Download Physics690_revised - Buffalo State College

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Newton's laws of motion wikipedia , lookup

Equivalence principle wikipedia , lookup

Geomorphology wikipedia , lookup

First observation of gravitational waves wikipedia , lookup

Negative mass wikipedia , lookup

Electromagnetism wikipedia , lookup

Aharonov–Bohm effect wikipedia , lookup

Introduction to general relativity wikipedia , lookup

Newton's law of universal gravitation wikipedia , lookup

Mass wikipedia , lookup

Schiehallion experiment wikipedia , lookup

Modified Newtonian dynamics wikipedia , lookup

Mass versus weight wikipedia , lookup

Time in physics wikipedia , lookup

Maxwell's equations wikipedia , lookup

Lorentz force wikipedia , lookup

Anti-gravity wikipedia , lookup

Speed of gravity wikipedia , lookup

Electric charge wikipedia , lookup

Field (physics) wikipedia , lookup

Weightlessness wikipedia , lookup

Gravity wikipedia , lookup

Electrostatics wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
1
AN ANALOGY BETWEEN SOLUTIONS OF ELECTROSTATIC AND
GRAVITATIONAL NATURE IN HOLLOW SPHERES
by
Pratibha Chopra-Sukumaran
A project submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of
Master’s in Education
State University of New York College at Buffalo
2009
Approved by
Program Authorized to Offer Degree
Date
2
State University of New York College at Buffalo
An Analogy between solutions of electrostatic and gravitational nature in
Hollow Conducting Sphere
by Pratibha Chopra-Sukumaran
Supervisory Faculty: Dr. Dan MacIsaac, Associate Professor, Physics Department
Dr. Luanna Gomez, Assistant Professor, Physics Department
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to relate the solutions of a conducting shell with uniform
charge density to that of hollow earth of uniform mass density. Both problems involve the use of
vector superposition within the empty space of a shell. The mathematical form, as a function of
densities, positions and directions in which they act, allows us to form similar solutions inside
and outside their respective shells. General solutions for the two problems for which points are
chosen off-center will be described. The importance of these solutions is to demonstrate and to
motivate the use of quasi-qualitative use of vector superposition in the physics classroom.
3
Introduction
In this paper, the effect of charges on a conducting surface of a hollow sphere of radius
Rc is compared to that of a hollow earth whose total mass is uniformly distributed on a spherical
shell of the radius equal to the earth’s mean radius Re The solutions to the net forces inside the
shells will be reproduced from several physics teaching resources.1,
2, 3
Coulomb’s law and
Gauss’s law within a spherical conducting surface are presented for both the systems.
The analogy between a hollow conducting sphere and a hollow earth arises from the
nature of force as function of positions between points on the sphere and a position inside or
outside the sphere.1, 2 The earth is typically modeled as a solid sphere of uniform volume and
mass density. Inside the respective spheres, Coulomb’s, Gauss’s4 and Universal Gravitation laws
will be applied.1 Outside the spheres, the concepts of an electric and gravitation flux passing
through a closed surface (a sphere of radius R), and the electric and gravitational forces outside
the sphere will be introduced.5
Coulomb’s Law Gauss’s Law within a Spherical Conducting Surface
When a charge is enclosed in a uniform shell as shown in Fig. 1, the net field inside the
shell is zero.1 This can be argued with the use of Coulomb’s law and Gauss’s law. According to

Coulomb’s law, the electric force F due to charges Q1 and q at a distance d falls off rapidly
as
1
. The equation for electric force is
d2

F
Q1q 
d
40 d 2
1
(1)
4

where, d is the distance in meters between the charges, d is the unit vector and  0 is the
permittivity of free space. In SI units  0 is equal to 8.8542 x 10-12 C2N-1m-2 .6
Consider an enclosed point charge B near the inside surface of a charged hollow sphere
(Fig. 1.)1 Imagine that the point charge is so small that it does not alter the distribution of charges
placed on the outside of the sphere itself. The charges to the upper left of the location B on the
surface are closer to B. Therefore, each force exerts a greater force to pull the charge towards the
surface. However, there are many more charges farther away from B and this result in electric

field E pointing to the right and downwards towards the surface.
Fig. 1
Gauss’s law for electric fields relates the spatial behavior of the electrostatic field with

the charge distribution that produces it, and relates patterns of electric field E over a closed
Gaussian surface to the amount of charge inside the closed surface. To calculate the electric field

from Gauss’s law, symmetry and superposition of the electric field are required. The E in
Gauss’s law represents the total electric field at each point on the surface.

