• Study Resource
  • Explore
    • Arts & Humanities
    • Business
    • Engineering & Technology
    • Foreign Language
    • History
    • Math
    • Science
    • Social Science

    Top subcategories

    • Advanced Math
    • Algebra
    • Basic Math
    • Calculus
    • Geometry
    • Linear Algebra
    • Pre-Algebra
    • Pre-Calculus
    • Statistics And Probability
    • Trigonometry
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Astronomy
    • Astrophysics
    • Biology
    • Chemistry
    • Earth Science
    • Environmental Science
    • Health Science
    • Physics
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Anthropology
    • Law
    • Political Science
    • Psychology
    • Sociology
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Accounting
    • Economics
    • Finance
    • Management
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Aerospace Engineering
    • Bioengineering
    • Chemical Engineering
    • Civil Engineering
    • Computer Science
    • Electrical Engineering
    • Industrial Engineering
    • Mechanical Engineering
    • Web Design
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Architecture
    • Communications
    • English
    • Gender Studies
    • Music
    • Performing Arts
    • Philosophy
    • Religious Studies
    • Writing
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Ancient History
    • European History
    • US History
    • World History
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Croatian
    • Czech
    • Finnish
    • Greek
    • Hindi
    • Japanese
    • Korean
    • Persian
    • Swedish
    • Turkish
    • other →
 
Profile Documents Logout
Upload
What is Fathom Trend database ? (cont.)
What is Fathom Trend database ? (cont.)

... What's New in OE Management 3.1C New features of 3.1C and 10.1C (cont.) ...
Oracle
Oracle

... • If the datafile that cannot be written to is in the SYSTEM tablespace, the file is not taken offline. Instead, an error is returned and Oracle shuts down the database. • If Oracle discovers that it cannot write to a datafile, and Oracle is not archiving filled online redo log files, DBWR fails and ...
Connection - Chen Li -
Connection - Chen Li -

... manages the connection between application & driver. • Driver: Translates API calls to operations for a specific data source. • Connection: A session between an application and a driver. • Statement: A SQL statement to perform a query or an update operation. • Metadata: Information about the returne ...
Chapter 1 - Eastern Illinois University
Chapter 1 - Eastern Illinois University

... The following screen shot shows how it looks like on an actual Plus window. More details will be taught in next class. ...
Backup and Recovery of SQL Anywhere, Tips and Techniques Joshua Savill
Backup and Recovery of SQL Anywhere, Tips and Techniques Joshua Savill

... Sybase Central using Translate Log File wizard Translation will fail if there is corruption in the transaction log Specifics regarding Log Translation Utility can be answered in the ...
An Adaptive Replication Environment for a Relational Database
An Adaptive Replication Environment for a Relational Database

... relevant information in a corporation is a database. Regarding relational database it is important to ensure the data consistency. Thus, there are some concerns such as independence, control and data integration, treatment of redundant information, and others, which are featured in a database manage ...
Oblivious Keyword Search
Oblivious Keyword Search

... Search (OKS). Let W be the set of possible keywords. In the commit phase, a database supplier T commits n data. In each transfer subphase, a user U can choose a keyword w ∈ W adaptively and find Search(w) without revealing w to T , where Search(w) is the set of all data which includes w as a keyword. ...
here
here

... • In a list, each row may contain information on more than one theme. As a result, needed information may appear in the lists only if information on other themes is also present – For Example: A list of Projects may include Project Manager information (Name, ID, and Phone Extension) and Project info ...
Slides
Slides

... • Atomicity • Consistency • Isolation • Durability D3C requires relaxing isolation • For semantic reasons, not for performance (such as lower isolation levels, eventual consistency) • We still want atomicity and durability And the communication due to coordination should be “controlled“ • “Residual" ...
FACT SHEET MANAGED SERVICES FOR DATABASES
FACT SHEET MANAGED SERVICES FOR DATABASES

