
Propositional Logic
... can be used as a deduction system (or proof system); that is, to construct proofs or refutations. This use of a logical language is called proof theory. In this case, a set of facts called axioms and a set of deduction rules (inference rules) are given, and the object is to determine which facts fol ...
... can be used as a deduction system (or proof system); that is, to construct proofs or refutations. This use of a logical language is called proof theory. In this case, a set of facts called axioms and a set of deduction rules (inference rules) are given, and the object is to determine which facts fol ...
Midpoints and Exact Points of Some Algebraic
... Such a number is exactly halfway between two consecutive floating-point numbers. The midpoints are the values where the function x 7! RNðxÞ is discontinuous, as illustrated in Fig. 1 on a toy floating-point format (" ¼ 2, p ¼ 3, emin ¼ $1, and emax ¼ 1). ...
... Such a number is exactly halfway between two consecutive floating-point numbers. The midpoints are the values where the function x 7! RNðxÞ is discontinuous, as illustrated in Fig. 1 on a toy floating-point format (" ¼ 2, p ¼ 3, emin ¼ $1, and emax ¼ 1). ...
Pascal`s triangle and the binomial theorem
... number of terms will be 25 (why?). These terms result from selecting one of the terms (ak or bk ) from each factor in the original product. Note that the number of as and bs in each term must add up to 5. How many terms are there with three as and two bs? There must be (53) = (52) = 25! 3! ! = 10 (w ...
... number of terms will be 25 (why?). These terms result from selecting one of the terms (ak or bk ) from each factor in the original product. Note that the number of as and bs in each term must add up to 5. How many terms are there with three as and two bs? There must be (53) = (52) = 25! 3! ! = 10 (w ...
CONJUGATION IN A GROUP 1. Introduction A reflection across one
... inner automorphism of G is a conjugation-by-x operation on G, for some x ∈ G. Inner automorphisms are about the only examples of automorphisms that can be written down without knowing extra information about the group (such as being told the group is abelian or that it is a particular matrix group). ...
... inner automorphism of G is a conjugation-by-x operation on G, for some x ∈ G. Inner automorphisms are about the only examples of automorphisms that can be written down without knowing extra information about the group (such as being told the group is abelian or that it is a particular matrix group). ...
Unit 1
... All of mathematics — (to do) without using this shorthand notation. The proposition — (to state) :... Instead of 'for all' we — frequently (to use) 'for every', or we — (to write) 'for each number x, each y and each z'. There is another important fact about this mathematical language which — (to not ...
... All of mathematics — (to do) without using this shorthand notation. The proposition — (to state) :... Instead of 'for all' we — frequently (to use) 'for every', or we — (to write) 'for each number x, each y and each z'. There is another important fact about this mathematical language which — (to not ...
lecture notes in logic - UCLA Department of Mathematics
... As we read these formulas in English (unabbreviating the formal symbols), the first two of them say exactly the same thing: that we can add some number to v2 and get 0—which is true exactly when v2 is a name of 0. The third formula says the same thing about whatever number v5 names, which need not b ...
... As we read these formulas in English (unabbreviating the formal symbols), the first two of them say exactly the same thing: that we can add some number to v2 and get 0—which is true exactly when v2 is a name of 0. The third formula says the same thing about whatever number v5 names, which need not b ...
Dedekind cuts of Archimedean complete ordered abelian groups
... (X = {x G : ×g G% x 5g}, Y =G− X) is a Dedekind cut of G for which B(X, Y)= G% and, so, by the hypothesis, (X+ G%, Y+G%) is a continuous cut in G/G%. Accordingly, since every member of a discrete ordered group has an immediate successor and an immediate predecessor, G/G% must be densely ordered. ...
... (X = {x G : ×g G% x 5g}, Y =G− X) is a Dedekind cut of G for which B(X, Y)= G% and, so, by the hypothesis, (X+ G%, Y+G%) is a continuous cut in G/G%. Accordingly, since every member of a discrete ordered group has an immediate successor and an immediate predecessor, G/G% must be densely ordered. ...
Theorem
In mathematics, a theorem is a statement that has been proven on the basis of previously established statements, such as other theorems—and generally accepted statements, such as axioms. The proof of a mathematical theorem is a logical argument for the theorem statement given in accord with the rules of a deductive system. The proof of a theorem is often interpreted as justification of the truth of the theorem statement. In light of the requirement that theorems be proved, the concept of a theorem is fundamentally deductive, in contrast to the notion of a scientific theory, which is empirical.Many mathematical theorems are conditional statements. In this case, the proof deduces the conclusion from conditions called hypotheses or premises. In light of the interpretation of proof as justification of truth, the conclusion is often viewed as a necessary consequence of the hypotheses, namely, that the conclusion is true in case the hypotheses are true, without any further assumptions. However, the conditional could be interpreted differently in certain deductive systems, depending on the meanings assigned to the derivation rules and the conditional symbol.Although they can be written in a completely symbolic form, for example, within the propositional calculus, theorems are often expressed in a natural language such as English. The same is true of proofs, which are often expressed as logically organized and clearly worded informal arguments, intended to convince readers of the truth of the statement of the theorem beyond any doubt, and from which a formal symbolic proof can in principle be constructed. Such arguments are typically easier to check than purely symbolic ones—indeed, many mathematicians would express a preference for a proof that not only demonstrates the validity of a theorem, but also explains in some way why it is obviously true. In some cases, a picture alone may be sufficient to prove a theorem. Because theorems lie at the core of mathematics, they are also central to its aesthetics. Theorems are often described as being ""trivial"", or ""difficult"", or ""deep"", or even ""beautiful"". These subjective judgments vary not only from person to person, but also with time: for example, as a proof is simplified or better understood, a theorem that was once difficult may become trivial. On the other hand, a deep theorem may be simply stated, but its proof may involve surprising and subtle connections between disparate areas of mathematics. Fermat's Last Theorem is a particularly well-known example of such a theorem.