• Study Resource
  • Explore
    • Arts & Humanities
    • Business
    • Engineering & Technology
    • Foreign Language
    • History
    • Math
    • Science
    • Social Science

    Top subcategories

    • Advanced Math
    • Algebra
    • Basic Math
    • Calculus
    • Geometry
    • Linear Algebra
    • Pre-Algebra
    • Pre-Calculus
    • Statistics And Probability
    • Trigonometry
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Astronomy
    • Astrophysics
    • Biology
    • Chemistry
    • Earth Science
    • Environmental Science
    • Health Science
    • Physics
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Anthropology
    • Law
    • Political Science
    • Psychology
    • Sociology
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Accounting
    • Economics
    • Finance
    • Management
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Aerospace Engineering
    • Bioengineering
    • Chemical Engineering
    • Civil Engineering
    • Computer Science
    • Electrical Engineering
    • Industrial Engineering
    • Mechanical Engineering
    • Web Design
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Architecture
    • Communications
    • English
    • Gender Studies
    • Music
    • Performing Arts
    • Philosophy
    • Religious Studies
    • Writing
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Ancient History
    • European History
    • US History
    • World History
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Croatian
    • Czech
    • Finnish
    • Greek
    • Hindi
    • Japanese
    • Korean
    • Persian
    • Swedish
    • Turkish
    • other →
 
Profile Documents Logout
Upload
Distributed Databases - Internet Database Lab.
Distributed Databases - Internet Database Lab.

... covers distributed database systems, revisiting the issues of database design, transaction management, and query evaluation and optimization, in the context of distributed databases. The chapter also covers issues of system availability during failures and describes the LDAP directory system. ...
Scaling Multicore Databases via Constrained Parallel Execution
Scaling Multicore Databases via Constrained Parallel Execution

... maximally take advantage of the CPU resources of multiple cores has become an important research problem. A key challenge facing multi-core databases is how to support serializable transactions while maximizing parallelism so as to scale to many CPU cores. Popular concurrency control schemes are bas ...
cos346day19
cos346day19

... results that are consistent with the results that would have occurred if they had run separately • Two-phased locking is one of the techniques used to achieve serializability ...
Architecture
Architecture

...  A conceptual framework whose purpose is to divide standardization work into manageable pieces and to show at a general level how these pieces are related to one another. ...
Slide 1
Slide 1

... • Distributed databases make it possible for a transaction to access data at several sites • Final COMMIT must not be issued until all sites have committed their parts of the transaction • Two-phase commit protocol requires each individual DP’s transaction log entry be written before the database fr ...
Full Article
Full Article

... there. In a huge transactional database like retailer database it is quite common that several items has been sale or purchase at the same time therefore the database must contains various transactions which include same set of items. Thus by taking benefits of such type of transactions, it has to b ...
JDBC
JDBC

... • The goal of ODBC and JDBC software systems is to allow connecting an application program to almost any database system • Applications using ODBC or JDBC are DBMS independent on both source code and executable code level (providing that the SQL standard is satisfied) • This independence is achieved ...
ppt - Spatial Database Group
ppt - Spatial Database Group

... Multi-media, active, distributed processing, more powerful operators, data warehouse processing, XML enabled, cloud computing ...
Data Sheet
Data Sheet

... Multi-User Concurrency, Persistence and Durability Applications deploy TimesTen Cache for multi-user and multi-threaded environment in the application tier. Applications access the cache tables using standard SQL and PL/SQL via JDBC, ODBC, ODP.NET, Oracle Call Interface (OCI) and Pro*C/C++ programmi ...
DatalogRA : Datalog with Recursive Aggregation in the Spark RDD
DatalogRA : Datalog with Recursive Aggregation in the Spark RDD

... [4] and Giraph, or in-memory systems like Spark [12]. These frameworks typically do their computations in several iterations, where each iteration consists of a computation distributed over different nodes. When an algorithm requires many iterations, an important distinction is whether between the i ...
Chapter 19: Distributed Databases
Chapter 19: Distributed Databases

...  Database systems that run on each site are independent of each other  Transactions may access data at one or more sites ...
Kroenke-Auer-DBP-e11-PPT
Kroenke-Auer-DBP-e11-PPT

... transactions that run concurrently and generate results that are consistent with the results that would have occurred if they had run separately. • Two-phased locking is one of the techniques used to achieve serializability. ...
SQLSaturday_Slide_Deck_Rohan
SQLSaturday_Slide_Deck_Rohan

... • Using backups we initiate other SQL Server disaster recovery features such as the log shipping, replication and always on ...
Database-Friendly Security
Database-Friendly Security

... on database host servers at the operating system level, and these agents monitor all database activity. The design is non-intrusive, easy to install, and consumes only small amounts of CPU resources (less than 5 percent of a single core/CPU per monitored instance—even on multiple processor machines) ...
presentation source
presentation source

... • Done via better utilization of resources: – While one processes is doing a disk read, another can be using the CPU or reading another disk. • DANGER DANGER! Concurrency could lead to incorrectness! – Must carefully manage concurrent data access. – There’s (much!) more here than the usual OS tricks ...
Parallel Query Processing in Shared Disk Database Systems
Parallel Query Processing in Shared Disk Database Systems

... rpsB were already achieved on a nCUBE-2 system with 64 nodes [Or91]. Recently, more than 1 KtpsA was achieved on a Sequent configuration of 2 nodes with 23 processors each. In addition to nCUBE and Sequent, other microprocessor-based "cluster'' architectures also suppon the shared-disk paradigm (Pyr ...
Database Systems Session 2 – Main Theme Relational Data Model
Database Systems Session 2 – Main Theme Relational Data Model

