* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Switched-mode power supply charger
Transformer wikipedia , lookup
Audio power wikipedia , lookup
Electrification wikipedia , lookup
Electrical ballast wikipedia , lookup
Mercury-arc valve wikipedia , lookup
Electric power system wikipedia , lookup
Immunity-aware programming wikipedia , lookup
Pulse-width modulation wikipedia , lookup
Current source wikipedia , lookup
Power factor wikipedia , lookup
Resistive opto-isolator wikipedia , lookup
Transformer types wikipedia , lookup
Power inverter wikipedia , lookup
Power engineering wikipedia , lookup
Electrical substation wikipedia , lookup
Variable-frequency drive wikipedia , lookup
Integrating ADC wikipedia , lookup
Stray voltage wikipedia , lookup
History of electric power transmission wikipedia , lookup
Surge protector wikipedia , lookup
Three-phase electric power wikipedia , lookup
Distribution management system wikipedia , lookup
Voltage regulator wikipedia , lookup
Schmitt trigger wikipedia , lookup
Power MOSFET wikipedia , lookup
Power electronics wikipedia , lookup
Power supply wikipedia , lookup
Voltage optimisation wikipedia , lookup
Alternating current wikipedia , lookup
Buck converter wikipedia , lookup
Mains electricity wikipedia , lookup
Switched-mode power supply charger Final presentation Aarne Liski Jere Kinnunen Original problem description • The project is about designing an approximately 325VDC charger, that can output approximately 10A. Power is taken from a 230 VAC 16 A plug. The efficiency should be over 90% and the size of the charger should be minimized by using switching frequency as high as possible. The charger is designed for liquid cooling. The SMPS could be implemented for example with MOSFET-components. Literature: Pressman, Billings, Morey; Switching Power Supply Design Our solution • A SMPS that is implemented with H-bridge topology driving the primary of a HF-transformer with center tapped secondary circuit. The H-bridge control signals are modulated with Phase shift modulation and a ZeroVoltage Switching is realized for transistor turn ons to minimize switching losses. • Uses Infineon SPP20N60CFD CoolFET-MOSFETs for the H-bridge and Texas Instruments UCC27714 High/Low-side drivers to drive the MOSFETS • Phase shift modulation and ZVS adaptability produced with a Linear Technologies LTC3722-1 PSM IC The schematic Simulation • The simulation circuit uses different MOSFET’s and drivers due to lack of models. • This should still give a good idea on the actual functionality of the circuit Simulation example Transformer voltage 1 Transformer voltage 2 Output Currentvoltage through a single MOSFET Simulation example (ZVS) Voltage over the transistor Transistor drain current Gate signal Thermal modelling Thermal simulation results Junction temperature (V=T) Case temperature (V=T) Thermal simulation results Junction temperature (V=T) Case temperature (V=T) Loss power switching (A=P) Loss power conducting (A=P) Main issues with the design • The DC-bus voltage has to be kept at a certain level for succesful realization of the output reference • The line supply can input power into the circuit only when the line voltage is above the voltage of the output of the input rectifier Main issues with the design DC-bus voltage Rectified AC voltage Current drawn from the line supply Main issues with the design • Storing energy into a DC-capacitor bank is not the main issue since electrolytic capacitors are relatively cheap • Still a DC-capacitor bank of this size would be the second most expensive component of this design after the high frequency transformer • The main issue is that the fuses are sized for the I^2t value of the input current so to use a 230VAC 16A supply to produce 3.25kW output we would need a very good power factor Proposed modifications to current design • There were two solutions proposed in order to lengthen the time during which energy can be drawn from the line input and to increase the power factor • 1. Increase the transformer ratio to allow for lower DC-bus voltage • 2 Use a passive choke to aid storing energy and correct the power factor Problem with solution 1. • Because of the increased turns ratio the secondary side rectifier diodes need to withstand huge voltages when the input is highest (close to 325VDC) • 1.2kV is a practical limit with stock-made components that are feasibly priced considering this application • The max input current was still over 45 amps when this limit was reached Problem with solution 1. Secondary rectifier diode voltage stress DC-voltage Input current from the line Problem with solution 2. (choke) • Passive chokes are very bulky and expensive • Choke of this size would also introduce considerable losses • Chokes of this size are not made to stock • The goal was to design a SMPS that is affordable, lightweight and small and this solution is none of these Alternative designs for a functional SMPS Alternative 1: A solution to meet the original design specification • Active Power Factor Correction Alternative 2: A solution for the desired application, but does not meet the initial specification • 3-phase AC input (560VDC) with choke Alternative 1: Active Power Factor Correction • The idea is to use an active input side to allow current being drawn from the input lines for the whole line input period Alternative 1: Active Power Factor Correction • Pros: • • • • Superior power factor achievable Excellent harmonic performance Compact and lightweight Probably cheapest manufacturing costs • Cons: • More components • Increased complexity • New source of EMI Alternative 2: Three phase supply with choke • Pros: • Effective frequency six times higher than 1-phase • Capacitor bank size can be reduced • Choke can be smaller • Simple and robust • Cons: • More expensive components • 3-phase input rectifier • Input side components require higher voltage rating Three phase supply with 3mH choke DC-voltage Current of U-phase U phase voltage W-phase voltage V-phase voltage Bill of Materials costs for different alternatives • Passive input without choke • ~142€ • Passive input with choke • Reference price couldn’t be found due to abnormally sized choke • Power Factor Correction • ~160+€ • Extra design effort considerable • 3-phase AC input (560VDC) • ~211€ Future work • If a single phase input is pursued • More study and design effort into Active Power Factor Correction • If the single phase input is not a necessity • A 3-phase SMPS can be realized with moderate amount of work Risks that realized • One group member dropped off the course • A major amount of time spent fighting with the simulation models • In general, time was used on quite a lot of paths that did not actually work towards our final design Plan vs. reality Questions?