 Fe
E
q0
(2)
5


E is a vector with magnitude directly proportional to force Fe on a small charge q 0 , with units
of Newtons per coulomb (N/C). To develop the concept of flux, the concept of electric field
needs to be clearly explained to students. According to Gauss’s law, electric charge produces an
electric field, and the flux of that field passing through any closed surface is proportional to the
total charge contained within that surface. The flux of a field through a curved surface is
described by a surface integral. The integral form for flux taken from Maxwell’s equations 3, 4 is
given in eq. 3 below,
   qenclosed
E
  ndA 
0
(3)


where E is the electric field, n is the unit vector (outward) normal to the surface, and qenclosed is
the charge in coulombs. The left side of equation 3 is the summation of the electric fluxes
through a vast number of very tiny pieces of a surface. This electric flux can be thought of as the
number of electric field lines passing through a closed surface. The right side of the equation is
the total amount of charge contained within that surface divided by the permittivity of free
space  0 . For a sphere with surface area of 4r 2 , the electric field as according to Coulomb’s law
is
q
40 r 2
. Then the electric flux through the spherical surface is
q
40 r
2
. 4r 2 
q
0
(4)
Gauss’s law is completely equivalent to Coulomb’s law for static charges. Coulomb’s law
is not valid for moving charges. In Gauss’s law, electric field represents the total electric field at
each point on the surface under consideration. The magnitude of electric field at all locations on
the conducting surface is given by Coulomb’s law. The electric field is not absorbed by space
6
and can come out from a positive charge and end at a negative charge. This is analogous to flow
of water from a sink to a drain. The charge is conserved and not lost on the way!!
High School Learning
Gauss’s law is a difficult concept for students to understand. Both Gauss’s law and
Coulomb’s law can be understood better through demonstrations. There are several
demonstrations for Gauss’s law and Coulomb’s law which can provide a clearer understanding
of the concepts for students studying physics in high school.7, 8
One of the demonstrations to show that charge inside a closed conducting surface is zero
uses the Faraday’s cage. The demonstration requires a wire screen Faraday cage with pith balls
and charging materials. When the cage is charged, the aluminum foil "pith balls" move away
from the outside of the cage, indicating the presence of an electric field. However, on the inside
of the cage the pith balls do not move from the wire cage, indicating that there is no charge and
therefore no electric field on the inside of the conducting surface. This demonstration and others
can be viewed on the website.7 Coulomb’s law can be demonstrated7, 9 using a torsion balance
showing that the electrostatic force varies as the square of the distance and is proportional to the
charge. Students can observe several demonstrations and simulations of Gauss’s and Coulomb’s
laws which involve the use of the Van de Graff generator.10
Gravitational Field due to Hollow Earth with uniformly Distributed Mass
Consider hollow earth represented above, with a mass m near the inside surface of the
7
hollow sphere (Fig. 2). The gravitational force Fg between the hollow earth of mass M e and
point mass m is

GmM e d
Fg  
d2
(5)
Figure 2

where, d is the distance in meters between the masses, d is the unit vector and G is the
Gravitational constant, with a value of 6.67 x10 11 Nm 2 kg 2 in SI units. The negative sign
indicates that the force is attractive. The magnitude of gravitational force is.2
| Fg | 
GmM e
d2
(6)
The point mass m is so small that it does not alter the mass distribution and density of the
hollow sphere. Each point on the hollow earth nearer to the point inside exerts a greater force to
pull the mass m towards the surface. However, there is a greater surface area of the hollow
sphere farther away towards left and downwards from the point and results in Fg pointing
downwards towards the surface. The greater mass below balances the greater force per unit
8
charge. The gravitational field on test mass, (a mass much smaller than that of the earth very near
the earth’s surface) is
Eg 
Fg
m

