• Study Resource
  • Explore
    • Arts & Humanities
    • Business
    • Engineering & Technology
    • Foreign Language
    • History
    • Math
    • Science
    • Social Science

    Top subcategories

    • Advanced Math
    • Algebra
    • Basic Math
    • Calculus
    • Geometry
    • Linear Algebra
    • Pre-Algebra
    • Pre-Calculus
    • Statistics And Probability
    • Trigonometry
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Astronomy
    • Astrophysics
    • Biology
    • Chemistry
    • Earth Science
    • Environmental Science
    • Health Science
    • Physics
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Anthropology
    • Law
    • Political Science
    • Psychology
    • Sociology
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Accounting
    • Economics
    • Finance
    • Management
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Aerospace Engineering
    • Bioengineering
    • Chemical Engineering
    • Civil Engineering
    • Computer Science
    • Electrical Engineering
    • Industrial Engineering
    • Mechanical Engineering
    • Web Design
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Architecture
    • Communications
    • English
    • Gender Studies
    • Music
    • Performing Arts
    • Philosophy
    • Religious Studies
    • Writing
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Ancient History
    • European History
    • US History
    • World History
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Croatian
    • Czech
    • Finnish
    • Greek
    • Hindi
    • Japanese
    • Korean
    • Persian
    • Swedish
    • Turkish
    • other →
 
Profile Documents Logout
Upload
Low-Overhead Asynchronous Checkpointing in Main
Low-Overhead Asynchronous Checkpointing in Main

... called stable status. Each record corresponds to a bit in stable status to indicate whether its stable version is empty1 . For the purposes of this discussion, we assume that transactions are executed using a pessimistic (lock-based) concurrency control algorithm in a multi-threaded execution enviro ...
driver
driver

... ODBC is (Open Database Connectivity):  A standard or open application programming interface (API) for accessing a database.  SQL Access Group, chiefly Microsoft, in 1992  By using ODBC statements in a program, you can access files in a number of different databases, including Access, dBase, DB2, ...
Parsing a SAS Database for Correctness: A Conceptual Introduction
Parsing a SAS Database for Correctness: A Conceptual Introduction

... daunting if an institution maintains many large and complex databases. This is the case in the pharmaceutical industry, where each study has its own database schema consisting of 20-50 unique SAS datasets. One can view the inter-record relationships as a tree structure having a well-defined geometry ...
3_concurrency
3_concurrency

... this page. Process2 sets the Shared lock on the page, because Shared locks are compatible with other Shared locks. Process3 wants to modify data and wants to set Exclusive lock, but it cannot make it before Process1 and Process2 will be finished, because Exclusive lock is not compatible with other l ...
Java Database Connectivity JDBC Architecture JDBC - CS
Java Database Connectivity JDBC Architecture JDBC - CS

... • The same data can be organized in very different ways – When designing your DB and when deciding what your primary keys should be, always think about typical use cases and deduce from them which queries are most common and which queries must run fastest ...
CS 46B: Introduction to Data Structures
CS 46B: Introduction to Data Structures

... Databases Illuminated, 3rd ed. by Ricardo & Urban Jones & Bartlett Learning, 2017 ISBN 978-1-284-05694-5 ...
Zephyr: Live Migration in Shared Nothing Databases for Elastic
Zephyr: Live Migration in Shared Nothing Databases for Elastic

... metadata to the destination which can then start serving new transactions, while the source completes the transactions that were active when migration started. Read/write access (called ownership) on database pages of the tenant is partitioned between the two nodes with the source node owning all pa ...
SQLite Library
SQLite Library

... Encrypted Databases (Cont.) • When a database is encrypted, it is linked to the device in which it is created. So, it does not support portability between databases. • In order to transfer the encrypted database to the other device, you have to decrypt it first. • An encrypted database should be cl ...
JDBC - Free
JDBC - Free

... Metadata: Information about the returned data, driver and the database. ResultSet : logical set of columns and rows returned by executing a statement. ...
Distributed Databases - University of Texas at El Paso
Distributed Databases - University of Texas at El Paso

... • 2 mirror-image databases maintained • All transactions stored/updated in both databases • Upon failure, the database is ‘switched’ for the mirror image • Generally stored across distributed databases • Fastest/most secure ...
Database Configuration and Maintenance
Database Configuration and Maintenance

... Configuring Files and Filegroups SQL Server uses two different types of files— data and transaction log files. Filegroups are a logical structure, defined within a database, that map a database and the objects contained within a database, to the data files on disk. Filegroups can contain more than o ...
TMs and ORBs - Microsoft Research
TMs and ORBs - Microsoft Research

... that explicitly refer to earlier service requests; for example, “Give me the next 10 records.” The requirement for such service requests arises with SQL cursors. First, there is the OPEN CURSOR call, which causes the SELECT statement to be executed and all the context information in the database sys ...
Chapter 9 - Personal.kent.edu
Chapter 9 - Personal.kent.edu

... Two-Phased Resource Locking • Two-phased locking, whereby locks are obtained as they are needed – A growing phase, whereby the transaction continues to request additional locks – A shrinking phase, whereby the transaction begins to release the locks ...
Read the note on How to Configure a Downstream
Read the note on How to Configure a Downstream

... On the Downstream Capture database, we will create standby redo log file groups. The size of the standby redo log file groups should be same as the online redo log file and the number of standby redo log file groups needs to be one more in number than the number of online redo log file groups. ...
HUAWEI OceanStor S5500T Exchange Server 2010 Solution with
HUAWEI OceanStor S5500T Exchange Server 2010 Solution with

