entanglement, no matter what the distance of separation are “aware” of each others condition in space-time. To continue with the absolute barrier (speed of light, c) it is only fundamental to special relativity with an additional postulate, “The Principle of Retarded Causality.” This basically means that all effects always occur after their cause in all frames of reference, which is in fact violated by Quantum Mechanics with phenomena such as Quantum Entanglement. It is evident that there are many apparent clashes between the theories of Quantum Mechanics and General Relativity, most of which are based on sound principle and experimental result. However as we venture deeper into the mystery that is our existence, we will surely continue to come across even more incompatibilities and contradictions. http://physics.about.com/od/stringtheory/\ http://www.sparknotes.com/lit/elegantuniverse/section1.html http://encyclopedia.laborlawtalk.com/Loop_quantum_gravity http://www.suite101.com/article.cfm/astronomy_astrophysics/108268 http://www.cerncourier.com/main/article/42/3/13 http://www.qedcorp.com/pcr/pcr/invar1.html http://www.astronomytoday.com/index.html http://www.damtp.cam.ac.uk/user/gr/public/qg_home.html http://reluctant-messenger.com/main.htm