... ƒ It is important also to think carefully about the correct (or just good!) choice of which tables to use and what should be their structure ƒ This we should do in order to have good logical design, not worrying (yet) about efficient storage in files ƒ Our initial design suffers (for pedagogical rea ...
Clay: Fine-Grained Adaptive Partitioning for General Database
Clay: Fine-Grained Adaptive Partitioning for General Database

... routing table, Schism creates a decision tree that simplifies the individual mapping of tuples into a set of range partitions. Finally, in the final validation step, Schism compares different solutions obtained in the previous steps and selects the one having the lowest rate of distributed transacti ...
Distributed Database - delab-auth
Distributed Database - delab-auth

... integration ≠ centralization Distributed DBMS ...
Chapter 21
Chapter 21

... • Consistency preservation: Specifies that each transaction does a correct action on the database on its own. Application programmers and DBMS constraint enforcement are responsible for this. • Isolation: Responsibility of the concurrency control protocol. • Durability or permanency: Enforced by the ...
37] C. Mohan and F. Levine. ARIES/IM an e cient
37] C. Mohan and F. Levine. ARIES/IM an e cient

... In general, the search proceeds as described in Section 7.3.1 except that each node visited is pushed onto the stack. We describe only the search for a \greater-than" value, though all comparisons are supported in the implementation. After a lock on the target key is obtained, validation is performe ...
Chapter 19: Distributed Databases
Chapter 19: Distributed Databases

... share no physical component  Database systems that run on each site are independent of each ...
Chapter 22
Chapter 22

...  Database systems that run on each site are independent of each other  Transactions may access data at one or more sites ...
SQL Scripts - InkaNegocios
SQL Scripts - InkaNegocios

... • host is the host name or IP address of the computer that is running Oracle Database XE • port (optional) is the TCP port number on which the Oracle Net listener is listening. If not specified, the default port number 1521 is assumed. • service_name (optional) is the name of the database service to ...
Chapter 1
Chapter 1

... This searching capability has to be backed by a database application. There is no other way that Amazon could provide acceptable performance. Looking at the Power Search keywords, it appears that they have written an application that translates user-friendly terms for search criteria into predicates ...
< 1 ... 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 ... 64 >

Commitment ordering

Commitment ordering (CO) is a class of interoperable serializability techniques in concurrency control of databases, transaction processing, and related applications. It allows optimistic (non-blocking) implementations. With the proliferation of multi-core processors, CO has been also increasingly utilized in concurrent programming, transactional memory, and especially in software transactional memory (STM) for achieving serializability optimistically. CO is also the name of the resulting transaction schedule (history) property, which was originally defined in 1988 with the name dynamic atomicity. In a CO compliant schedule the chronological order of commitment events of transactions is compatible with the precedence order of the respective transactions. CO is a broad special case of conflict serializability, and effective means (reliable, high-performance, distributed, and scalable) to achieve global serializability (modular serializability) across any collection of database systems that possibly use different concurrency control mechanisms (CO also makes each system serializability compliant, if not already).Each not-CO-compliant database system is augmented with a CO component (the commitment order coordinator—COCO) which orders the commitment events for CO compliance, with neither data-access nor any other transaction operation interference. As such CO provides a low overhead, general solution for global serializability (and distributed serializability), instrumental for global concurrency control (and distributed concurrency control) of multi database systems and other transactional objects, possibly highly distributed (e.g., within cloud computing, grid computing, and networks of smartphones). An atomic commitment protocol (ACP; of any type) is a fundamental part of the solution, utilized to break global cycles in the conflict (precedence, serializability) graph. CO is the most general property (a necessary condition) that guarantees global serializability, if the database systems involved do not share concurrency control information beyond atomic commitment protocol (unmodified) messages, and have no knowledge whether transactions are global or local (the database systems are autonomous). Thus CO (with its variants) is the only general technique that does not require the typically costly distribution of local concurrency control information (e.g., local precedence relations, locks, timestamps, or tickets). It generalizes the popular strong strict two-phase locking (SS2PL) property, which in conjunction with the two-phase commit protocol (2PC) is the de facto standard to achieve global serializability across (SS2PL based) database systems. As a result CO compliant database systems (with any, different concurrency control types) can transparently join such SS2PL based solutions for global serializability.In addition, locking based global deadlocks are resolved automatically in a CO based multi-database environment, an important side-benefit (including the special case of a completely SS2PL based environment; a previously unnoticed fact for SS2PL).Furthermore, strict commitment ordering (SCO; Raz 1991c), the intersection of Strictness and CO, provides better performance (shorter average transaction completion time and resulting better transaction throughput) than SS2PL whenever read-write conflicts are present (identical blocking behavior for write-read and write-write conflicts; comparable locking overhead). The advantage of SCO is especially significant during lock contention. Strictness allows both SS2PL and SCO to use the same effective database recovery mechanisms.Two major generalizing variants of CO exist, extended CO (ECO; Raz 1993a) and multi-version CO (MVCO; Raz 1993b). They as well provide global serializability without local concurrency control information distribution, can be combined with any relevant concurrency control, and allow optimistic (non-blocking) implementations. Both use additional information for relaxing CO constraints and achieving better concurrency and performance. Vote ordering (VO or Generalized CO (GCO); Raz 2009) is a container schedule set (property) and technique for CO and all its variants. Local VO is a necessary condition for guaranteeing global serializability, if the atomic commitment protocol (ACP) participants do not share concurrency control information (have the generalized autonomy property). CO and its variants inter-operate transparently, guaranteeing global serializability and automatic global deadlock resolution also together in a mixed, heterogeneous environment with different variants.
  • studyres.com © 2025
  • DMCA
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Report