• Study Resource
  • Explore
    • Arts & Humanities
    • Business
    • Engineering & Technology
    • Foreign Language
    • History
    • Math
    • Science
    • Social Science

    Top subcategories

    • Advanced Math
    • Algebra
    • Basic Math
    • Calculus
    • Geometry
    • Linear Algebra
    • Pre-Algebra
    • Pre-Calculus
    • Statistics And Probability
    • Trigonometry
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Astronomy
    • Astrophysics
    • Biology
    • Chemistry
    • Earth Science
    • Environmental Science
    • Health Science
    • Physics
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Anthropology
    • Law
    • Political Science
    • Psychology
    • Sociology
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Accounting
    • Economics
    • Finance
    • Management
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Aerospace Engineering
    • Bioengineering
    • Chemical Engineering
    • Civil Engineering
    • Computer Science
    • Electrical Engineering
    • Industrial Engineering
    • Mechanical Engineering
    • Web Design
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Architecture
    • Communications
    • English
    • Gender Studies
    • Music
    • Performing Arts
    • Philosophy
    • Religious Studies
    • Writing
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Ancient History
    • European History
    • US History
    • World History
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Croatian
    • Czech
    • Finnish
    • Greek
    • Hindi
    • Japanese
    • Korean
    • Persian
    • Swedish
    • Turkish
    • other →
 
Profile Documents Logout
Upload
Right associative exponentiation normal forms and properties
Right associative exponentiation normal forms and properties

On Angles Whose Squared Trigonometric Functions are Rational
On Angles Whose Squared Trigonometric Functions are Rational

19(2)
19(2)

Propositional Logic
Propositional Logic

... can be used as a deduction system (or proof system); that is, to construct proofs or refutations. This use of a logical language is called proof theory. In this case, a set of facts called axioms and a set of deduction rules (inference rules) are given, and the object is to determine which facts fol ...
A Mathematical Introduction to Modal Logic
A Mathematical Introduction to Modal Logic

Midpoints and Exact Points of Some Algebraic
Midpoints and Exact Points of Some Algebraic

... Such a number is exactly halfway between two consecutive floating-point numbers. The midpoints are the values where the function x 7! RNðxÞ is discontinuous, as illustrated in Fig. 1 on a toy floating-point format (" ¼ 2, p ¼ 3, emin ¼ $1, and emax ¼ 1). ...
Concatenation of Consecutive Fibonacci and Lucas Numbers: a
Concatenation of Consecutive Fibonacci and Lucas Numbers: a

Full text
Full text

Asymptotic Enumeration of Reversible Maps Regardless of Genus
Asymptotic Enumeration of Reversible Maps Regardless of Genus

WB - Product of Primes
WB - Product of Primes

Mentally Expressing a Number as a Sum of Four
Mentally Expressing a Number as a Sum of Four

Pascal`s triangle and the binomial theorem
Pascal`s triangle and the binomial theorem

... number of terms will be 25 (why?). These terms result from selecting one of the terms (ak or bk ) from each factor in the original product. Note that the number of as and bs in each term must add up to 5. How many terms are there with three as and two bs? There must be (53) = (52) = 25! 3! ! = 10 (w ...
29(1)
29(1)

15(3)
15(3)

Intermediate Logic
Intermediate Logic

pdf
pdf

CONJUGATION IN A GROUP 1. Introduction A reflection across one
CONJUGATION IN A GROUP 1. Introduction A reflection across one

... inner automorphism of G is a conjugation-by-x operation on G, for some x ∈ G. Inner automorphisms are about the only examples of automorphisms that can be written down without knowing extra information about the group (such as being told the group is abelian or that it is a particular matrix group). ...
CONJUGATION IN A GROUP 1. Introduction
CONJUGATION IN A GROUP 1. Introduction

Unit 1
Unit 1

... All of mathematics — (to do) without using this shorthand notation. The proposition — (to state) :... Instead of 'for all' we — frequently (to use) 'for every', or we — (to write) 'for each number x, each y and each z'. There is another important fact about this mathematical language which — (to not ...
ppt - HKOI
ppt - HKOI

lecture notes in logic - UCLA Department of Mathematics
lecture notes in logic - UCLA Department of Mathematics

... As we read these formulas in English (unabbreviating the formal symbols), the first two of them say exactly the same thing: that we can add some number to v2 and get 0—which is true exactly when v2 is a name of 0. The third formula says the same thing about whatever number v5 names, which need not b ...
(pdf)
(pdf)

ON THE NUMBER OF NON-ZERO DIGITS OF INTEGERS IN
ON THE NUMBER OF NON-ZERO DIGITS OF INTEGERS IN

Dedekind cuts of Archimedean complete ordered abelian groups
Dedekind cuts of Archimedean complete ordered abelian groups

... (X = {x  G : ×g  G% x 5g}, Y =G− X) is a Dedekind cut of G for which B(X, Y)= G% and, so, by the hypothesis, (X+ G%, Y+G%) is a continuous cut in G/G%. Accordingly, since every member of a discrete ordered group has an immediate successor and an immediate predecessor, G/G% must be densely ordered. ...
Lecture 1: Propositions and logical connectives 1 Propositions 2
Lecture 1: Propositions and logical connectives 1 Propositions 2

< 1 ... 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 ... 170 >

Theorem



In mathematics, a theorem is a statement that has been proven on the basis of previously established statements, such as other theorems—and generally accepted statements, such as axioms. The proof of a mathematical theorem is a logical argument for the theorem statement given in accord with the rules of a deductive system. The proof of a theorem is often interpreted as justification of the truth of the theorem statement. In light of the requirement that theorems be proved, the concept of a theorem is fundamentally deductive, in contrast to the notion of a scientific theory, which is empirical.Many mathematical theorems are conditional statements. In this case, the proof deduces the conclusion from conditions called hypotheses or premises. In light of the interpretation of proof as justification of truth, the conclusion is often viewed as a necessary consequence of the hypotheses, namely, that the conclusion is true in case the hypotheses are true, without any further assumptions. However, the conditional could be interpreted differently in certain deductive systems, depending on the meanings assigned to the derivation rules and the conditional symbol.Although they can be written in a completely symbolic form, for example, within the propositional calculus, theorems are often expressed in a natural language such as English. The same is true of proofs, which are often expressed as logically organized and clearly worded informal arguments, intended to convince readers of the truth of the statement of the theorem beyond any doubt, and from which a formal symbolic proof can in principle be constructed. Such arguments are typically easier to check than purely symbolic ones—indeed, many mathematicians would express a preference for a proof that not only demonstrates the validity of a theorem, but also explains in some way why it is obviously true. In some cases, a picture alone may be sufficient to prove a theorem. Because theorems lie at the core of mathematics, they are also central to its aesthetics. Theorems are often described as being ""trivial"", or ""difficult"", or ""deep"", or even ""beautiful"". These subjective judgments vary not only from person to person, but also with time: for example, as a proof is simplified or better understood, a theorem that was once difficult may become trivial. On the other hand, a deep theorem may be simply stated, but its proof may involve surprising and subtle connections between disparate areas of mathematics. Fermat's Last Theorem is a particularly well-known example of such a theorem.
  • studyres.com © 2025
  • DMCA
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Report