Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Account for the development of the Athenian empire to 440 BC. The Delian League began as a mutual defence pact between Athens and the other maritime states of Greece. However, by 440 it had been transformed into a powerful empire, with Athens at its centre. Athens had achieved this by wresting control of the League’s political, economic, military and judicial levers. In the process, the other states were reduced to mere tributaries. When the Delian League was formed in 478 it was intended to be an alliance of equals. All the Ionian states joined, as did the cities of Thrace, Euboea, Thessaly and Propontis. Each sent a deputy to the island of Delos, where meetings were held and where the treasury was based. These deputies had equal voting rights, though Athens exercised greater influence given its size and prestige. Member states contributed to the League’s finances according to their capacity to pay, with the larger states supplying ships, and the smaller ones contributing money. Plutarch tells us that the contributions were determined with “scrupulous integrity and justice”, and that the member states “felt they had been appropriately and satisfactorily treated.” In its early years, the League devoted itself to its mandate – liberating the Ionian states, driving the Persians from the Aegean and plundering their territories. However, as the Persian threat receded during the 470s, member states became resentful of the annual tribute they had to pay. This became an increasing problem for Athens following the Battle of Eurymedon in 468, when the Persian navy was decisively beaten and Xerxes forced to sign a humiliating treaty. The Delian League had now fulfilled its original purpose, so why did it need to exist? At the very least, why did the tributes have to remain so steep? That same year, the island of Naxos decided to leave. The Athenians argued that this was illegal, as each member state had sworn an oath of loyalty which bound them in perpetuity. (Aristotle tells us they had thrown lumps of iron into the sea to symbolise an alliance that would last until the metal floated.) The fleet commander, Cimon, used the League’s forces to besiege Naxos and force it to rejoin. Naxos was then obliged to pay tribute rather than provide ships. Thucydides points to this as a turning point in the transformation of the Delian League into the Athenian empire. Increasingly, member states either preferred, or were required, to contribute money, which Athens used to build ships that were manned by its own citizens. Those ships, in practice, were under Athenian rather than League control, and could be used to enforce Athenian authority. That authority was used again by Cimon in 465, when Thasos seceded from the League. Thasos was the richest island in the northern Aegean, and objected to Athenian demands for a share of its mining operations in Thrace. The Athenian fleet laid siege to Thasos, and defeated it in 463. As punishment, it was forced to hand over its ships and mining interests to Athens, demolish its city walls, and pay tribute rather than provide ships. This was the first time Athens had used the League’s fleet to settle a dispute between itself and another member. It was a promise of things to come, and the first sign that the League was, in practice, becoming an Athenian empire. Up until 461 Athens had maintained friendly relations with Sparta. Cimon was happy to cede military leadership to Sparta if it ceded naval leadership to Athens. However, this changed following an earthquake and slave revolt in Sparta in 464. Cimon sent soldiers to help the Spartans crush the revolt, but the Spartans ordered them home, fearing they might spread ideas about democracy to the slave population. Cimon was publicly humiliated and his chief political rival, Ephialtes, had him ostracised in 461. Ephialtes and Pericles now put an end to Cimon’s policy of cooperation with Sparta, and embarked on a program of conflict with the Peloponnesian League. Over the next twenty years, Athens attempted to establish a land empire for itself by weakening the Peloponnesian League. It forged an alliance with Sparta’s enemies Argos and Megara, made war on Aegina and forced it to join the Delian League, and sent troops to Egypt to support a revolt against Persian rule. In the process, it tightened its grip on the Delian League, using political, economic, military and judicial means to exercise control over its allies. Politically, Athens took control of the League’s foreign policy, as evidenced by the fact that the council ceased to meet after 460. Athens also installed democratic governments in member states previously ruled by tyrants or oligarchs – a move that was popular with the lower classes, and which kept them loyal to their hegemon. In addition, Athens made members states swear an oath of loyalty to itself rather than to the League – something it could then use to justify punishing them if they opposed its leadership. Economically, Athens took control of the League’s finances, moving the treasury from Delos to Athens itself. Increasingly, the money was used to fortify and beautify the city as well as to maintain the fleet. Athens also enforced a uniform currency on its allies, with all coins minted by itself. This made trade easier, but stripped the allies of much of their independence. Judicially, Athens insisted that the legal affairs of its allies be heard in its own courts, where the outcomes could be manipulated in its favour. Finally, Athens used League’s fleet to punish any states which attempted to secede. These included Megara and Euboea in 447-46 and Samos in 440. It also stationed its own troops inside the walls of states which it suspected of disloyalty, and established cleruchies on their land. Hence by 440, the Delian League had been transformed from an alliance of equals to an empire under the control of Athens. According to Thucydides, Pericles conceded that the empire he had helped to create now resembled a tyranny. “It may have been wrong of Athens to take it,” Pericles reasoned, but “it was certainly dangerous to let it go.”