
Introduction to Writing Proofs in Mathematics
... Since 1 ¤ 2, these calculations show that this conjecture is false. However, if we do not find a counterexample for a conjecture, we usually cannot claim the conjecture is true. The best we can say is that our examples indicate the conjecture is true. As an example, consider the conjecture that If x ...
... Since 1 ¤ 2, these calculations show that this conjecture is false. However, if we do not find a counterexample for a conjecture, we usually cannot claim the conjecture is true. The best we can say is that our examples indicate the conjecture is true. As an example, consider the conjecture that If x ...
Chapter Seven Real Numbers and the Pythagorean Theorem
... Round your answer to the nearest whole number. 27. NUMBER SENSE There are three numbers that are their own cube roots. What are the numbers? 28. LOGIC Each statement below is true for square roots. Determine whether the statement is also true for cube roots. Explain your reasoning and give an exampl ...
... Round your answer to the nearest whole number. 27. NUMBER SENSE There are three numbers that are their own cube roots. What are the numbers? 28. LOGIC Each statement below is true for square roots. Determine whether the statement is also true for cube roots. Explain your reasoning and give an exampl ...
3.6 The Real Zeros of a Polynomial Function
... complicated. No general formulas exist for polynomial equations of degree 5 or higher. Refer to the Historical Feature at the end of this section for more information. ...
... complicated. No general formulas exist for polynomial equations of degree 5 or higher. Refer to the Historical Feature at the end of this section for more information. ...
The Natural Order-Generic Collapse for ω
... Since it is more convenient for our proof, we will talk about structures instead of databases. A structure can be viewed as a database whose database schema may contain not only relation symbols but also constant symbols. This allows us to restrict ourselves to boolean queries (which are formulated ...
... Since it is more convenient for our proof, we will talk about structures instead of databases. A structure can be viewed as a database whose database schema may contain not only relation symbols but also constant symbols. This allows us to restrict ourselves to boolean queries (which are formulated ...
Department of Mathematics, Jansons Institute of Technology
... (b) intuitionistic semi-preclosed ( -closed or -closed) if there exists an intuitionistic preclosed set such that . The family of all -closed sets of an will be denoted by ...
... (b) intuitionistic semi-preclosed ( -closed or -closed) if there exists an intuitionistic preclosed set such that . The family of all -closed sets of an will be denoted by ...
CS 103X: Discrete Structures Homework Assignment 2 — Solutions
... number p/q, we would have √6 = (p − 5q)/2q, which is a rational number. But we’ve proved the first part that 6 is irrational, which proves the result √ by contradiction. √ in √ For 2 + 6, the same method works, only we use the fact that 3 is irrational. Exercise 8 (20 points). Consider n lines in th ...
... number p/q, we would have √6 = (p − 5q)/2q, which is a rational number. But we’ve proved the first part that 6 is irrational, which proves the result √ by contradiction. √ in √ For 2 + 6, the same method works, only we use the fact that 3 is irrational. Exercise 8 (20 points). Consider n lines in th ...
Theorem
In mathematics, a theorem is a statement that has been proven on the basis of previously established statements, such as other theorems—and generally accepted statements, such as axioms. The proof of a mathematical theorem is a logical argument for the theorem statement given in accord with the rules of a deductive system. The proof of a theorem is often interpreted as justification of the truth of the theorem statement. In light of the requirement that theorems be proved, the concept of a theorem is fundamentally deductive, in contrast to the notion of a scientific theory, which is empirical.Many mathematical theorems are conditional statements. In this case, the proof deduces the conclusion from conditions called hypotheses or premises. In light of the interpretation of proof as justification of truth, the conclusion is often viewed as a necessary consequence of the hypotheses, namely, that the conclusion is true in case the hypotheses are true, without any further assumptions. However, the conditional could be interpreted differently in certain deductive systems, depending on the meanings assigned to the derivation rules and the conditional symbol.Although they can be written in a completely symbolic form, for example, within the propositional calculus, theorems are often expressed in a natural language such as English. The same is true of proofs, which are often expressed as logically organized and clearly worded informal arguments, intended to convince readers of the truth of the statement of the theorem beyond any doubt, and from which a formal symbolic proof can in principle be constructed. Such arguments are typically easier to check than purely symbolic ones—indeed, many mathematicians would express a preference for a proof that not only demonstrates the validity of a theorem, but also explains in some way why it is obviously true. In some cases, a picture alone may be sufficient to prove a theorem. Because theorems lie at the core of mathematics, they are also central to its aesthetics. Theorems are often described as being ""trivial"", or ""difficult"", or ""deep"", or even ""beautiful"". These subjective judgments vary not only from person to person, but also with time: for example, as a proof is simplified or better understood, a theorem that was once difficult may become trivial. On the other hand, a deep theorem may be simply stated, but its proof may involve surprising and subtle connections between disparate areas of mathematics. Fermat's Last Theorem is a particularly well-known example of such a theorem.