... This solution is intended for medium-to-large enterprise that is planning to deploy Microsoft Exchange Server 2010 on HUAWEI storage and would like to leverage the Exchange Server 2010 mailbox resiliency Database Availability Group (DAG) feature. The solution design represents an Exchange Server 201 ...
DBC-e03-Chapter-06-PP
DBC-e03-Chapter-06-PP

... © 2008 Pearson Prentice Hall ...
ppt - Avi Silberschatz
ppt - Avi Silberschatz

... no physical component  Database systems that run on each site are independent of each other  Transactions may access data at one or more sites ...
NSClient MSSQL
NSClient MSSQL

... number_graph.cgi ...
Distributed Databases
Distributed Databases

... It is important to distinguish between distributed and decentralized databases. A decentralized database is also stored on computers at multiple locations; however, the computers are not interconnected by network and database software that make the data appear to be in one logical database. Thus, us ...
inconsistent databases
inconsistent databases

... which semantic constraints have to be imposed; or more generally, a database on which imposing new constrains depending on specific needs, e.g. user constraints, becomes necessary. In the area of data integration the satisfaction of desirable ICs by a database is much more difficult to achieve. One ...
Introduction to Database System
Introduction to Database System

... atomic or null value. ...
Berkeley DB Proceedings of the FREENIX Track: 1999 USENIX Annual Technical Conference
Berkeley DB Proceedings of the FREENIX Track: 1999 USENIX Annual Technical Conference

... and splits pages unevenly to keep pages fuller. This reduces tree size, yielding better search performance and smaller databases. ...
Introduction to Database System
Introduction to Database System

... Database administrator's duties include : – Define the schema – Define storage structure and access method – Modify schema and physical organization – Granting user authority to access the database – Specifying integrity constraints – Acting as liaison with users – Monitoring performance and respond ...
Manually Creating the Log Database
Manually Creating the Log Database

... A threats partition database (by default, wslogdb70_amt_1) holds information about advanced malware threats used to populate the Threats dashboard. ...
Chapter 21:Application Development and Administration
Chapter 21:Application Development and Administration

... • E.g., store join of account and depositor; branch-name and balance information is repeated for each holder of an account, but join need not be computed repeatedly. • Price paid: more space and more work for programmer to keep relation consistent on updates • better to use materialized views (more ...
< 1 ... 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 ... 64 >

Commitment ordering

Commitment ordering (CO) is a class of interoperable serializability techniques in concurrency control of databases, transaction processing, and related applications. It allows optimistic (non-blocking) implementations. With the proliferation of multi-core processors, CO has been also increasingly utilized in concurrent programming, transactional memory, and especially in software transactional memory (STM) for achieving serializability optimistically. CO is also the name of the resulting transaction schedule (history) property, which was originally defined in 1988 with the name dynamic atomicity. In a CO compliant schedule the chronological order of commitment events of transactions is compatible with the precedence order of the respective transactions. CO is a broad special case of conflict serializability, and effective means (reliable, high-performance, distributed, and scalable) to achieve global serializability (modular serializability) across any collection of database systems that possibly use different concurrency control mechanisms (CO also makes each system serializability compliant, if not already).Each not-CO-compliant database system is augmented with a CO component (the commitment order coordinator—COCO) which orders the commitment events for CO compliance, with neither data-access nor any other transaction operation interference. As such CO provides a low overhead, general solution for global serializability (and distributed serializability), instrumental for global concurrency control (and distributed concurrency control) of multi database systems and other transactional objects, possibly highly distributed (e.g., within cloud computing, grid computing, and networks of smartphones). An atomic commitment protocol (ACP; of any type) is a fundamental part of the solution, utilized to break global cycles in the conflict (precedence, serializability) graph. CO is the most general property (a necessary condition) that guarantees global serializability, if the database systems involved do not share concurrency control information beyond atomic commitment protocol (unmodified) messages, and have no knowledge whether transactions are global or local (the database systems are autonomous). Thus CO (with its variants) is the only general technique that does not require the typically costly distribution of local concurrency control information (e.g., local precedence relations, locks, timestamps, or tickets). It generalizes the popular strong strict two-phase locking (SS2PL) property, which in conjunction with the two-phase commit protocol (2PC) is the de facto standard to achieve global serializability across (SS2PL based) database systems. As a result CO compliant database systems (with any, different concurrency control types) can transparently join such SS2PL based solutions for global serializability.In addition, locking based global deadlocks are resolved automatically in a CO based multi-database environment, an important side-benefit (including the special case of a completely SS2PL based environment; a previously unnoticed fact for SS2PL).Furthermore, strict commitment ordering (SCO; Raz 1991c), the intersection of Strictness and CO, provides better performance (shorter average transaction completion time and resulting better transaction throughput) than SS2PL whenever read-write conflicts are present (identical blocking behavior for write-read and write-write conflicts; comparable locking overhead). The advantage of SCO is especially significant during lock contention. Strictness allows both SS2PL and SCO to use the same effective database recovery mechanisms.Two major generalizing variants of CO exist, extended CO (ECO; Raz 1993a) and multi-version CO (MVCO; Raz 1993b). They as well provide global serializability without local concurrency control information distribution, can be combined with any relevant concurrency control, and allow optimistic (non-blocking) implementations. Both use additional information for relaxing CO constraints and achieving better concurrency and performance. Vote ordering (VO or Generalized CO (GCO); Raz 2009) is a container schedule set (property) and technique for CO and all its variants. Local VO is a necessary condition for guaranteeing global serializability, if the atomic commitment protocol (ACP) participants do not share concurrency control information (have the generalized autonomy property). CO and its variants inter-operate transparently, guaranteeing global serializability and automatic global deadlock resolution also together in a mixed, heterogeneous environment with different variants.
  • studyres.com © 2025
  • DMCA
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Report