... Fujitsu America, Inc. is a leading ICT solutions provider for organizations in the U.S., Canada, and the Caribbean. Fujitsu enables clients to meet their business objectives through integrated offerings including consulting, systems integration, managed services and outsourcing for enterprise applic ...
a Workload-Driven Approach to Database Replication and Partitioning
a Workload-Driven Approach to Database Replication and Partitioning

... distributed transactions. These results show that distributed transactions are expensive, and that finding a good partitioning is critical for obtaining good performance from a distributed OLTP database. In a distributed shared-nothing database, transactions that only access data on a single node ex ...
Principles of database performance tuning
Principles of database performance tuning

... an operation than repeat it for a longer time For example, sending 1 Kbyte across a network is only a bit more expensive then sending 1 byte packet or reading one block takes more or less the same time as reading entire ...
Databases and Database Programming Robert M. Dondero, Ph.D. Princeton University
Databases and Database Programming Robert M. Dondero, Ph.D. Princeton University

... Update row R (quan=105) COMMIT Release lock on R Fetch row R (quan=105) Acquire lock on R quan += 5 Update row R (quan=110) COMMIT Release lock on R ...
LESSON: Java DataBase Connectivity (JDBC)
LESSON: Java DataBase Connectivity (JDBC)

... 2. Implement the listParts() method that prints out all rows in the parts table. The SQL is "SELECT * FROM parts". You may do the same for listCycles(). The latter may have records with a NULL 'power' field in the Result. Handle this case by printing 'not−specified'. 3. Implement the addDucati() met ...
SQL Server Backup - Pearson Education
SQL Server Backup - Pearson Education

...  A complete backup makes a copy of the entire database  A differential backup makes a copy of the database changes since the last complete backup  Differential backups are faster and can be taken more frequently  Complete backups are simpler to use for recovery • The transaction log also needs t ...
Slides - FSU Computer Science
Slides - FSU Computer Science

... • Consider a query graph q which contains a subgraph g • If power(T (g)) ≈ power(g), there is no need to index the graph-feature g, because its subtrees jointly have the similar pruning power • if power(g) >> power(T (g)), it will be necessary to select g as an index feature because g is more discri ...
SAP Database Administration for Oracle
SAP Database Administration for Oracle

...  Checking physical consistency (that is, availability of data files, control files, and redo log files)  Checking missing optimizer statistics  Checking specific problem situations based upon SAP’s experience in managing databases  Controlling all system checks by one single customizing transact ...
IT 21003 Database Administration
IT 21003 Database Administration

...  Archiving allows the following features: Full recovery of the database to a state of consistency as of the time of the crash No loss of any committed data Important for transaction-oriented volatile databases ...
Parallel Databases
Parallel Databases

... supercomputer in the world. System X is radically different from traditional, high-performance supercomputers. Unlike most, it is based on a “supercluster” of Power Mac G5 computers, each of which has 4GB of main memory, and 160GB of serial ATA storage. Not only is System X the world’s fastest, most ...
Microsoft Access 2010
Microsoft Access 2010

... General Project Guidelines – for Queries • Identify the fields – which fields from which tables? • Identify restrictions – does the query include ALL records or a restricted group? • Determine whether special order is required – should you sort the data? • Determine whether more than one table is r ...
PrefIndex: An Efficient Supergraph Containment Search Technique
PrefIndex: An Efficient Supergraph Containment Search Technique

... times in q for the verifications of ga and gb . Generally speaking, if a feature f is contained by n candidates, the subgraph isomorphism test on f against q will be repeated (n + 1) times (including one test in the filtering phase). To avoid redundant subgraph isomorphism test cost, [14] proposes GPT ...
NA-0500-0025 - Automation Solutions
NA-0500-0025 - Automation Solutions

... user. In the background, a save operation and corresponding exclusive lock is still being performed by the database for each change. This functionality can work against you from a performance perspective if multiple (3 or more) configuration changes need to be made to the same object; Control Studio ...
October 10, 2015
October 10, 2015

