• Study Resource
  • Explore
    • Arts & Humanities
    • Business
    • Engineering & Technology
    • Foreign Language
    • History
    • Math
    • Science
    • Social Science

    Top subcategories

    • Advanced Math
    • Algebra
    • Basic Math
    • Calculus
    • Geometry
    • Linear Algebra
    • Pre-Algebra
    • Pre-Calculus
    • Statistics And Probability
    • Trigonometry
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Astronomy
    • Astrophysics
    • Biology
    • Chemistry
    • Earth Science
    • Environmental Science
    • Health Science
    • Physics
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Anthropology
    • Law
    • Political Science
    • Psychology
    • Sociology
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Accounting
    • Economics
    • Finance
    • Management
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Aerospace Engineering
    • Bioengineering
    • Chemical Engineering
    • Civil Engineering
    • Computer Science
    • Electrical Engineering
    • Industrial Engineering
    • Mechanical Engineering
    • Web Design
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Architecture
    • Communications
    • English
    • Gender Studies
    • Music
    • Performing Arts
    • Philosophy
    • Religious Studies
    • Writing
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Ancient History
    • European History
    • US History
    • World History
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Croatian
    • Czech
    • Finnish
    • Greek
    • Hindi
    • Japanese
    • Korean
    • Persian
    • Swedish
    • Turkish
    • other →
 
Profile Documents Logout
Upload
First-Order Intuitionistic Logic with Decidable Propositional
First-Order Intuitionistic Logic with Decidable Propositional

... their subsets”. Propositional logic can be considered a part of the mathematics of finite sets because of availability of finite models using truth tables. Thus, LEM for propositional formulas is not really a target of intuitionistic criticism of classical logic. The classical assumption that every ...
CS103X: Discrete Structures Homework Assignment 2: Solutions
CS103X: Discrete Structures Homework Assignment 2: Solutions

Monadic Second-Order Logic with Arbitrary Monadic Predicates⋆
Monadic Second-Order Logic with Arbitrary Monadic Predicates⋆

... In such case, we say that L is advice regular. This extends the Myhill-Nerode theorem proposed in [13], which proves the equivalence between (3) and (5) for the special case of uniform predicates. The proof consists in showing the following: – the equivalence between 2 and 3 consists in determinizi ...
for all - WorkBank247.com
for all - WorkBank247.com

... The statement is not true. According to Lemma, the intersection of any finite collection of open subsets of R is open. In case of infinite, it is not true. Counterexample: Suppose A1, A2, . . . , An are open sets and let A = Tn i=1 Ai . Let x ∈ A be arbitrary. Then x ∈ Ai for every i = 1, . . . , n. ...
Credibility-Limited Revision Operators in Propositional Logic
Credibility-Limited Revision Operators in Propositional Logic

Using linear logic to reason about sequent systems
Using linear logic to reason about sequent systems

Elementary sieve methods and Brun`s theorem on twin primes
Elementary sieve methods and Brun`s theorem on twin primes

1.1 Inductive Reasoning(AS)
1.1 Inductive Reasoning(AS)

Lesson 4: The Binomial Theorem
Lesson 4: The Binomial Theorem

1 Introduction to Logic
1 Introduction to Logic

The Division Theorem • Theorem Let n be a fixed integer ≥ 2. For
The Division Theorem • Theorem Let n be a fixed integer ≥ 2. For

... using modular arithmetic. We choose a large modulus, often related to word size in memory, like 231 −1. Then we choose an integer seed a0, using it as the base case for an inductive definition an+1 = (16, 807 · an) mod (231 − 1). (The number 16,807 is carefully chosen here.) • There are many generat ...
Nelson`s Strong Negation, Safe Beliefs and the - CEUR
Nelson`s Strong Negation, Safe Beliefs and the - CEUR

Infinite numbers: what are they and what are they good for?
Infinite numbers: what are they and what are they good for?

Chapter 2, Section 2.4
Chapter 2, Section 2.4

Real Zeros of Polynomial Functions - peacock
Real Zeros of Polynomial Functions - peacock

... Let f(x) and d(x) be two polynomials, with degree of d(x) greater than zero and less than the degree of f(x). Then there exists unique polynomials q(x) and r(x) such that f(x) = d(x) • q(x) + r(x) Dividend = Divisor • Quotient + Remainder where either r(x) = 0 or the degree of r(x) is less than the ...
19(5)
19(5)

Untitled - Purdue Math
Untitled - Purdue Math

Solutions
Solutions

Preservation and destruction in simple refinements
Preservation and destruction in simple refinements

Full text
Full text

PYTHAGOREAN TRIPLETS AND AN EXTENDED PYTHAGOREAN
PYTHAGOREAN TRIPLETS AND AN EXTENDED PYTHAGOREAN

Introduction to Induction
Introduction to Induction

05 Polynomials and Polynomial Functions
05 Polynomials and Polynomial Functions

Lectures on Integer Partitions - Penn Math
Lectures on Integer Partitions - Penn Math

DIPLOMAMUNKA
DIPLOMAMUNKA

< 1 ... 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 ... 170 >

Theorem



In mathematics, a theorem is a statement that has been proven on the basis of previously established statements, such as other theorems—and generally accepted statements, such as axioms. The proof of a mathematical theorem is a logical argument for the theorem statement given in accord with the rules of a deductive system. The proof of a theorem is often interpreted as justification of the truth of the theorem statement. In light of the requirement that theorems be proved, the concept of a theorem is fundamentally deductive, in contrast to the notion of a scientific theory, which is empirical.Many mathematical theorems are conditional statements. In this case, the proof deduces the conclusion from conditions called hypotheses or premises. In light of the interpretation of proof as justification of truth, the conclusion is often viewed as a necessary consequence of the hypotheses, namely, that the conclusion is true in case the hypotheses are true, without any further assumptions. However, the conditional could be interpreted differently in certain deductive systems, depending on the meanings assigned to the derivation rules and the conditional symbol.Although they can be written in a completely symbolic form, for example, within the propositional calculus, theorems are often expressed in a natural language such as English. The same is true of proofs, which are often expressed as logically organized and clearly worded informal arguments, intended to convince readers of the truth of the statement of the theorem beyond any doubt, and from which a formal symbolic proof can in principle be constructed. Such arguments are typically easier to check than purely symbolic ones—indeed, many mathematicians would express a preference for a proof that not only demonstrates the validity of a theorem, but also explains in some way why it is obviously true. In some cases, a picture alone may be sufficient to prove a theorem. Because theorems lie at the core of mathematics, they are also central to its aesthetics. Theorems are often described as being ""trivial"", or ""difficult"", or ""deep"", or even ""beautiful"". These subjective judgments vary not only from person to person, but also with time: for example, as a proof is simplified or better understood, a theorem that was once difficult may become trivial. On the other hand, a deep theorem may be simply stated, but its proof may involve surprising and subtle connections between disparate areas of mathematics. Fermat's Last Theorem is a particularly well-known example of such a theorem.
  • studyres.com © 2025
  • DMCA
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Report