GM e
d2
(7)
E g is defined as the gravitational force per unit mass, labeled as g with a value of 9.8 Nkg 1 or in
more familiar terms it is the acceleration due to gravity. Since the gravitational field falls off
rapidly as
1
this results in the forces to the right and left canceling each other out, leading to a
d2
net zero field inside the sphere.
This has also been proved mathematically by Crowell.2 Without going into mathematical
derivation, it can be shown that the gravitational field of a uniform hollow earth of mass M e
interacting with point like mass m outside the hollow earth is
Eg  
GM e m
s
(8)
where s is the center to center distance. If mass m is inside the shell, then the energy is
constant, i.e. the shell’s interior gravitational field is zero, given by
Eg  
GM e
b
(9)
for mass m inside the hollow earth sphere and b is the distance from the center of hollow earth.
The alteration of the space around a mass is called gravitational field and space around a
charge changes to create an electric field. There is similarity between the gravitational energy of
9
a uniform spherical shell of mass M , interacting with a point like mass m outside it and electric
field due to a point charge inside and outside a hollow sphere of charge. The gravitational energy
equals 
GM e m
, and G is the gravitational constant. In Gauss’s law for electrostatics, G is
s
replaced by k , which equals
1
4 0
. The value of k in SI units is 8,9874 x10 9 Nm 2 C 2 .5 If mass
m is inside the shell, then the energy is constant, in other words, the gravitational field in the
shell’s interior is zero. The electrostatic energy on the interior of hollow shell is also zero. By
knowing the electric field due to charges on the outer surface, and expressing the electric field on
a surface quantitatively in terms of electric flux, the charge inside the closed surface can be
obtained.
The gravitational energy and electrostatic energy both follow a 1/r dependence, as shown in the
graph below graph from Crowell.2
10
Conclusion
Gauss’s law is useful in calculating the electric flux knowing the electric field over a
surface. Gauss’s law in essence is a physical analogy between flux and electric field. However,
electric flux should not be confused as a physical movement of particles. Using the concept of
flux, it is easier for students to understand that the charge inside a closed surface will always be
zero. The integral form of Gauss’s law for electric fields can be understood by explaining each
term in equation 3. It shows that any charge located on the outside surface produces an equal
amount of inward flux and outward flux and that the net contribution the flux through the surface
must be zero. There is an analogy between the gravitational energy for a uniform spherical shell
interacting with a point like mass inside it, and electric field due to interaction of a point charge
inside and outside a hollow sphere of charge. Equations 7-9 illustrate this analogy. Classroom
demonstrations and simulations can aid students understand these difficult concepts from
fundamental principles.
Acknowledgement
This manuscript fulfills the requirements for PHY 690 at SUNY – Buffalo State College.
Discussions, suggestions and help in the preparation of this manuscript from Drs. MacIsaac
and Gomez are gratefully acknowledged. Author also acknowledges support from Noyce
Fellowship for pursuing the M. S. Ed. program and NSF for attending Summer Workshops and
Teacher Training Fellowship.
11
References
1. R. W. Chabay, B. A. Sherwood, Electric and Magnetic Interactions (Wiley,
Hoboken, NJ, 1995), p. 14- 15, p. 146, p. 404.
2. B. Crowell, Simple Nature (2008), p. 101-102
http://www.lightandmatter.com/html_books
3. R. Knight, Physics for Scientists and Engineers with Modern Physics: A Strategic
Approach (Pearson Education, Inc., Addison Wesley, San Francisco, CA, 2004).
4. D. Fleisch, A Student’s Guide to Maxwell’s Equations (Cambridge University Press,
NY, 2008).
5. S. Saeli, & D. MacIsaac, “Using Gravitational Analogies to introduce Elementary
Electrical Field Theory Concepts,” Phys. Teach., 45, 104 (2007)
6. D. A. McQuarrie, J. D. Simon, Physical Chemistry A Molecular Approach (University
Science Books, Sausalito, CA, 2002), p18
7. http://www.physics.ucla.edu/demoweb/demomanual/electricity_and_magnetism/electrost
atics/gausss_law.html
8. http://www.phys.uvic.ca/resman/electricity_and_magnetism.html#5B1
9. http://www3.interscience.wiley.com:8100/legacy/college/halliday/0471320005/simulatio
ns6e/index.htm).
10. http://www.virlab.virginia.edu/VL
12
13
BIOGRAPHY
Pratibha Chopra-Sukumaran has a B.S. and M.S. in chemistry from India. She completed her
doctorate in 1990 from SUNYAB. She has served as a lecturer at SUNY Empire State College for
ten years and as a Visiting Lecturer at SUNY College at Buffalo for three years. She currently
resides in Amherst with her husband and daughter. She can be contacted at [email protected]