... irreversible. To confirm the upgrade, type the name of the server ‘pluto' below. The duration of upgrade ranges from several hours to days depending on the size, edition and number of databases in the server. During this time all databases on this server will remain online but server and database ma ...
slides
slides

... Problems with databases are usually a result of having attributes in the wrong tables The solution usually involves moving attributes to different tables and creating additional tables The GCUTours database is fairly well normalised, so we’ll look at some other examples, based on an IT Consultancy c ...
Chapter 6
Chapter 6

... © 2010, 2008 Pearson Prentice Hall ...
< 1 ... 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 ... 64 >

Commitment ordering

Commitment ordering (CO) is a class of interoperable serializability techniques in concurrency control of databases, transaction processing, and related applications. It allows optimistic (non-blocking) implementations. With the proliferation of multi-core processors, CO has been also increasingly utilized in concurrent programming, transactional memory, and especially in software transactional memory (STM) for achieving serializability optimistically. CO is also the name of the resulting transaction schedule (history) property, which was originally defined in 1988 with the name dynamic atomicity. In a CO compliant schedule the chronological order of commitment events of transactions is compatible with the precedence order of the respective transactions. CO is a broad special case of conflict serializability, and effective means (reliable, high-performance, distributed, and scalable) to achieve global serializability (modular serializability) across any collection of database systems that possibly use different concurrency control mechanisms (CO also makes each system serializability compliant, if not already).Each not-CO-compliant database system is augmented with a CO component (the commitment order coordinator—COCO) which orders the commitment events for CO compliance, with neither data-access nor any other transaction operation interference. As such CO provides a low overhead, general solution for global serializability (and distributed serializability), instrumental for global concurrency control (and distributed concurrency control) of multi database systems and other transactional objects, possibly highly distributed (e.g., within cloud computing, grid computing, and networks of smartphones). An atomic commitment protocol (ACP; of any type) is a fundamental part of the solution, utilized to break global cycles in the conflict (precedence, serializability) graph. CO is the most general property (a necessary condition) that guarantees global serializability, if the database systems involved do not share concurrency control information beyond atomic commitment protocol (unmodified) messages, and have no knowledge whether transactions are global or local (the database systems are autonomous). Thus CO (with its variants) is the only general technique that does not require the typically costly distribution of local concurrency control information (e.g., local precedence relations, locks, timestamps, or tickets). It generalizes the popular strong strict two-phase locking (SS2PL) property, which in conjunction with the two-phase commit protocol (2PC) is the de facto standard to achieve global serializability across (SS2PL based) database systems. As a result CO compliant database systems (with any, different concurrency control types) can transparently join such SS2PL based solutions for global serializability.In addition, locking based global deadlocks are resolved automatically in a CO based multi-database environment, an important side-benefit (including the special case of a completely SS2PL based environment; a previously unnoticed fact for SS2PL).Furthermore, strict commitment ordering (SCO; Raz 1991c), the intersection of Strictness and CO, provides better performance (shorter average transaction completion time and resulting better transaction throughput) than SS2PL whenever read-write conflicts are present (identical blocking behavior for write-read and write-write conflicts; comparable locking overhead). The advantage of SCO is especially significant during lock contention. Strictness allows both SS2PL and SCO to use the same effective database recovery mechanisms.Two major generalizing variants of CO exist, extended CO (ECO; Raz 1993a) and multi-version CO (MVCO; Raz 1993b). They as well provide global serializability without local concurrency control information distribution, can be combined with any relevant concurrency control, and allow optimistic (non-blocking) implementations. Both use additional information for relaxing CO constraints and achieving better concurrency and performance. Vote ordering (VO or Generalized CO (GCO); Raz 2009) is a container schedule set (property) and technique for CO and all its variants. Local VO is a necessary condition for guaranteeing global serializability, if the atomic commitment protocol (ACP) participants do not share concurrency control information (have the generalized autonomy property). CO and its variants inter-operate transparently, guaranteeing global serializability and automatic global deadlock resolution also together in a mixed, heterogeneous environment with different variants.
  • studyres.com © 2025
  • DMCA
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Report